Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of an individual personalised rehabilitation program on mobility performance in older-old people

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies have shown benefits of exercise interventions on preferred and fast gait speed in healthy older adults, but the impact of a personalised rehabilitation program targeting a large cohort of non-disabled older-old adults has rarely been examined.

Aims

The purpose was to determine whether personalised intervention-related improvements in gait and mobility performance in older-old adults were dependent on cognitive status and/or history of falls.

Methods

Based on a pre-post design, 483 older-old persons (mean age: 83.3 ± 5.1 years) were followed during a personalised rehabilitation program over a period of 7 weeks, with twice-weekly sessions (45 min each). Gait speed in four conditions (preferred, fast, and under two dual-task conditions), static postural sway, Timed Up and Go test, Five Times Sit to Stand test, the ability to rise from the floor, and handgrip strength test were assessed.

Results

Using a pre-post analysis of covariance, a significant increase in preferred gait speed (+ 20.1%), fast gait speed (+ 15.8%), and dual-task speed while counting (+ 13.4%) was observed after the rehabilitation, regardless of the baseline cognitive status and fall history. Similar improvements in TUG and maximal handgrip force were observed, with a significant reduction of performance time (-19.5%) or an increase of handgrip strength (+ 6.2%).

Discussion

Results suggest the effectiveness of personalised intervention to improve a battery of physical performance measures in older-old adults, even for the frailest participants.

Conclusion

Implementing a personalised intervention for targeting the high-risk older-old adults in priority is critical regarding the clinically meaningful change in gait speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

There are no linked research data sets for this paper. Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Montero-Odasso M, Almeida QJ, Bherer L et al (2019) Consensus on shared measures of mobility and cognition: From the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 74:897–909. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D et al (2003) Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51104.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Artaud F, Singh-Manoux A, Dugravot A et al (2015) Decline in fast gait speed as a predictor of disability in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 63:1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BWHJ et al (2005) Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people–results from the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1675–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53501.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF et al (2000) Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M221-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/55.4.m221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montero-Odasso M, Schapira M, Soriano ER et al (2005) Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. J Gerontol Series A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:1304–1309. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.10.1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosano C, Newman AB, Katz R et al (2008) Association between lower digit symbol substitution test score and slower gait and greater risk of mortality and of developing incident disability in well-functioning older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1618–1625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01856.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabia S, Dumurgier J, Tavernier B et al (2014) Change in fast walking speed preceding death: results from a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K et al (2011) Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 305:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Beauchet O, Allali G, Thiery S et al (2011) Association between high variability of gait speed and mild cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:1973–1974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03610_9.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Callisaya ML et al (2016) Poor gait performance and prediction of dementia: results from a meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.092

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Leandri M, Cammisuli S, Cammarata S et al (2009) Balance features in Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 16:113–120. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2009-0928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mignardot J-B, Beauchet O, Annweiler C et al (2014) Postural sway, falls, and cognitive status: a cross-sectional study among older adults. J Alzheimer’s Dis 41:431–439. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-132657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Montero-Odasso MM, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Speechley M et al (2017) Association of dual-task gait with incident dementia in mild cognitive impairment: results from the gait and brain study. JAMA Neurol 74:857–865. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0643

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hortobágyi T, Lesinski M, Gäbler M et al (2015) Effects of three types of exercise interventions on healthy old adults’ gait speed: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 45:1627–1643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0371-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA (2006) Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:743–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pothier K, Gagnon C, Fraser SA et al (2018) A comparison of the impact of physical exercise, cognitive training and combined intervention on spontaneous walking speed in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 30:921–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0878-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Abbema R, De Greef M, Crajé C et al (2015) What type, or combination of exercise can improve preferred gait speed in older adults? A meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 15:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0061-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardy SE, Perera S, Roumani YF et al (2007) Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:1727–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01413.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reuben DB, Fishman LK, McNabney M, Wolde-Tsadik G (1996) Looking inside the black box of comprehensive geriatric assessment: a classification system for problems, recommendations, and implementation strategies. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:835–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb03744.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW et al (1963) Studies of ILLNESS in the aged. the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 185:914–919. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF et al (2005) Clinical measurement of sit-to-stand performance in people with balance disorders: validity of data for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test. Phys Ther 85:1034–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander NB, Ulbrich J, Raheja A, Channer D (1997) Rising from the floor in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:564–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03088.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tinetti ME (1986) Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 34:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bohannon RW (2008) Hand-Grip Dynamometry Predicts Future Outcomes in Aging Adults. J Geriatric Physical Therapy 31:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1519/00139143-200831010-00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lam FM, Huang M-Z, Liao L-R et al (2018) Physical exercise improves strength, balance, mobility, and endurance in people with cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review. J Physiotherapy 64:4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2017.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang W, Low L-F, Gwynn JD, Clemson L (2019) Interventions to improve gait in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review: interventions to improve gait. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:381–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kikkert LHJ, Vuillerme N, van Campen JP et al (2016) Walking ability to predict future cognitive decline in old adults: a scoping review. Ageing Res Rev 27:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oh-Park M, Holtzer R, Xue X, Verghese J (2010) Conventional and robust quantitative gait norms in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:1512–1518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02962.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Magnani PE, Freire Junior RC, Zanellato NFG et al (2019) The influence of aging on the spatial and temporal variables of gait during usual and fast speeds in older adults aged 60 to 102 years. Hum Mov Sci 68:102540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.102540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Buatois S, Miljkovic D, Manckoundia P et al (2008) Five times sit to stand test is a predictor of recurrent falls in healthy community-living subjects aged 65 and older: letters to the editor. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1575–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01777.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wearing J, Konings P, Stokes M, de Bruin ED (2018) Handgrip strength in old and oldest old Swiss adults – a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0959-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M (2015) Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Physical Activity 23:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2013-0236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rolland YM, Cesari M, Miller ME et al (2004) Reliability of the 400-M usual-pace walk test as an assessment of mobility limitation in older adults: reliability of the 400-m walk test. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:972–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52267.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Atkinson HH, Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB et al (2005) Predictors of combined cognitive and physical decline: combined cognitive and physical decline. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53362.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D et al (2016) Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology 17:567–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-016-9641-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Herold F, Hamacher D, Schega L, Müller NG (2018) Thinking while moving or moving while thinking – concepts of motor-cognitive training for cognitive performance enhancement. Frontiers Aging Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thibault Deschamps.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

According to the French legislation (articles L.1121–1 paragraph 1 and R1121-2, Public Health Code), no approval of the ethics committee was needed to use data for an epidemiologic study. All procedures contributing to this study complied with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rincé, G., Couturier, C., Berrut, G. et al. Impact of an individual personalised rehabilitation program on mobility performance in older-old people. Aging Clin Exp Res 33, 2821–2830 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01812-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01812-3

Keywords

Navigation