Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of pubic symphysis ultrasound in the detection of unstable pelvis in polytrauma patients during e-FAST: the value of FAST–PLUS protocol. A preliminary experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Extended focused abdominal sonography for trauma (e-FAST) is part of the primary survey in patients with high-energy trauma. However, it does not identify patients with retroperitoneal haemorrhage associated with significant pelvic trauma. A traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis, as well as an ‘open book’ (OB) pelvic injury, is a diagnostic clue to recognize unstable pelvis with higher risk of bleeding. FAST–PLUS (FAST–PL pleural –US ultrasound of symphysis) protocol is an addendum to the e-FAST, which takes into account the study of the pubic symphysis in a single transverse scan after the traditional focused evaluation of the abdomen and thorax.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to determine the value of FAST–PLUS protocol in the evaluation of pubic symphysis injuries and the identification of ‘open book’ (OB) unstable pelvic fractures.

Methods

Between January 2018 and December 2019, we retrospectively reviewed 67 polytraumatised patients with clinical suspicion of pelvic instability and with known anteroposterior pelvis compression injuries who underwent e-FAST with an additional transverse scan of the pubic symphysis, named the FAST–PLUS protocol and computed tomography (CT) exam in order to assess the correlation between them in defining the presence or absence of pubic symphyseal widening (SW). A cutoff value of 2.5 cm in transverse diameter was used to diagnose OB unstable pelvic injury. The results were analysed using Cohen's test, which uses the Kappa value as the reference index.

Results

The analysis carried out to assess the degree of agreement between FAST–PLUS and CT showed 5/67 patients (7.5%) with a critical pubic SW (> 2.5 cm transverse diameter) suggestive of unstable OB pelvic injury and 62/67 (92,5%) without any signs of SW at FAST–PLUS. At CT, findings of unstable OB pelvic fracture were confirmed in all patients with positive results at FAST–PLUS. Similarly, all patients with negative results for critical pubic SW (< 2.5 cm in transverse diameter) at FAST–PLUS were found to be negative at CT exam. The level of correlation between the two methods was high (Kappa value = 1)

Conclusion

The FAST–PLUS protocol shows a high correlation with CT exam, which is the gold standard for the detection of unstable pubic SW, as well as OB pelvic injury, in polytraumatised patients. Inclusion of FAST–PLUS in patient management in the shock room may lead to a quicker identification of patients with unstable pelvis and to faster therapeutic work-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Toutouzas K et al (2002) Pelvic fractures: epidemiology and predictors of associated abdominal injuries and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 195:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Flint L, Cryer HG (2010) Pelvic fracture: the last 50 years. J Trauma 69:483–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCormak R, Strauss EJ, Alwatter BJ et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of pelvic fractures. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 68:281–291

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trainham L, Rizzolo D, Diwan A et al (2015) Emergency management of high-energy pelvic trauma. JAAPA 28:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon W, Kim JK, Jeong YY et al (2004) Pelvic arterial hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fractures: detection with contrast-enhanced CT. RadioGraphics 24:1591–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pennal GF, Tile M, Waddell JP et al (1980) Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:12–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gertzbein SD, Chenoweth DR (1977) Occult injuries of the pelvic ring. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:202–207

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stahel PF, Hammerberg EM (2016) History of pelvic fracture management: a review. World J Emerg Surg 11:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaidya R, Scott AN, Tonnos F et al (2016) Patients with pelvic fractures from blunt trauma. What is the cause of mortality and when? Am J Surg 211:495–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chong KH, DeCoster T, Osler T et al (1997) Pelvic fractures and mortality. Iowa Orthop J 17:110–114

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampson MA, Colquhoun KBM, Hennessy NLM (2006) Computed tomography whole body imaging in multi-trauma: 7 years experience. Clin Radiol 61:365–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trinci M, Piccolo CL, Ferrari R et al (2019) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. J Ultrasound 22:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Piccolo CL, Trinci M, Pinto A (2018) Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis and management of traumatic splenic injuries. J Ultrasound 21:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moylan M, Newgard CD, Ma OJ et al (2007) Association between a positive ED FAST examination and therapeutic laparotomy in normotensive blunt trauma patients. J Emerg Med. 33:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ianniello S, Di Giacomo V, Sessa B et al (2014) First-line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of e-FAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Radiol Med 119:674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ianniello S, Piccolo CL, Trinci M (2019) Extended-FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma: time to revisit ATLS imaging approach? J Ultrasound 22:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Sehouli J et al (2005) Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(9):004446

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB et al (2005) Prospective evaluation of hand-held focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in blunt abdominal trauma. Can J Surg 48:453–460

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Poletti PA, Wintermark M, Schnyder P et al (2002) Traumatic injuries: role of imaging in the management of the polytrauma victim (conservative expectation). Eur Radiol 12:969–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Becker I, Woodley SJ, Stringer MD (2010) The adult human pubic symphysis: a systematic review. J Anat 217:475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bauman M, Marinaro J, Tawil I et al (2011) Ultrasonographic determination of pubic symphyseal widening in trauma: the FAST-PS Study. J Emerg Med 40:528–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Authors declare that they do not receive any funding for the publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Radiology, S. Camillo Hospital, C.ne Gianicolense, 87, 00152, Rome, Italy

    Stefania Ianniello, Paola Conte, Margherita Trinci & Michele Galluzzo

  2. Department of General and Emergency Radiology, “Antonio Cardarelli” Hospital, Naples, Italy

    Marco Di Serafino

  3. Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

    Vittorio Miele

  4. Department of Life and Health, “Vincenzo Tiberio” University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy

    Gianfranco Vallone

Authors
  1. Stefania Ianniello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paola Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Di Serafino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vittorio Miele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Margherita Trinci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gianfranco Vallone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michele Galluzzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Ianniello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was acquired.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ianniello, S., Conte, P., Di Serafino, M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of pubic symphysis ultrasound in the detection of unstable pelvis in polytrauma patients during e-FAST: the value of FAST–PLUS protocol. A preliminary experience. J Ultrasound 24, 423–428 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00483-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00483-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation