Skip to main content
Log in

Dorsal scapholunate interosseous ligament: ultrasound evaluation between dominant and non-dominant wrist in young sports patients

  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The dorsal component of the scapholunate ligament, is the strongest component, in fact it has a maximum tensile strength of 300 N and mainly controls flexion and extension. In a recent study, the thickness and length of the dorsal component of SLIL was measured using ultrasound image, the length of the dorsal scapholunate ligament was 7.5 mm ± 1.4 mm and the thickness of 1.8 mm ± 0.4 mm. We evaluate 60 wrists of 30 young athletic volunteers with ultra-sound image, comparing the thickness variations of the dorsal component of SLIL between the dominant and non-dominant wrist, to confirm our hypothesis that the dorsal component SLIL has proprioceptive activity and therefore the thickness of the ligament increases in following wrist activity.

Methods

With a high-frequency ultrasound probe > 15 MHz (Sonoscape X3 Pro) we evaluated 60 wrists of 30 young men (16 males and 14 females, 20–38 years old) manual sports volunteers (10 tennis players, 8 padel players, 7 swimmers, 5 weight lifters) with no recent ligament injuries of the hand or wrist to participate in the study, we compared the dorsal component of SLIL between the dominant and non-dominant wrist.

Results

Dorsal SLIL was visualized in all 60 volunteers wrists. We measured an average scapholunate dorsal ligament length 7.7 mm and average thickness of 2.3 mm in the dominant wrist and average 7.2 mm in length and average 1.9 mm thickness in the non dominant wrist. The mean dorsal scapholunate interval was average 4.9 mm and the mean central interval was average 2.1 mm in the dominant wrist and 4.7 mm and 1.8 mm in the non dominant wrist, so that meas-urements remained unchanged with those reported by previous authors.

Conclusions

In our study we ultrasonographically measured an average scapholunate dorsal ligament length 7.7 mm and average thickness of 2.3 mm in the dominant wrist and average 7.2 mm in length and average 1.9 mm thickness in the non dominant wrist. This confirms our hypothesis that there is a direct stimulus on the ligamentous component of the dor-sal SLIL in the dominant wrist following repeated uses and activities such as to cause an increase in thickness of the dorsal ligament to highlight the possibility of a proprioceptivity of the ligament if subjected to continuous training.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger RA (1996) The gross and histologic anatomy of the scapholunate interosseous ligament. J Hand Surg 21(2):170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80096-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Manske MC, Huang JI (2018) The quantitative anatomy of the dorsal scapholunate interosseous ligament. Hand. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718798846

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pappou IP, Basel J, Deal DN (2013) Scapholunate ligament injuries: a review of current concepts. HAND 8(2):146–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9499-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dao KD, Dolomon DJ, Shin AY et al (2004) The efficacy of ultrasound in the evaluation of dynamic scapholunate ligamentous instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(7):1473–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Short WH, Werner FW, Green JK, Masaoka S (2002) Biomechanical evaluation of ligamentous stabilizers of the scaphoid and lunate. J Hand Surg 27(6):991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.35878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Waters MS, Werner FW, Haddad SF et al (2016) Biomechanical evaluation of scaphoid and lunate kinematics following selective sectioning of portions of the scapholunate interosseous ligament. J Hand Surg Am 41(2):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodriguez RM, Ernat JJ (2019) Ultrasonography for dorsal-sided wrist pain in a combat environment: technique, pearls, and a case report of dynamic evaluation of the scapholunate ligament. Mil Med. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JC, Healy JC (2005) Normal sonographic anatomy of the wrist and hand. Radiographics 25(6):1577–1590. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.256055028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Olchowy C, Łasecki M, Zaleska-Dorobisz U (2015) Wrist ultrasound examination – scanning technique and ultrasound anatomy. Part 1: dorsal wrist. J Ultrasonogr 61:172–188. https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2015.0015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gitto S, Draghi F (2016) Normal sonographic anatomy of the wrist with emphasis on assessment of tendons, nerves, and ligaments. J Ultrasound Med 35(5):1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.06105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Della Rosa N, Sapino G, Vita F, di Summa PG, Adani R (2020) Modified Viegas dorsal capsuloplasty for chronic partial injury of the scapholunate ligament in young athletes: outcomes at 24 months. J Hand Surg (Eur Vol). https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193420939490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kendi ATK, Güdemez E (2006) Sonographic evaluation of scapholunate ligament: value of tissue harmonic imaging. J Clin Ultrasound 34(3):109–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boutry N, Lapegue F, Masi L, Claret A, Demondion X, Cotten A (2005) Ultrasonographic evaluation of normal extrinsic and intrinsic carpal ligaments: preliminary experience. Skeletal Radiol 34(9):513–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0929-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith DK (1993) Dorsal carpal ligaments of the wrist: normal appearance on multiplanar reconstructions of three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 161(1):119–125. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.1.8517289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayfield JK, Johnson RP, Kilcoyne RF (1976) The ligaments of the human wrist and their functional significance. Anat Rec 186(3):417–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091860307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Giulia Zoggia for the english correction of the article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VF, DRN and GS researched literature and conceived the study. VF, DD and FP wrote the first draft of the manuscript. TG corrected the English language of the article. AR, FC and DRN reviewed, edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vita Fabio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study for their anonimyzed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fabio, V., Danilo, D., Cesare, F. et al. Dorsal scapholunate interosseous ligament: ultrasound evaluation between dominant and non-dominant wrist in young sports patients. J Ultrasound 25, 579–584 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-021-00626-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-021-00626-3

Keywords

Navigation