Skip to main content
Log in

Potential functional benefits of a comprehensive evaluation of physical activity for aging adults: a CLSA cross-sectional analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Physical activity recommendations for aging adults do not account for possible benefits of light-intensity physical activity on physical function. The purpose of this study was to assess if a sum of all physical activities (regardless of intensity) related to physical function for aging adults, independent of physical activity guidelines.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted with baseline data of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA n = 25,072) including ages from 45 to 85. Physical activity was collected via the Physical Activity Scale for Elderly questionnaire. The sum of all activities, based on the Metabolic Equivalent of a Task (MET), was called Total Index. Physical function was derived from objective measures. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis based on the specific age and sex median values of physical function.

Results

The Total Index was associated with being in the lowest median of physical function when adjusted for the physical activity guidelines and other potential confounders (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01–1.03, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study suggests that components of physical activity not currently included in current guidelines may be associated with better physical function outcomes for aging adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paterson DH, Warburton DE (2010) Physical activity and functional limitations in older adults: a systematic review related to Canada’s physical activity guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ (2012) Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol 2:1143–2121. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c110025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brach JS, FitzGerald S, Newman AB et al (2003) Physical activity and functional status in community-dwelling older women: a 14-year prospective study. Arch Intern Med 163:2565–2571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.21.2565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (n.d) WHO | Physical activity and older adults. https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_olderadults/en/. Accessed 29 Sep 2018

  5. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I et al (2011) Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian health measures survey. Health Rep 22:7–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaput JP, Carson V, Gray CE et al (2014) Importance of all movement behaviors in a 24 hour period for overall health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:12575–12581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111212575

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Statistics Canada (2013) Directly measured physical activity of Canadian adults, 2007 to 2011. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-625-x/2013001/article/11807-eng.htm. Accessed: 17 Aug 2017.

  8. Wannamethee SG, Ebrahim S, Papacosta O et al (2005) From a postal questionnaire of older men, healthy lifestyle factors reduced the onset of and may have increased recovery from mobility limitation. J Clin Epidemiol 58:831–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tremblay MS, Carson V, Chaput JP et al (2016) Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 41:S311–S327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saunders TJ et al (2016) Combinations of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep: relationships with health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Physiol Appl Nutr Metab 41(6 Suppl3):S283–293 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM et al (1993) The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 46:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4 

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuit A, Schouten E, Westerterp K et al (1997) Validity of the physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): according to energy expenditure assessed by the doubly labeled water study. J Clin Epidemiol 50:541–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loland N (2002) Reliability of the physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE). Eur J Sport Sci 2:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390200072504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD et al (2011) 2011 Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:1575–1581. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chad KE, Reeder BA, Harrison EL et al (2005) Profile of physical activity levels in community-dwelling older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:1774–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raina PS, Wolfson C, Kirkland SA et al (2009) The Canadian longitudinal study on aging (CLSA). Can J Aging 28:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bohannon RW (1995) Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills 80:163–166. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Statistics Canada (2016) Figure 3 mean/median grip strength reference values (in kilograms) for selected countries, by age and sex, selected years, 2007 to 2015. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2016010/article/14665/c-g/c-g03-eng.htm. Accessed 13 June 2018

  19. Ibrahim A, Singh DKA, Shahar S (2017) Timed Up and Go’ test: Age, gender and cognitive impairment stratified normative values of older adults. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185641

  20. Jones J, Rikili R (2002) Measuring functional fitness of older adults. J Active Aging 1:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  21. Springer BA, Marin R, Cyhan T et al (2007) Normative values for the unipedal stance test with eyes open and closed. J Geriatr Phys Ther 30:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible using the data/biospecimens collected by the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Funding for the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under grant reference: LSA 9447 and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. This research has been conducted using the CLSA Baseline Comprehensive Dataset version 4.0, under Application Number 170609. The CLSA is led by Drs. Parminder Raina, Christina Wolfson and Susan Kirkland. The Authors would also like to acknowledge The University of New Brunswick and the New Brunswick Health Research Foundation in their support through resources and student funding.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of New Brunswick Endowment fund (RF-2017-07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle R. Bouchard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The database from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging was free of charge due to the project being a student-based thesis, the opinions expressed in this manuscript are the author's own and do not reflect the views of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Research Board of Ethics at the University of New Brunswick (IRB: 2017-086).

Informed consent

All participants in the CLSA database received information packages and informed consent at various steps of the study. For this type of study formal consent is not required. 

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayo, A., Sénéchal, M., Boudreau, J. et al. Potential functional benefits of a comprehensive evaluation of physical activity for aging adults: a CLSA cross-sectional analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 33, 285–289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01528-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01528-w

Keywords

Navigation