Skip to main content
Log in

Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions and duality for a class of convex adjustable robust optimization problem

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates optimality conditions and duality for a class of convex adjustable robust optimization problem (ARP). We first propose some constraint qualifications (CQs): the Abadie CQ, the local Farkas–Minkowski CQ, Mangasarian-Fromovitz CQ, and Slater CQ; and give some relationships between these CQs. Then we employ them to derive necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for the optimal solution of (ARP). These conditions are form of Karush–Kuhn–Tucker multiplier rules. We also introduce the Wolfe and Mond-Weir duality schemes and discuss weak, strong, and converse duality results. As an application, some optimality conditions for robust optimization problem are obtained. We include many examples for analyzing and illustrating our results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Ardestani-Jaafari A, Delage E (2018) The value of flexibility in robust location-transportation problems. Transp Sci 52:189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atamtürk A, Zhang M (2007) Two-stage robust network flow and design under demand uncertainty. Oper Res 55:662–673

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2008) Selected topics in robust convex optimization. Math Program (Ser B) 112:125–158

  • Ben-Tal A, Goryashko A, Guslitzer E, Nemirovski A (2004) Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Math Program 99:351–376

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Golany B, Nemirovski A, Vial JP (2005) Retailer-supplier flexible commitments contracts: a robust optimization approach. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 7:248–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Goyal V (2013) On the approximability of adjustable robust convex optimization under uncertainty. Math Methods Oper Res 77:323–343

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Brown DB, Caramanis C (2011) Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev 53:464–501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boni O, Ben-Tal A (2008) Adjustable robust counterpart of conic quadratic problems. Math Methods Oper Res 68:211–233

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Köbis E, Yao JC (2019) Optimality conditions and duality for robust nonsmooth multiobjective optimization problems with constraints. J Optim Theory Appl 181:411–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chuong TD (2016) Optimality and duality for robust multiobjective optimization problems. Nonlinear Anal 134:127–143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chuong TD (2020) Robust optimality and duality in multiobjective optimization problems under data uncertainty. SIAM J Optim 30:1501–1526

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chuong TD, Kim DS (2014) Nonsmooth semi-infinite multiobjective optimization problems. J Optim Theory Appl 160:748–762

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrel V, Murat C, Thiele A (2014) Recent advances in robust optimization: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 235:471–483

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goberna MA, Jeyakumar V, Li G, Vicente-Perez J (2014) Robust solutions of multiobjective linear semi-infinite programs under constraint data uncertainty. SIAM J Optim 24:1402–1419

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goberna MA, Jeyakumar V, Li G, Vicente-Perez J (2015) Robust solutions to multi-objective linear programs with uncertain data. Eur J Oper Res 242:730–743

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hiriart-Urruty JB, Lemarechal C (1991) Convex analysis and minimization algorithms I. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeyakumar V, Li G (2010) Strong duality in robust convex programming: complete characterizations. SIAM J Optim 20:3384–3407

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyakumar V, Li G, Lee GM (2012) Robust duality for generalized convex programming problems under data uncertainty. Nonlinear Anal 75:1362–1373

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH, Lee GM (2018) On optimality conditions and duality theorems for robust semi-infinite multiobjective optimization problems. Ann Oper Res 269:419–438

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee GM, Son PT (2014) On nonsmooth optimality theorems for robust optimization problems. Bull Korean Math Soc 51:287–301

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marandi A, Den Hertog D (2018) When are static and adjustable robust optimization problems with constraint-wise uncertainty equivalent? Math Program 170:555–568

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mordukhovich BS, Nam NM (2013) An easy path to convex analysis and applications. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng TS, Sy C (2014) An affine adjustable robust model for generation and transmission network planning. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 60:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pınar MC, Tütüncü RH (2005) Robust profit opportunities in risky financial portfolios. Oper Res Lett 33:331–340

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda A, Taguchi S, Tütüncü RH (2008) Adjustable robust optimization models for a nonlinear two-period system. J Optim Theory Appl 136:275–295

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tung NM, Duy MV (2023) Constraint qualifications and optimality conditions for robust nonsmooth semi-infinite multiobjective optimization problems. 4OR 21:151–176

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zalinescu C (2002) Convex analysis in general vector spaces. World Scientific, NewJersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the Editors and the Anonymous Referees for their valuable suggestions and remarks leading to the significant improvement of the paper. This research is funded by Vietnam National University HoChiMinh City (VNU-HCM) under Grant number B2024-20-36. A part of this work was completed during a research stay of the first author at Vietnam Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics (VIASM). They are warmly grateful to this institute for its hospitality and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Minh Tung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dedicated to Professor Pham Tien Son on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tung, N.M., Van Duy, M. & Dai, L.X. Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions and duality for a class of convex adjustable robust optimization problem. Comp. Appl. Math. 43, 245 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-024-02762-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-024-02762-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation