Skip to main content
Log in

On-machine measurement of tool nose radius and wear during precision/ultra-precision machining

  • Published:
Advances in Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tool state exerts a strong influence on surface quality and profile accuracy during precision/ultra-precision machining. However, current on-machine measurement methods cannot precisely obtain the tool nose radius and wear. This study therefore investigated the on-machine measurement of tool nose radius on the order of hundreds of microns and wear on the order of a few microns to tens of microns during precision/ultra-precision machining using the edge reversal method. To provide the necessary replication, pure aluminum and pure copper soft metal substrates were evaluated, with pure copper exhibiting superior performance. The feasibility of the measurement method was then demonstrated by evaluating the replication accuracy using a 3D surface topography instrument; the measurement error was only 0.1%. The wear of the cutting tool was measured using the proposed method to obtain the maximum values for tool arc wear, flank wear, and wear depth of 3.4 µm, 73.5 µm and 3.7 µm, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo J, Wang XY, Zhao Y et al (2021) Recent progress on fabrication technologies and machining performance of textured cutting tools. J Mech Eng 57(13):172–200

  2. Guo J, Zhang JG, Pan YA et al (2020) A critical review on the chemical wear and wear suppression of diamond tools in diamond cutting of ferrous metals. Int J Extrem Manuf 2(1):5–27

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang JG, Li QS, Zhang H et al (2017) Fast generation of micro structured surface by applying PCD tools in micro turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1/4):1165–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li GX, Rahim MZ, Ding SL et al (2016) Performance and wear analysis of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tools manufactured with different methods in turning titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1/4):825–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindvall D, Lenrick F, Persson F et al (2020) Performance and wear mechanisms of PCD and pcBN cutting tools during machining titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Wear 454/455:203329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2020.203329

  6. Li GX, Rahim MZ, Pan WC et al (2020) The manufacturing and the application of polycrystalline diamond tools—a comprehensive review. J Manuf Process 56:400–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G et al (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 9(1):717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawryluk M, Ziemba J, Dworzak L (2017) Development of a method for tool wear analysis using 3D scanning. Metrol Meas Syst 24(4):739–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asai S, Taguchi Y, Horio K et al (1990) Measuring the very small cutting-edge radius for a diamond tool using a new kind of SEM having two detectors. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 39(1):85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Angseryd J, Coronel E, Elfwing M et al (2009) The microstructure of the affected zone of a worn PCBN cutting tool characterised with SEM and TEM. Wear 267(5):1031–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi M, Lane B, Mooney CB et al (2010) Diamond tool wear measurement by electron-beam-induced deposition. Precis Eng 34(4):718–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tosello G, Hansen HN, Marinello F et al (2010) Replication and dimensional quality control of industrial nanoscale surface using calibrated AFM measurement and SEM image processing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikai A, Afrin R, Saito M et al (2018) Atomic force microscope as a nano- and micrometer scale biological manipulator: a short review. Semin Cell Dev Biol 73:132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazzeo AD, Stein AJ, Trumper DL et al (2009) Atomic force microscope for accurate dimensional metrology. Precis Eng 33(2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cai YD, Chen YL, Xu ML et al (2018) An ultra-precision tool nanoindentation instrument for replication of single point diamond tool cutting edges. Meas Sci Technol 29(5):054004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aaa913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li XP, Rahman M, Liu K et al (2003) Nano-precision measurement of diamond tool edge radius for wafer fabrication. J Mater Process Technol 140:358–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen YL, Cai YD, Shimizu Y et al (2016) On-machine measurement of microtool wear and cutting edge chipping by using a diamond edge artifact. Precis Eng 43:462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bagga PJ, Makhesana MA, Patel K et al (2021) Tool wear monitoring in turning using image processing techniques. Mater Today 44(1):771–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jurkovic J, Korosec M, Kopac J (2004) New approach in tool wear measuring technique using CCD vision system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(9):1023–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohammed WM, Ng E, Elbestawi MA (2012) Modeling the effect of compacted graphite iron microstructure on cutting forces and tool wear. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 5(2):87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Azmi AI (2015) Monitoring of tool wear using measured machining forces and neuro-fuzzy modelling approaches during machining of GFRP composites. Adv Eng Softw 82:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernandez YS, Vilches FJT, Gamboa CB et al (2019) Online tool wear monitoring by the analysis of cutting forces in transient state for dry machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Metals 9(9):1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9091014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamaguchi T, Higuchi M, Shimada S et al (2009) Tool life monitoring during the diamond turning of electroless Ni–P. Precis Eng 31(3):196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rao DK, Srinivas K (2017) An analysis of feature identification for tool wear monitoring by using acoustic emission. J New Mat Electr Sys 34(3/4):117–135

    Google Scholar 

  25. Song KY, Wang M, Liu LM et al (2020) Intelligent recognition of milling cutter wear state with cutting parameter independence based on deep learning of spindle current clutter signal. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(3/4):929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Akbari A, Danesh M, Khalili K (2017) A method based on spindle motor current harmonic distortion measurements for tool wear monitoring. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 39(12):5049–5055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fang JW, Zhang C, Zhou LS (2010) Study of indirect measurement of tool wear in milling. Mach Build Autom 40(3):56–58

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sun YH, Zhang C, Guo S et al (2011) Software development and data processing of tool wear based on mapping measurement for ball-end cutter. Mach Des Manuf 2011(11):150–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bagga PJ, Makhesana MA, Patel KM (2021) A novel approach of combined edge detection and segmentation for tool wear measurement in machining. Prod Eng Res Devel 15:519–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen YL, Cai YD, Xu M et al (2017) An edge reversal method for precision measurement of cutting edge radius of single point diamond tools. Precis Eng 50:380–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Evans CJ, Hocken RJ, Estler WT (1996) Self-calibration: reversal, redundancy, error separation and ‘absolute testing’. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 45(2):617–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang K, Cai YD, Shimizu Y et al (2020) High-precision cutting edge radius measurement of single point diamond tools using an atomic force microscope and a reverse cutting edge artifact. Appl Sci 14(10):4799. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elias JV, Venkatesh NP, Lawrence K et al (2021) Tool texturing for micro-turning applications–an approach using mechanical micro indentation. Mater Manuf Proc 36(1):84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson KL (1982) One hundred years of hertz contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng 196(1):363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2018YFA0702900), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975096).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren-Ke Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Wang, XY., Zhao, Y. et al. On-machine measurement of tool nose radius and wear during precision/ultra-precision machining. Adv. Manuf. 10, 368–381 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-022-00397-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-022-00397-y

Keywords

Navigation