Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantum-mechanical correlations and Tsirelson bound from geometric algebra

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Bell–Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt inequality can be used to show that no local hidden-variable theory can reproduce the correlations predicted by quantum mechanics (QM). It can be proved that certain QM correlations lead to a violation of the classical bound established by the inequality, while all correlations, QM and classical, respect a QM bound (the Tsirelson bound). Here, we show that these well-known results depend crucially on the assumption that the values of physical magnitudes are scalars. More specifically, the assumption that these values are not scalars, but vectors that are elements of the geometric algebra G\(^{{\mathbf {3}}}\) over R\(^{{\mathbf {3}}}\), makes it possible that the classical bound is violated and the QM bound respected, even given a locality assumption.The result implies, first, that the origin of the Tsirelson bound is geometrical, not physical; and, second, that a local hidden-variable theory does not contradict QM if the values of physical magnitudes are vectors in the geometric algebra G\(^{{\mathbf {3}}}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23(15), 880–4 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, J..S.: On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Physics 1(3), 195–200 (1964). (reprinted in [3], chap. 2)

  3. Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Redhead, M.L.G.: Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism. A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)

  5. Hughes, R.I.G.: The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)

  6. Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Taut, D.V., Zanghi, N.: Bell’s theorem. Scholarpedia 6(10), 8378 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsirelson, B.S.: Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality. Lett. Math. Phys. 4(2), 93–100 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalfin, L.A., Tsirelson, B.S.: Quantum and quasi-classical analogs of Bell inequalities. In: Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P. (eds.) Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1985, pp. 441–460, 442–443. World Scientific Publications, Singapore (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hestenes, D., Sobczyk, G.: Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus. A Unified Language for Mathematics and Physics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Doran, C.J.L., Lasenby, A.N.: Geometric Algebra for Physicists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Macdonald, A.: A survey of geometric algebra and geometric calculus. Adv. Appl. Cliff. Alg. 27, 853–891 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Held, C.: Non-contextual and local hidden-variable model for the Peres–Mermin and Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger systems. Found. Phys. 51, 33 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bell, J. S.: Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality. J. Phys. 42(C2), 41–61 (1981). (reprinted in [3], chap. 16; see the derivation of eq. (18) from eqs.(11–13))

  14. Griffiths, R.: Quantum locality. Found. Phys. 41, 705–733 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hensen, B.:, et al.: Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015)

  16. Tsirelson’s bound-Wikipedia sec.3: Derivation from physical principles (accessed August 4, 2021)

  17. Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., Wehner, S.: Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014). (introduction)

  18. Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M., Zeilinger, A.: Going beyond Bell’s theorem. In: Kafatos, M. (ed.) Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, p. 69. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mermin, N.D.: Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Untergraben 13, 99423, Weimar, Germany

    Carsten Held

Authors
  1. Carsten Held
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Held.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Held, C. Quantum-mechanical correlations and Tsirelson bound from geometric algebra. Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 8, 411–417 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-021-00252-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-021-00252-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation