Abstract
We study a recovery problem for an unknown boundary coefficient relating to one material characteristic in an eddy current field. The field equations are represented in terms of the potential field method (\(\varvec{T} - \psi \) method) and can be solved numerically by the nodal finite element method. We introduce a measurement as an additional condition and prove the existence and uniqueness of the weak solution. Further, we present an iteration algorithm for the recovery problem and validate its efficiency by two numerical experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen T, Kang T, Lu G, Wu L (2014) A (\(\varvec {T}\), \(\psi \))-\(\psi _e\) decoupled scheme for a time-dependent multiply-connected eddy current problem. Math Methods Appl Sci 37(3):343–359
Chew WC (2014) Vector potential electromagnetic theory with generalized gauge for inhomogeneous anisotropic media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.4780
Chovan J, Geuzaine C, Slodička M (2017) \(\varvec {A}-\phi \) formulation of a mathematical model for the induction hardening process with a nonlinear law for the magnetic field. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321:294–315
Costabel M, Dauge M (2002) Weighted regularization of maxwell equations in polyhedral domains. Numer Math 93(2):239–277
Duan H-Y, Jia F, Lin P, Tan RCE (2009) The local \({L} ^2\) projected \({C} ^0\) finite element method for maxwell problem. SIAM J Numer Anal 47(2):1274–1303
Duan H-Y, Lin P, Tan RCE (2012) \({C} ^0\) elements for generalized indefinite maxwell equations. Numer Math 122(1):61–99
Duan H-Y, Lin P, Tan RCE (2013) Analysis of a continuous finite element method for \(\varvec {H} \left( \text{ curl }, \text{ div } \right)\)-elliptic interface problem. Numer Math 123(4):671–707
Duan H-Y, Lin P, Tan RCE (2013) Error estimates for a vectorial second-order elliptic eigenproblem by the local \({L} ^2\) projected \({C} ^0\) finite element method. SIAM J Numer Anal 51(3):1678–1714
Duan H-Y, Lin P, Tan RCE (2016) A finite element method for a curlcurl-graddiv eigenvalue interface problem. SIAM J Numer Anal 54(2):1193–1228
Fabrizio M, Morro A (2003) Electromagnetism of continuous media. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jin J (2014) The finite element method in electromagnetics, 3rd edn. Wiley-IEEE Press, New York
Kang T, Chen T, Wang Y, Kim KI (2015) A \(\varvec {T}\)-\(\psi \) formulation with the penalty function term for the 3d eddy current problem in laminated structures. Appl Math Comput 271:618–641
Kang T, Kim KI (2009) Fully discrete potential-based finite element methods for a transient eddy current problem. Computing 85(4):339–362
Monk P (2003) Finite element methods for Maxwell’s equations. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Mur G (1994) Edge elements, their advantages and their disadvantages. IEEE Trans Magn 30(5):3552–3557
Slodička M, Van Keer R (2000) Determination of the convective transfer coefficient in elliptic problems from a non-standard boundary condition. In: Marylka J, Tuma M, Sembere J (eds) Simulation, modelling, and numerical analysis : SIMONA 2000. Technical University Liberec, Liberec, pp 13–20
Zemanova V, Slodička M, Dupré L (2010) Determination of a material constant in the impedance boundary condition for electromagnetic fields. J Comput Appl Math 234(7):2062–2068
Zeng Z, Udpa L, Udpa SS, Chan MSC (2009) Reduced magnetic vector potential formulation in the finite element analysis of eddy current nondestructive testing. IEEE Trans Magn 45(3):964–967
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Jorge X. Velasco.
This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (41725017, 41590864, 11571352), National Basic Research Program of China under Grant number 2014CB845906. It was also partially supported by the CAS/CAFEA international partnership Program for creative research teams (No. KZZD-EW-TZ-19 and KZZD-EW-TZ-15).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, R., Kang, T. & Wang, Y. Boundary coefficient determination for an eddy current problem based on the potential field method. Comp. Appl. Math. 37, 3981–3994 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0562-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0562-6