Skip to main content
Log in

Streamlined bodies drag force estimation using wake integration technique

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the drag force calculation around the SUBOFF submarine in axisymmetric configuration was investigated using the “Wake Integration Technique.” This method is usually used in wind tunnels as an auxiliary method instead of the common “surface integral technique” for flow around complex geometries or shock wave flows. The results of this method are dependent on data collection vertex space, distance, and section size, where practical suggestions were made for each parameter in this research. Furthermore, the contribution of the pressure, momentum, and fluctuation terms in the total drag force were also evaluated at different cross sections. These findings can be implemented in wind tunnels with small test section length and also to compare the results obtained by the common surface integral method. Simulations were carried out at different aspect ratios at zero angles of attack, and the capabilities of this method at inclined flows were also discussed. The obtained results were also compared against the common method, and the results show only 4% deviation at zero angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

L :

Body length

D :

Maximum body diameter

AR:

Length-to-the-diameter aspect ratio

x, y, z :

Coordinate system

\(\Delta x,\Delta y\) :

Grid space in x and y-direction

d :

The ratio of grid space to diameter

X :

Longitudinal distance from the body

r :

Measurement radius

S :

Surface area

\(P\), u :

Local pressure and velocity

\(P_{\infty } , U_{\infty }\) :

Free-stream pressure and velocity

\(C_{\text{D}}\) :

Drag coefficient

\(C_{p}\) :

Pressure coefficient

\(\alpha\) :

Incidence angle

\(y^{ + }\) :

Dimensionless wall distance

\(\rho\) :

Fluid density

\(\tau_{xx}\) :

Normal stress component

References

  1. Van Dam CP (1999) Recent experience with different methods of drag prediction. Prog Aerosp Sci 35(8):751–798

    Google Scholar 

  2. Noca F, Shiels D, Jeon D (1999) A comparison of methods for evaluating time-dependent fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J Fluids Struct 13(5):551–578

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu J-Z, Lu X-Y, Zhuang L-X (2007) Integral force acting on a body due to local flow structures. J Fluid Mech 576:265–286

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Marongiu C, Tognaccini R (2010) Far-field analysis of the aerodynamic force by lamb vector integrals. AIAA J 48(11):2543–2555

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chao D, Van Dam C (1999) Airfoil drag prediction and decomposition. J Aircr 36(4):675–681

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Neil K (2009) Drag and momentum in a two-dimensional vortex wake. Fluid Dyn Res 41(3):035505

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Saffman P, Schatzman J (1982) An inviscid model for the vortex-street wake. J Fluid Mech 122:467–486

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gariépy M, Trépanier J-Y, Masson C (2011) Convergence criterion for a far-field drag prediction and decomposition method. AIAA J 49(12):2814–2818

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gariépy M, Trépanier J (2012) A new axial velocity defect formulation for a far-field drag decomposition method. Can Aeronaut Space J 58(02):69–82

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kusunose K, Maruyama S, Sasō A (2005) A wake integration method for airplane drag prediction. Tohoku University Press, Sendai

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coles D, Wadcock AJ (1979) Flying-hot-wire study of flow past an NACA 4412 airfoil at maximum lift. AIAA J 17(4):321–329

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rae WH, Pope A (1984) Low-speed wind tunnel testing. Wiley, New York, pp 176–178

    Google Scholar 

  13. Antonia R, Rajagopalan S (1990) Determination of drag of a circular cylinder. AIAA J 28(10):1833–1834

    Google Scholar 

  14. Janus JM, Chatterjee A (1996) Use of a wake-integral method for computational drag analysis. AIAA J 34(1):188–190

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kusunose K (1998) Drag prediction based on a wake-integral method. AIAA J 2723:1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kusunose K (2001) Lift analysis based on a wake-integral method. AIAA J 420:2001

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spalart PR (2008) On the far wake and induced drag of aircraft. J Fluid Mech 603:413–430

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Alam MM, Zhou Y (2008) Alternative drag coefficient in the wake of an isolated bluff body. Phys Rev E 78(3):036320

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suryanarayana C, Satyanarayana B, Ramji K et al (2010) Experimental evaluation of pumpjet propulsor for an axi-symmetric body in wind tunnel. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng 2(1):24–33

    Google Scholar 

  20. Destarac D, Van Der Vooren J (2004) Drag/thrust analysis of jet-propelled transonic transport aircraft; definition of physical drag components. Aerosp Sci Technol 8(6):545–556

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Khoshnevis A, Barzanooni V (2013) Experimental investigation of aerodynamics of a car model. Int J Adv Des Manuf Technol 6(1):41–48

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khoshnevis A, Barzanooni V (2012) Experimental investigation of the trailer wake effects on the aerodynamics of a car model. J Fluid Mech Aerodyn 1(1):13–27

    Google Scholar 

  23. Manshadi MD, Esfandeh S, Dehghan AA (2015) Experimental investigation of the wake of a submarine model by five-hole probe in a wind tunnel. Modares Mech Eng 15(8):29–40

    Google Scholar 

  24. Toubin H, Bailly D (2015) Development and application of a new unsteady far-field drag decomposition method. AIAA J 53(11):3414–3429

    Google Scholar 

  25. Toubin H, Bailly D, Costes M (2016) Improved unsteady far-field drag breakdown method and application to complex cases. AIAA J 54(6):1907–1921

    Google Scholar 

  26. Son O, Cetiner O (2016) Drag prediction in the near wake of a circular cylinder based on DPIV data. J Appl Fluid Mech 9(4):1963–1968

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilcox DC (1998) Turbulence modeling for CFD: DCW industries La Canada

  28. Groves NC, Huang TT, Chang MS (1989) Geometric characteristics of DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) SUBOFF Models (DTRC Model Numbers 5470 and 5471), DTIC Document

  29. Huang T, Liu H (1992) Measurements of flows over an axisymmetric body with various appendages in a wind tunnel: the DARPA SUBOFF experimental program. In: 19th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Seoul, South Korea

  30. Roddy RF (1990) Investigation of the stability and control characteristics of several configurations of the DARPA SUBOFF model (DTRC Model 5470) from captive-model experiments, DTIC Document

  31. Jones W, Launder B (1972) The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transf 15(2):301–314

    Google Scholar 

  32. ANSYS (2015) ANSYS Fluent User Guide, Technical Report Release 16.1, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania: ANSYS Inc

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Talezade Shirazi.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Daniel Onofre de Almeida Cruz, D.Sc..

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talezade Shirazi, A., Dehghan Manshadi, M. Streamlined bodies drag force estimation using wake integration technique. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 293 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02373-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02373-8

Keywords

Navigation