Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tube drawing analysis using upper bound and energy methods and validation by Cockcroft-Latham failure criteria

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cold tube drawing reduces the tube dimensions with closed tolerances and improves its mechanical properties. In this paper, there was an investigation into the cold drawing process with a floating plug using an upper bound analysis and energy method. The ring compression test was performed to determine the friction coefficient. Grooved pipe testing was done to determine the critical damage value. Simulation results confirmed the values of 0.05 for friction coefficient and 0.862 for critical damage value. Using the design of experiments with Taguchi method, the upper bound analysis was done and the correct design parameters were selected. For the selected parameters, the stress value of 289 MPa was obtained from the upper bound analysis. The design process was simulated using ABAQUS software and the results of the stress analysis at the die output showed the consistency of the upper bound analysis and simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Samipour S, Khaliulin V, Batrakov V (2018) Development of the technology of manufacturing Aerospace composite tubular elements by radial braiding. J Mach Manuf Reliab 47(3):284–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Syed A, Samal M, Chattopadhyay J, Dutta P (2020) Fracture toughness evaluation of axially-cracked tubular thin-walled specimens of Zircaloy-4 and its implications for integrity analysis of nuclear fuel clad. Theor Appl Fract Mech 106:102449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bortot P, Ceretti E, Giardini C (2008) The determination of flow stress of tubular material for hydroforming applications. J Mater Process Technol 203(1):381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L, Xu W, Long J, Lei Z (2015) Surface roughening analysis of cold drawn tube based on macro–micro coupling finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 224:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee S-K, Jeong M-S, Kim B-M, Lee S-K, Lee S-B (2013) Die shape design of tube drawing process using FE analysis and optimization method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(1–4):381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaheen L (2007) Tube drawing principles: understanding processes, parameters key to quality. In: The tube and pipe journal. The tube & pipe association, International, pp 10–28

  7. Bramley A, Smith D (1976) Tube drawing with a floating plug. Metals Technology 3(1):322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Łuksza J and Sadok L (1983) Wybrane zagadnienia z ciągarstwa AGH

  9. Gattmah J, Ozturk F, Orhan S (2020) A new development of measurement technique for residual stresses generated by the cold tube drawing process with a fixed mandrel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108(11):3675–3687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubio E (2006) Analytical methods application to the study of tube drawing processes with fixed conical inner plug: slab and upper bound methods. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 14(1–2):119–130

    Google Scholar 

  11. Świątkowski K, Hatalak R (2004) Study of the new floating-plug drawing process of thin-walled tubes. J Mater Process Technol 151(1–3):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubio EM, González C, Marcos M, Sebastián MA (2006) Energetic analysis of tube drawing processes with fixed plug by upper bound method. J Mater Process Technol 177(1):175–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwan C-T (2002) A generalized velocity field for axisymmetric tube drawing through an arbitrarily curved die with an arbitrarily curved plug. J Mater Process Technol 122(2–3):213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cockcroft M (1968) Ductility and workability of metals. J of Metals 96:2444

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee S, Ko D, Kim B, Lee J, Kim S, Lee Y (2007) A study on monobloc tube drawing for steering input shaft. J Mater Process Technol 191(1–3):55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubio E, Camacho A, Pérez R, Marín M (2017) Guidelines for selecting plugs used in thin-walled tube drawing processes of metallic alloys. Metals 7(12):572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuboki T, Nishida K, Sakaki T, Murata M (2008) Effect of plug on levelling of residual stress in tube drawing. J Mater Process Technol 204(1–3):162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haddi A, Imad A, Vega G (2011) Analysis of temperature and speed effects on the drawing stress for improving the wire drawing process. Mater Des 32(8):4310–4315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Toribio J, Lorenzo M, Vergara D, Kharin V (2014) Influence of the die geometry on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of cold drawn wires. Eng Fail Anal 36:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chobaut N, Drezet J, Mischler S, Nguyen V, De Marco B, Dobler S, Rosset E (2019) Miniaturized tube fixed plug drawing: determination of the friction coefficients and drawing limit of 316 LVM stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 263:396–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cao TS (2017) Models for ductile damage and fracture prediction in cold bulk metal forming processes: a review. Int J Mater Form 10(2):139–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong Z, Zhang J, Li H, Kong N (2018) Deep drawing and bulging forming limit of dual-phase steel under different mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(5–8):2111–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farahani ND, Parvizi A, Barooni A, Naeini SA (2018) Optimum curved die profile for tube drawing process with fixed conical plug. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ASTMA53, (2020) Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  25. Astm I, (2016) ASTM E8/E8M-16a: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International

  26. Kim S, Kwon Y, Lee Y, Lee J (2007) Design of mandrel in tube drawing process for automotive steering input shaft. J Mater Process Technol 187:182–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Świątkowski K, Hatalak R (2006) Application of modified tools in the process of thin-walled tube drawing. Arch Metall Mater 51(2):193–197

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Pouyafar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Lincoln Cardoso Brandao.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pouyafar, V., Bolandi, H. & Meshkabadi, R. Tube drawing analysis using upper bound and energy methods and validation by Cockcroft-Latham failure criteria. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03302-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03302-z

Keywords

Navigation