Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Link Between Problem Behavior and Communication Impairment in Persons with Developmental Disabilities

  • Communication Disorders (J Sigafoos, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Developmental Disorders Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Functional communication training (FCT) is rooted in the theory that if people with developmental disabilities (DD) have a socially appropriate way (i.e., communication) to get their needs or wants met, they will no longer need to resort to problem behavior. This review will examine the history of the link between problem behavior and communication impairment in individuals with DD as well as recent advances in research on FCT and directions for future research.

Recent Findings

Teaching people with DD a functional communication response (FCR) leads to a decrease in problem behaviors, provided that the FCR is at least as efficient as the problem behavior. Recent findings suggest ways to mitigate the resurgence of problem behavior as well as the importance of teaching an FCR that is acceptable to caretakers and addressing cognitive obstacles that may interfere with caretakers’ ability to carry out FCT.

Summary

Through programming for maintenance and generalization of the FCR as well as addressing the needs of caretakers when teaching them to implement and sustain FCT, we can improve outcomes for individuals with DD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Plato. The laws. London: J.M. Dent; circa 348 BC/1960, p. 174.

  2. Rousseau JJ. Emile. New York: basic books; 1762/1979, p. 77.

  3. Van Daal J, Verhoeven L, Van Balkom H. Behaviour problems in children with language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48:1139–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01790.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. •• Curtis PR, Frey JR, Watson CD, Hampton LH, Roberts MY. Language disorders and problem behaviors: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2018;142:e20173551. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3551 This study found that children with language disorders exhibited greater rates of problem behaviors than typically developing children.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Durand VM, Moskowitz L. Functional communication training: thirty years of treating challenging behavior. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2015;35:116–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415569509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Durand VM. Severe behavior problems: a functional communication training approach. New York: Guilford Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carr EG, Durand VM. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985;18:111–26. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. LaRue R, Weiss MJ, Cable MK. Functional communication training: the role of speech pathologists and behavior analysts in serving students with autism. J Speech Lang Pathol Appl Behav Anal. 2009;3:164–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richman DM, Wacker DP, Winborn L. Response efficiency during functional communication training: effects of effort on response allocation. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013;34:73–6. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz PF, Boelter EW, Jarmolowicz DP, Chin MD, Hagopian LP. An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:2935–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heath AK, Ganz JB, Parker R, Burke M, Ninci J. A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Rev J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;2:155–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0044-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong C, Odom S, Hume KA, Cox AW, Fettig A, Kucharczyk S, et al. Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:1951–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bambara LM, Mitchell-Kvacky NA. Positive behavioral support for students with severe disabilities: an emerging multicomponent approach for addressing challenging behaviors. Sch Psychol Rev. 1994;23:263–78.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Durand VM, Merges E. Functional communication training: a contemporary behavior analytic intervention for problem behaviors. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2001;16:110–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760101600207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Durand VM, Merges E. Functional communication training to treat challenging behavior. In: O’Donohue W, Fisher JE, editors. General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Halle JW, Ostrosky MM, Hemmeter ML. Functional communication training. In: McCauley RA, Fey M, editors. Treatment of language disorders in children: conventional and controversial treatments. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mancil GR. Functional communication training: a review of the literature related to children with autism. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2006;41:213–24.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matson JL, Dixon DR, Matson ML. Assessing and treating aggression in children and adolescents with developmental disabilities: a 20-year overview. Educ Psychol. 2005;2–3:151–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000301148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Petscher ES, Rey C, Bailey JS. A review of empirical support for differential reinforcement of alternative behavior. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:409–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirenda P. Supporting individuals with challenging behavior through functional communication training and AAC: research review. Augment Altern Commun. 2009;13:207–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619712331278048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schindler HR, Horner HR. Generalized reduction of problem behavior of young children with autism: building trans-situational interventions. Am J Ment Retard. 2005;110:36–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Volkert VM, Lerman DC, Call NA, Trosclair-Lasserre N. An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013;42:145–60. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. • Kimball RT, Kelley ME, Podlesnik CA, Forton A, Hinkle B. Resurgence with and without an alternative response. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018;51:154–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.466 This study found that more robust resurgence might occur if the alternative communication response is absent than if the alternative response is placed on extinction.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Horner RH, Day HM. The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991;24:719–32. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wacker DP, Harding JW, Berg WK, Lee JF, Schieltz KM, Padilla YC, et al. An evaluation of persistence of treatment effects during long-term treatment of destructive behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011;96:261–82. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2011.96-261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. • Briggs AM, Fisher WW, Greer BD, Kimball RT. Prevalence of resurgence of destructive behavior when thinning reinforcement schedules during functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018;51:620–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.472 This study evaluated the prevalence of resurgence of problem behavior after reinforcement for the functional communication response is thinned.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Ringdahl JE, St. Peter C. Resurgence: the unintended maintenance of problem behavior. Educ Treat Child. 2017;40:7–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0002 This article provides a helpful discussion of resurgence of problem behavior, including ways to prevent or mitigate resurgence and program for maintenance.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hagopian LP, Fisher WW, Sullivan MT, Acquisto J, LeBlanc LA. Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: a summary of 21 inpatient cases. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013;31:211–35. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fisher WW, Thompson RH, Hagopian LP, Bowman LG, Krug A. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behav Modif. 2000;24:3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500241001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hanley GP, Iwata BA, Thompson RH. Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013;34:17–38. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fisher WW, Greer BD, Querim AC, DeRosa N. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:2614–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roane HS, Fisher WW, Sgro GM, Falcomata TS, Pabico RR. An alternative method of thinning reinforcer delivery during differential reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 2004;37:213–8. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. • Saini V, Sullivan WE, Baxter EL, De Rosa NM, Roane HS. Renewal during functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018;51:603–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.471 This study examined the relapse of problem behavior following successful FCT and factors that contributed to that relapse.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. • Kestner KM, Peterson SM, Wacker DP. Introduction to the special section on resurgence. Educ Treat Child. 2017;40:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0000 This study provides an overview of resurgence and its importance to practitioners.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fisher WW, Greer BD, Fuhrman AM, Querim AC. Using multiple schedules during functional communication training to promote rapid transfer of treatment effects. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015;48:713–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tiger JH, Hanley GP, Bruzek J. Functional communication training: a review and practical guide. Behav Anal Pract. 2008;1:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. • Neely S, Garcia E, Bankston B, Green A. Generalization and maintenance of functional communication training for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic and quality review. Res Dev Disabil. 2018;79:116–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.002 This study synthesized studies on the maintenance and generalization of effects following FCT, finding that most studies did not implement additional maintenance/generalization strategies.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stokes TF, Baer DM. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977;10:349–67. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. •• Wacker DP, Schieltz KM, Berg WK, Harding JW, Padilla Dalmau YC, Lee JF. The long-term effects of functional communication training conducted in young children’s home settings. Educ Treat Child. 2017;40:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0003 This study describes results of a series of studies that involved FCT conducted in children’s homes by their parents and discusses defining maintenance as the persistence of treatment effects in the face of treatment challenges.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moes DR, Frea WD. Contextualized behavioral support in early intervention for children with autism and their families. J Autism Dev Disord. 2002;32:519–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021298729297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. • Ghaemmaghami M, Hanley GP, Jessel J, Landa R. Shaping complex functional communication responses. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018;51:502–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.468 This study described an effective shaping process to develop complex functional communication responses (FCRs) from simple FCRs without resurgence of problem behavior.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Durand VM. Optimistic parenting: hope and help for you and your challenging child. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Durand VM, Hieneman M, Clarke S, Wang M, Rinaldi ML. Positive family intervention for severe challenging behavior I: a multisite randomized clinical trial. J Posit Behav Interv. 2013;15:133–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300712458324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Durand VM, Hieneman M. Helping parents with challenging children positive family intervention facilitator guide. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, 140 7th Avenue South, TER 404, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA

    V. Mark Durand

  2. St. John’s University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA

    Lauren J. Moskowitz

Authors
  1. V. Mark Durand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren J. Moskowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Mark Durand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Collection on Communication Disorders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durand, V.M., Moskowitz, L.J. The Link Between Problem Behavior and Communication Impairment in Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Curr Dev Disord Rep 6, 138–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-019-00172-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-019-00172-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation