Abstract
This paper is concerned with the application of the modal expansion method (MEM) to the vibro-acoustic simulation of flexible vibrating structures. The structural vibration field due to the external excitation is expanded by a FEM-based modal expansion method, and the corresponding normal velocity is transferred into the acoustic FE mesh that is generated for the acoustic analysis. In this kind of acoustic simulation, the numerical results are definitely influenced by the accuracy of the expanded vibration field using the modal expansion method, which is in turn influenced by the sensor placement for extracting and determining the reduced numerical mode shapes and the modal participation factors that are essential for the modal expansion method. In this context, the investigation of its effect on the numerical accuracy of the acoustic analysis is of importance. We in this paper compare the acoustic analysis results, such as the sound patterns, power, and pressures, between the regular and optimum sensor placements with MSC/Nastran results for three different boundary conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avsar Y, Gonullu MT (2005) Determination of safe distance between roadway and school buildings to get acceptable school outdoor noise level by using noise barriers. Build Environ 40(9):1255–1260
Shur M, Spalart P, Strelets M, Garbaruk A (2006) Further steps in LES-based noise prediction for complex jets. 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit AIAA: 2006–485
Lopes LV, Burley CL (2011) Design of the next generation aircraft noise prediction program: ANOPP2. In: 17th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, AIAA: 2011–2854
Junger MC, Feit D (1993) Sound, structures, and their interaction. Acoustical Society of America
Sandberg GE, Hansson PA, Gustavsson M (2001) Domain decomposition in acoustic and structure-acoustic analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(24–25):2979–2988
Ding WP, Chen HL (2001) A symmetrical finite element model for structure-acoustic coupling analysis of an elastic, thin-walled cavity. J Sound Vib 243(3):547–559
Minami S, Kawai H, Yoshimura S (2012) Parallel BDD-based monolithic approach for acoustic fluid-structure interaction. Comput Mech 50(6):707–718
Matthies HG, Steindorf J (2002) Partitioned but strongly coupled iteration schemes for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction. Comput Struct 80(27–30):1991–1999
Cho JR, Park SW, Kim HS, Rashed S (2008) Hydroelastic analysis of insulation containment of LNG carrier by global-local approach. Int J Numer Methods Engng 76:749–774
Brinkmeier M, Nackenhorst U, Peterson S, von Estorff O (2008) A finite element approach for the simulation of tire rolling noise. J Sound Vib 309:20–39
Bernard ML, Bronowicki AJ (1994) Modal expansion method for eigensensitivity with repeated roots. AIAA J 32:1500–1506
Rao AR, Anandakumar G (2008) Optimal sensor placement techniques for system identification and health monitoring of civil structures. Smart Struct Syst 4(4):465–492
Yi TH, Li HN, Gu LM (2012) Sensor placement for structural health monitoring of Canton Tower. Smart Struct Sys 19(4):313–329
Stephan C (2012) Sensor placement for modal identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 27:461–470
Cho JR, Lee JH, Jeong KM, Kim KW (2012) Optimum design of run-flat tire insert rubber by genetic algorithm. Finite Elem Anal Des 52:60–70
Jung BK, Cho JR, Jeong WB (2015) Sensor placement optimization for structural modal identification of flexible structures using genetic algorithm. J Mech Sci Technol 29(7):2775–2783
LMS International NV, LMS Virtual.Lab REV9 NVM Standard Training. Belgium
Cho JR, Song JM (2001) Assessment of classical numerical models for the separate fluid-structure modal analysis. J Sound Vib 239(5):995–1012
Xing JT (2007) Natural vibration of two-dimensional slender structure-water interaction systems subject to Sommerfeld radiation condition. J Sound Vib 308:67–79
Keller JB, Givoli D (1989) Exact non-reflecting boundary conditions. J Comput Phys 82(1):172–192
Wrobel LC (2002) The boundary element method, applications in thermo-fluids and acoustics. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Astley RJ (2000) Infinite element formulations for wave problems: a review of current formulations and an assessment of accuracy. Int J Numer Methods Eng 49:951–976
Kim MS, Jeon SH, Cho JR, Jeong WB (2014) Comparative evaluation of PML technique for hydrodynamic impact loading on spar-type floating platform. Ocean Eng 85:80–92
Allemang RJ, Brown DL (1982) A correlation coefficients for modal vector analysis. In: Proc int modal anal conference, pp 110–116
Liu W, Gao WC, Sun Y, Xu MJ (2008) Optimal sensor placement for spatial lattice structure based on genetic algorithms. J Sound Vib 317:175–189
Cho JR, Song JM, Lee JK (2001) Finite element techniques for the free-vibration and seismic analysis of liquid-storage tanks. Finite Elem Anal Des 37:467–483
Li FL, Hu XY, Zhang L (2013) Left and right inverse eigenpairs problem for -Hermitian matrices. J Appl Math ID 230408:1–6
Berenger JP (1994) A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J Comput Phys 114(2):185–200
Tournour M, Dessart S, McCulloch C (2002) On the accuracy of vibrao-acoustic solutions using the atv method. In: Pro ISMA 2002, Leuven, Belgium
von Estorff O (2003) Efforts to reduce computation time in numerical acoustics an overview. Acta Acust Acust 89(1):1–13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: José Roberto de França Arruda.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, B.K., Cho, J.R. Structure-acoustic simulation using the modal expansion method and the optimum sensor placement. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 570 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03297-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03297-7