Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive velocity region-based path planning system for autonomous vehicle under multiple obstacles with various velocities

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Path planning is the research hotspot of automatic driving technology. However, it is hard to ensure path safety for autonomous vehicle (AV) under multiple obstacles with various velocities. To solve this problem, an adaptive velocity region-based path planning system (AVR-PPS) which includes two parts, an adaptive velocity region controller (AVRC) and a path fusion controller (PFC), is presented in this work. The AVRC is designed to improve the velocity adaptivity through two units, a velocity region reconstruction unit (VRRU) and a potential field construction unit (PFCU). The VRRU restructures new velocity region to obtain the constraints of velocities, and the PFCU establishes an uniform potential field for the reconstructed velocity region to get the objective function for evaluating different velocities. The PFC is designed to generate the optimal path for obstacle avoidance using the constraints of multiple obstacles and the objective function derived from the AVRC. The path planning performance of the AVR-PPS is verified through simulation experiments on the MATLAB-CarSim simulation platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roy D, Chowdhury A, Maitra M, Bhattacharya S (2021) Geometric region-based swarm robotics path planning in an unknown occluded environment. IEEE Trans Industrial Electron 68(7):6053–6063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng C, Sha Q, He B, Li G (2021) Path planning and obstacle avoidance for AUV: A review. Ocean Eng 235:109355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lazarowska Agnieszka (2021) Review of collision avoidance and path planning methods for ships utilizing radar remote sensing. Remote Sens 13(16):455–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberge V, Tarbouchi M, Labonté G (2018) Fast genetic algorithm path planner for fixed-wing military UAV using GPU. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 54(5):2105–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan X, Yuan XW, Wang XH (2021) Path planning for mobile robot based on improved bat algorithm. Sensors 21(13):4389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu XH, Yan B, Yue Y (2021) Path planning and collision avoidance in unknown environments for USVs based on an improved D* Lite. Appl Sci-Basel 11(17):7863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zafar MN, Mohanta JC, Keshari A (2021) GWO-potential field method for mobile robot path planning and navigation control. Arab J Sci Eng 46(8):8087–8104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shamir T (2004) How should an autonomous vehicle overtake a slower moving vehicle: Design and analysis of an optimal trajectory. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(4):607–610

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosolia Ugo, De Bruyne Stijn, Alleyne Andrew G (2017) Autonomous vehicle control: A nonconvex approach for obstacle avoidance. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 25(2):469–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou XB, Yu X, Zhang YM, Luo YY, Peng XY (2021) Trajectory planning and tracking strategy applied to an unmanned ground vehicle in the presence of obstacles. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 18(4):1575–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Du Toit Noel E, Burdick Joel W (2012) Robot motion planning in dynamic, uncertain environments. IEEE Trans Rob 28(1):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuhuan Wen, Wei Zheng, Jinghai Zhu (2012) Elman fuzzy adaptive control for obstacle avoidance of mobile robots using hybrid force/position incorporation. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews 42(4):603–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Joong Kim Cheol, Dongkyoung Chwa (2015) Obstacle avoidance method for wheeled mobile robots using interval type-2 fuzzy neural network. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(3):677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malone N (2017) Hybrid dynamic moving obstacle avoidance using a stochastic reachable set-based potential field. IEEE Trans Rob 33(5):1124–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mora MC (2015) Predictive and multirate sensor-based planning under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(3):1493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zong CF, Han XJ, Zhang D, Liu Y, Zhao WQ, Sun M (2021) Research on local path planning based on improved RRT algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-Journal of Automobile Engineering 235(8):2086–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang ZW, Zheng L, Li YN, Zeng PY, Liang YX (2021) Structured road-oriented motion planning and tracking framework for active collision avoidance of autonomous vehicles. Science China-Technological Sciences 64(11):2427–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jang-Ho Cho, Dong-Sung Pae, Taeg Lim Myo (2018) A real-time obstacle avoidance method for autonomous vehicles using an obstacle-dependent gaussian potential field. J Adv Transp J

  19. Dang R, Wang J, Eben Li S, Li K (2019) Path generation algorithm based on crash point prediction for lane changing of autonomous vehicles. Int J Automot Technol 20(3):507–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuxiao Chen, Huei Peng, Jessy Grizzle (2018) Obstacle avoidance for low-speed autonomous vehicles with barrier function. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 26(1):194–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun X, Deng S, Tong B (2021) “Trajectory planning approach of mobile robot dynamic obstacle avoidance with multiple constraints.” 2021 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), pp. 829-834

  22. Ren J, Zhang J, Cui YN (2021) Autonomous obstacle avoidance algorithm for unmanned surface vehicles based on an improved velocity obstacle method. Isprs Inter J Geo-Information 10(9):618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li BY, Du HP, Li WH (2017) A potential field approach-based trajectory control for autonomous electric vehicles with in-wheel motors. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(8):2044–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang L, Mou JM, Chen PF, Li MX (2021) Path planning for autonomous ships: a hybrid approach based on improved APF and modified VO methods. J Marine Sci Eng 9(7):761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang H, Zhu YF, Liu XF, Xu XR (2021) Analysis of obstacle avoidance strategy for Dual-Arm robot based on speed field with improved artificial potential field algorithm. Electronics 10(15):1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu WJ, Liu C, Chen G, Knoll A (2021) Gaussian process based model predictive control for overtaking in autonomous driving. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 15

  27. Schwarting W, Alonso-Mora J, Paull L, Karaman S, Rus D (2018) Safe nonlinear trajectory generation for parallel autonomy with a dynamic vehicle model. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(9):2994–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixian Liu.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Adriano Almeida Gonçalves Siqueira.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62073127), the Open Program of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Vehicle Power and Transmission System (No.VPTS202002).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Yuan, X. Adaptive velocity region-based path planning system for autonomous vehicle under multiple obstacles with various velocities. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 288 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03597-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03597-6

Keywords

Navigation