Abstract
The theoretical magnetotelluric responses of a vertical inhomogeneous and anisotropic resistivity structure with a transitional layer in which the resistivity is a linear function of depth are investigated. The expressions of the tangential electric and magnetic fields at the surface of the Earth model and the corresponding impedance have been evaluated. The influence of some model parameters such as the anisotropic dipping angles, the anisotropic coefficients and the resistivity contrast as well as the thickness of the transitional layer on the apparent resistivity and impedance phase are treated in detail. The results are graphically illustrated in the form of apparent resistivity and impedance phase curves, and they may be used in the interpretation of magnetotelluric sounding data in some specified geologic situations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovici F (1974) The forward magnetotelluric problem for an inhomogeneous and anisotropic structure. Geophysics 39:59–68
Adetunji AQ, Ferguson IJ, Vayavur R, Cheraghi S, Naghizadeh M, Whymark W, Smith RS, Ayer J, Craven JA (2021) Evidence of magmatism and rifting in the southern superior craton from the temagami geophysical anomaly. Precambrian Res 362:106310
Arfken GB, Weber HJ, Harris FE (2013) Mathematical methods for physicists. Academic Press
Bedrosian PA, Peacock JR, Dhary M, Sharif A, Feucht DW, Zahran H (2019) Crustal magmatism and anisotropy beneath the arabian shield—a cautionary tale. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 124(10):10153–10179
Berdichevsky M, Dmitriyev V, Mershchikova N (1974) Investigation of gradient media in deep electromagnetic sounding. 1zv, Akad. Nauk, Sssr, Series Fiz., Zemli, 10(6):61–72; Engl Trans 1974, Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth,10(6):380–386, 61–72
Boas ML (2006) Mathematical methods in the physical sciences. John Wiley and Sons
Bologna MS, Padilha AL, Vitorello Í (2005) Geoelectric crustal structures off the sw border of the sao francisco craton, central brazil, as inferred from a magnetotelluric survey. Geophys J Int 162:357–370
Cagniard L (1953) Basic theory of the mt methods of geophysical propecting. Geophysics 18:605–635
Chave AD, Jones AG (2012) The Magnetotelluric method: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Danda N, Rao CK, Kumar A, Rao PR, Rao PS (2020) Implications for the lithospheric structure of cambay Rift Zone, Western India: inferences from a magnetotelluric study. Geosci Front 11:278–289
Didana YL, Thiel S, Heinson G (2014) Magnetotelluric imaging of upper crustal partial melt at tendaho graben in Afar Ethiopia. Geophys Res Lett 41(9):3089–3095
Grajales-Nishimura JM, Ramos-Arias MA, Solari L, Murillo-Muñetón G, Centeno-García E, Schaaf P, Torres-Vargas R (2018) The juchatengo complex: an upper-level ophiolite assemblage of late paleozoic age in Oaxaca, Southern Mexico. Int J Earth Sci 107:1005–1031
Kao D (1981) Magnetotelluric response on vertically inhomogeneous earth. J Geophys Res 86:3027–3038
Kao D (1982) Magnetotelluric response on vertically inhomogeneous earth having conductivity varying exponentially with depth. Geophysics 47:89–99
Kao D, Rankin D (1980) Magnetotelluric response on inhomogeneous layered earth. Geophysics 45:1793–1802
Ma C, Naghizadeh M, Adetunji A, Lodge RW, Snyder D, Sherlock R (2021) Imaging neoarchean crustal structures: an integrated geologic-seismic-magnetotelluric study in the western wabigoon and winnipeg river Terranes Superior Craton. Precambrian Res 364:106339
Mallick K (1971) Can transition in the electrical properties of the earth be detected? Geophys Prospect 19:156–161
Mallick K (1970) Magnetotelluric sounding on a layered earth with transitional boundary. Geophys Prospect 18:738–757
Menezes PT, Travassos JM (2010) Magnetotellurics as a modeling tool in the extensive magmatic context of Paraná Basin, Brazil. Lead Edge 29:832–840
Negi J, Saraf P (1972) Impedance of a plane electromagnetic wave at the surface of a layered conducting earth with dipping anisotropy. Geophys Prospect 20:785–799
Negi JG, Saraf PD (1973) Inductive sounding of a stratified earth with transition layer resting on dipping anisotropic beds. Geophys Prospect 21:635–647
Pal B, Banerjee B (1990) Magnetotelluric response on a multilayered earth containing transition layer. Gerlands Beiträge Zur Geophysik 99:365–375
Pal BP (1998) Magnetotelluric response on a layered earth with non-monotonic resistivity distribution. Deep electromagnetic exploration. Springer, Berlin, pp 425–431
Peacock JR, Mangan MT, Mcphee D, Ponce DA (2015) Imaging the magmatic system of mono basin, California, with magnetotellurics in three dimensions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:7273–7289
Pek J, Santos FAM (2002) Magnetotelluric impedances and parametric sensitivities for 1-D anisotropic layered media. Comput Geosci 28:939–950
Persidis S (2007) Mathematical handbook. ESPI Publishing, Athens
Qin L, Yang C (2020) Magnetotelluric soundings on a stratified earth with two transitional layers. Pure Appl Geophys 177(11):5263–5274
Ritz M (1984) Inhomogeneous structure of the senegal lithosphere from deep magnetotelluric soundings. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89:11317–11331
Simpson F, Bahr K (2005) Practical magnetotellurics. Cambridge University Press
Sinha AK (1969) The magnetotelluric effect in an inhomogeneous and anisotropic earth. Geoexploration 7:9–28
Tikhonov AN (1950) The determination of the electrical properties of the deep layers of the earth’s crust. Dokl Acad Nauk SSR 73:295–297 ((in Russian))
Tikhonov AN (1986) On determining electrical characteristics of the deep layers of the earth’s crust. In: Vozoff K (ed) Magnetotelluric Methods. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 2–3
Acknowledgements
Dr. Josef Pek is deeply acknowledged for making his computer code Z1ANIS.FOR publicly available. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Anna Martí and the other anonymous reviewer for their thorough reading of the manuscript and for their insightful questions and constructive comments which certainly improved the quality of this paper. Thanks are also to the editor Viktor Wesztergom for the thoughtful suggestion.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding
This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42176092 and 41776079) and the Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, MNR (Grant No. JG2102).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All of three authors discussed the idea of this study. Qin write the original manuscript texts, Yang and Ding review and modify the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Code availability
The code used in this study may be obtained from the corresponding author upon suitable reasons.
Appendix A: The MT responses in polarization with electric vector oriented along the \(x^{{\prime}}\)-axis.
Appendix A: The MT responses in polarization with electric vector oriented along the \(x^{{\prime}}\)-axis.
When the electric field vector of the normally incident plane wave is along the \(x^{{\prime}}\) direction (strike), the existing electric and magnetic fields components in first two isotropic layers are \(E_{x^{\prime}}\) and \(H_{y^{\prime}}\)(in \(o - x^{{\prime}} y^{{\prime}} z^{{\prime}}\) coordinate system), and in the dipping anisotropic layer are \(E_{x}\), \(H_{y}\) and \(H_{z}\) (in \(o{ - }xyz\) coordinate system).
In \(o - x^{{\prime}} y^{{\prime}} z^{{\prime}}\) coordinate system, the electric and magnetic fields may be calculated according to the algebra described in Sect. 3, here only the final results are given. The solution may be refer to the Sect. 3 in this study and the corresponding context in (Qin and Yang 2020).
The electric and magnetic fields in region 1:
The electric and magnetic fields in region 2:
The electric and magnetic fields in region 3:
where \(N^{{\prime}} = {{k_{3} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{k_{3} } {i\omega \mu }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {i\omega \mu }}\).
The impedance at the surface of the model (\(z^{\prime} = 0\)) may be calculated as follows:
where \(\frac{{A^{{\prime}} }}{{B^{{\prime}} }} = \frac{{\left[ {U^{{\prime}} K_{0} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right) + N^{{\prime}} K_{1} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right)} \right]\left[ {I_{1} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right) - I_{0} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right)} \right] + \left[ {U^{{\prime}} I_{0} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right) - N^{{\prime}} I_{1} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right)} \right]\left[ {K_{1} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right) + K_{0} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right)} \right]}}{{\left[ {U^{{\prime}} K_{0} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right) + N^{{\prime}} K_{1} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right)} \right]\left[ {I_{1} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right) + I_{0} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right)} \right] + \left[ {U^{{\prime}} I_{0} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right) - N^{{\prime}} I_{1} \left( {\gamma_{2} } \right)} \right]\left[ {K_{1} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right) - K_{0} \left( {\gamma_{1} } \right)} \right]}}e^{{2k_{1} z_{1} }} ,\)
Finally, the commonly used MT transfer functions (apparent resistivity and impedance phase) can be easily obtained according to the formulas (28) given in Sect. 3.5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, L., Yang, C. & Ding, W. Magnetotelluric responses of a vertical inhomogeneous and anisotropic resistivity structure with a transitional layer. Acta Geod Geophys 57, 157–176 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00373-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00373-9