Skip to main content
Log in

Phase 2 of family-based treatment: an exploratory assessment of clinician practices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In manualized family-based treatment (FBT) for eating disorders, phase 1 of the 3-phase treatment—during which parents are put in control of eating-related issues—is perhaps the most critical phase, and is comprehensively addressed in the manual. Phase 2, during which control over eating is gradually returned to the patient, is more variable and the manual dedicates less space to this phase. The purpose of the current exploratory study was to assess Phase 2 practices of clinicians providing FBT and to compare these practices to the guidance offered in the manual.

Methods

In the current study, a survey assessing Phase 2 practices was sent to clinicians. Twenty-seven providers responded. Two providers reported that they did not provide FBT in an outpatient setting. One reported not currently providing outpatient FBT but had in the past. The remaining providers were currently providing FBT in an outpatient setting.

Results

No items addressing the core interventions of Phase 2, including encouraging age-appropriate independent eating, were endorsed by 100% of respondents as being addressed 100% of the time in Phase 2.

Conclusion

Responses reflected some adherence to the manual, along with examples of therapist drift and incorporation of therapeutic interventions that are not described in the FBT manual. Adherence to manualized treatments may improve outcome for some patients, while allowing for flexibility to address clinical situations that are not addressed in the manual.

Level of evidence

V. Opinions of respected authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Eating disorders: recognition and treatment. NICE guideline (NG69). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng69/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-161214767896. Accessed 6 Nov 2021

  2. Lock J, Le Grange D (2013) Treatment manual for anorexia nervosa: a family-based approach, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Couturier J, Kimber M, Jack S, Niccols A, Van Blyderveen S, McVey G (2013) Understanding the uptake of family-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: therapist perspectives. Int J Eat Disorder 46:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellison R, Rhodes P, Madden S, Miskovic J, Wallis A, Baillie A, Kohn M, Touyz S (2012) Do the components of manualized family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa predict weight gain? Int J Eat Disorder 45:609–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimitropoulos G, Lock JD, Agras WS, Brandt H, Halmi KA, Jo B, Kaye WH, Pinhas L, Wilfley DE, Woodside DB (2020) Therapist adherence to family-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a multi-site exploratory study. Eur Eat Disord Rev 28:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Couturier J, Kimber M, Barwick M, McVey G, Findlay S, Webb C, Niccols A, Lock J (2021) Assessing fidelity to family-based treatment: an exploratory examination of expert, therapist, parent, and peer ratings. J Eat Disorder. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00366-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Couturier J, Isserlin L, Lock J (2010) Family-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a dissemination study. Eat Disorders 18:199–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640261003719443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bateup SE, Palmer CR, Catarino A (2020) Using technology to understand how therapist variables are associated with clinical outcomes in IAPT. Cog Behav Ther 13:e26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X20000252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Forsberg S, Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Aspen V, Accurso EC, Bryson SW, Agras S, Arnow KD, Le Grange D, Lock J (2015) Development and evaluation of a treatment fidelity instrument for family-based treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disorder 48:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forsberg S, Lock J, Le Grange D (2018) Family based treatment for restrictive eating disorders: a guide for supervision and advanced clinical practice. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Linehan M (1993) Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loeb KL, Walsh BT, Lock J, Le Grange D, Jones J, Marcus S, Weaver J, Dobrow I (2007) Open trial of family-based treatment for full and partial anorexia nervosa in adolescence: evidence of successful dissemination. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:792–800. https://doi.org/10.1097/chi.0b013e318058a98e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray SB, Quintana DS, Loeb KL, Griffiths S, Le Grange D (2019) Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psych Med 49:535–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718002088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marques L, Valentine SE, Kaysen D, Mackintosh M-A, De Silva LED, Ahles EM, Youn SJ, Shtasel DL, Simon NM, Wiltsey-Stirman S (2019) Provider fidelity and modifications to cognitive processing therapy in a diverse community health clinic: associations with clinical change. J Consult Clin Psych 87:357–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginzburg DM, Bohn C, Höfling V, Weck F, Clark DM, Stangier U (2012) Treatment specific competence predicts outcome in cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther 50:747–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.09.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein M, Murray SB, Griffiths S, Rayner K, Podkowka J, Bateman JE, Wallis A, Thornton CE (2016) The effectiveness of family-based treatment for full and partial adolescent anorexia nervosa in an independent private practice setting: clinical outcomes. Int J Eat Disord 49:1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallis A, Rhodes P, Kohn M, Madden S (2007) Five-years of family based treatment for anorexia nervosa: the Maudsley model at the Children’s hospital at Westmead. Int J Adolesc Med Health 19:277–283. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJAMH.2007.19.3.277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson CM, Kroon Van Diest AM, Mara CA, Matthews A (2020) Dialectical behavioral therapy skills group as an adjunct to family-based therapy in adolescents with restrictive eating disorders. Eat Disorders 28:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2019.1568101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray SB, Anderson LK, Cusack A, Nakamura T, Rockwell R, Griffiths S, Kaye WH (2015) Integrating family-based treatment and dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent bulimia nervosa: preliminary outcomes of an open pilot trial. Eat Disorders 23:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2015.1044345

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renee D. Rienecke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Jacobs has no conflicts to disclose. Dr. Muhlheim receives royalties from New Harbinger and consulting fees from Equip Health. Dr. Rienecke receives consulting fees from the Training Institute for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, LLC, and receives royalties from Routledge.

Ethics approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not required for the current study.

Informed consent

This was not considered human subjects research so informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, S., Muhlheim, L. & Rienecke, R.D. Phase 2 of family-based treatment: an exploratory assessment of clinician practices. Eat Weight Disord 27, 2137–2142 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01360-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01360-3

Keywords

Navigation