Abstract
Purpose of Review
Mosquito-borne diseases are a serious concern in Europe since the proliferation of invasive mosquito species increases the risk of epidemics. Aedes spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) are among the most dangerous mosquito vectors in Europe. Among Aedes spp., less attention has been paid to the North American invasive species, Aedes atropalpus and Aedes triseriatus, although these species are vectors of serious diseases. This article aims to provide information about the current status and prospective of these species in Europe.
Recent Findings
While the presence of Ae. atropalpus in the European continent is still debated, Ae. triseriatus is no longer present in the European continent, but accidental introductions have been recently reported. Nevertheless, the climatic changes and global market increase the possibility of introduction of North American Aedes species in Europe.
Summary
The present article contains a brief overview of the biology, ecology, and vector competence of these two mosquito vectors, outlining their potential to invade new areas and medical importance. We highlighted some bioecological traits that need to be considered to design surveillance programs tailored for these species. Lastly, research challenges aimed to improve basic knowledge and control programs targeting these species are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since the first report of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) in Europe, dating back to 1979 in Albania, concerns about the establishment of invasive mosquito vectors started rising [1]. The subsequent detection of this species in Italy in 1990 revealed how much the risk was real and increased the concerns also about the possible role of invasive Aedes spp. in the transmission and diffusion of exotic pathogens and parasites [2, 3]. Mosquito vectors are responsible for the transmission of several human and animal pathogens. The majority of mosquitoes of epidemiological importance are invasive species, such as Ae. albopictus, Aedes aegypti (L.), and Culex quinquefasciatus Say [4–6]. Nevertheless, almost 20 years have passed since the first cases of pathogen transmission to humans by Aedes species in the European continent, when chikungunya virus (CHIKV) first spread in Northern Italy in 2007, causing more than 200 reported cases [7,8,9]. Subsequent CHIKV and dengue virus (DENV) outbreaks were also reported in Southern France in 2010 [10, 11]. In this scenario, surveillance and preventive programs have been carried out to assess the presence and establishment of invasive mosquito species, although less attention has been paid to North American Aedes species.
Invasive Mosquito Vectors in Europe: Let Us Make the Point
Through the last two decades, European countries have faced repeated outbreaks of diseases transmitted by invasive mosquito vectors, due to sporadic inoculation, as well as permanent establishment among the native fauna, of invasive alien Aedes species [2]. The emergence of vector-borne diseases could be ascribed to several factors, including global trade, urbanization processes, as well as climate changes [12••]. The reduced biodiversity of urban areas and favourable conditions for mosquito proliferation, coupled with the increase in human population density and availability of artificial breeding sites can facilitate the proliferation of mosquito vector species. Consequently, species adapted to urban environments can potentially expand their range to densely populated non-endemic regions increasing the risk of arbovirus outbreaks [13].
In Europe, the native African species, Ae. aegypti, and the three indigenous Asian species, Ae. albopictus, Ae. japonicus japonicus (Theobald), and Ae. koreicus (Edwards) are the most widely known invasive vector mosquitoes. These species have the highest epidemiological importance in the region and are commonly targeted species by the local health authorities [14]. Moreover, two additional Aedes species native to the North American continent have been detected in Europe, Aedes atropalpus (Coquillett) and Ae. triseriatus (Say). These species can add another layer of complexity to the already complex epidemiology of arbovirus transmission in European countries [2].
North American Invasive Aedes Species
In Europe, two Aedes invasive species from North America have been reported, Ae. atropalpus and Ae. triseriatus. The presence of Ae. atropalpus in the continent is still debated, while Ae. triseriatus is no longer present in the European continent (Fig. 1) [2, 15, 16]. The occurrence of periodical invasions, driven by commercial exchanges, should be carefully considered to inform surveillance activities and improve arbovirus preparedness and response. Indeed, the lack of reliable information and the limitations of mosquito surveillance techniques can lead to the failure to detect or to the underestimating of the presence and abundance of species with low population densities or if their biology and behaviors are dissimilar from the attractants used by the mosquito traps designed for anthropophilic species [17, 18]. Unfortunately, this could be the case for the two North American species Ae. atropalpus and Ae. triseriatus.
This article provides a short overview of the invasion potential, biology, ecology, and vector competence of Ae. atropalpus and Ae. triseriatus. In the last sections, vector control challenges for public health are outlined.
Aedes atropalpus
Aedes atropalpus, also known as the American rock pool mosquito (Fig. 2), is a riparian species native to North-East America (Fig. 1), which adapted to develop also in urban areas using artificial containers as breeding sites [2]. Aedes atropalpus is a competent vector for several pathogens, including La Crosse and West Nile virus, although it seems to have limited medical importance in the field [19••, 20, 21].
The species is widely present in the North American continent [22], and it has been introduced several times in Europe through the importation of used tires containing non-desiccating eggs of Ae. atropalpus [23]. The first documented detections occurred in 1996 and 1997 in northern Italy [24•, 25], followed by France and the Netherlands in the 2000s [2, 20]. It has been reported that Ae. atropalpus was able to develop and reproduce for a short period of time in well-defined areas [2]; then, it has been eliminated by public health authorities from France in 2003 and 2005 and Switzerland in 2008 [15]. However, information on the presence of Ae. atropalpus in Italy and the Netherlands are contrasting. Indeed, it has been affirmed that the species has been eliminated from both countries through insecticide-based interventions [2, 16, 20, 24•, 25]. However, according to WRBU [15], Ae. atropalpus is established in Italy and the Netherlands (Fig. 1). The low dispersal ability due to Ae. atropalpus limited flight ability makes this species more abundant around natural aquatic habitats [21]. In addition, although this species prefers warm aquatic environments [26], its ability to acclimate to colder climates in Northern Europe cannot be discarded due to its distribution in Northern America [27].
Conversely to many other Aedes species, Ae. atropalpus females do not require blood meals to produce fertile eggs, which are usually oviposited directly on the water surface [28]. However, Ae. atropalpus are active biters both during day and night and can feed on several mammalian and bird hosts, including humans [21]. Nevertheless, the ability to reproduce independently from blood meals permits this species to produce eggs earlier in the spring season compared to other Aedes mosquitoes and to gain a competitive advantage [22, 28].
Aedes triseriatus
Aedes triseriatus (Fig. 3) is a species native to hardwood forests of Eastern and Central North America (Fig. 1) [29] and was detected in Europe once in 2004 in France. It is believed that it was introduced throughout the importation of used tires from the USA and promptly eliminated [30]. Aedes triseriatus is specifically a diurnal biter [21] and a zoophilic species, which can opportunistically bite humans [31••]. In the North American continent, this species is the key vector for the La Crosse virus [29, 32], and it is a competent vector for several pathogens, including West Nile virus and dengue [31••, 33,34,35,36].
There is still no evidence that this species can successfully invade and colonize Europe; nevertheless, despite its preference for tree holes in rural and forest areas, it is able to easily breed in artificial containers in sub-urban areas [37]. Furthermore, Ae. triseriatus can produce diapausing overwintering eggs and the hatched larvae are even able to overwinter in semi-frozen aquatic habitats [29, 37], suggesting that this species adapt to the colder climate of Northern Europe competing with the other invasive mosquito species Ae. japonicus japonicus [38].
Conclusions and Future Challenges
The dispersion, establishment, and colonization of new areas by alien mosquito species are well documented in Europe; however, the mechanisms employed by invasive mosquito species to invade and colonize urban and rural environments still need to be clarified. Furthermore, guidelines to prevent the invasion of new areas by populations of vector mosquito species are still largely neglected by institutions, in comparison to surveillance and monitoring campaigns [17]. Nevertheless, the common surveillance techniques used for invasive mosquito vector species concentrate on artificial container breeding species and in urban areas, where the risk of disease transmission is higher. Furthermore, by neglecting mosquito surveillance at important points of entry to allow the early detection of invasive species, the effort needed to eradicate the target invasive species upon detection in populous urban areas would be considerably higher [39]. On the other hand, the two above-described invasive mosquito species preferentially breed in rural and natural habitats, where the monitoring implies higher operational and labor costs. In this context, digital technologies and smart trap development can be useful to facilitate monitoring activity in marginal and remote environments [40, 41]. Indeed, capillary surveillance programs in the rural areas would probably reveal differences in the relative abundance of invasive vector mosquitoes compared to urban areas. The marginality of those areas should not make underestimate their potentiality as reservoir and habitat for several noxious mosquito species, including preferential zoophilic species which can contribute to spillover events.
Aedes atropalpus and Ae. triseriatus are among the most important native North American mosquito vectors, transmitting several endemic pathogens, such as California encephalitis virus, La Crosse virus, Jamestown Canyon virus, Rift Valley fever virus, and St. Louis encephalitis virus [19••, 20, 29, 32, 34, 42]. However, the danger of these invasive species pose to Europe could be underestimated or set aside compared to other invasive mosquito vector species. Thus, further studies about the basic ecology and behavior of these species should be encouraged to unveil their potential to invade Europe and their importance as vectors to assess the current and future risks related to these invasive species [43].
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Benelli G, Wilke ABB, Beier JC. Aedes albopictus (Asian Tiger Mosquito). Trends Parasitol. 2020;36:942–3.
Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Versteirt V, Cull B, Kampen H, Fontenille D, et al. An entomological review of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Bull Entomol Res. 2015;105:637–63.
Benelli G, Mehlhorn H. Declining malaria, rising of dengue and Zika virus: insights for mosquito vector control. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:1747–54.
Kamal M, Kenawy MA, Rady MH, Khaled AS, Samy AM. Mapping the global potential distributions of two arboviral vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus under changing climate. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0210122.
Samy AM, Elaagip AH, Kenawy MA, Ayres CFJ, Peterson AT, Soliman DE. Climate Change influences on the global potential distribution of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus, vector of West Nile Virus and Lymphatic Filariasis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0163863.
di Giovanni F, Wilke ABB, Beier JC, Pombi M, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Desneux N, et al. Parasitic strategies of arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. Entomol Gen. 2021;41:511–22.
Angelini R, Finarelli AC, Angelini P, Po C, Petropulacos K, Macini P, et al. An outbreak of chikungunya fever in the province of Ravenna. Italy Euro Surveill. 2007;12:3260.
Angelini R, Finarelli AC, Angelini P, Po C, Petropulacos K, Silvi G, et al. Chikungunya in north-eastern Italy: a summing up of the outbreak. Euro Surveill. 2007;12:3313.
Rezza G, Nicoletti L, Angelini R, Romi R, Finarelli A, Panning M, et al. Infection with chikungunya virus in Italy: an outbreak in a temperate region. The Lancet. 2007;370:1840–6.
Grandadam M, Caro V, Plumet S, Thiberge JM, Souarès Y, Failloux AB, et al. Chikungunya Virus, Southeastern France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:910.
la Ruche G, Souarès Y, Armengaud A, Peloux-Petiot F, Delaunay P, Desprès P, et al. First two autochthonous dengue virus infections in metropolitan France, September 2010. Euro Surveill. 2010;15:1–5.
•• Wilke ABB, Benelli G, Beier JC. Anthropogenic changes and associated impacts on vector-borne diseases. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37:1027–30. Forum article outlining how, when and why anthropogenic habitat modifications can affect vector populations and the spread vector-borne diseases.
Wilke ABB, Chase C, Vasquez C, Carvajal A, Medina J, Petrie WD, et al. Urbanization creates diverse aquatic habitats for immature mosquitoes in urban areas. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–11.
Brugueras S, Fernández-Martínez B, Martínez-de la Puente J, Figuerola J, Porro TM, Rius C, et al. Environmental drivers, climate change and emergent diseases transmitted by mosquitoes and their vectors in southern Europe: A systematic review. Environ Res. 2020;191:110038.
Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit (WRBU), Aedes atropalpus (Coquillett, 1902). 2021;https://wrbu.si.edu/vectorspecies/mosquitoes/atropalpus [access: November, 9 2022].
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Aedes atropalpus - current known distribution: March 2022. 2022; https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/aedes-atropalpus-current-known-distribution-march-2022 [access: November, 9 2022].
Kampen H, Medlock JM, Vaux AGC, Koenraadt CJM, van Vliet AJH, Bartumeus F, et al. Approaches to passive mosquito surveillance in the EU. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:1–13.
Koban MB, Kampen H, Scheuch DE, Frueh L, Kuhlisch C, Janssen N, et al. The Asian bush mosquito Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Europe, 17 years after its first detection, with a focus on monitoring methods. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:1–13.
•• Freier JE, Beier JC. Oral and transovarial transmission of La Crosse virus by Aedes atropalpus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33:708–14. The study provides clear evidence of the transmission dynamics of La Cross virus in its mosquito vector Aedes atropalpus.
Scholte EJ, den Hartog W, Braks M, Reusken C, Dik M, Hessels A. First report of a North American invasive mosquito species Ochlerotatus atropalpus (Coquillett) in the Netherlands, 2009. Euro Surveill. 2009;14:19400.
Turell MJ, Dohm DJ, Sardelis MR, O’Guinn ML, Andreadis TG, Blow JA. An update on the potential of North American mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit West Nile Virus. J Med Entomol. 2005;42:57–62.
Juliano SA, Philip LL. Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health. Ecol Lett. 2005;8:558–74.
Cebrián-Camisón S, de la Puente JM, Figuerola J. A literature review of host feeding patterns of invasive Aedes mosquitoes in Europe. Insects. 2020;11:848.
• Romi R, Sabatinelli G, Savelli LG, Raris M, Zago M, Malatesta R. Identification of a North American mosquito species, Aedes atropalpus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Italy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1997;13:245–6. Aedes atropalpus firstly reported in Italy.
Romi R, di Luca M, Majori G. Current status of Aedes albopictus and Aedes atropalpus in Italy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999;15:425–7.
Andreadis TG, Wolfe RJ. Evidence for reduction of native mosquitoes with increased expansion of invasive Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Northeastern United States. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:43–52.
Armistead JS, Nishimura N, Escher RL, Lounibos LP. Larval competition between Aedes japonicus and Aedes atropalpus (Diptera: Culicidae) in simulated rock pools. J Vector Ecol. 2008;33:238–46.
Yee DA. Tires as habitats for mosquitoes: A review of studies within the Eastern United States. J Med Entomol. 2008;45:581–93.
Borucki MK, Kempf BJ, Blitvich BJ, Blair CD, Beaty BJ. La Crosse virus: replication in vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Microbes Infect. 2002;4:341–50.
Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Schaffner F, Versteirt V, Hendrickx G, Zeller H, et al. A review of the invasive mosquitoes in Europe: Ecology, public health risks, and control options. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:435–47.
•• Freier JE, Grimstad PR. Transmission of dengue virus by orally infected Aedes triseriatus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:1429–34. The study provides evidence of the transmission dynamics of dengue virus in its mosquito vector Aedes triseriatus.
McJunkin JE, De los Reyes EC, Irazuzta JE, Caceres MJ, Khan TR, Minnich LL, et al. La Crosse encephalitis in children. New England J Med. 2001;344(11):801–7.
Aliota MT, Peinado SA, Osorio JE, Bartholomay LC. Culex pipiens and Aedes triseriatus mosquito susceptibility to Zika Virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1857.
Andreadis TG, Anderson JF, Armstrong PM, Main AJ. Isolations of Jamestown Canyon virus (Bunyaviridae: Orthobunyavirus) from field-collected mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Connecticut, USA: a ten-year analysis, 1997–2006. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:175–89.
Davis MH, Hogge AL, Corristan EC, Ferrell JF. Mosquito transmission of Venezuelan Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus from experimentally infected dogs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966;15:227–30.
Styer LM, Kent KA, Albright RG, Bennett CJ, Kramer LD, Bernard KA. Mosquitoes inoculate high doses of West Nile Virus as they probe and feed on live hosts. PLoS ONE. 2007;3:e132.
Khatchikian CE, Dennehy JJ, Vitek CJ, Livdahl T. Climate and geographic trends in hatch delay of the treehole mosquito, Aedes triseriatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Ecol. 2009;34:119–28.
Alto BW. Interspecific larval competition between invasive Aedes japonicus and native Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) and adult longevity. J Med Entomol. 2011;48:232–42.
Schaffner F, Medlock JM, van Bortel W. Public health significance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect Elsevier. 2013;19:685–92.
González MI, Encarnação J, Aranda C, Osório H, Montalvo T, Talavera S. The use of artificial intelligence and automatic remote monitoring for mosquito surveillance. Ecol Control Vector Borne Dis. 2022;7:211–23.
Johnson BJ, Manby R, Devine GJ. The use of automated traps to assess the efficacy of insecticide barrier treatments against abundant mosquitoes in remote environments. J Med Entomol. 2022;59:384–9.
Hardy JL, Rosen L, Reeves WC, Scrivani RP, Presser SB. Experimental transovarial transmission of St. Louis encephalitis virus by Culex and Aedes mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33:166–75.
Giunti G, Becker N, Benelli G. Invasive mosquito vectors in Europe: from bioecology to surveillance and management. Acta Trop. 2023;239:106832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.106832.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Carnegie Institution of Washington and K. Copas, iNaturalist, as well as to Dr. Pratt, Dr. H. Weinburgh, and Dr. J. Gathany (CDC-PHIL) for providing the Ae. atropalpus and Ae. triseriatus photos presented in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. Images included in the Figs. 2 and 3 are of public domain and thus free of copyright restrictions. Original images are freely available at the CDC Public Health Library, https://phil.cdc.gov.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università di Pisa within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Tropical Medicine in the Mediterranean Region
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Giunti, G., Wilke, A.B.B., Beier, J.C. et al. What Do We Know About the Invasive Mosquitoes Aedes atropalpus and Aedes triseriatus?. Curr Trop Med Rep 10, 41–46 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-023-00284-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-023-00284-x