Skip to main content
Log in

Sufficient condition for near-optimal control of general controlled linear forward–backward stochastic differential equations

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article studies sufficient conditions for near-optimal stochastic control for systems governed by general linear controlled forward–backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs in short). The control is allowed to enter into both drift and diffusion coefficients. We prove that under certain additional conditions on the Hamiltonian, the near-maximum condition on the Hamiltonian function in the integral form is sufficient for near-optimality. As an applications, an example is given to illustrate our theoretical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou XY (1998) Stochastic near-optimal controls: necessary and sufficient conditions for near-optimality. SIAM Control Optim 36(3):929–947

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang J, Li X, Wang G (2010) Near-optimal control problems for linear forward-backward stochastic systems. Automatica 46:397–404

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hui E, Huang J, Li X, Wang G (2011) Near-optimal control for stochasic recursive problems. Syst Control Lett 60:161–168

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hafayed M, Abbas S (2014) On near-optimal mean-field stochastic singular controls: necessary and sufficient conditions for near-optimality. J Optim Theory Appl 160(3):778–808

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hafayed M, Abba A, Abbas S (2014) On mean-field stochastic maximum principle for near-optimal controls for poisson jump diffusion with applications. Int J Dynam Control 2:262–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hafayed M, Abbas S (2013) Stochastic near-optimal singular controls for jump diffusions: necessary and sufficient conditions. J Dyn Control Syst 19(4):503–517

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hafayed M, Abbas S, Veverka P (2013) On necessary and sufficient conditions for near-optimal singular stochastic controls. Optim Lett 7(5):949–966

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hafayed M, Veverka P, Abbas S (2012) On maximum principle of near-optimality for diffusions with jumps, with application to consumption-investment problem. Differ Equ Dyn Syst 20(2):111–125

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hafayed M, Veverka P, Abbas A (2014) On Near-optimal necessary and sufficient conditions for forward-backward stochastic systems with Jumps, with applications to finance. Appl Math 59(4):407–440

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Huang J, Li X (2015) Necessary condition for near optimal control of linear forward-backward stochastic differential equations. Int J Control 1–29. doi:10.1080/00207179

  11. Zhou XY, Sethi S (1994) A sufficient condition for near optimal stochastic controls and its applications to manufacturing systems. Appl Math Optim 29:67–92

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Z (2013) A general maximum principle for optimal control of forward-backward stochastic systems. Automatica 49:1473–1480

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yong J (2010) Optimality variational principle for controlled forward–backward stochastic differential equations with mixed initial-terminal conditions. SIAM J Control Optim 48:4119–4156

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma J, Yong J (1999) Forward-backward stochastic differential equations and their applications. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ekeland I (1974) On the variational principle. J Math Anal Appl 47:324–353

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke FH (1983) Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangquan Zhang.

Additional information

This work was partially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11201263, 11201264), the Nature Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2012AQ004) and the ITEA MODRIO project of INRIA.

Appendix

Appendix

The following result gives the definition and some basic properties of the Clarke’s generalized gradient.

Definition 7

Let F be a convex set in \({\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) and let \(f:F\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) be a locally Lipschitz function. The generalized gradient of f at \( \widehat{x}\in F\), denoted by \(\partial _{x}f\left( \widehat{x}\right) \), is a set defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \partial _{x}f\left( \widehat{x}\right) =\left\{ \xi \in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}:\left\langle \xi ,\upsilon \right\rangle \le f^{\circ }\left( \widehat{x},\upsilon \right) ,\text { for any }\upsilon \in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\right\} , \end{aligned}$$

where \(f^{\circ }\left( \widehat{x},\upsilon \right) =\lim \sup _{y\rightarrow \widehat{x},t\rightarrow 0}\frac{1}{t}\left( f\left( y+t\upsilon \right) -f\left( y\right) \right) \).

Proposition 8

If \(f:{\mathbb {R}}^{n}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is locally Lipschitz at \(x\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), then the following statements holds

  1. 1.

    \(\partial _{x}f\left( x\right) \) is nonempty, compact and convex set in \({\mathbb {R}}^{n}\).

  2. 2.

    \(\partial _{x}\left( -f\right) \left( x\right) =-\partial _{x}\left( f\right) \left( x\right) \).

  3. 3.

    \(\partial _{x}f\left( x\right) \ni 0\) if f attains a local minimum or maximum at x.

  4. 4.

    If f is continuously differentiable at x, then \(\partial _{x}f\left( x\right) =\left\{ f^{\prime }\left( x\right) \right\} \).

  5. 5.

    If f, \(g:{\mathbb {R}}^{n}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) are locally Lipschitz functions at \(x\in {\mathbb {R}}^{d}\), then \(\partial _{x}\left( f+g\right) \left( x\right) \subset \partial _{x}f\left( x\right) +\partial _{x}g\left( x\right) \).

For the detailed proof of the above Proposition see Clarke [16] or the book by Yong and Zhou ([13] Lemma 2.3).

Lemma 9

(Ekeland’s Variational Principle [15]) Let (F, \(d_{F})\) be a complete metric space and \(f:F\rightarrow \overline{{\mathbb {R}}} \) be a lower semi-continuous function which is bounded from below. For a given \(\varepsilon >0\), suppose that \(u^{\varepsilon }\in F\) satisfying \( f\left( u^{\varepsilon }\right) \le \inf _{u\in F}f(u)+\varepsilon \). Then for any \(\delta >0\), there exists \(u^{\delta }\in F\) such that

  1. 1.

    \(f\left( u^{\delta }\right) \le f\left( u^{\varepsilon }\right) \).

  2. 2.

    \(d_{F}\left( u^{\delta },u^{\varepsilon }\right) \le \delta \).

  3. 3.

    \(f\left( u^{\delta }\right) \le f\left( u\right) +\dfrac{ \varepsilon }{\delta }d_{F}\left( u,u^{\delta }\right) ,\,\) for all \(u\in F\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L. Sufficient condition for near-optimal control of general controlled linear forward–backward stochastic differential equations. Int. J. Dynam. Control 5, 306–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-015-0179-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-015-0179-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation