Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the Slot Machine Zone

  • Gambling (L Clark, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Addiction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The slot machine zone describes a ‘trance-like’ state of diminished attention to time passing and gambling-irrelevant events during Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) use. This article summarizes two prominent theoretical accounts of this state and articulates a new account that seeks to integrate them.

Recent Findings

Zone experiences are correlated with gambling problems and may be amplified by specific features of EGMs and other modern gambling formats. Links with excitement, relaxation, and depression have been found, implicating both positive and negative reinforcement processes. Emerging evidence suggests gamblers in the zone are more focused on EGM use (‘zoned in’). Models rooted in either Flow Theory or dissociation do not fully account for these effects.

Summary

Integrating earlier models, we propose a continuum of gambling immersion as a function of problem gambling severity. Cognitive studies aimed at clarifying the psychological nature of immersion will help inform programmes that treat and prevent gambling harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potenza MN, Balodis IM, Derevensky J, Grant JE, Petry NM, Verdejo-Garcia A, et al. Gambling Disorder. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2019;5:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0099-7.

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Wardle H, Reith G, Langham E, Rogers RD. Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm. BMJ. 2019;365:1807–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Browne M, Langham E, Rawat V, Greer N, Li E, Rose J, Rockloff M, Donaldson P, Thorne H, Goodwin B, Bryden G, Best T. Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: a public health perspective. Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation. 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51519. Accessed 29 Apr 2021.

  5. Markham F, Young M, Doran B. The relationship between player losses and gambling-related harm: evidence from nationally representative cross-sectional surveys in four countries. Addiction. 2015;111:320–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Korn DA, Shaffer HJ. Gambling and the Health of the public: adopting a public health perspective. J Gambl Stud. 1999;15:289–365. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023005115932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffiths M. Fruit machine gambling: the importance of structural characteristics. J Gambl Stud. 1993;9:101–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Breen RB, Zimmerman M. Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2002;18:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014580112648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Binde P, Romild U, Volberg RA. Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: evidence from a Swedish population survey. Int Gambl Stud. 2017;17:490–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1360928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MacLaren VV. Video lottery is the most harmful form of gambling in Canada. J Gambl Stud. 2015;32:459–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9560-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dowling N, Smith D, Thomas T. Electronic Gaming Machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? 2005;100:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00962.x.

  12. Taylor A, Gill T, Head L, Pugh L, Star G, Rogers N, Tiss Y, Chappell R, Walter C, Delfabbro P. Gambling Prevalence in South Australia. South Australian Department for Families and Communities. 2006. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/9595.

  13. Schüll ND. Addiction by design, vol. 108. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12326.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobs DF. A general theory of addictions: a new theoretical model. J Gambl Behav. 1986;2:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oakes J, Pols R, Lawn S, Battersby M. The zone: a qualitative exploratory study of an altered state of awareness in electronic gaming machine problem gambling. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018;18:177–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9976-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs DF. Evidence for a common dissociative-like reaction among addicts. J Gambl Behav. 1988;4:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01043526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diskin KM, Hodgins DC. Narrowing of attention and dissociation in pathological video lottery gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 1999;15:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102306291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. IJsselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW, Poels K. The Game Experience Questionnaire. NL: Eindhoven; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta R, Derevensky JL. An empirical examinination of Jacobs’ General Theory of Addictions: Do Adolescent Gamblers Fit the Theory? J Gambl Stud. 1998;14:17–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow and the Foundations of positive psychology. New York: Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Dixon MJ, Stange M, Larche CJ, Graydon C, Fugelsang JA, Harrigan KA. Dark flow, depression and multiline slot machine play. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9695-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murch WS, Ferrari MA, McDonald BM, Clark L. Investigating flow state and cardiac pre-ejection period during electronic gaming machine use. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuley NB, Jacobs DF. The relationship between dissociative-like experiences and sensation seeking among social and problem gamblers. J Gambl Behav. 1988;4:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bergh C, Kühlhorn E. The development of pathological gambling in Sweden. J Gambl Stud. 1994;10:261–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kofoed L, Morgan TJ, Buchkowski J, Carr R. Dissociative Experiences Scale and MMPI-2 scores in video poker gamblers, other gamblers, and alcoholic controls. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997;185:58–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199701000-00011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Diskin KM, Hodgins DC. Narrowed focus and dissociative experiences in a community sample of experienced video lottery gamblers. Can J Behav Sci. 2001;33:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wood RTA, Gupta R, Derevensky JL, Griffiths M. Video game playing and gambling in adolescents: common risk factors. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2004;14:77–100. https://doi.org/10.1300/J029v14n01_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gee P, Coventry KR, Birkenhead D. Mood state and gambling: using mobile telephones to track emotions. Br J Psychol. 2005;96:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712604X15536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wanner B, Ladouceur R, Auclair AV, Vitaro F. Flow and dissociation: examination of mean levels, cross-links, and links to emotional well-being across sports and recreational and pathological gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2006;22:289–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9017-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ledgerwood DM, Petry NM. Psychological experience of gambling and subtypes of pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Res. 2006;144:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Farrelly S, Ffrench C, Ogeil RP, Phillips JG. Coping strategies and problem gambling. Behav Chang. 2007;24:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.24.1.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Noseworthy TJ, Finlay K. A comparison of ambient casino sound and music: effects on dissociation and on perceptions of elapsed time while playing slot machines. J Gambl Stud. 2009;25:331–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9136-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hopley AAB, Nicki RM. Predictive factors of excessive online poker playing. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010;13:379–85. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carlbring P, Degerman N, Jonsson J, Andersson G. Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with a three-year follow-up. Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41:321–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2012.689323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. McCormick J, Delfabbro P, Denson LA. Psychological vulnerability and problem gambling: an application of Durand Jacobs’ General Theory of Addictions to electronic gaming machine playing in Australia. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28:665–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9281-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oakes J, Pols R, Battersby M, Lawn S, Pulvirenti M, Smith D. A focus group study of predictors of relapse in electronic gaming machine problem gambling, part 1: factors that “push” towards relapse. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28:451–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9264-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stewart MJ, Wohl MJA. Pop-up messages, dissociation, and craving: how monetary limit reminders facilitate adherence in a session of slot machine gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;27:268–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dixon MJ, Graydon C, Harrigan KA, Wojtowicz L, Siu V, Fugelsang JA. The allure of multi-line games in modern slot machines. Addiction. 2014;109:1920–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wohl MJA, Parush A, Kim HAS, Warren K. Building it better: applying human-computer interaction and persuasive system design principles to a monetary limit tool improves responsible gambling. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;37:124–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cartmill T, Slatter T, Wilkie B. The role of anxiety and dissociation in young Australian gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31:1215–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9510-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Craparo G, Gori A, Sareri GI, Pace U. Personality and clinical dimensions of pathological gamblers. A pilot study. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2015;6:612–6. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Imperatori C, Innamorati M, Bersani FS, Imbimbo F, Pompili M, Contardi A, et al. The association among childhood trauma, pathological dissociation and gambling severity in casino gamblers. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017;24:203–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1997.

  43. Templeton JA, Dixon MJ, Harrigan KA, Fugelsang JA. Upping the reinforcement rate by playing the maximum lines in multi-line slot machine play. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31:949–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9446-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gori A, Craparo G, Caretti V, Giannini M, Iraci-Sareri G, Bruschi A, et al. Impulsivity, alexithymia and dissociation among pathological gamblers in different therapeutic settings: a multisample comparison study. Psychiatry Res. 2016;246:789–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.046.

  45. Tricker C, Rock AJ, Clark GI. Cue-reactive altered State of consciousness mediates the relationship between problem-gambling severity and cue-reactive urge in poker-machine Gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2016;32:661–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9549-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McKeith CFA, Rock AJ, Clark GI. Trait mindfulness, problem-gambling severity, altered state of awareness and urge to gamble in poker-machine gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2017;33:617–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9635-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Murch WS, Chu SWM, Clark L. Measuring the slot machine zone with attentional dual tasks and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31:375–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Trivedi RH, Teichert T. The Janus-Faced Role of Gambling Flow in Addiction Issues. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20:180–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Caretti V, Gori A, Craparo G, Giannini M, Iraci-Sareri G, Schimmenti A. A new measure for assessing substance-related and addictive disorders: The Addictive Behavior Questionnaire (ABQ). J Clin Med. 2018;7:194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080194.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Chu S, Limbrick-Oldfield EH, Murch WS, Clark L. Why do slot machine gamblers use stopping devices? Findings from a ‘Casino Lab’ experiment. Int Gambl Stud. 2018;18:310–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1413125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rémond JJ, Romo L. Analysis of gambling in the media related to screens: immersion as a predictor of excessive use? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:58. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010058.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Dixon MJ, Gutierrez J, Stange M, Larche CJ, Graydon C, Vintan S, et al. Mindfulness problems and depression symptoms in everyday life predict dark flow during slots play: implications for gambling as a form of escape. Psychol Addict Behav. 2019;33:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000435.

  53. Murch WS, Clark L. Effects of bet size and multi-line play on immersion and respiratory sinus arrhythmia during electronic gaming machine use. Addict Behav. 2019;88:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dixon MJ, Gutierrez J, Larche CJ, Stange M, Graydon C, Kruger TB, et al. Reward reactivity and dark flow in slot-machine gambling: “Light” and “dark” routes to enjoyment. J Behav Addict. 2019;8:489–98. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.38.

  55. Lavoie RV, Main KJ. When Losing Money and Time Feels Good: The paradoxical role of flow in gambling. J Gambl Issues. 2019;41:53–72. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2019.41.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Murch WS, Limbrick-Oldfield EH, Ferrari MA, MacDonald KI, Fooken J, Cherkasova MV, et al. Zoned in or zoned out? Investigating immersion in slot machine gambling using mobile eye tracking. Addiction. 2020;115:1127–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14899.

  57. Kruger TB, Dixon MJ, Graydon C, Stange M, Larche CJ, Smith SD, et al. Using deliberate mind-wandering to escape negative mood states: implications for gambling to escape. J Behav Addict. 2020;9:723–33. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00067.

  58. Rogier G, Beomonte Zobel S, Marini A, Camponeschi J, Velotti P. Gambling disorder and dissociative features: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000693.

  59. Schluter MG, Hodgins DC. Dissociative experiences in gambling disorder. Curr Addict Rep. 2019;6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-0238-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Blaszczynski A, Nower L. A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction. 2002;97:487–99. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Murch WS, Clark L. Games in the brain: neural substrates of gambling addiction. Neurosci. 2016;22:534–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415591474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rogers RD, Butler J, Millard S, Cristino F, Davitt LI, Leek EC. A scoping investigation of eye-tracking in Electronic Gambling Machine (EGM) play. GambleAware. 2017. https://research.bangor.ac.uk/portal/files/20304339/2018_RGT_Eye_tracking_machines.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2021.

  63. Barton KR, Yazdani Y, Ayer N, Kalvapalle S, Brown S, Stapleton J, et al. The effect of losses disguised as wins and near misses in electronic gaming machines: a systematic review. J Gambl Stud. 2017;33:1241–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9688-0.

  64. Friedman B. Designing Casinos To Dominate The competition: The Friedman International Standards of Casino Design. NV: Institute for the Study of Gambling Reno; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cairns P, Cox A, Nordin AI. Immersion in digital games: review of gaming experience research. In: Angelides MC, Agius H, editors. Handbook of Digital Games. Hoboken: Wiley; 2014. pp. 338–60.

  66. Olson JA, Stendel M, Veissière S. Hypnotised by your phone? Smartphone addiction correlates with hypnotisability. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Bernstein EM, Putnam FW. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986;174:731–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(08)80004-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Braun BG. The BASK model of dissociation. Dissociation. 1988;1:4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jackson SA, Marsh H. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1996;18:17–35. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Butler LD. Normative dissociation. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2006;29:45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2005.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Taylor LN. Video games: perspective, point-of-view and immersion. Dissertation. Gainesville: University of Florida; 2002.

  72. Bernstein EM, Putnam FW. Development, reliability, and validity of a child dissociation scale. Child Abuse Negl. 1986;174:731–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(08)80004-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Blaszczynski A, Ladouceur R, Nower L, Shaffer H. Informed choice and gambling: principles for consumer protection. J Gambl Bus Econ. 2008;2:103–18. https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v2i1.527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wohl MJA, Davis CG, Hollingshead SJ. How much have you won or lost? Personalized behavioral feedback about gambling expenditures regulates play. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;70:437–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Livingstone C, Woolley R. The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers. Australian Institute for Primary Care and Ageing. 2008. https://apo.org.au/node/2737. Accessed 29 Apr 2021.

  76. Blaszczynski A, Cowley E, Anthony C, Hinsley K. Breaks in play: do they achieve intended aims? J Gambl Stud. 2016;32:789–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9565-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Blaszczynski A, Gainsbury S, Karlov L. Blue gum gaming machine: an evaluation of responsible gambling features. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30:697–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9378-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Warren K, Parush A, Wohl M, Kim HS. Embedded disruption: facilitating responsible gambling with persuasive systems design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Persuasive Technology; 2014. p. 253–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_22.

  79. Idris F, Small D. Interacting with game elements using eye movement tracking. US Patent #US20190384385A1. 2018. https://patents.google.com/patent/US10725538B2/en. Accessed 29 Apr 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Magdalen Schluter for providing insightful input into the Gambling Immersion hypothesis presented in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Spencer Murch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Luke Clark is the Director of the Centre for Gambling Research at UBC, which is supported by funding from the Province of British Columbia and the British Columbia Lottery Corporation (BCLC), a Canadian Crown Corporation. The Province of British Columbia and BCLC had no involvement in the ideas expressed herein and impose no constraints on publishing. Luke Clark has received speaker/travel honoraria from the National Association of Gambling Studies (Australia) and the National Center for Responsible Gaming (USA). He has received consulting fees from Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (Canada), GambleAware (UK), and the National Center for Responsible Gaming (USA). He has not received any further direct or indirect payments from the gambling industry or groups substantially funded by gambling. He has received royalties from Cambridge Cognition Ltd. relating to neurocognitive testing. Spencer Murch completed his PhD at the Centre for Gambling Research at UBC. He has no further conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Gambling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murch, W.S., Clark, L. Understanding the Slot Machine Zone. Curr Addict Rep 8, 214–224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-021-00371-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-021-00371-x

Keywords

Navigation