Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Digital Technology to Enhance Clinical Care of Early Psychosis

  • Technology and its Impact on Mental Health Care (J Torous and T Becker, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Despite considerable evidence supporting the clinical benefits of early intervention for psychosis, issues remain with access and maintenance of long-term recovery. As digital technology has advanced rapidly over recent decades, so too has recognition for its capacity to address the challenges in providing care for those with mental ill health. The current report provides an overview of research focusing on the use of digital technologies to enhance clinical care of people with early psychosis.

Recent findings

Research suggests that people with early psychosis use technology in a similar fashion to those in the general population, and there is interest in its use for mental health. Studies have primarily focused on smartphone apps and online interventions targeting self-management, psychosocial functioning, and supporting case management. Findings support feasibility and acceptability; however, evidence for the efficacy of digital approaches is yet to be established in early psychosis populations.

Summary

Whilst promising, findings in early psychosis are currently limited to a small number of studies at primarily pilot stages. More broadly, a number of challenges have been highlighted in digital mental health literature, including quality standards, the slow pace of research evaluation, difficulties with implementation and ethical considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. McGorry PD, Killackey E, Yung AR. Early intervention in psychotic disorders: detection and treatment of the first episode and the critical early stages. Med J Aust. 2007;187(S7):S8–S10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Díaz-Caneja CM, Pina-Camacho L, Rodríguez-Quiroga A, Fraguas D, Parellada M, Arango C. Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review. NPJ Schizophr. 2015;1:14005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Penttilä M, Jääskeläinen E, Hirvonen N, Isohanni M, Miettunen J. Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(2):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charlson FJ, Ferrari AJ, Santomauro DF, Diminic S, Stockings E, Scott JG, et al. Global epidemiology and burden of schizophrenia: findings from the global burden of disease study 2016. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44(6):1195–203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Saarni SI, Viertiö S, Perälä J, Koskinen S, Lönnqvist J, Suvisaari J. Quality of life of people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychotic disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197(5):386–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Świtaj P, Anczewska M, Chrostek A, Sabariego C, Cieza A, Bickenbach J, et al. Disability and schizophrenia: a systematic review of experienced psychosocial difficulties. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Csillag C, Nordentoft M, Mizuno M, Jones PB, Killackey E, Taylor M, et al. Early intervention services in psychosis: from evidence to wide implementation. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016;10(6):540–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGorry PD. Risk syndromes, clinical staging and DSM V: new diagnostic infrastructure for early intervention in psychiatry. Schizophr Res. 2010;120(1–3):49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. IEPA. 2019. Retrieved from https://iepa.org.au/services/.

  10. Correll CU, Galling B, Pawar A, Krivko A, Bonetto C, Ruggeri M, et al. Comparison of early intervention services vs treatment as usual for early-phase psychosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(6):555–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Birchwood M, Connor C, Lester H, Patterson P, Freemantle N, Marshall M, et al. Reducing duration of untreated psychosis: care pathways to early intervention in psychosis services. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(1):58–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fusar-Poli P, McGorry PD, Kane JM. Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):251–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhugra D, Tasman A, Pathare S, Priebe S, Smith S, Torous J, et al. The WPA-lancet psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(10):775–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Health Service. Five year forward view. 2017.

  15. Proudfoot J. The future is in our hands: the role of mobile phones in the prevention and management of mental disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013;47(2):111–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867412471441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Price M, Yuen EK, Goetter EM, Herbert JD, Forman EM, Acierno R, et al. mHealth: a mechanism to deliver more accessible, more effective mental health care. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014;21(5):427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersson G. Internet interventions: past, present and future. Internet Interv. 2018;12:181–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(3):288–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. • Alvarez-Jimenez M, Alcazar-Corcoles M, Gonzalez-Blanch C, Bendall S, McGorry P, Gleeson J. Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophr Res. 2014;156(1):96–106 A systematic review summarising evidence for the use of digital interventinos for psychosis treatment.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Batra S, Baker RA, Wang T, Forma F, DiBiasi F, Peters-Strickland T. Digital health technology for use in patients with serious mental illness: a systematic review of the literature. Med Devices. 2017;10:237–51. https://doi.org/10.2147/mder.S144158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Berry N, Lobban F, Emsley R, Bucci S. Acceptability of interventions delivered online and through mobile phones for people who experience severe mental health problems: a systematic review. JMIR. 2016;18(5).

  22. Erbe D, Eichert H-C, Riper H, Ebert DD. Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: systematic review. JMIR. 2017;19(9).

  23. Firth J, Torous J. Smartphone apps for schizophrenia: a systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2015;3(4):e102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Naslund JA, Marsch LA, McHugo GJ, Bartels SJ. Emerging mHealth and eHealth interventions for serious mental illness: a review of the literature. J of Ment Health. 2015;24(5):321–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pew Research Centre. Mobile Fact Sheet. 2018.

  26. Lal S, Dell'Elce J, Tucci N, Fuhrer R, Tamblyn R, Malla A. Preferences of young adults with first-episode psychosis for receiving specialized mental health services using technology: a survey study. JMIR Ment Health. 2015;2(2):e18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel-Baki A, Lal S, D.-Charron O, Stip E, Kara N. Understanding access and use of technology among youth with first-episode psychosis to inform the development of technology-enabled therapeutic interventions. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017;11(1):72–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Firth J, Cotter J, Torous J, Bucci S, Firth JA, Yung AR. Mobile phone ownership and endorsement of “mHealth” among people with psychosis: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Schizophr Bull. 2015;42(2):448–55 Thorough meta-analysis examining ownership, use and interest in mobile technologies amongst psychosis populations.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Poushter J. Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Res Center. 2016;22:1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malhotra S, Chakrabarti S, Shah R. A model for digital mental healthcare: its usefulness and potential for service delivery in low-and middle-income countries. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019;61(1):27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Torous J, Friedman R, Keshavan M. Smartphone ownership and interest in mobile applications to monitor symptoms of mental health conditions. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2(1):e2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Highton-Williamson E, Priebe S, Giacco D. Online social networking in people with psychosis: a systematic review. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015;61(1):92–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Birnbaum ML, Rizvi AF, Correll CU, Kane JM, Confino J. Role of social media and the I nternet in pathways to care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders and non-psychotic mood disorders. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017;11(4):290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bucci S, Morris R, Berry K, Berry N, Haddock G, Barrowclough C, et al. Early psychosis service user views on digital technology: qualitative analysis. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(4):e10091.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Berry N, Bucci S, Lobban F. Use of the internet and mobile phones for self-management of severe mental health problems: qualitative study of staff views. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(4).

  36. Lal S, Daniel W, Rivard L. Perspectives of family members on using technology in youth mental health care: a qualitative study. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(2):e21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ennis L, Rose D, Denis M, Pandit N, Wykes T. Can’t surf, won’t surf: the digital divide in mental health. J Ment Health. 2012;21(4):395–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Greer B, Robotham D, Simblett S, Curtis H, Griffiths H, Wykes T. Digital exclusion among mental health service users: qualitative investigation. JMIR. 2019;21(1):e11696.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Bendall S, Lederman R, Wadley G, Chinnery G, Vargas S, et al. On the HORYZON: moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2013;143(1):143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson J, Bendall S, Penn D, Yung A, Ryan R, et al. Enhancing social functioning in young people at ultra high risk (UHR) for psychosis: a pilot study of a novel strengths and mindfulness-based online social therapy. Schizophr Res. 2018;202:369–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bucci S, Barrowclough C, Ainsworth J, Machin M, Morris R, Berry K et al. Actissist: proof-of-concept trial of a theory-driven digital intervention for psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2018.

  42. Schlosser DA, Campellone TR, Truong B, Etter K, Vergani S, Komaiko K, et al. Efficacy of PRIME, a mobile app intervention designed to improve motivation in young people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2018.

  43. Kim SW, Lee GY, Yu HY, Jung EI, Lee JY, Kim SY, et al. Development and feasibility of smartphone application for cognitive-behavioural case management of individuals with early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12(6):1087–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lim MH, Gleeson JF, Rodebaugh TL, Eres R, Long KM, Casey K, et al. A pilot digital intervention targeting loneliness in young people with psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019:1–13.

  45. Vaessen T, Steinhart H, Batink T, Klippel A, Van Nierop M, Reininghaus U, et al. ACT in daily life in early psychosis: an ecological momentary intervention approach. Psychosis. 2019:1–12.

  46. Niendam TA, Tully LM, Iosif A-M, Kumar D, Nye KE, Denton JC, et al. Enhancing early psychosis treatment using smartphone technology: a longitudinal feasibility and validity study. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;96:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kumar D, Tully LM, Iosif A-M, Zakskorn LN, Nye KE, Zia A et al. A mobile health platform for clinical monitoring in early psychosis: implementation in community-based outpatient early psychosis care. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(1).

  48. Thomas N, Farhall J, Foley F, Leitan ND, Villagonzalo K-A, Ladd E, et al. Promoting personal recovery in people with persisting psychotic disorders: development and pilot study of a novel digital intervention. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7.

  49. Williams A, Fossey E, Farhall J, Foley F, Thomas N. Recovery after psychosis: qualitative study of service user experiences of lived experience videos on a recovery-oriented website. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(2):e37. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9934.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Speyer R, Denman D, Wilkes-Gillan S, Chen Y-W, Bogaardt H, Kim J-H, et al. Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(3):225–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ebner-Priemer UW, Trull TJ. Ambulatory assessment: an innovative and promising approach for clinical psychology. Eur Psychol. 2009;14(2):109–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Palmier-Claus JE, Ainsworth J, Machin M, Barrowclough C, Dunn G, Barkus E, et al. The feasibility and validity of ambulatory self-report of psychotic symptoms using a smartphone software application. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ben-Zeev D, Brian R, Wang R, Wang W, Campbell AT, Aung MS, et al. CrossCheck: integrating self-report, behavioral sensing, and smartphone use to identify digital indicators of psychotic relapse. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017;40(3):266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Piasecki TM, Hufford MR, Solhan M, Trull TJ. Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers. Psychol Assess. 2007;19(1):25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bell IH, Fielding-Smith SF, Hayward M, Rossell SL, Lim MH, Farhall J, et al. Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention in a blended coping-focused therapy for distressing voices: development and case illustration. Internet Interv. 2018;14:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2018.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kroeze R, Van Veen D, Servaas MN, Bastiaansen JA, Oude Voshaar R, Borsboom D, et al. Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: a proof-of-principle study. J Person-Oriented Res. 2017;3(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Heron K, Smyth J. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(1):1–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bell IH, Lim MH, Rossell SL, Thomas N. Ecological momentary assessment and intervention in the treatment of psychotic disorders: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv. 2017:appi.ps.201600523. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600523.

  59. Ben-Zeev D, Brenner C, Begale M, Duffecy J, Mohr D, Mueser K. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014;sbu033.

  60. Granholm E, Ben-Zeev D, Link P, Bradshaw K, Holden J. Mobile assessment and treatment for schizophrenia (MATS): a pilot trial of an interactive text-messaging intervention for medication adherence, socialization, and auditory hallucinations. Schizophr Bull. 2011:sbr155.

  61. Hardy A, Wojdecka A, West J, Matthews E, Garety P. The development of SlowMo: how inclusive, user-centred design research can improve psychological therapies for psychosis. JMIR. 2018;5(4):e11222.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Priede A, Hetrick S, Bendall S, Killackey E, Parker A, et al. Risk factors for relapse following treatment for first episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Schizophr Res. 2012;139(1–3):116–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Barnett I, Torous J, Staples P, Sandoval L, Keshavan M, Onnela J-P. Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;1.

  64. Eisner E, Bucci S, Berry N, Emsley R, Barrowclough C, Drake RJ. Feasibility of using a smartphone app to assess early signs, basic symptoms and psychotic symptoms over six months: a preliminary report. Schizophr Res. 2019.

  65. Torous J, Wisniewski H, Liu G, Keshavan M. Mental health mobile phone app usage, concerns, and benefits among psychiatric outpatients: comparative survey study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(4):e11715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Rus-Calafell M, Garety P, Sason E, Craig T, Valmaggia L. Virtual reality in the assessment and treatment of psychosis: a systematic review of its utility, acceptability and effectiveness. Psychol Med. 2018;48(3):362–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Freeman D, Bradley J, Antley A, Bourke E, DeWeever N, Evans N et al. Virtual reality in the treatment of persecutory delusions: randomised controlled experimental study testing how to reduce delusional conviction. Br J Psychiatry. 2016:bjp. bp. 115.176438.

  68. Chan CL, Ngai EK, Leung PK, Wong S. Effect of the adapted virtual reality cognitive training program among Chinese older adults with chronic schizophrenia: a pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(6):643–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pot-Kolder RM, Geraets CN, Veling W, van Beilen M, Staring AB, Gijsman HJ, et al. Virtual-reality-based cognitive behavioural therapy versus waiting list control for paranoid ideation and social avoidance in patients with psychotic disorders: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(3):217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Park K-M, Ku J, Choi S-H, Jang H-J, Park J-Y, Kim SI, et al. A virtual reality application in role-plays of social skills training for schizophrenia: a randomized, controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2011;189(2):166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Sorkin A, Weinshall D, Modai I, Peled A. Improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of schizophrenia by means of virtual reality. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(3):512–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Craig TK, Rus-Calafell M, Ward T, Leff JP, Huckvale M, Howarth E, et al. AVATAR therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations in people with psychosis: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(1):31–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Realpe A, Elahi F, Bucci S, Birchwood M, Vlaev I, Taylor D et al. Co-designing a virtual world with young people to deliver social cognition therapy in early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019.

  74. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson J, Henry L, Harrigan S, Harris M, Killackey E, et al. Road to full recovery: longitudinal relationship between symptomatic remission and psychosocial recovery in first-episode psychosis over 7.5 years. Psychol Med. 2012;42(3):595–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gleeson JF, Cotton SM, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Wade D, Gee D, Crisp K, et al. A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for first-episode psychosis patients: outcome at 30-month follow-up. Schizophr Bull. 2011;39(2):436–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Gronholm P, Thornicroft G, Laurens K, Evans-Lacko S. Mental health-related stigma and pathways to care for people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2017;47(11):1867–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lim MH, Gleeson JF, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Penn DL. Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018:1–18.

  78. Michalska da Rocha B, Rhodes S, Vasilopoulou E, Hutton P. Loneliness in psychosis: a meta-analytical review. Schizophr Bull. 2017;44(1):114–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Jain SH, Powers BW, Hawkins JB, Brownstein JS. The digital phenotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Torous J, Onnela J, Keshavan M. New dimensions and new tools to realize the potential of RDoC: digital phenotyping via smartphones and connected devices. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(3):e1053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Torous J, Kiang MV, Lorme J, Onnela J-P. New tools for new research in psychiatry: a scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Ment Health. 2016;3(2).

  82. Onnela J-P, Rauch SL. Harnessing smartphone-based digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(7):1691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Research2Guidance. 325,000 mobile health apps available in 2017 - Android now the leading mHealth platform2017.

  84. Larsen ME, Huckvale K, Nicholas J, Torous J, Birrell L, Li E, et al. Using science to sell apps: evaluation of mental health app store quality claims. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Neary M, Schueller SM. State of the field of mental health apps. Cogn Behav Pract. 2018;25(4):531–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Hollis C, Sampson S, Simons L, Davies EB, Churchill R, Betton V, et al. Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(10):845–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop. Journal of medical Internet research. 2017;19(6).

  89. Torous J, Andersson G, Bertagnoli A, Christensen H, Cuijpers P, Firth J, et al. Towards a consensus around standards for smartphone apps and digital mental health. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):97–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. • Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and validation of the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2016;4(2):e72 A commonly used tool for evaluating the quality of smarpthone apps. Can be used by clinicians, researchers or consumers.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Torous JB, Chan SR, Gipson SY-MT, Kim JW, Nguyen T-Q, Luo J, et al. A hierarchical framework for evaluation and informed decision making regarding smartphone apps for clinical care. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(5):498–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Torous J, Firth J. The digital placebo effect: mobile mental health meets clinical psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):100–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Gagnon M-P, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;23(1):212–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Luxton D, McCann R, Bush N, Mishkind M, Reger G. mHealth for mental health: integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2011;42(6):505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Mohr DC, Lyon AR, Lattie EG, Reddy M, Schueller SM. Accelerating digital mental health research from early design and creation to successful implementation and sustainment. JMIR. 2017;19(5).

  96. Mohr DC, Weingardt KR, Reddy M, Schueller SM. Three problems with current digital mental health research... and three things we can do about them. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(5):427–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Hewitt C, Brierley G, Tharmanathan P, Araya R, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2015;351:h5627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Torous J, Nicholas J, Larsen ME, Firth J, Christensen H. Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018:ebmental-2018-102891.

  99. Torous J, Staples P, Slaters L, Adams J, Sandoval L, Onnela J, et al. Characterizing smartphone engagement for schizophrenia: results of a naturalist mobile health study. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2017.

  100. Hoffman L, Benedetto E, Huang H, Grossman E, Kaluma D, Mann Z, et al. Augmenting mental health in primary care: a one-year study of deploying smartphone apps in a multi-site primary care/behavioral health integration program. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Mohr DC, Riper H, Schueller SM. A solution-focused research approach to achieve an implementable revolution in digital mental health. JAMA psychiatry. 2018;75(2):113–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. • Torous J, Roberts LW. The ethical use of mobile health technology in clinical psychiatry. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017;205(1):4–8 Provides good discussion and guidance regarding the ethical issues surrounding technology in mental health care.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Glenn T, Monteith S. Privacy in the digital world: medical and health data outside of HIPAA protections. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16(11):494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Sunyaev A, Dehling T, Taylor PL, Mandl KD. Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;22(e1):e28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Kotz D, Gunter CA, Kumar S, Weiner JP. Privacy and security in mobile health: a research agenda. Computer (Long Beach Calif). 2016;49(6):22.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Armontrout J, Torous J, Fisher M, Drogin E, Gutheil T. Mobile mental health: navigating new rules and regulations for digital tools. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18(10):91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Torous J, Chan S, Luo J, Boland R, Hilty D. Clinical informatics in psychiatric training: preparing today’s trainees for the already present future. Acad Psychiatry. 2017:1–4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia

    Imogen H. Bell

  2. Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez

  3. Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez

Authors
  1. Imogen H. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imogen H. Bell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Imogen H. Bell declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mario Alvarez-Jimenez declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Technology and its Impact on Mental Health Care

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bell, I.H., Alvarez-Jimenez, M. Digital Technology to Enhance Clinical Care of Early Psychosis. Curr Treat Options Psych 6, 256–270 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-019-00182-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-019-00182-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation