Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation into the contact characteristics of rough surfaces with surface tension

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface tension is a kind of force that exists between the molecules of the material surface, which has a significant influence on the contact characteristics of rough surfaces. Therefore, the Nayak’s random process model is introduced to describe the height and curvature distribution of asperity on isotropic rough surfaces, and a single conical asperity system considering surface tension is established. Then, the single conical asperity system is extended to the entire rough surface, and a new contact model of the rough surface is presented based on statistical methods. The contact stiffness from the proposed model is added to the finite element model for comparison with experimental results. The effects of surface tension and semi-cone angle of conical asperity on the contact load, the contact area, and the contact stiffness of rough surfaces are revealed. The results show that the new model has larger normal load and contact stiffness, and a smaller real contact area than the classical elastic model where the dimensionless separation is constant. In addition, the contact load and contact stiffness between rough surfaces increase with increasing surface tension, but the real contact area decreases. When the surface tension is constant, the larger the semi-cone angles of the conical asperity, the greater the load, the real contact area, and the stiffness will be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madhusudana CV (2014) Thermal contact conductance. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Yovanovich MM (2005) Four decades of research on thermal contact, gap, and joint resistance in microelectronics. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 28(2):182–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenwood JA, Williamson JP (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A 295(1442):300–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang WR, Etsion I, Bogy DB (1987) An elastic–plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. J Tribol 109(2):257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1991) Fractal model of elastic–plastic contact between rough surfaces. J Tribol 113(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan Y, Gan L, Liu K, Yang X (2017) Elastoplastic contact mechanics model of rough surface based on fractal theory. Chin J Mech Eng 30(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sepehri A, Farhang K (2009) Closed-form equations for three dimensional elastic–plastic contact of nominally flat rough surfaces. J Tribol 131(4):041402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorbatikh L, Popova M (2006) Modeling of a locking mechanism between two rough surfaces under cyclic loading. Int J Mech Sci 48(9):1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerberich WW, Tymiak NI, Grunlan JC, Horstemeyer MF, Baskes MI (2002) Interpretations of indentation size effects. J Appl Mech 69(4):433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim CW, Li ZR, He LH (2006) Size dependent, non-uniform elastic field inside a nano-scale spherical inclusion due to interface stress. Int J Solids Struct 43(17):5055–5065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang ZP, Sun L (2007) Size-dependent effective properties of a heterogeneous material with interface energy effect: from finite deformation theory to infinitesimal strain analysis. Acta Mech 190(1–4):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ru CQ (2009) Size effect of dissipative surface stress on quality factor of microbeams. Appl Phys Lett 94(5):051905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurtin ME, Murdoch AI (1975) A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch Ration Mech Anal 57(4):291–323

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hajji MA (1978) Indentation of a membrane on an elastic half space. J Appl Mech 45(2):320–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang GY, Yu SW (2007) Effect of surface elasticity on the interaction between steps. J Appl Mech 74(4):821–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He LH, Lim CW (2006) Surface green function for a soft elastic half-space: influence of surface stress. Int J Solids Struct 43(1):132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuenot S, Frétigny C, Demoustier-Champagne S, Nysten B (2004) Surface tension effect on the mechanical properties of nanomaterials measured by atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B 69(16):165410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang GF, Feng XQ (2007) Effects of surface stresses on contact problems at nanoscale. J Appl Phys 101(1):013510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsson PA, Park HS (2012) On the importance of surface elastic contributions to the flexural rigidity of nanowires. J Mech Phys Solids 60(12):2064–2083

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao X, Hao F, Fang D, Huang Z (2013) Boussinesq problem with the surface effect and its application to contact mechanics at the nanoscale. Int J Solids Struct 50(16–17):2620–2630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Long JM, Wang GF (2013) Effects of surface tension on axisymmetric Hertzian contact problem. Mech Mater 56(1):65–70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding Y, Niu X, Wang G (2015) Elastic compression of nanoparticles with surface energy. J Phys D Appl Phys 48(48):485303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Salez T, Benzaquen M, Raphaël É (2013) From adhesion to wetting of a soft particle. Soft Matter 9(45):10699–10704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao X, Hao F, Huang Z, Fang D (2014) Mechanics of adhesive contact at the nanoscale: the effect of surface stress. Int J Solids Struct 51(3–4):566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond Math Phys Sci 324(1558):301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu X, Jagota A, Hui CY (2014) Effects of surface tension on the adhesive contact of a rigid sphere to a compliant substrate. Soft Matter 10(26):4625–4632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu X, Xu W (2018) Effect of surface tension on the behavior of adhesive contact based on Lennard-Jones potential law. J Mech Phys Solids 111:170–183

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Do M, Cerezo V, Beautru Y, Kane M (2013) Modeling of the connection road surface microtexture/water depth/friction. Wear 302(1–2):1426–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hisakado T, Suda H (1999) Effects of asperity shape and summit height distributions on friction and wear characteristics. Wear 225:450–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jourani A (2015) A new three-dimensional numerical model of rough contact: influence of mode of surface deformation on real area of contact and pressure distribution. J Tribol 137(1):011401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nayak PR (1971) Random process model of rough surfaces in plastic contact. Wear 26(3):398–407

    Google Scholar 

  32. Greenwood JA (2006) A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact. Wear 261(2):191–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Shenoy V, Sharma A (2001) Pattern formation in a thin solid film with interactions. Phys Rev Lett 86(1):119–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sneddon IN (1948) Boussinesq’s problem for a rigid cone. Proc Camb Philos Soc 44(4):492–507

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Long J, Ding Y, Wang G (2017) Contact problems at micro/nano scale with surface tension. Proc IUTAM 21:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sherif HA, Kossa SS (1991) Relationship between normal and tangential contact stiffness of nominally flat surfaces. Wear 151(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo T, Li L, Zhao Y (2012) Alternative method for identification of the dynamic properties of bolted joints. J Mech Sci Technol 26(10):3017–3027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Popov VL (2010) Contact mechanics and friction. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51305327, 51475352) and the Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 2018JM5066).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Li.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Paulo de Tarso Rocha de Mendonça, Ph.D.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Yun, QQ., Tian, HF. et al. Investigation into the contact characteristics of rough surfaces with surface tension. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 343 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1847-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1847-z

Keywords

Navigation