Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Focusing the Attention on What Truly Matters. Preventive Approaches for Problematic Instagram use in Youth

  • Published:
Current Addiction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

This paper addresses the extensive use of Instagram by youth and explores the potential negative consequences of such use, with a view to provide recommendations for prevention purposes.

Recent findings

Based on an attention economy model, Instagram strategically incorporates design elements rooted in behavioral psychology to maximize user engagement, fostering habit loops and self-presentation. The paper outlines and discusses Instagram’s unique features for aesthetic manipulation of content, provides an overview of reported negative consequences of Instagram use, and identifies factors influencing vulnerability to problematic use, such as social comparison orientation and fear of missing out. Based on these analyses, recommendations for prevention are formulated.

Summary

To develop prevention strategies for problematic Instagram use and implement tailored interventions for individuals at high risk, it is crucial to emphasize identity development, critical thinking, and emotion regulation. Promoting ethical social network design and responsible Instagram use are critical. Users should be made aware of these risks and processes, automatic usage patterns need to be addressed, and self-regulation and life skills enhanced. More applied research on these topics is required and encouraged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Notes

  1. Part of the arguments of this paper derive from the first author’s PhD thesis. The full document can be accessed here: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/269794

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Naslund JA, Bondre A, Torous J, Aschbrenner KA. Social media and mental health: benefits, risks, and opportunities for research and practice. J Technol Behav Sci. 2020;5:245–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong HY, Mo HY, Potenza MN, Chan MNM, Lau WM, Chui TK, et al. Relationships between severity of internet gaming disorder, severity of problematic social media use, sleep quality and psychological distress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):1879.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shannon H, Bush K, Villeneuve PJ, Hellemans KG, Guimond S. Problematic social media use in adolescents and young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9(4): e33450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Appel M, Marker C, Gnambs T. Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence. Rev Gen Psychol. 2020;24(1):60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019880891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Faelens L, Hoorelbeke K, Cambier R, et al. The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: A systematic review. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2021;4: 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100121. ()

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zulli D. Capitalizing on the look: insights into the glance, attention economy, and Instagram. Crit Stud Media Commun. 2018;35(2):137–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2017.1394582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldhaber MH. The attention economy and the Net. First Monday. 1997;2(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i4.519.

  8. • Bhargava V, Velasquez M. Ethics of the attention economy: The problem of social media addiction. Bus Ethics Q. 2021;31(3):321–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.32. ()

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cloarec J. The personalization–privacy paradox in the attention economy. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020;161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120299.

  10. Abbott M. The epidemiology and impact of gambling disorder and other gambling-related harm. In: WHO Forum on Alcohol, Drugs, and Addictive Behaviours, Geneva, Switzerland; 2017.

  11. Cash H, Rae C, Steel A, Winkler A. Internet addiction: A brief summary of research and practice. Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2012;8:292–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340012803520513.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Eyal N. Hooked: How to build habit-forming products. Penguin; New York, NY, USA; 2014.

  13. Ertemel A, Aydın G. Technology addiction in the digital economy and suggested solutions. Addicta Turk J Addict. 2018;5:665–90. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.4.0038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kozyreva A, Lewandowsky S, Hertwig R. Citizens versus the internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2020;21(3):103–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson IA, Wood W. Habits and the electronic herd: The psychology behind social media’s successes and failures. Consumer Psychol Rev. 2021;4(1):83–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrejevic M. The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. Crit Stud Media Commun. 2002;19(2):230–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180216561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alter A. Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. Penguin Press; New York, NY, USA; 2017.

  18. Montag C, Lachmann B, Herrlich M, Zweig K. Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(14):2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sedera D, Lokuge S. Flaws in flawlessness: Perfectionism as a new technology-driven mental disorder. Forty-first International Conference on Information Systems, India; 2020. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12032.

  20. Kim Y, Kim JH. Using computer vision techniques on Instagram to link users’ personalities and genders to the features of their photos: An exploratory study. Inf Process Manage. 2018;54(6):1101–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Romero S, Van den Broucke S, Van Beggelaer W. Understanding Motives, Usage Patterns, and Effects of Instagram Use in Youths: A Qualitative Study. Emerg Adulthood. 2022;10(6):1376–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968221114251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Casaló LV, Flavián C, Ibáñez-Sánchez S. Understanding consumer interaction on Instagram: the role of satisfaction, hedonism, and content characteristics. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(6):369–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Griffiths MD, Balakrishnan J. The psychosocial impact of excessive selfie-taking in youth: A brief overview. Educ Health. 2018;36(1):3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McComb SE, Mills JS. Young women’s body image following upwards comparison to Instagram models: The role of physical appearance perfectionism and cognitive emotion regulation. Body Image. 2021;38:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harren N, Walburg V, Chabrol H. Studying Social Media Burnout and Problematic Social Media use: The implication of perfectionism and metacognitions. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2021;4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100117.

  26. Cramer EM, Song H, Drent AM. Social comparison on Facebook: Motivation, affective consequences, self-esteem, and Facebook fatigue. Comput Human Behav. 2016;64:739–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Latif K, Weng Q, Pitafi AH, Ali A, Siddiqui AW, Malik MY, Latif Z. Social comparison as a double-edged sword on social media: The role of envy type and online social identity. Telematics Inform. 2021;56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101470.

  28. Liu C, Ma J. Social media addiction and burnout: The mediating roles of envy and social media use anxiety. Curr Psychol. 2020;39(6):1883–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9998-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reer F, Tang WY, Quandt T. Psychosocial well-being and social media engagement: The mediating roles of social comparison orientation and fear of missing out. New Media Soc. 2019;21(7):1486–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818823719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Foroughi B, Griffiths MD, Iranmanesh M, Salamzadeh Y. Associations between Instagram addiction, academic performance, social anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction among university students. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00510-5.

  31. Tanega C, Downs A. Addictive Technology: Prevalence and Potential Implications of Problematic Social Media Use. Psi Chi J Psychol Res. 2020;25(2). https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN25.2.151.

  32. •• Valkenburg PM, Meier A, Beyens I. Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;44:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.017. ()

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wegmann E, Brand M. A narrative overview about psychosocial characteristics as risk factors of problematic social networks use. Curr Addict Rep. 2019;6(4):402–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00286-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Browne M, Hing N, Rockloff M, et al. A multivariate evaluation of 25 proximal and distal risk-factors for gambling-related harm. J Clin Med. 2019;8:509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Verduyn P, Ybarra O, Résibois M, Jonides J, Kross E. Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well‐Being? A Critical Review. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2017;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033.

  36. Andreassen CS. Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2:175–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Frison E, Eggermont S. Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(10):603–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lup K, Trub L, Rosenthal L. Instagram# instasad? Exploring associations among Instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(5):247–52. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang CC. Instagram use, loneliness, and social comparison orientation: Interact and browse on social media, but don’t compare. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(12):703–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Romero S, Van den Broucke S, Billieux J, et al. Development, psychometric validation, and cross-cultural comparison of the “Instagram Motives Questionnaire” (IMQ) and the “Instagram Uses and Patterns Questionnaire” (IUPQ). J Behav Addict. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Closson LM, Bond TA. Social network site use and university adjustment. Educ Psychol. 2019;39(8):1027–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1618443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rozgonjuk D, Sindermann C, Elhai JD, Montag C. Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and social media’s impact on daily-life and productivity at work: Do WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat Use Disorders mediate that association? Addict Behav. 2020;110: 106487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen S, Schreurs L, Pabian S, Vandenbosch L. Daredevils on social media: a comprehensive approach toward risky selfie behavior among adolescents. New Media Soc. 2019;21(11–12):2443–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819850112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mills JS, Musto S, Williams L, Tiggemann M. “Selfie” harm: Effects on mood and body image in young women. Body Image. 2018;27:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pounders K, Kowalczyk CM, Stowers K. Insight into the motivation of selfie postings: Impression management and self-esteem. Eur J Mark. 2016;50(9/10):1879–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weiler B, Gstaettner AM, Scherrer P. Selfies to die for: A review of research on self-photography associated with injury/death in tourism and recreation. Tour Manag Perspect. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dumas TM, Maxwell-Smith M, Davis JP, Giulietti PA. Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Comput Human Behav. 2017;71:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dumas TM, Maxwell-Smith MA, Tremblay PF, Litt DM, Ellis W. Gaining likes, but at what cost? Longitudinal relations between young adults’ deceptive like-seeking on Instagram, peer belonging and self-esteem. Comput Human Behav. 2020;112: 106467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Drenten J, Gurrieri L, Tyler M. Sexualized labour in digital culture: Instagram influencers, porn chic and the monetization of attention. Gender Work Organ. 2020;27(1):41–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hosseinmardi H, Mattson SA, Rafiq RI, Han R, Lv Q, Mishra S. Detection of cyberbullying incidents on the Instagram social network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03909. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27433-1_4.

  51. Moreno MA, Ton A, Selkie E, Evans Y. Secret society 123: Understanding the language of self-harm on Instagram. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(1):78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Vitak J, Chadha K, Steiner L, Ashktorab Z. Identifying women’s experiences with and strategies for mitigating negative effects of online harassment. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2017:1231–1245. Portland, Oregon, USA: ACM. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2998181.2998337.

  53. Boyd D. Why America is self-segregating. Data & Society. 2017:1–10. https://points.datasociety.net/why-america-is-self-segregating-d881a39273ab

  54. DellaPosta D, Shi Y, Macy M. Why do liberals drink lattes? Am J Sociol. 2015;120(5):1473–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Feltman CE, Szymanski DM. Instagram use and self-objectification: The roles of internalization, comparison, appearance commentary, and feminism. Sex Roles. 2018;78(5):311–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0796-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. •• Meier A, Reinecke L. Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review. Commun Res. 2021;48(8):1182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220958224. ()

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. •• Cataldo I, Billieux J, Esposito G, Corazza O. Assessing problematic use of social media: where do we stand and what can be improved? Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022;45: 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101145. ()

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. •• Flayelle M, Schimmenti A, Starcevic V, Billieux J. The pitfalls of recycling substance-use disorder criteria to diagnose behavioral addictions. In: Heather N, Field M, Moss A, Satel S, eds. Evaluating the Brain Disease Model of Addiction. Routledge; 2022:339–349. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032762-34Provides a critical account on the application of the biomedical model of addiction to non-substance related addictive behaviors.

  59. Orben A. Teenagers, screens and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55(4):407–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Satchell LP, Fido D, Harper CA, et al. Development of an Offline-Friend Addiction Questionnaire (O-FAQ): Are most people really social addicts? Behav Res. 2021;53:1097–106. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01462-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Valkenburg PM. Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021;45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006.

  62. Green L, Kreuter M. The precede–proceed model. In: Health Promotion Planning: An Educational Approach. 3rd ed. California, USA: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1999:32–43.

  63. Brailovskaia J, Rohmann E, Bierhoff HW, Schillack H, Margraf J. The relationship between daily stress, social support and Facebook Addiction Disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2019;276:167–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Burnell K, George MJ, Vollet JW, Ehrenreich SE, Underwood MK. Passive social networking site use and well-being: The mediating roles of social comparison and the fear of missing out. Cyberpsychology. 2019;13(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-3-5.

  65. Casale S, Fioravanti G. Why narcissists are at risk for developing Facebook addiction: The need to be admired and the need to belong. Addict Behav. 2018;76:312–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Elhai JD, Levine JC, Dvorak RD, Hall BJ. Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav. 2016;63:509–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Elhai JD, Levine JC, Hall BJ. The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: A review of the literature and conceptual frameworks. J Anxiety Disord. 2019;62:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Roberts JA, Pullig C, Manolis C. I need my smartphone: A hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;79:13–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Satici SA. Facebook addiction and subjective well-being: A study of the mediating role of shyness and loneliness. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2019;17(1):41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9862-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang P, Zhao M, Wang X, et al. Peer relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction: The mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of the need to belong. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(4):708–17. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wegmann E, Brand M. Internet-communication disorder: It’s a matter of social aspects, coping, and Internet-use expectancies. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Yau JC, Reich SM. Are the qualities of adolescents’ offline friendships present in digital interactions? Adolescent Res Rev. 2018;3(3):339–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0059-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ. Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 1994.

  74. Brand M, Wegmann E, Stark R, et al. The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;104:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Abeele MMV, Halfmann A, Lee EW. Drug, demon, or donut? Theorizing the relationship between social media use, digital well-being, and digital disconnection. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.007.

  76. Radtke T, Apel T, Schenkel K, Keller J, von Lindern E. Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mobile Media & Communication. 2022;10(2):190–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Syvertsen T, Enli G. Digital detox: Media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence. 2020;26(5–6):1269–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519847325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Coyne P, Woodruff SJ. Taking a Break: The Effects of Partaking in a Two-Week Social Media Digital Detox on Problematic Smartphone and Social Media Use, and Other Health-Related Outcomes among Young Adults. Behav Sci. 2023;13(12):1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13121004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. World Health Organization. Mental health: strengthening our response. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response. 2022.

  80. World Health Organization. Mental health: strengthening our response. https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheet/fs220/en/. 2016.

  81. World Health Organization. Public health implications of excessive use of the Internet, computers, smartphones and similar electronic devices: Meeting report. Japan, 27–29 August 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/184264/1/9789241509367_eng.pdf. 2015.

  82. Romero S, Van den Broucke S. The effectiveness of prevention programs for problematic Internet use in adolescents and youths: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychol: J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace. 2021;15(2). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-2-10.

  83. American Psychological Association. Guidelines for prevention in psychology. Am Psychol. 2014;69(3):285–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Gielen AC, McDonald EM, Gary TL, Bone LR. Using the PRECEDE/PROCEED Model to Apply Health Behavior Theories. In: Glanz K, Rimer FM, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 4th ed. Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 407–33.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Green L. Toward cost–benefit evaluations of health education: some concepts, methods, and examples. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(Suppl. 2):34–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Glasgow RE. RE-AIMing research for application: ways to improve evidence for family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(1):11–9. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.1.11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2004;27(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. • Algorithm Justice League. The Algorithmic Justice League’s 101 overview. https://www.ajl.org/learn-more. Published 2020. Provides important information towards equitable and accountable AI.

  90. • Center for Humane Technology. Policy reforms toolkit. https://www.humanetech.com/policy-reforms. Published 2022. Provides a toolkit to continue drafting policies that address asymmetries of power between technology companies and democratic societies.

  91. Hermstruwer Y. Contracting around privacy: the (behavioral) law and economics of consent and big data. J Intell Prop Info Tech Elec Com L. 2017;8:9.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science. 2015;347(6221):509–14. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Donovan J, Caplan R, Matthews J, Hanson L. Algorithmic accountability: A primer. Data & Society Research Institute; 2018. Available from: https://datasociety.net/library/algorithmic-accountability-a-primer/.

  94. Bandy J. Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 2021;5(CSCW1):74. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Eg R, Demirkol Tønnesen Ö, Tennfjord MK. A scoping review of personalized user experiences on social media: The interplay between algorithms and human factors. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2023;9: 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Natarajan N. Do They Stop? How Do They Stop? Why Do They Stop? Whether, How, and Why Teens Insert “Frictions” Into Social Media’s Infinite Scroll. Int J Commun. 2024;18:20.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Rixen JO, Meinhardt LM, Glöckler M, Ziegenbein ML, Schlothauer A, Colley M, Rukzio E, Gugenheimer J. The Loop and Reasons to Break It: Investigating Infinite Scrolling Behaviour in Social Media Applications and Reasons to Stop. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 2023;7(MHCI):228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604275.

  98. Purohit A, Jan B, Schöbel S, Janson A, Holzer A. Designing for Digital Wellbeing on a Smartphone: Co-creation of Digital Nudges to Mitigate Instagram Overuse. Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2023. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2023.499.

  99. Király O, Potenza MN, Stein DJ, et al. Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance. Compr Psychiatry. 2020;100: 152180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Verduyn P, Gugushvili N, Massar K, Täht K, Kross E. Social comparison on social networking sites. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020;36:32–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Fioravanti G, Casale S, Bocci Benucci S, Prostamo A, Falone A, Ricca V, Rotella F. Fear of missing out and social networking sites use and abuse: A meta-analysis. Comput Human Behav. 2021;122: 106839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Andrade FC, Erwin S, Burnell K, Jackson J, Storch M, Nicholas J, Zucker N. Intervening on Social Comparisons on Social Media: Electronic Daily Diary Pilot Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2023;10: e42024. https://doi.org/10.2196/42024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Alutaybi A, Al-Thani D, McAlaney J, Ali R. Combating Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) on Social Media: The FoMO-R Method. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Phillips WJ, Wisniewski AT. Self-compassion moderates the predictive effects of social media use profiles on depression and anxiety. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2021;4: 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Weaver JL, Swank JM. Mindful Connections: A Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Adolescent Social Media Users. J Child Adolesc Couns. 2019;5(2):103–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23727810.2019.1586419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Ryan E, Linehan C. A qualitative exploration into personal psychological agency in Instagram use. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2022;6: 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Bandura A. Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age; 2006. pp. 1–43.

  108. Kögler H-H. Agency and the Other: On the intersubjective roots of self-identity. New Ideas Psychol. 2012;30(1):47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Verplanken B, Orbell S. Attitudes, Habits, and Behavior Change. Annu Rev Psychol. 2022;73:327–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Olson JA, Sandra DA, Chmoulevitch D, et al. A Nudge-Based Intervention to Reduce Problematic Smartphone Use: Randomised Controlled Trial. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2023;21:3842–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00826-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Brevers D, Turel O. Strategies for self-controlling social media use: Classification and role in preventing social media addiction symptoms. J Behav Addict. 2019;8(3):554–63. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Tandon A, Kaur P, Dhir A, Mäntymäki M. Sleepless due to social media? Investigating problematic sleep due to social media and social media sleep hygiene. Comput Human Behav. 2020;113: 106487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Barsova T, Cheong ZG, Mak AR, Liu JC. Predicting Psychological Symptoms When Facebook’s Digital Well-being Features Are Used: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(8): e39387. https://doi.org/10.2196/39387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Meynadier J, Malouff JM, Loi NM, et al. Lower Mindfulness is Associated with Problematic Social Media Use: A Meta-Analysis. Curr Psychol. 2024;43:3395–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04587-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Chan SS, Van Solt M, Cruz RE, Philp M, Bahl S, Serin N, ... Canbulut M. Social media and mindfulness: From the fear of missing out (FOMO) to the joy of missing out (JOMO). J Consumer Aff. 2022;56(3):1312–1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12476.

  116. Kreling R, Meier A, Reinecke L. Feeling Authentic on Social Media: Subjective Authenticity Across Instagram Stories and Posts. Social Media + Society. 2022;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086235.

  117. Hofmann W, Luhmann M, Fisher RR, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. J Pers. 2014;82(4):265–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Iwakabe S, Nakamura K, Thoma NC. Enhancing emotion regulation. Psychother Res. 2023;33(7):918–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2183155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Tornquist M, Miles E. Trait self-control and beliefs about the utility of emotions and emotion regulation in self-control performance. Self Identity. 2023;22(4):639–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2022.2146183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Paschke K, Diestelkamp S, Zapf A, Busch K, Arnaud N, Prehn-Kristensen A, Reis O, Stark M, Cloes JO, Schulz AL, Brauer H, Krömer T, Thomasius R, the Res@t Consortium. An app-based training for adolescents with problematic digital-media use and their parents (Res@t digital): protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial. Front Psychiatry. 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1245536.

  121. Cohen N, Ochsner KN. From surviving to thriving in the face of threats: the emerging science of emotion regulation training. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018;24:143–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Doré BP, Silvers JA, Ochsner KN. Toward a Personalized Science of Emotion Regulation. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2016;10(4):171–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Zahrai K, Veer E, Ballantine PW, Peter de Vries H. Conceptualizing Self-control on Problematic Social Media Use. Australas Mark J. 2022;30(1):74–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1839334921998866.

  124. Zahrai K, Veer E, Ballantine PW, de Vries HP, Prayag G. Either you control social media or social media controls you: Understanding the impact of self-control on excessive social media use from the dual-system perspective. J Consumer Aff. 2022;56(2):806–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Fujita K, Orvell A, Kross E. Smarter, not harder: A toolbox approach to enhancing self-control. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2020;7(2):149–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/237273222094124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:348–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Haga SM, Kraft P, Corby E-K. Emotion regulation: antecedents and well-being outcomes of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression in cross-cultural samples. J Happiness Stud. 2009;10:271–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9080-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Dryman MT, Heimberg RG. Emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression: a systematic review of expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;65:17–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Hu T, Zhang D, Wang J, Mistry R, Ran G, Wang X. Relation between emotion regulation and mental health: A meta-analysis review. Psychol Rep. 2014;114(2):341–62. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.20.PR0.114k22w4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Pogrebtsova E, Son Hing L, González-Morales MG. Effectiveness of an emotion regulation intervention versus an active control on daily well-being and cognitive reappraisal: An experience sampling randomized controlled trial. Int J Stress Manag. 2022;29(4):400–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. World Health Organization. Life skills education for children and adolescents in schools. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63552. 2020.

  132. • Reinecke L, Gilbert A, Eden A. Self-regulation as a key boundary condition in the relationship between social media use and well-being. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;45:101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.008Important article on the role of self-regulation and self-control as boundary conditions of the effects on social media on psychological well-being.

  133. Nasheeda A, Abdullah HB, Krauss SE, Ahmed NB. A narrative systematic review of life skills education: effectiveness, research gaps, and priorities. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2019;24(3):362–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2018.1479278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Leaning M. An Approach to Digital Literacy through the Integration of Media and Information Literacy. Media Commun. 2019;7(2):4–13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1931.

  135. Law NWY, Woo DJ, de la Torre J, Wong KWG. A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2018. Available from: http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf.

  136. Polanco-Levicán K, Salvo-Garrido S. Understanding Social Media Literacy: A Systematic Review of the Concept and Its Competences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):8807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148807.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Manca S, Bocconi S, Gleason B. “Think globally, act locally”: A glocal approach to the development of social media literacy. Comput Educ. 2021;160: 104025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Taibi D, Scifo L, Bruno N, Fulantelli G. Social Media Literacy to Support a Conscious Use of Social Media in Adolescents and Improve Their Psychological Well-Being: A Pilot Study. Sustainability. 2023;15:12726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Iftikhar I, Yasmeen B, Nadeem M, Ahmad N. Filtered reality: Exploring gender differences in Instagram use, social conformity pressure, and regret among young adults. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2023:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2023.2244020.

  140. Stavrova O, Luhmann M. Social connectedness as a source and consequence of meaning in life. J Posit Psychol. 2016;11(5):470–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1117127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Lambert NM, Stillman TF, Hicks JA, Kamble S, Baumeister RF, Fincham FD. To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013;39:1418–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Dev Psychol. 2007;43(2):267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Wegmann E, Brand M. A narrative overview about psychosocial characteristics as risk factors of a problematic social networks use. Curr Addict Rep. 2019;6:402–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00286-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Jarzyna CL. Parasocial Interaction, the COVID-19 Quarantine, and Digital Age Media. Human Arenas. 2021;4(3):413–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00156-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Verswijvel K, Heirman W, Hardies K, Walrave M. Designing and validating the friendship quality on social network sites questionnaire. Comput Human Behav. 2018;86:289–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Wang X, Arafa A, Liu K, Eshak ES, Hu Y, Dong JY. Combined healthy lifestyle and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Affect Disord. 2021;289:144–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive any financial support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium

    Silvana Melissa Romero Saletti & Stephan Van den Broucke

Authors
  1. Silvana Melissa Romero Saletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan Van den Broucke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SMRS conceived the idea for the review and outlined it. SMRS and SVdB wrote the manuscript text, and adjusted and reviewed it for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvana Melissa Romero Saletti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of Interest

SMRS and SVdB have nothing to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

No animal or human subjects were used in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romero Saletti, S.M., Van den Broucke, S. Focusing the Attention on What Truly Matters. Preventive Approaches for Problematic Instagram use in Youth. Curr Addict Rep (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00576-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00576-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation