Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Variations in Inland Transport Regulation: a Barrier to a Competitive Global LNG Market

  • Midstream Sector (JD Makholm, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LNG trade traditionally existed as an industry dominated by long-term contracts between regions of resource abundance—with excess supplies of gas—and regions of resource scarcity—with a great need for fuel. Now, a new type of landscape is emerging with the impending entry of North American unconventional gas exports. These new exports are produced and transported by sellers in the competitive North American gas market. But there is little ability for exporters to reach consumers at the other end of the journey because regulation outside of North America means that, by and large, the only potential buyers are monopolies that own the regasification facilities, the transmission pipelines, and the distribution companies. Before a worldwide gas market akin to the global oil market can emerge, a paradigm shift in gas transport regulation outside North America would have to take place. The cost of maritime gas transport would have to also decline to make LNG more attractive than local unconventional gas production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2014). “June marks 50th Anniversary of the First Commercial Liquefied Natural Gas Tanker,” Today in Energy June 19, 2014, http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=16771

  2. BP (2015). “Statistical Review of World Energy, 2015,” accessed December 23, 2015, http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html

  3. International Gas Union (IGU) (2015). “World LNG Report – 2015 Edition.” Staff Report.

  4. Makholm, J.D. and L.T.W.Olive (2016). “A Petroleum Tanker of a Different Color: Obstacles to a LNG-based Global Gas Spot Market,” Working Paper. http://www.nera.com/publications/archive/2015/a_petroleum_tanker_of_a_different_color.html

  5. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Statistics (UNCTAD) (2015). “Merchant fleet by flag of registration and by type of ship, annual, 1980–2014,” accessed February 15, 2015, http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx.

  6. Hartley PR. The future of long-term LNG contracts. Energy J. 2015;36(3):209–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers (GIIGNL) (2015). “The LNG Industry in 2014.” Staff Report.

  8. Reuster, S. (2015). “Financing LNG Projects and the Role of Long-Term Sales-and Purchase Agreements.” DIW Berlin Working Papers 1441.

  9. Fattouh, B. (2011). “An anatomy of the crude oil pricing system.” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

  10. Fattouh B, Kilian L, Mahadeva L. The role of speculation in oil markets: what have We learned so far? Energy J. 2013;34(3):7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gulen G. Regionalization in the world crude oil market. Energy J. 1999;20(1):125–39.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mabro R. The international oil price regime. J Energy Lit. 2005;XI(1):3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Correljé, A. (2016). “Natural gas: a tale of three markets.” In (eds.) Finger, M. and Jaag, C., Routledge companion to network industries. London: Routledge.

  14. Li R, Joyeux R, Ripple RD. International natural gas market integration. Energy J. 2014;35(4):159–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Makholm JD. Regulation of natural Gas in the United States, Canada and Europe: prospects for a low carbon fuel. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2015;9(1):107–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neumann A, von Hirschhausen C. Natural gas: an overview of a lower-carbon transformation fuel. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2015;9(1):64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Makholm, J.D. (2016). “There is but one true hub and his name is Henry.” In Nat Gas Electricity, Volume 33, Issue 1: 27–30.

  18. Stern, J. (2016). “The New Japanese LNG strategy: a major step towards hub-based gas pricing in Asia,” Oxford Energy Comment for The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

  19. Apte, S. and J. Critchlow (2011). “Are we on the edge of a truly global gas market?,” Bain Brief, December 5, 2011, http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/are-we-on-the-edge-of-a-truly-global-gas-market.aspx

  20. Brito DL, Hartley PR. Expectations and the evolving world gas market. Energy J. 2007;28(1):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Du, Y. and S. Paltsev (2014). “International Trade in Natural Gas: Golden Age of LNG?”MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No, 271.

  22. Foss MM. Global natural gas issues and challenges: a commentary. Energy J. 2005;26(2):111–28.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maugeri, L. (2014). “Falling Short: A Reality Check for Global LNG Exports.” The Geopolitics of Energy Project, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/24870/falling_short.html

  24. von Hirschhausen C, Neumann A. Long-term contracts and asset specificity revisited: an empirical analysis of producer-importer relations in the natural gas industry. Rev Ind Organ. 2008;32:131–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reuster S. Changing contract structures in the international liquefied natural gas market: a first empirical analysis. Rev Econ Ind. 2009;127(3e trimestre 2009):89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Makholm JD. The political economy of pipelines: a century of comparative institutional development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Tirole J. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Neumann, A., S. Ruster, and C. von Hirschhausen (2015). “Long-term contracts in the natural gas industry—literature survey and data on 426 contracts (1965–2014).” DIW Berlin Data Documentation 77.

  29. European Union (EU) (2009). “Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC,” July 13, 2009, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:211:0094:0136:en:PDF.

  30. Noël, P. (2013). “EU Gas Supply Security: Unfinished Business,” (working paper, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, CWPE 1312).

  31. Makholm JD. ‘Entry/exit’ pipeline pricing in gas ‘islands’ enables EU to resist competition. Nat Gas Electricity,. 2015;2015:27–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hunt, P. (2008). “Entry-exit transmission pricing with notional hubs: can it deliver a pan-European wholesale market in gas?” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

  33. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2007). “Existing and Proposed North American LNG Terminals,” August 6, 2007.

  34. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2016). “North American LNG Import/Export Terminals, Existing,” June 2, 2016.

  35. Reuters (2010). “Update 1-GE buys 30 pct stake in US Gulf LNG Terminal,” March 21, 2010.

  36. Veresen (2016). “Jordan Cove LNG Project,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.vereseninc.com/our-business/business-development/jordan-cove-lng-project/

  37. Leucadia National Corporation (2016). “Oregon LNG,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.oregonlng.com/.

  38. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2016). “North American LNG Import/Export Terminals, Approved,” June 2, 2016

  39. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2016). “North American LNG Export Terminals, Proposed,” June 2, 2016.

  40. Energy Transfer (2016). “Lake Charles LNG,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.energytransfer.com/investment_lc_lng.aspx?p=ete

  41. Kinder Morgan (2016). “Elba LNG,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.kindermorgan.com/business/gas_pipelines/projects/elbaLNG

  42. Kinder Morgan (2016). “Gulf LNG,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.kindermorgan.com/pages/business/gas_pipelines/projects/gulfLNG/project.aspx

  43. Parallax Enterprises LLC (2016). “Louisiana LNG,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://louisianalngenergy.com/.

  44. Exelon (2016). “Annova LNG,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://annovalng.com/project

  45. Sempra Energy (2016). “Port Arthur LNG,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://portarthurlng.com/

  46. Gas Infrastructure Europe (2016). “GIE LNG Map Dataset version May 2015,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.gie.eu/index.php/maps-data/lng-map.

  47. Fluxys Belgium (2016). “Transmission and hub services,” accessed June 20, 2016, http://www.fluxys.com/belgium/en/Services/Transmission/Transmission.

  48. Elengy (2016). “Group Websites,” accessed June 20, 2016, http://www.engie.com/en/group-websites/

  49. Engie (2016). “The Board of Directors,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.grtgaz.com/en/our-company/governance.html

  50. Snam Rete Gas (2016). “GNL Italia,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.gnlitalia.it/en/index.html

  51. Snam (2016). “Infrastructure,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.snamretegas.it/en/activities/Infrastructures/

  52. Gate Terminal (2016). “Profile,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://gate.nl/en/gate-terminal/profile.html

  53. Gasunie (2016). “Gasunie Transport Services,” accessed June 21, 2016, https://www.gasunietransportservices.nl/en

  54. Enagás (2016). “Regasification Plants,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.enagas.es/enagas/en/Transporte_de_gas/PlantasRegasificacion

  55. Enagás (2016). “Enagás infrastructure map in Spain,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.enagas.es/enagas/en/Transporte_de_gas/TransporteYOperacion/MapaInfraestructuras

  56. Regnosa (2016). “LNG Terminal,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.reganosa.com/en/lng-terminal-0

  57. Regnosa (2016). “Transmission Network,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.reganosa.com/en/transmission-network

  58. National Grid (2016). “The Grain LNG Terminal,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://grainlng.com/who-are-we/about-our-terminal/

  59. National Grid (2016). “System Entry Capacity,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://grainlng.com/operational-information/system-entry-capacity/

  60. Excelerate Energy (2016). “Teesside GasPort”,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://excelerateenergy.com/project/teesside-gasport/

  61. Dragon LNG (2016). “About Us”,” accessed June 21, 2016, http://www.dragonlng.co.uk/about-us

  62. South Hook LNG (2016). “About Us,” accessed June 21, 2016, https://www.southhooklng.com/about-us/

  63. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2014). “Developing a Natural Gas Trading Hub in Asia: Obstacles and Opportunities,” March 31, 2015, https://www.iea.org/media/freepublications/AsianGasHub_WEB.pdf.

  64. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) (2013). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Staff Report.

  65. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2013b). Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries outside the United States. Staff Report

  66. Ikonnikova S, Gülen G, Browning J, Tinker SW. Profitability of shale gas drilling: a case study of the Fayetteville shale play. Energy. 2015;81(1):382–293.

  67. Makholm, J.D. (2016). “Why does most shale gas worldwide remain in the ground?” In Nat Gas Electricity, Volume 32, Issue 7, pp. 29–32.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Economic Research Associates, Inc., 200 Clarendon St, Boston, MA, 02116, USA

    Laura T. W. Olive

Authors
  1. Laura T. W. Olive
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura T. W. Olive.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the topical collection on Midstream Sector

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olive, L.T.W. Variations in Inland Transport Regulation: a Barrier to a Competitive Global LNG Market. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 3, 10–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-016-0045-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-016-0045-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation