Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the design of propeller hydrokinetic turbines: the effect of the number of blades

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A design study of propeller hydrokinetic turbines is explored in the present paper, where the optimized blade geometry is determined by the classical Glauert theory applicable to the design of axial flow turbines (hydrokinetic and wind turbines). The aim of the present study is to evaluate the optimized geometry for propeller hydrokinetic turbines, observing the effect of the number of blades in the runner design. The performance of runners with different number of blades is evaluated in a specific low-rotational-speed operating conditions, using blade element momentum theory (BEMT) simulations, confirmed by measurements in wind tunnel experiments for small-scale turbine models. The optimum design values of the power coefficient, in the operating tip speed ratio, for two-, three- and four-blade runners are pointed out, defining the best configuration for a propeller 10 kW hydrokinetic machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laws ND, Epps BP (2016) Hydrokinetic energy conversion: technology, research, and outlook. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:1245–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sleiti AK (2017) Tidal power technology review with potential applications in Gulf Stream. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar D, Sarkar S (2016) A review on the technology, performance, design optimization, reliability, techno-economics and environmental impacts of hydrokinetic energy conversion systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:796–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuce MI, Muratoglu A (2015) Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems: A technology status review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rehman S, Mahbub Alam M, Alhems LM, Rafique MM (2018) Horizontal axis wind turbine blade design methodologies for efficiency enhancement—a review. Energies 11:506–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schubel PJ, Crossley RJ (2012) Wind turbine blade design. Energies 5:3425–3449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glauert H (1935) Airplanes propellers. In: Durand WF, Aerodynamic theory Chapter XI. vol. 4, pp. 191-195 (reprinted, Dover, New York, 1963)

  8. Burton T, Sharpe D, Jenkins N, Bossanyi E (2001) Wind energy handbook. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen MOL (2015) Aerodynamics of wind turbines, 3rd edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaffarczyk AP (2014) Introduction to wind turbine aerodynamics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu S, Janajreh I (2012) Development and application of an improved blade element momentum method model on horizontal axis wind turbines. Int J Energy Environ Eng 3:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buhl Jr. M L (2005) A new empirical relationship between thrust coefficient and induction factor for the turbulent windmill state. Technical Report NREL/TP-500-36834

  13. Benini E (2004) Significance of blade element theory in performance prediction of marine propellers. Ocean Eng 31:957–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman JC, Masters I, Togneri M, Orme JAC (2013) The Buhl correction factor applied to high induction conditions for tidal stream turbines. Renew Energy 60:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goundar JN, Rafiuddin AM (2013) Design of a horizontal axis tidal current turbine. Appl Energy 111:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li W, Zhou H, Liu H, Lin Y, Xu Q (2016) Review on the blade design technologies of tidal current turbine. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 63:414–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Batten WMJ, Bahaj AS, Molland AF, Chaplin JR (2007) Experimentally validated numerical method for the hydrodynamic design of horizontal axis tidal turbines. Ocean Eng 34(7):1013–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Silva PASF, Shimoya LD, Oliveira TF, Vaz JRP, Amarante Mesquita AL, Brasil Junior ACP (2017) Analysis of cavitation for the optimized design of hydrokinetic turbines using BEM. Appl Energy 185:1281–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duquette MM, Swanson J, Visser KD (2003) Solidity and blade number effects on a fixed pitch, 50 W horizontal axis wind turbine. Wind Eng 27(4):299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Badshah M, Badshah S, Jan S (2017) Hydrodynamical design of tidal current turbine and the effect of solidity on performance. J Eng Appl Sci 36:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muhle F, Adaramola MS, Stran L (2016) The effect of the number of blades on wind turbine wake a comparison between 2-and 3-bladed rotors. J Phys Conf Ser 753:032017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brasil Junior ACP, Mendes RCF, Lacroix J, Noguera R, Oliveira TF (2017) Hydrokinetic propeller turbines. How many blades? Am J Hydropower Water Environ Syst 4:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maalawi KY, Badawy MTS (2001) A direct method for evaluating performance of horizontal axis wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 5:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Drela, M, Giles, M B (1987) A two-dimensional viscous aerodynamic design and analysis code. AIAA-87 0424 report

  25. Amarante Mesquita AL, Alves ASG (2000) An improved approach for performance prediction of HAWT using the strip theory. Wind Eng 24:417–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marten D, Wendler J, Pechlivanoglou J, Nayeri C N, Paschereit C O, (2013) QBLADE: an open source tool for design and simulation of horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3:264–269

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kolekar N, Banerjee A (2015) Performance characterization and placement of a marine hydrokinetic turbine in a tidal channel under boundary proximity and blockage effects. Appl Energy 148:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Machuca M, Wind tunnel experiments of free flow turbines—hydrokinetic and wind turbines (in Portuguese), MSc dissertation in Mechanical Sciences, University of Brasilia, 2016

  29. Monteiro JP, Silvestre MR, Piggott H, Andre JC (2013) Wind tunnel testing of a horizontal axis wind turbine rotor and comparison with simulations from two blade element momentum codes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 123:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis. University Science Books, Sausalito, p 327

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially financed by the HYDRO-K project consortium in a context of the ANEEL P&D Grant, with the partnership of AES-Brasil Company. The authors are grateful to the support of Brazilian Ministry of Education, by means of CAPES, for the PhD scholarships. The France–Brazil cooperation program lying ENSAM-ParisTech and UnB has maintained the international mobility of the researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taygoara F. Oliveira.

Additional information

Technical Editor: André Cavalieri.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Propagation of uncertainties

Propagation of uncertainties

The experimental uncertainties of this work are given by the sum of instrumental and random errors. For the digital sensors, the instrumental errors are given by the smallest scale value displayed by the instrument and for the analog instruments by the smallest half scale. Random uncertainties were defined as being the standard deviation a set of realizations under the same conditions. In this work, the derived uncertainties can be expressed according to the following primary measurements errors: wind velocity (\(\delta V_0\)), rotational speed (\(\delta \omega\)) and torque (\(\delta T\)). The uncertainty in Cp measurements (\(\delta Cp\)) is computed with the general formula for error propagation [30], as it is given in Eqs. 47, 47 and 48.

$$\begin{aligned} \delta P= & {} \sqrt{\omega ^2\delta \tau ^2+\tau ^2\delta \omega ^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(47)
$$\begin{aligned} \delta P_\mathrm{flow}= & {} \sqrt{(3/2\rho A \ V_0^2 \delta V_0)^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(48)
$$\begin{aligned} \delta Cp= & {} \sqrt{(P_\mathrm{flow}^{-1} \delta P)^2+(P P_\mathrm{flow}^{-2}\delta {P_\mathrm{flow}})^2}. \end{aligned}$$
(49)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brasil Junior, A.C.P., Mendes, R.C.F., Wirrig, T. et al. On the design of propeller hydrokinetic turbines: the effect of the number of blades. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1753-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1753-4

Keywords

Navigation