Abstract
Task interspersal is a commonly used teaching method for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. There are several procedural variations of task interspersal reported in the literature. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of different procedural variations and the effectiveness of task interspersal across target skills. Results revealed that no procedural variation presents a significant benefit over any other, suggesting that task interspersal may be an instructional procedure easily adapted to a client’s needs or preferences. Further, task interspersal was effective across a range of target skills. The flexibility of task interspersal as an instructional procedure is limited in that practitioners still must rely upon clinical judgment when deciding to implement specific task interspersal procedures. Considerations for programming task interspersal are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
These terms were selected because they are associated with teaching procedures that involve the interspersal of multiple maintenance trials prior to each target acquisition trial.
References
Adcock, J., & Cuvo, A. J. (2009). Enhancing learning for children with autism spectrum disorders in regular education by instructional modifications. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 319–328.
Banda, D. R., & Kubina, R. M. (2006). The effects of a high-probability request sequencing technique in enhancing transition behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(3), 507–516.
Belfiore, P. J., Basile, S. P., & Lee, D. L. (2008). Using a high probability command sequence to increase classroom compliance: The role of behavioral momentum. Journal of Behavior and Education, 17, 160–171.
Benavides, C. A., & Poulson, C. L. (2009). Task interspersal and performance of matching tasks by preschoolers with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 619–629.
Charlop, M. H., Kurtz, P. F., & Milstein, J. P. (1992). Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: Assessing task intersperal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 795–808.
Chong, I. M., & Carr, J. E. (2005). An investigation of the potentially adverse effects of task interspersal. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 285–300.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2006). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus: OH: Pearson Education, Inc..
Congdon, M. (2013). Increasing food acceptance in the school setting for children with autism spectrum disorder using high probability requests sequences (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest., 3599690.
Cowan, R. J., Abel, L., & Candel, L. (2017). A meta-analysis of single-subject research on behavioral momentum to enhance success in students with autism. Journal of Developmental Disorders, 47, 1464–1477.
Davis, C. A., Brady, M. P., Williams, R. E., & Hamilton, R. (1992). Effects of high-probability requests on the acquisition and generalization of responses to requests in young children with behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 905–916.
Davis, C. A., Brady, M. P., Hamilton, R., McEvoy, M. A., & Williams, R. E. (1994). Effects of high-probability requests on the social interactions of young children with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 619–637.
DeLeon, I., Podlesnik, C., & Miller, J. (2015). Implications of behavioral momentum theory for intervention in autism Spectrum disorder. In F. D. DiGennaro Reed & D. Reed (Eds.), Autism Service Delivery, autism and child psychopathology series. New York, NY: Springer.
Dube, W. V., MacIlvane, W. J., Mazzitelli, K., & McNamara, B. (2003). Reinforcer rate effects and behavioral momentum in individuals with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108(2), 134–143.
Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. L. (1980). Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(4), 619–627.
Durand, M. A. (2014). Autism Spectrum disorder: A clinical guide for general practitioners. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Esch, K., & Fryling, M. J. (2013). A comparison of two variations of the high-probability instructional sequence with a child with autism. Education & Treatment of Children, 36(1), 61–72.
Gard, M. J. (2012). An evaluation of sight word instruction procedures for children with autism: Interspersed trial training (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest., 3518730.
Henrickson, M. L., Rapp, J. T., & Ashbeck, H. A. (2015). Teaching with massed versus interspersed trials: Effects on acquisition, maintenance, and problem behavior. Behavioral Interventions, 30, 36–50.
Houlihan, D., Jacobson, L., & Brandon, P. K. (1994). Replication of a high-probability request sequence with varied interprompt times in a preschool setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(4), 737–738.
Humm, S. P., Blampied, N. M., Liberty, & K. A. (2015). Effects of parent-administered, home-based, high-probability request sequences on compliance by children with developmental disabilities. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 27(3), 27–45.
Jung, S., Sainato, D. M., & Davis, C. A. (2008). Using high-probability request sequences to increase social interactions in young children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(3), 163–187.
Kelly, L., & Holloway, J. (2015). An investigation of the effectiveness of behavioral momentum on the acquisition and fluency outcomes of tacts in three children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 182–192.
Koegel, L. K., Singh, A. K., & Koegel, R. L. (2010). Improving motivation for academics in children with autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 40, 1057–1066.
Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., Taubman, M., McEachinohn, J., & Delmolino, L. (2014). Comparison of flexible prompt fading to error correction for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(2), 203–224.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidia, J. P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. K., Kleignen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7).
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., Dube, W. V., & McIlvane W. J. (2010). Evaluation of resistance to change under different disrupter conditions in children with autism and severe intellectual disability. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93(3), 369–383.
Love, J. R., Carr, J. E., Almason, S. M., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). Early and intensive behavioral intervention for autism: A survey of clinical practice. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 421–428.
Mace, F. C., Mauro, B. C., Boyajian, A. E., & Eckert, T. L. (1997). Effects of reinforcer quality on behavioral momentum: Coordinated applied and basic research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(1), 1–20.
Majdalany, L. M., Wilder, D. A., Greif, A., Mathisen, D., & Saini, V. (2014). Comparing massed-trial instruction, distributed-trial instruction, and task interspersal to teach tacts to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(3), 657–662.
McComas, J. J., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., Peck, S., Golonka, Z., Millard, T., & Richman, D. (2000). Effects of the high-probability request procedure: Patterns of responding to low-probability requests. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 12(2), 157–171.
McCormack, J., Arnold-Saritepe, A., & Elliffee, D. (2017). The differential outcomes effect in children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 32(4), 357–369.
Meier, A. E., Fryling, M. J., Wallace, M. D., & Volkert, V. (2012). Using high-probability foods to increase the acceptance of low-probability foods. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(1), 149–153.
Miller, D. J., Spengler, E. S., & Spengler, P. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of confidence and judgment accuracy in clinical decision making. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 553–567.
Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C., & Atak, J. R. (1983). The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 49–59.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35(4), 303–322.
Pitts, L., & Dymond, S. (2012). Increasing compliance of children with autism: Effects of programmed reinforcement of high-probability requests and varied inter-instruction intervals. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 135–143.
Rapp, J. T., & Gunby, K. (2016). Task interspersal for individuals with autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(3), 730–734.
Ray, K. P., Skinner, C. H., & Watson, T. S. (1999). Transferring stimulus control via momentum to increase compliance in a student with autism: A demonstration of collaborative consultation. School Psychology Review, 28(4), 622–628.
Riviere, V., Becquet, M., Peltret, E., Facon, B., & Darcheville, J. C. (2011). Increasing compliance with medical examination requests directed to children with autism: Effects of a high-probability request procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(1), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-193
Romano, J. P., & Roll, D. (2000). Expanding the utility of behavioral momentum for youth with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 15, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-078X(200004/06)15:2<99::AID-BIN48>3.0.CO;2-K
Rowan, V. C., & Pear, J. J. (1985). A comparison of the effects of interspersal and concurrent training sequences on acquisition, retention, and generalization of picture names. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6, 127–145.
Rhymer, K. N., & Morgan, S. K. (2005). Comparison of the explicit timing and interspersal intervention: Analysis of problem completion rates, student preference, and teacher acceptability. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14(4), 283–303.
Sanchez-Fort, M. R., Brady, M. P., & Davis, C. A. (1995). Using high-probability requests to increase low-probability communication behavior in young children with severe disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 151–165.
Shadish, W. R., Brasil, I. C. C., Illingworth, D. A., White, K. D., Galindo, R., Nagler, E. D., et al. (2009). Using Ungraph to extract data from image files: Verification of reliability and validity. Behavior Research Methods, 4(1), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.177
Sze, K. M. (2006). Using a high-probability behavioral momentum sequence to teach functional vocabulary to children with autism (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest., 3226277.
Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., & Gonen, O. (2011). Single case research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 1.0). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Retrieved Wedesday, 6th April 2016. Available from singlecaseresearch.org.
Ventola, P., Yang, D., Friedman, H. E., Oosting, D., Wolf, J., Sukhodolsky, D. G., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2015). Heterogeneity of neural mechanisms of response to pivotal response treatment. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 9(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-014-9331-y
Volkert, V. M., Lerman, D. C., Trosclair, N., Addison, L., & Kodak, T. (2008). An exploratory analysis of task-interspersal procedures while teaching object labels to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2008.41-335
Winterling, V., Dunlap, G., & O’Neil, R. E. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behaviors of autistic students. Education and Treatment of Children, 10(2), 105–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
The study did not include participants.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bottini, S., Vetter, J., McArdell, L. et al. Task Interspersal: a Meta-Analytic Review of Effective Programming. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 5, 119–128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0127-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0127-7