Abstract
Surface tension is a kind of force that exists between the molecules of the material surface, which has a significant influence on the contact characteristics of rough surfaces. Therefore, the Nayak’s random process model is introduced to describe the height and curvature distribution of asperity on isotropic rough surfaces, and a single conical asperity system considering surface tension is established. Then, the single conical asperity system is extended to the entire rough surface, and a new contact model of the rough surface is presented based on statistical methods. The contact stiffness from the proposed model is added to the finite element model for comparison with experimental results. The effects of surface tension and semi-cone angle of conical asperity on the contact load, the contact area, and the contact stiffness of rough surfaces are revealed. The results show that the new model has larger normal load and contact stiffness, and a smaller real contact area than the classical elastic model where the dimensionless separation is constant. In addition, the contact load and contact stiffness between rough surfaces increase with increasing surface tension, but the real contact area decreases. When the surface tension is constant, the larger the semi-cone angles of the conical asperity, the greater the load, the real contact area, and the stiffness will be.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Madhusudana CV (2014) Thermal contact conductance. Springer, Berlin
Yovanovich MM (2005) Four decades of research on thermal contact, gap, and joint resistance in microelectronics. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 28(2):182–206
Greenwood JA, Williamson JP (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A 295(1442):300–319
Chang WR, Etsion I, Bogy DB (1987) An elastic–plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. J Tribol 109(2):257–263
Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1991) Fractal model of elastic–plastic contact between rough surfaces. J Tribol 113(1):1–11
Yuan Y, Gan L, Liu K, Yang X (2017) Elastoplastic contact mechanics model of rough surface based on fractal theory. Chin J Mech Eng 30(1):1–9
Sepehri A, Farhang K (2009) Closed-form equations for three dimensional elastic–plastic contact of nominally flat rough surfaces. J Tribol 131(4):041402
Gorbatikh L, Popova M (2006) Modeling of a locking mechanism between two rough surfaces under cyclic loading. Int J Mech Sci 48(9):1014–1020
Gerberich WW, Tymiak NI, Grunlan JC, Horstemeyer MF, Baskes MI (2002) Interpretations of indentation size effects. J Appl Mech 69(4):433–442
Lim CW, Li ZR, He LH (2006) Size dependent, non-uniform elastic field inside a nano-scale spherical inclusion due to interface stress. Int J Solids Struct 43(17):5055–5065
Huang ZP, Sun L (2007) Size-dependent effective properties of a heterogeneous material with interface energy effect: from finite deformation theory to infinitesimal strain analysis. Acta Mech 190(1–4):151–163
Ru CQ (2009) Size effect of dissipative surface stress on quality factor of microbeams. Appl Phys Lett 94(5):051905
Gurtin ME, Murdoch AI (1975) A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch Ration Mech Anal 57(4):291–323
Hajji MA (1978) Indentation of a membrane on an elastic half space. J Appl Mech 45(2):320–324
Huang GY, Yu SW (2007) Effect of surface elasticity on the interaction between steps. J Appl Mech 74(4):821–823
He LH, Lim CW (2006) Surface green function for a soft elastic half-space: influence of surface stress. Int J Solids Struct 43(1):132–143
Cuenot S, Frétigny C, Demoustier-Champagne S, Nysten B (2004) Surface tension effect on the mechanical properties of nanomaterials measured by atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B 69(16):165410
Wang GF, Feng XQ (2007) Effects of surface stresses on contact problems at nanoscale. J Appl Phys 101(1):013510
Olsson PA, Park HS (2012) On the importance of surface elastic contributions to the flexural rigidity of nanowires. J Mech Phys Solids 60(12):2064–2083
Gao X, Hao F, Fang D, Huang Z (2013) Boussinesq problem with the surface effect and its application to contact mechanics at the nanoscale. Int J Solids Struct 50(16–17):2620–2630
Long JM, Wang GF (2013) Effects of surface tension on axisymmetric Hertzian contact problem. Mech Mater 56(1):65–70
Ding Y, Niu X, Wang G (2015) Elastic compression of nanoparticles with surface energy. J Phys D Appl Phys 48(48):485303
Salez T, Benzaquen M, Raphaël É (2013) From adhesion to wetting of a soft particle. Soft Matter 9(45):10699–10704
Gao X, Hao F, Huang Z, Fang D (2014) Mechanics of adhesive contact at the nanoscale: the effect of surface stress. Int J Solids Struct 51(3–4):566–574
Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond Math Phys Sci 324(1558):301–313
Xu X, Jagota A, Hui CY (2014) Effects of surface tension on the adhesive contact of a rigid sphere to a compliant substrate. Soft Matter 10(26):4625–4632
Zhu X, Xu W (2018) Effect of surface tension on the behavior of adhesive contact based on Lennard-Jones potential law. J Mech Phys Solids 111:170–183
Do M, Cerezo V, Beautru Y, Kane M (2013) Modeling of the connection road surface microtexture/water depth/friction. Wear 302(1–2):1426–1435
Hisakado T, Suda H (1999) Effects of asperity shape and summit height distributions on friction and wear characteristics. Wear 225:450–457
Jourani A (2015) A new three-dimensional numerical model of rough contact: influence of mode of surface deformation on real area of contact and pressure distribution. J Tribol 137(1):011401
Nayak PR (1971) Random process model of rough surfaces in plastic contact. Wear 26(3):398–407
Greenwood JA (2006) A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact. Wear 261(2):191–200
Shenoy V, Sharma A (2001) Pattern formation in a thin solid film with interactions. Phys Rev Lett 86(1):119–122
Sneddon IN (1948) Boussinesq’s problem for a rigid cone. Proc Camb Philos Soc 44(4):492–507
Long J, Ding Y, Wang G (2017) Contact problems at micro/nano scale with surface tension. Proc IUTAM 21:40–47
Sherif HA, Kossa SS (1991) Relationship between normal and tangential contact stiffness of nominally flat surfaces. Wear 151(1):49–62
Guo T, Li L, Zhao Y (2012) Alternative method for identification of the dynamic properties of bolted joints. J Mech Sci Technol 26(10):3017–3027
Popov VL (2010) Contact mechanics and friction. Springer, Berlin
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51305327, 51475352) and the Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 2018JM5066).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: Paulo de Tarso Rocha de Mendonça, Ph.D.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Yun, QQ., Tian, HF. et al. Investigation into the contact characteristics of rough surfaces with surface tension. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 343 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1847-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1847-z