Skip to main content
Log in

LQR-based attitude controllers design for a 3-DOF helicopter system with comparative experimental tests

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of different linear quadratic regulator (LQR)-based attitude controllers design for a 3-DOF helicopter system. Firstly, dynamics model of 3-DOF helicopter system is established. Then, three LQR-based attitude controllers are designed, which are robust LQR attitude controller, linear parameter varying (LPV)-based robust LQR attitude controller and weight adaptation-based LQR attitude controller are developed for the helicopter system, respectively. Finally, based on the Quanser’s 3-DOF helicopter experimental platform, the stability and tracking performance of these three attitude controllers are tested under three conditions including normal condition, actuator fault and wind disturbance. Based on the experimental results, some discussions are carried out, which are expected to provide some guidance for the design of flight control system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data and code in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Boukoberine MN, Zhou Z, Benbouzid M (2019) A critical review on unmanned aerial vehicles power supply and energy management: solutions, strategies, and prospects. Appl Energy 255:113823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao T, Li W (2022) Design configuration and technical application of rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicles. Mech Intell Transport Syst 1(1):69–85. https://doi.org/10.56578/mits010108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adão T, Hruška J, Pádua L, Bessa J, Peres E, Morais R et al (2017) Hyperspectral imaging: a review on UAV-based sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry. Remote Sens 9(11):1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Jawhar I, Idries A, Mohammed F (2020) Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities. Technol Forecast Social Change 153:119293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Li Z, Yang Y, Qi L, Ke R (2021) High-resolution vehicle trajectory extraction and denoising from aerial videos. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 22(5):3190–3202. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3003782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nidya MV, Mija SJ, Jacob J (2022) Feedback-linearization based robust relatively optimal trajectory tracking controller for 3-DOF helicopter. Eng Sci Technol—An Int J-Jestech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Okasha M, Kralev J, Islam M (2022) Design and experimental comparison of PID LQR and MPC stabilizing controllers for parrot mambo mini-drone. Aerospace. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9060298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang L, Ni HQ, Zhou WF, Pardalos PM, Fang JT, Fei MR (2014) MBPOA-based LQR controller and its application to the double-parallel inverted pendulum system. Eng Appl Artif Intell 36:262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.07.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisco NR, Adeli H (2011) Smart structures: Part II—Hybrid control systems and control strategies. Scientia Iranica 18(3):285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elia N, Mitter SK (2001) Stabilization of linear systems with limited information. IEEE Trans Autom Control 46(9):1384–1400. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.948466

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Subramanian RG, Elumalai VK (2016) Robust MRAC augmented baseline LQR for tracking control of 2 DoF helicopter. Robot Auton Syst 86:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sir Elkhatem A, Naci ES (2022) Robust LQR and LQR-PI control strategies based on adaptive weighting matrix selection for a UAV position and attitude tracking control. Alex Eng J 61(8):6275–6292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.11.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Lu G, Zhong Y (2011) Theory and experiments on robust LQR attitude control of a 3-DOF lab helicopter. Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference2011. p. 2335–40

  14. Wu JL (2017) A simultaneous mixed LQR/H-infinity control approach to the design of reliable active suspension controllers. Asian J Control 19(2):415–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1058

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Caun RD, Assuncao E, Teixeira MCM (2021) H-2/H-infinity formulation of LQR controls based on LMI for continuous-time uncertain systems. Int J Syst Sci 52(3):612–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2020.1836283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu H, Lu G, Zhong YS (2013) Robust LQR attitude control of a 3-DOF laboratory helicopter for aggressive maneuvers. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 60(10):4627–4636. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2012.2216233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu XY, Li DD (2021) Robust attitude control of a 3-DOF helicopter considering actuator saturation. Mech Syst Signal Process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin G, Zou JX (2015) H-infinity control of four-wheel-independent-drive electric vehicles with random time-varying delays. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/245493

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Nkemdirim M, Dharan S, Chaoui H, Miah S (2022) LQR control of a 3-DOF helicopter system. Int J Dyn Control 10(4):1084–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-021-00872-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi Z, Liu Z, Liu M (2021) Flight control for three-surface morphing aircraft using linear quadratic regulator design based on stochastic robustness analysis. 2021 China Automation Congress (CAC) 2021. p. 6055–6060

  21. Nie L, Cai B, Lu SG, Qin H, Zhang LX (2021) Finite-time switched LPV control of quadrotors with guaranteed performance. J Franklin Instite-Eng Appl Math 358(14):7032–7054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.07.018

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Cardoso DN, Esteban S, Raffo GV (2021) A new robust adaptive mixing control for trajectory tracking with improved forward flight of a tilt-rotor UAV. ISA Trans 110:86–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.10.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saleem O, Iqbal J, Afzal MS (2023) A robust variable-structure LQI controller for under-actuated systems via flexible online adaptation of performance-index weights. PLoS ONE 18(3):e0283079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Azimi SM, Naghizadeh RA, Kian AR (2019) Optimal controller design for interconnected power networks with predetermined degree of stability. IEEE Syst J 13(3):3165–3175. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsyst.2018.2877922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saleem O, Mahmood-Ul-Hasan K, Rizwan M (2021) An experimental comparison of different hierarchical self-tuning regulatory control procedures for under-actuated mechatronic systems. PLoS ONE 16(8):e0256750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jajarmi A, Hajipour M, Sajjadi SS, Baleanu D (2018) A robust and accurate disturbance damping control design for nonlinear dynamical systems. Opt Control Appl Methods 40(3):375–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2480

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Vinodh Kumar E, Raaja GS, Jerome J (2016) Adaptive PSO for optimal LQR tracking control of 2 DoF laboratory helicopter. Appl Soft Comput 41:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang H, Jiang B, Yang H, Liu HHT (2018) Synchronization of multiple 3-DOF helicopters under actuator faults and saturations with prescribed performance. ISA Trans 75:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2018.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peng HC, Wei LJ, Zhu XY, Xu W, Zhang SY (2022) Aggressive maneuver oriented integrated fault-tolerant control of a 3-DOF helicopter with experimental validation. Aerospace Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Das S, Pan I, Halder K, Das S, Gupta A (2013) LQR based improved discrete PID controller design via optimum selection of weighting matrices using fractional order integral performance index. Appl Math Model 37(6):4253–4268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.022

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51605279.

Funding

Wei Li’s work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51605279.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TZ performed software, data curation, validation, writing, and visualization. WL contributed to conceptualization, methodology, supervision, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, T., Li, W. LQR-based attitude controllers design for a 3-DOF helicopter system with comparative experimental tests. Int. J. Dynam. Control 12, 1063–1072 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01242-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01242-1

Keywords

Navigation