Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic analysis and estimator design of a hydraulic drive system

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the dynamic analysis and state of the art estimator design through system inversion of a pedagogical hydraulic system, comprising variable displacement axial piston pump, high speed low torque hydraulic motor, proportional direction control valve, loading pump (bent axis) and a pressure relief valve at loading circuit. The hydraulic system has been modeled for simulation study and both the transient and the steady state responses have been validated experimentally. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the system to be observable have been obtained with respect to the minimum number of sensors placement. Thereafter, an estimator adaptive to varying load condition has been designed to have a good estimate of all the states using minimum sensors. All the estimated states have been compared with the responses from the test bed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies RM, Watton J (1995) Intelligent control of an electrohydraulic motor drive system. Mechatronics 5(5):527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murrenhoff H (1999) Systematic approach to the control of hydrostatic drives. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 213(5):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Helduser S (1999) Electric-hydrostatic drive—an innovative energy-saving power and motion control system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 213(5):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogata K (2011) Modern control engineering. PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bay JS (1999) Fundamentals of linear state space systems. WCB/McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guan ZH et al (2002) On controllability and observability for a class of impulsive systems. Syst Control Lett 47:247–257

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Xie G, Wang L (2005) Controllability and observability for a class of linear impulsive systems. J Math Anal Appl 304:336–355

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Watton J (2009) Fundamentals of fluid power control. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandal SK, Dasgupta K, Pan S et al (2009) Theoretical and experimental studies on the steady-state performance of low-speed high-torque hydrostatic drives. Part 1: modeling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 223(11):2663–2674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandal SK, Dasgupta K, Pan S (2009) Theoretical and experimental studies on the steady-state performance of low-speed high-torque hydrostatic drives. Part 2: Experimental investigation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 223(11):2675–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Axin M, Eriksson B, Krus P (2014) Flow versus pressure control of pumps in mobile hydraulic systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 228(4):245–256

  12. Guo TL (2012) Controllability and observability of impulsive fractional linear time-invariant system. Comput Math Appl 64:3171–3182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou T (2015) On the controllability and observability of networked dynamic systems. Automatica 52:63–75

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sassano M, Astolfi A (2014) Dynamic generalized controllability and observability functions with applications to model reduction and sensor deployment. Automatica 50:1349–1359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lupulescu V, Younus A (2011) On controllability and observability for a class of linear impulsive dynamic systems on time scales. Math Comput Model 54:1300–1310

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Karnopp DC, Margolis DL, Rosenberg RC (1990) System dynamics: a unified approach, 2nd edn. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York

  17. Mukherjee A, Karmakar R, Samantaray AK (2006) Bond graph in modeling, simulation and fault identification. I. K. International, New Delhi

  18. McCandlish D, Dorey RE (1984) The mathematical modeling of hydrostatic pumps and motors. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 198(3):165–174

  19. Lai Z, Lei Y, Zhu S, Xu YL, Zhang XH, Krishnaswamy S (2016) Moving-window extended Kalman filter for structural damage detection with unknown process and measurement noises. Measurement. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.016

  20. Finkelstein Ludwik (2009) Widely-defined measurement—an analysis of challenges. Measurement 42:1270–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xueqin Chen, Rui Sun, Wancheng Jiang, Qingxian Jia, Jinxiu Zhang (2016) A novel two-stage extended Kalman filter algorithm for reaction flywheels fault estimation. Chin J Aeronaut 29(2):462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pan S, Xiao D, Xing S, Law SS, Dua P, Li Y (2016) A general extended Kalman filter for simultaneous estimation of system and unknown inputs. Eng Struct 109:85–98

  23. Delgado-Aguiñaga JA, Besançon G, Begovich O, Carvajal JE (2016) Multi-leak diagnosis in pipelines based on Extended Kalman Filter. Control Eng Pract 49:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hydac Electronic, Portable Data Recorder HMG 3010, Edition 2012-06-28-V04 R01

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Ghoshal.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Kátia Lucchesi Cavalca Dedini.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 2.

Table 2 Summary of major components and instruments

Appendix 2

2.1 Notation

A o :

Port opening area of the valve

A dcv :

Port opening area of the direction control valve

A lv :

Port opening area of the loading valve

C d :

Co-efficient of discharge

D lp :

Loading pump displacement rate

D m :

Motor displacement rate

D p :

Pump displacement rate

f :

Function

J :

Moment of inertia

K :

Bulk stiffness of fluid

L :

Angular momentum

M p :

Maximum percentage overshoot

\(\dot{P}_{1}\) :

Inertia torque

P mi :

Pressure at inlet port of the hydro-motor

P spply :

Supply pressure at pump plenum

P pp :

Pressure at loading pump plenum

R vlv :

Resistance offered by a valve

R vlvdcv :

Valve port resistance

R lv :

Resistance offered by the loading valve

R fric :

Friction resistance on the hydro-motor shaft

R lkgp :

Leakage resistance of the pump

R mlkg :

Leakage resistance of the hydro-motor

R lkglp :

Leakage resistance of the loading pump

t :

Time

t p :

Time taken to reach first peak

t r :

Rise time

t :

Time taken to reach steady state

\(\dot{V}\) :

Flow

\(\dot{V}_{1}\) :

Flow lost due to compression at pump plenum

\(\dot{V}_{2}\) :

Flow lost due to compression at motor plenum

\(\dot{V}_{3}\) :

Flow lost due to compression at pump plenum

\(\dot{V}_{p}\) :

Flow supplied by the pump

\(\dot{V}_{\text{m}}\) :

Flow supplied by the motor

\(\dot{V}_{\text{lp}}\) :

Flow supplied by the loading pump

\(\dot{V}_{\text{lkgp}}\) :

Leakage flow of the pump

\(\dot{V}_{\text{lkgm}}\) :

Leakage flow of the motor

\(\dot{V}_{\text{lkglp}}\) :

Leakage flow of the loading pump

\(\dot{V}_{\text{dcv}}\) :

Flow passing through DCV

\(\dot{V}_{\text{lv}}\) :

Flow passing through loading valve

ω H :

Speed of the hydro-motor

ω n :

Natural frequency

ω E :

Speed of the prime mover (electric motor)

ρ :

Density of hydraulic oil

ξ :

Damping factor

ΔP :

Differential pressure

A, B, C, D :

Matrices of appropriate dimensions

O :

Observability matrix

U :

Input vector

E :

Feedback gain

X :

State vector

Y :

Output vector

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasan, M.E., Ghoshal, S.K., Dasgupta, K. et al. Dynamic analysis and estimator design of a hydraulic drive system. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 39, 1097–1108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0594-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0594-7

Keywords

Navigation