Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative analysis of lower ionospheric response time delay associated to the solar flares

  • Original Study
  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The D-layer of the ionosphere doesn’t respond instantaneously to the incoming solar irradiation, rather, there’s a measurable amount of time delay (\(\Delta t\)) between the incoming solar X-ray flux (\(\phi (t)\)) during a solar flare and the respective change in the electron density profile (\(N_e(t)\)). The \(\Delta t\) depends on the peak of the incoming X-ray flux (\(\phi _{max}\)) during the flare. We solve the ‘electron continuity equation’ for the D-layer by numerical method for a selected set of 455 solar flares to obtain \(\Delta t\) over six suitably chosen latitudes of the mid-latitude regions of both hemispheres and analyse the \(\Delta t\)\(\phi _{max}\) profile. To analyse the latitude dependence of the dispersed nature of \(\Delta t\)\(\phi _{max}\) profile, we define and compute two parameters, namely, (i) the RMS value of the D-layer response time delay (\(\Delta t_{rms}\)) and (ii) the gradient of the slope (m) of the linear fitting on \(\Delta t\)\(log_{10}(\phi _{max})\) profile over each of those chosen latitudes. Further, we compute the latitudinal variation of D-layer response time delay (\(\Delta _{lat}(\Delta t)\)) for selected pairs of chosen latitudes. To analyse the \(\Delta _{lat}(\Delta t)\)\(\phi _{max}\) profile, we compute a third parameter, namely, the RMS value of latitudinal variation of D-layer response time delay (\(\Delta _{lat}(\Delta t)_{rms}\)). We do a comparative analysis of these parameters across the chosen set of latitudes. Finally, we conclude quantitatively with possible explanations about the systematic latitude dependence and variation of the dispersed nature of \(\Delta t\)\(\phi _{max}\) profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availibility of data and materials

Data used here is available at ‘https://satdat.ngdc.noaa.gov’.

References

  • Basak T, Chakrabarti SK (2013) Effective recombination coefficient and solar zenith angle effects on low-latitude D-region ionosphere evaluated from VLF signal amplitude and its time delay during X-ray solar flares. Astrophys Space Sci 348:315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdermann J, Kriegel M, Heymann F, Hoque MM, Wilken V, Borries C, Heßelbarth A, Jakowski N (2018) Ionospheric response to the X9. 3 flare on 6 September 2017 and its implication for navigation services over Europe. Space Weather 16:1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti SK, Sasmal S, Chakraborty S, Basak T, Tucker RL (2018) Modeling D-region ionospheric response of the Great American TSE of August 21, 2017 from VLF signal perturbation. Adv Space Res 62(3):651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Basak T (2020) Numerical analysis of electron density and response time delay during solar flares in mid-latitudinal lower ionosphere. Astrophys Space Sci 365:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Ruohoniemi JM, Baker JBH, Fiori RAD, Bailey SM, Zawdie KA (2021) Ionospheric sluggishness: a characteristic time-lag of the ionospheric response to solar flares. J Geophys Res 126:e2020JA028813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilov BG, Ermak VM, Poklad YV, Ryakhovskii IA (2019) Estimate of variations in the parameters of the midlatitude lower ionosphere caused by the solar flare of September 10, 2017. Geomagn Aeron 59(5):587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolarski A, Grubor D, Šulić D (2011) Diagnostics of the solar X-flare impact on lower ionosphere through the VLF-NAA signal recordings. Open Astron 20(4):591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Kumar S (2018) Solar flare effects on D-region ionosphere using VLF measurements during low-and high-solar activity phases of solar cycle 24. Earth Planets Space 70:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le H, Liu L, Chen B, Lei J, Yue X, Wan W (2007) Modeling the responses of the middle latitude ionosphere to solar flares. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 69:1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le H, Liu L, Chen Y, Wan W (2013) Statistical analysis of ionospheric responses to solar flares in the solar cycle 23. J Geophys Res 118(1):576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae WM, Thomson NR (2004) Solar flare induced ionospheric D-region enhancements from VLF phase and amplitude observations. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 66:77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midya SK, Chattopadhyay R (1996) The effects of solar and ionospheric parameters on seasonal variation of 6300 Å line emission at Calcutta. Earth Moon Planets 74:123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra AP (1974) Ionospheric effects of solar flares, vol 46. Reidel, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra SK (1992) The upper atmosphere. The Asiatic Society, Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • Nina A, Čadež VM (2021) Variation of electron loss rate due to recombination processes in the upper ionospheric D-region plasma after a solar X-ray flare: a study case. Eur Phys J D 75:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nina A, Čadež V, Žulić D, Srećković V, Žigman V (2012) Effective electron recombination coefficient in ionospheric D-region during the relaxation regime after solar flare from February 18, 2011. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 279:106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nina A, Čadež VM, Bajčetić J, Mitrović ST, Popović LC (2018) Analysis of the relationship between the solar X-ray radiation intensity and the D-region electron density using satellite and ground-based radio data. Sol Phys 293:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nina A, Čadež VM, Lakićević MD, Radovanović MM, Kolarski AB, Popović LC (2019) Variations in ionospheric D-region recombination properties during increase of its X-ray heating induced by solar X-ray flare. Therm Sci 23:4043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacini AA, Raulin JP (2006) Solar X-ray flares and ionospheric sudden phase anomalies relationship: a solar cycle phase dependence. J Geophys Res 111:A09301

    Google Scholar 

  • Palit S, Basak T, Pal S, Chakrabarti SK (2015) Theoretical study of lower ionospheric response to solar flares: sluggishness of D-region and peak time delay. Astrophys Space Sci 356:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palit S, Ray S, Chakrabarti SK (2016) Inverse problem in ionospheric science: prediction of solar soft-X-ray spectrum from very low frequency radiosonde results. Astrophys Space Sci 361:151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palit S, Raulin JP, Szpigel S (2018) Response of earth’s upper atmosphere and VLF propagation to celestial X-ray ionization: investigation with Monte Carlo simulation and long wave propagation capability code. J Geophys Res Space Phys 123:10224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey U, Singh B, Singh OP, Saraswat VK (2015) Solar flare induced ionospheric D-region perturbation as observed at a low latitude station Agra, India. Astrophys Space Sci 357:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe JN, Ferraro AJ, Lee HS, Kreplin RW, Mitra AP (1970) Observations of electron density during a solar flare. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 31:1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvakumarana R, Maurya AK, Gokani SA, Veenadhari B, Kumar S, Venkatesham K, Phanikumar DV, Singh AK, Siingh D, Singh R (2015) Solar flares induced D-region ionospheric and geomagnetic perturbations. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 123:102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson NR, Clilverd MA (2001) Effective recombination coefficient and solar zenith angle effects on low-latitude D-region ionosphere evaluated from VLF signal amplitude and its time delay during X-ray solar flares. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 63(16):1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todoroki Y, Maekawa S, Yamauchi T, Horie T, Hayakawa M (2017) Solar flare induced D region perturbation in the ionosphere, as revealed from a short-distance VLF propagation path. Geophys Res Lett 34:1–5

  • Valnicek B, Ranzinger P (1972) X-ray emission and D-region sluggishness. Bull Astron Inst Czechoslov 23:318

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten RC, Poppoff IG (1961) A model of solar-flare-induced ionization in the D region. J Geophys Res 66:2779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten RC, Poppoff IG, Edmonds RS, Berning WW (1965) Effective recombination coefficients in the lower ionosphere. J Geophys Res 70:1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žigman V, Grubour D, Šulić D (2007) D-region electron density evaluated from VLF amplitude time delay during X-ray solar flares. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 69:775

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank NCEI-NOAA for using solar X-ray data. They thank the reviewers also for their constructive suggestions.

Funding

Sayak Chakraborty acknowledges the support of DST-INSPIRE fellowship, Department of Science and Technology, India (Application Reference No. DST/INSPIRE/03/2021/001103; IF No. IF200266).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamal Basak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors don’t have any conflict of interest

Consent for publication

Authors give consent to publish this original article in this journal.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraborty, S., Aryan, K., Roy, T. et al. Quantitative analysis of lower ionospheric response time delay associated to the solar flares. Acta Geod Geophys 57, 447–459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00390-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00390-8

Keywords

Navigation