Skip to main content
Log in

What Did We Really Learn From the Collaborative? Is It In Our Best Interest to Use “Every Organ Every Time” in Kidney Transplantation?

  • Kidney Transplantation (M Henry, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Transplantation Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative (ODBC) was formed in 2003 in response to a widening gap between the number of available organs and the number of patients wait listed for transplantation, as well as recognition of a potential to avail a large pool of donor organs. It made an immediate impact by increasing the number of donations and of organs procured. As the bulk of the organs came from an expanded donor pool, the impact on organ use varied somewhat. The discard rates for kidneys, a life-sustaining organ, increased significantly. A substantial effort to decrease organ discards has raised questions over whether “every organ every time” is in the best interest of kidney transplantation. This article is based on currently available data and reviews the circumstances that led to the formation of the ODBC and its short- and long-term impact on kidney transplantation. We question whether this is the right direction for the current situation and discuss whether there might be other potential avenues to pursue in bridging this divide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance

  1. United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Annual data report 2015. Available at http://www.usrds.org/adr.aspx. Accessed on 1/3/2016.

  2. Punch JD, Hayes DH, LaPorte FB, McBride V, Seely MS. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1996-2005. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:1327–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shafer TJ, Wagner D, Chessare J, et al. US organ collaborative increases organ donation. Crit Care Nurse. 2008;31:190–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graham JM, Sabeta MR, Cooke JT, et al. A system’s approach to improve organ donation. Prog Transplant. 2009;19:216–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2013 annual data report. Kidney Am J Transplant. 2015;15:1–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. OPTN/HRSA National transplantation data reports. Available at https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/latestData/step2.asp. Accessed 01/03/2016.

  7. Shafer TJ, Wagner D, Chessare J, et al. Organ donation breakthrough collaborative: increasing organ donation through system redesign. Crit Care Nurse. 2006;26:33–42. 44-8; quiz 49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marks WH, Wagner D, Pearson TC, et al. Organ donation and utilization, 1995-2004: entering the collaborative era. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(5 Pt 2):1101–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE, et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(7):667–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Port FK, Bragg JL, Metzger RA, et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation. 2002;74:1281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis BD, Norton HJ, Jacobs DG. The organ donation breakthrough collaborative: has it made a difference? Am J Surg. 2013;205:381–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI innovation series white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003.

  13. U.S. Government Information on Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation. Available at http://www.organdonor.gov/dtcp/dtcp.html. Accessed on 1/3/2016.

  14. Saidi RF. Changing pattern of organ donation and utilization in the USA. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2012;3(4):149–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report. Available at http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2012/Default.aspx. Accessed on 1/3/2016.

  16. Saidi RF, Hejazii Kenari SK. Challenges or organ shortage for transplantation: solutions and opportunities. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2014;5(3):87–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Israni AJ, Salkowski N, Gustafson S, et al. New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:1842–8. This paper gives a brief summary of the kidney donation and transplantation trends in the USA and explains rationale behind changes in national allocation policy and discusses the effects of this new policy on organ donation and transplantation in the USA.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Massie AB, Luo X, Lonae BE, et al. Early changes in the kidney distribution under the new allocation system. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Dec 17 [Epub ahead of print]. This study provides an excellent summary of changes under the newly implemented kidney allocation system and its impact on kidney transplantation in the USA in the short time since its implementation.

  19. Tanriover B, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, et al. Kidneys at higher risk of discard: expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(2):404–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Schold J, Arrington C, Levine G. Significant alterations in reported clinical practice associated with increased oversight of transplant center performance. Prog Transplant. 2010;20(3):279–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abecassis MM, Burke R, Klintmalm GB, et al. American Society of Transplant Surgeons transplant center outcomes requirement: a threat to innovation. Am K Transplant. 2009;9(6):1279–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Razdan M, Degenholtz HB, Kahn JM, et al. Breakthrough in the organ donation process and its effect on organ availability. J Transplant. 2015;2015:831501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chavalitdhamrong D, Gill J, Takemoto S, et al. Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database. Transplantation. 2008;85(11):1573–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surendra Shenoy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Surendra Shenoy and Adeel S Khan declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Kidney Transplantation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A.S., Shenoy, S. What Did We Really Learn From the Collaborative? Is It In Our Best Interest to Use “Every Organ Every Time” in Kidney Transplantation?. Curr Transpl Rep 3, 139–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-016-0100-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-016-0100-2

Keywords

Navigation