Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of the position of perpendicular pier groups in a sharp bend on flow and scour patterns: numerical simulation

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous bridges are destroyed worldwide every year mostly due to the role of hydraulic factors including scour being ignored when they are designed. Therefore, examination of the scour phenomenon around bridge piers in rivers and identification of the parameters affecting them gain a great level of significance. Particularly, if the bridge piers are installed at river bends, the complicated nature of the flow in bends adds to complications already existent in analysis of flow and scour patterns around such structures, which indicates the need for further study. Hence, the present study has utilized SSIIM numerical model to analyze the three-dimensional flow and scour patterns around perpendicular pier groups (two series of triad parallel piers) at different positions of a bended channel (at the 60-, 90-, and 120-degree angles). The simulated bended channel is a 1-m-wide channel with a central angle of 180 degrees and a relative curvature radius of 2. These data are first compared and confirmed with data collected by acoustic Doppler velocimetry under similar conditions for validation of the numerical data. The results obtained from this model indicated that changing the position of the bridge piers in the channel does not have a significant effect on the maximum scour value; however, the amount of the maximum sedimentation increases by 12% after relocating the piers from the 60- to the 90-degree angle, whereas relocating them from the 90- to the 120-degree position leads to a 42% reduction in the maximum sedimentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laursen EM, Toch A (1956) Scour around bridge piers and abutments. Iowa Highway Research Board, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laursen EM (1963) An analysis of relief bridge scour. J Hydraul Div 89:93–118

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jain SC, Fischer EE (1980) Scour around bridge piers at high flow velocities. J Hydraul Div 106:1827–1842

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raudkivi AJ, Ettema R (1983) Clear-water scour at cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Eng 109:338–350. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:3(338)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Melville BW (1984) Live-bed scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 110:1234–1247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:9(1234)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Melville BW, Sutherland AJ (1988) Design method for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 114:1210–1226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:10(1210)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dargahi B (1990) Controlling mechanism of local scouring. J Hydraul Eng 116:1197–1214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:10(1197)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yanmaz AM, Altmbilek HD (1991) Study of time-dependent local scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 117:1247–1268. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:10(1247)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson EV, Davis SR (1995) Evaluating scour at bridges. Federal Highway Administration Hydraulic Engineering, Office of Technology Applications, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson JE, Panchang VG (1998) Three-dimensional simulation of scourinducing flow at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 124:530–540. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:5(530)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bozkus Z, Yildiz O (2001) Experimental investigation of scouring around inclined bridge piers. Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference, Nevada, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/40581(2001)122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang W, Yang Q, Xiao H (2009) CFD modeling of scale effects on turbulence flow and scour around bridge piers. Comput Fluids 38:1050–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.01.029

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Keshavarzi A, Melville B, Ball J (2014) Three-dimensional analysis of coherent turbulent flow structure around a single circular bridge pier. Environ Fluid Mech 14:821–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9332-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, Salimi S (2016) The effect of circular bridge piers with different inclination angles toward downstream on scour. Sadhana 41:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-015-0443-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ben Mohammad Khajeh S, Vaghefi M, Mahmoudi A (2017) The scour pattern around an inclined cylindrical pier in a sharp 180-degree bend: an experimental study. Int J River Basin Manag 15:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2016.1274322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Breusers HNC, Raudkivi AJ (1991) Scouring. Hydraulic structures design manual. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hannah CR (1978) Scour at pile groups. Research Rep. No. 78-3, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

  18. Nazariha M (1996) Design relationships for maximum local scour depth for bridge pier groups. University of Ottawa, Canada. https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zarrati AR, Nazariha M, Mashahir MB (2006) Reduction of local scour in the vicinity of bridge pier groups using collars and riprap. J Hydraul Eng 132:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:2(154)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bozkus Z, Cesme M (2010) Reduction of scouring depth by using inclined piers. Can J Civil Eng 37:1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Özalp MC (2013) Experimental investigation of local scour around bridge pier groups. In: 21st Canadian hydrotechnical conference, Alberta, Canada

  22. Beg M, Beg S (2015) Scour hole characteristics of two unequal size bridge piers in tandem arrangement. ISH J Hydraul Eng 21:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2014.963176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Islam SU, Rahman H, Ying ZC, Saha SC (2016) Comparison of wake structures and force measurements behind three side-by-side cylinders. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 38:843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0297-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaman H, Das S, Kuila A, Mazumdar A (2017) Hydrodynamic flow patterns around three inline eccentrically arranged circular piers. Arab J Sci Eng 42:3973–3990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2536-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaghefi M, Tabibnezhad MJ, Hashemi SS, Moradi S (2018) Experimental study of bed topography variations due to placement of a triad series of vertical piers at different positions in a 180° bend. Arab J Geosci 11:102–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3443-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Asadollahi M, Vaghefi M, Tabib Nazhad Motlagh MJ (2019) Experimental and numerical comparison of flow and scour patterns around a single and triple bridge piers located at a sharp 180 degrees bend. Sci Iran Trans A (Published Online). https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2019.5637.1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alemi M, Maia R (2018) Numerical simulation of the flow and local scour process around single and complex bridge piers. Int J Civ Eng 16:475–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0137-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamidi A, Siadatmousavi SM (2018) Numerical simulation of scour and flow field for different arrangements of two piers using SSIIM model. Ain Shams Eng J 9:2415–2426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohammad V, Yaser S, Shaker HS (2016) Effects of distance between the T-shaped spur dikes on flow and scour patterns in 90° bend using the SSIIM model. Ain Shams Eng J 7:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vaghefi M, Radan P, Akbari M (2019) Flow pattern around attractive, vertical, and repelling t-shaped spur dikes in a mild bend using CFD modeling. Int J Civ Eng 17:607–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0340-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vaghefi M, Akbari M (2019) A procedure for setting up 180-degree sharp bend flume including construction and examinations with hydraulic structures. Sci Iran Trans A (Published Online). https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.5033.1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vaghefi M, Akbari M, Fiouz A (2016) An experimental study of mean and turbulent flow in a 180 degree sharp open channel bend: secondary flow and bed shear stress. KSCE J Civ Eng 20:1582–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-1560-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Baghalian S, Ghodsian M (2017) Experimental analysis and prediction of velocity profiles of turbidity current in a channel with abrupt slope using artificial neural network. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39:4503–4517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0867-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Melville BW, Chiew YM (1999) Time scale for local scour at bridge Piers. J Hydraul Eng 125:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:1(59)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chiew Y (1992) Scour protection at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 118:1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1260)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Olsen NRB (2007) Computational fluid dynamics in hydraulic and sedimentation engineering. Class notes, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  37. Beccati N, Ferrari C, Bonanno A, Balestra M (2019) Calibration of a CFD discharge process model of an off-road self-loading concrete mixer. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1578-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nayyer S, Farzin S, Karami H, Rostami M (2019) A numerical and experimental investigation of the effects of combination of spur dikes in series on a flow field. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1757-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaghefi M, Faraji B, Akbari M, Eghbalzadeh A (2018) Numerical investigation of flow pattern around a T-shaped spur dike in the vicinity of attractive and repelling protective structures. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0954-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vaghefi M, Safarpoor Y, Akbari M (2017) Numerical comparison of the parameters influencing the turbulent flow using a T-shaped spur dike in a 90° bend. J Appl Fluid Mech 10:231–241. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jafm.73.238.26175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vaghefi M, Safarpoor Y, Akbari M (2016) Numerical investigation of flow pattern and components of three-dimensional velocity around a submerged T-shaped spur dike in a 90 degree bend. J Cent South Univ Tech 23:2984–2998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3362-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Olsen NRB (2007) A three dimensional numerical model for simulation of sediment movements in water intakes with multiblock option. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, Online User’s manual

    Google Scholar 

  43. Olsen NRB, Jimenes OF, Abrahamsen L, Lovoll A (1999) 3D CFD modeling of water and sediment flow in a hydropower reservoir. J Soils Sediment 14:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1989-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schlichting H (1960) Boundary layer theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Shukry A (1950) Flow around bends in an open flume. T Am Soc Civ Eng 115:751–779

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Shahid Mahini Street, Bushehr, 7516913817, Iran

    Morteza Asadollahi, Mohammad Vaghefi & Maryam Akbari

Authors
  1. Morteza Asadollahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Vaghefi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maryam Akbari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Vaghefi.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Daniel Onofre de Almeida Cruz, D.Sc.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asadollahi, M., Vaghefi, M. & Akbari, M. Effect of the position of perpendicular pier groups in a sharp bend on flow and scour patterns: numerical simulation. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 422 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02503-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02503-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation