Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study of thermophysical properties of MWCNT and graphene coolant nanofluids for automotive application

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study reports on an experimental investigation regarding thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and graphene coolant nanofluids at four volumetric concentrations (0.025%, 0.050%, 0.1% and 0.15%), with focus on automotive applications. The base fluid was composed of a mixture of water–ethylene glycol (70:30). The nanofluids were prepared using the high-pressure homogenization method, which presents long-term stability. Thermal conductivity of nanofluids was measured using the transient hot bridge method, at temperatures ranging from 20 to 50 °C and dynamic viscosity from 20 to 80 °C using a rotational viscometer. Experimental results revealed that nanoparticle concentration and temperature significantly affect the thermophysical properties. Increases in thermal conductivity were found of up to 7.7% for MWCNT nanofluid at a 0.15% concentration. Graphene nanofluids presented thermal conductivity similar to MWCNT, with its highest augmentation found at 5.9% for a 0.1% volumetric concentration. MWCNT nanofluids presented discrete increments on viscosity relative to base fluid for temperatures lower than 50 °C (up to 9.2%) and more pronounced increments at higher temperatures (29.7% at 80 °C). Graphene nanofluids’ viscosity was close to base fluid over the entire analyzed temperature range. The maximum increase was 4.7% for 0.05% concentration at 30 °C, and viscosity was lower than base fluid for some conditions, with a maximum decrease of 3.9%. The experimental results on thermal conductivity and viscosity were compared with proposed correlations found in the literature and showed good agreement. Finally, the increase in thermal conductivity combined with similar viscosity compared to base fluid indicates that the use of nanofluids, as an alternative coolant for automotive applications, is certainly feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi SUS, Eastman JA (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED. San Francisco, CA, pp 99–105

  2. Chen LC (2010) Preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles by submerged arc nanoparticle synthesis system. J Alloy Compd 495:476–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikkam N (2014) Engineering nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

  4. Zhu HT, Lin YS, Yin YS (2004) A novel one-step chemical method for preparation of copper nanofluids. J Colloid Interface Sci 277:100–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang Y, Lee J-K, Lee J-K et al (2008) Production and dispersion stability of nanoparticles in nanofluids. Powder Technol 186:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suganthi KS, Rajan KS (2012) Temperature induced changes in ZnO–water nanofluid: zeta potential, size distribution and viscosity profiles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55:7969–7980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.08.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oliveira GA, Bandarra Filho EP, Wen D (2014) Synthesis and characterization of silver/water nanofluids. High Temp-High Pressures 43:69–83

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blosi M, Albonetti S, Dondi M et al (2011) Microwave-assisted polyol synthesis of Cu nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 13:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0010-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrouillat S, Bontemps A, Poncelet O et al (2013) Influence of nanoparticle shape factor on convective heat transfer and energetic performance of water-based SiO2 and ZnO nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng 51:839–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azmi WH, Hamid KA, Mamat R et al (2016) Effects of working temperature on thermo-physical properties and forced convection heat transfer of TiO2nanofluids in water–ethylene glycol mixture. ApplThermEng 106:1190–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Syam Sundar L, Venkata Ramana E, Singh MK, Sousa ACM (2014) Thermal conductivity and viscosity of stabilized ethylene glycol and water mixture Al2O3 nanofluids for heat transfer applications: an experimental study. IntCommun Heat Mass Transf 56:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shanbedi M, Zeinali Heris S, Maskooki A (2015) Experimental investigation of stability and thermophysical properties of carbon nanotubes suspension in the presence of different surfactants. J Therm Anal Calorim 120:1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4404-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sabiha MA, Mostafizur RM, Saidur R, Mekhilef S (2016) Experimental investigation on thermo physical properties of single walled carbon nanotube nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 93:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.10.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suresh S, Venkitaraj KPP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M (2012) Effect of Al2O3–Cu/water hybrid nanofluid in heat transfer. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 38:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Madhesh D, Parameshwaran R, Kalaiselvam S (2014) Experimental investigation on convective heat transfer and rheological characteristics of Cu–TiO2 hybrid nanofluids. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 52:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mishra S, Hansora D (2017) Graphene nanomaterials: fabrication, properties, and applications. Pan Stanford, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahbubul IM, Saidur R, Amalina MA (2012) Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55:874–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akhavan-Behabadi MA, Shahidi M, Aligoodarz MR, Fakoor-Pakdaman M (2016) An experimental investigation on rheological properties and heat transfer performance of MWCNT-water nanofluid flow inside vertical tubes. Appl Therm Eng 106:916–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cárdenas Gómez AO, Hoffmann ARK, Bandarra Filho EP (2015) Experimental evaluation of CNT nanofluids in single-phase flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 86:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oliveira GA, Cardenas Contreras EM, Bandarra FEP (2016) Experimental study on the heat transfer of MWCNT/water nanofluid flowing in a car radiator. Appl Therm Eng 111:1450–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Esfahani MR, Languri EM, Nunna MR (2016) Effect of particle size and viscosity on thermal conductivity enhancement of graphene oxide nanofluid. IntCommun Heat Mass Transf 76:308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hummers WS, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339–1339. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ilyas SU, Pendyala R, Narahari M (2017) Stability and thermal analysis of MWCNT-thermal oil-based nanofluids. Colloids Surf A 527:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kole M, Dey TK (2013) Investigation of thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J Appl Phys 113:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4793581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumaresan V, Velraj R (2012) Experimental investigation of the thermo-physical properties of water–ethylene glycol mixture based CNT nanofluids. Thermochim Acta 545:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mehrali M, Sadeghinezhad E, Latibari ST et al (2014) Investigation of thermal conductivity and rheological properties of nanofluids containing graphene nanoplatelets. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohd Zubir MN, Badarudin A, Kazi SN et al (2015) Highly dispersed reduced graphene oxide and its hybrid complexes as effective additives for improving thermophysical property of heat transfer fluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 87:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang H, Wang S, Lin Y et al (2017) Stability, thermal conductivity, and rheological properties of controlled reduced graphene oxide dispersed nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng 119:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Esfahani MR, Languri EM (2017) Exergy analysis of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger using graphene oxide nanofluids. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 83:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Tong W, Ong W-J, Chai S-P et al (2015) Enhanced evaporation strength through fast water permeation in graphene-oxide deposition. Sci Rep 5:11896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.03.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Soltanimehr M, Afrand M (2016) Thermal conductivity enhancement of COOH-functionalized MWCNTs/ethylene glycol–water nanofluid for application in heating and cooling systems. Appl Therm Eng 105:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehrali M, Sadeghinezhad E, Rosen MA et al (2015) Heat transfer and entropy generation for laminar forced convection flow of graphene nanoplatelets nanofluids in a horizontal tube. IntCommun Heat Mass Transf 66:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sandhu H, Gangacharyulu D (2017) An experimental study on stability and some thermophysical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with water–ethylene glycol mixtures. Part Sci Technol 35:547–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2016.1180335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Selvam C, Lal DM, Harish S et al (2017) Enhanced heat transfer performance of an automobile radiator with graphene based suspensions. Appl Therm Eng 123:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadeghinezhad E, Mehrali M, Latibari ST et al (2014) Experimental investigation of convective heat transfer using graphene nanoplatelet based nanofluids under turbulent flow conditions. IndEngChem Res 53:12455–12465. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie501947u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Teng TP, Yu CC (2013) Heat dissipation performance of MWCNTs nano-coolant for vehicle. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 49:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang Y, Al-Saaidi HAI, Kong M, Alvarado JL (2018) Thermophysical performance of graphene based aqueous nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 119:408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang Z, Wu Z, Han F et al (2018) Experimental comparative evaluation of a graphene nanofluid coolant in miniature plate heat exchanger. Int J Therm Sci 130:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Omrani AN, Esmaeilzadeh E, Jafari M, Behzadmehr A (2019) Effects of multi walled carbon nanotubes shape and size on thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids. Diam Relat Mater 93:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cárdenas Contreras EM, Oliveira GA, Bandarra Filho EP (2019) Experimental analysis of the thermohydraulic performance of graphene and silver nanofluids in automotive cooling systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 132:375–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Askari S, Rashidi A, Koolivand H (2019) Experimental investigation on the thermal performance of ultra-stable kerosene-based MWCNTs and graphene nanofluids. IntCommun Heat Mass Transf 108:104334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ghodbane M, Said Z, Hachicha AA, Boumeddane B (2019) Performance assessment of linear Fresnel solar reflector using MWCNTs/DW nanofluids. Renew Energy 151:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nanoamor (2018) Nanostructured and amorphous materials. https://nanoamor.com. Accessed 25 Jun 2018

  44. American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (2013) Handbook Fundamentals, SI. ASHRAE, USA

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nan CW, Shi Z, Lin Y (2003) A simple model for thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Chem Phys Lett 375:666–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00956-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yamada E, Ota T (1980) Effective thermal conductivity of dispersed materials. Wärme- und Stoffübertragung 13:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Selvam C, Lal DM, Harish S (2016) Thermal conductivity enhancement of ethylene glycol and water with graphene nanoplatelets. Thermochim Acta 642:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2016.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ijam A, Saidur R (2012) Nanofluid as a coolant for electronic devices (cooling of electronic devices). Appl Therm Eng 32:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.08.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams W, Buogiorno J, Hu LW (2008) Experimental investigation of turbulent convective heat transfer and pressure loss of alumina/water and zirconia/water nanoparticle colloids (nanofluids) in horizontal tubes. J Heat Transf 130:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2818775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen H, Ding Y, He Y, Tan C (2007) Rheological behaviour of ethylene glycol based titania nanofluids. Chem Phys Lett 444:333–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kumar PG, Sakthivadivel D, Meikandan M et al (2019) Experimental study on thermal properties and electrical conductivity of stabilized H2O–solar glycol mixture based multi-walled carbon nanotube nanofluids: developing a new correlation. Heliyon 5:e02385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02385

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme Azevedo Oliveira.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Jose A. R. Parise.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, G.A., Cardenas Contreras, E.M. & Bandarra Filho, E.P. Experimental study of thermophysical properties of MWCNT and graphene coolant nanofluids for automotive application. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02870-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02870-4

Keywords

Navigation