Abstract
The Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative (ODBC) was formed in 2003 in response to a widening gap between the number of available organs and the number of patients wait listed for transplantation, as well as recognition of a potential to avail a large pool of donor organs. It made an immediate impact by increasing the number of donations and of organs procured. As the bulk of the organs came from an expanded donor pool, the impact on organ use varied somewhat. The discard rates for kidneys, a life-sustaining organ, increased significantly. A substantial effort to decrease organ discards has raised questions over whether “every organ every time” is in the best interest of kidney transplantation. This article is based on currently available data and reviews the circumstances that led to the formation of the ODBC and its short- and long-term impact on kidney transplantation. We question whether this is the right direction for the current situation and discuss whether there might be other potential avenues to pursue in bridging this divide.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance
United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Annual data report 2015. Available at http://www.usrds.org/adr.aspx. Accessed on 1/3/2016.
Punch JD, Hayes DH, LaPorte FB, McBride V, Seely MS. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1996-2005. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:1327–38.
Shafer TJ, Wagner D, Chessare J, et al. US organ collaborative increases organ donation. Crit Care Nurse. 2008;31:190–210.
Graham JM, Sabeta MR, Cooke JT, et al. A system’s approach to improve organ donation. Prog Transplant. 2009;19:216–20.
Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2013 annual data report. Kidney Am J Transplant. 2015;15:1–34.
OPTN/HRSA National transplantation data reports. Available at https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/latestData/step2.asp. Accessed 01/03/2016.
Shafer TJ, Wagner D, Chessare J, et al. Organ donation breakthrough collaborative: increasing organ donation through system redesign. Crit Care Nurse. 2006;26:33–42. 44-8; quiz 49.
Marks WH, Wagner D, Pearson TC, et al. Organ donation and utilization, 1995-2004: entering the collaborative era. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(5 Pt 2):1101–10.
Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE, et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(7):667–74.
Port FK, Bragg JL, Metzger RA, et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation. 2002;74:1281–6.
Davis BD, Norton HJ, Jacobs DG. The organ donation breakthrough collaborative: has it made a difference? Am J Surg. 2013;205:381–6.
The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI innovation series white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003.
U.S. Government Information on Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation. Available at http://www.organdonor.gov/dtcp/dtcp.html. Accessed on 1/3/2016.
Saidi RF. Changing pattern of organ donation and utilization in the USA. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2012;3(4):149–56.
OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report. Available at http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2012/Default.aspx. Accessed on 1/3/2016.
Saidi RF, Hejazii Kenari SK. Challenges or organ shortage for transplantation: solutions and opportunities. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2014;5(3):87–96.
Israni AJ, Salkowski N, Gustafson S, et al. New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:1842–8. This paper gives a brief summary of the kidney donation and transplantation trends in the USA and explains rationale behind changes in national allocation policy and discusses the effects of this new policy on organ donation and transplantation in the USA.
Massie AB, Luo X, Lonae BE, et al. Early changes in the kidney distribution under the new allocation system. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Dec 17 [Epub ahead of print]. This study provides an excellent summary of changes under the newly implemented kidney allocation system and its impact on kidney transplantation in the USA in the short time since its implementation.
Tanriover B, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, et al. Kidneys at higher risk of discard: expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(2):404–15.
Schold J, Arrington C, Levine G. Significant alterations in reported clinical practice associated with increased oversight of transplant center performance. Prog Transplant. 2010;20(3):279–87.
Abecassis MM, Burke R, Klintmalm GB, et al. American Society of Transplant Surgeons transplant center outcomes requirement: a threat to innovation. Am K Transplant. 2009;9(6):1279–86.
Razdan M, Degenholtz HB, Kahn JM, et al. Breakthrough in the organ donation process and its effect on organ availability. J Transplant. 2015;2015:831501.
Chavalitdhamrong D, Gill J, Takemoto S, et al. Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database. Transplantation. 2008;85(11):1573–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Surendra Shenoy and Adeel S Khan declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Kidney Transplantation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, A.S., Shenoy, S. What Did We Really Learn From the Collaborative? Is It In Our Best Interest to Use “Every Organ Every Time” in Kidney Transplantation?. Curr Transpl Rep 3, 139–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-016-0100-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-016-0100-2