Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hybridization of IMC and PID control structures based on filtered GPC using genetic algorithm

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classical and advanced hybridization methods are employed in the control literature to calibrate the tuning parameters of internal model control (IMC) and proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers. This paper presents an alternative tuning design for the generalized predictive controller (GPC) that is based on both the positional process model and cost function. The proposed method involves the selection of an integral polynomial weighting filter for reference and output signals to deal with reference tracking, disturbance rejection, model-plant mismatch (MPM), minimum control energy and closed-loop robustness. The filter positional GPC (FP-GPC) obtained is transformed into a two-degree-of-freedom polynomial filtered RST structure and then into filtered internal model control (F-IMC) and PID controllers. Also, a multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm is applied to tune the filter parameters. Numerical and experimental essays show the effectiveness of the proposed control methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asano M, Yamamoto T (2001) A design of self-tuning predictive PID controllers. IEICE Trans Fundam E84–A:1779–1783

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley D, Bully DR, Martinz RR (1993a) An overview of genetic algorithms: Part 1. Fundam Univ Comput 15(2):58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley D, Bully DR, Martinz RR (1993b) An overview of genetic algorithms: Part 2. Fundam Univ Comput 15(4):170–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Braatz RD (1996) Internal model control. In: Levine WS (ed) The control handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Branke J, Deb K, Miettinen K, Sowinski R (2008) Multiobjective optimization: interactive and evolutionary approaches. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chien IL (1988) IMC-PID controller design—an extension. In Proceeding of the IFAC adaptive control chemical processes conference, pp 147–152

  • Clarke DW, Mohtadi C, Tuffs PS (1987) Generalized predictive control—Part I: the basic algorithm. Automatica 23:137–148

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke DW (1996) Adaptive predictive control. Annu Rev 20:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Duan Y, Xu S, Shao K, Chen Q (2011) Adaptive PID controller based on generalized predictive control. In: Instrumentation, measurement, computer, communication and control, pp 993–995

  • de Araújo RB, Coelho AAR (2017) Filtered predictive control design using multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm for handling offset in chemical processes. Chem Eng Res Des 17:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadali MS, Visioli A (2013) Digital control engineering: analysis and design, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garpinger O, Hagglund T, Astrom KJ (2014) Performance and robustness trade-offs in PID control. J Process Control 24:568–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Zhang H, Chen Z, Chu B, Cao K, Shan B, Chen R (2015) Generalized predictive control of temperature on an atomic layer deposition reactor. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 23:2408–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jipuang Z, Ren S, Linan M, Mengxiao W (2002) Disturbance rejection performance of generalized predictive control. In: Proceedings of the 4th World congress on intelligent control and automation, pp 295–299

  • Katayama M, Yamamoto T (2004) Evolutional computation in designing a robust IMC-based PID controller. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, pp 6120–6124

  • Landau ID (1998) The RST digital controller design and applications. Control Eng Pract 6:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morari M, Zafiriou E (1989) Robust process control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neshasteriz AR, Sedigh AK, Sadjadian H (2010) Generalized predictive control and tuning of industrial processes with second order plus dead time models. J Process Control 20:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preitl Z, Bars R, Vajk I, Haber R (2004) Internal model representation for generalized predictive control with constraint Handling. In: IEEE 4th international conference on intelligent systems design and application, pp 681–685

  • Sato T, Inoue A (2006) Improvement of tracking performance in self-tuning PID controller based on generalized predictive control. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 2:491–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Seborg DE, Mellichamp DA, Edgar TF, Doyle FJ (2011) Process dynamics and control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silveira AS, Rodriguez JEN, Coelho AAR (2012) Robust design of a 2-DOF GMV controller: a direct self-tuning and fuzzy scheduling approach. ISA Trans 51:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogestad S, Grimholt C (2012) Optimal PI-control and verification of the SIMC tuning rule. In: IFAC conference on advances in PID control, Brescia, Italy, pp 1–5

  • Skogestad S, Postlethwaite I (1996) Multivariable feedback control: analysis and design. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Visioli A (2006) Practical PID control. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vuppu GKRP, Venkata SM, Kodati S (2015) Robust design of PID controller using IMC technique for integrating process based on maximum sensitivity. J Control Autom Electr Syst 26:466–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Rossiter JA (2008) Disturbance rejection and set-point tracking of sinusoidal signals using generalized predictive control. In: Proceedings of the 47th IEEE conference on decision and control, Cancun, Mexico, 9–11 Dec 2008, pp 4079–4084

  • Yamamoto T, Sato T, Inoue A (2006) Improvement of tracking performance in designing a GPC-based PID controller using a time-varying proportional gain. Trans Electr Electron Eng 1:438–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhi-cheng Z, Zhi-yuan L, Jing-gang Z (2011) IMC-PID tuning method based on sensitivity specification for process with time-delay. J Central South Univ 18:1153–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rejane De B. Araújo.

Additional information

Communicated by Jose Roberto Castilho Piqueira, Elbert E N Macau, Luiz de Siqueira Martins Filho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araújo, R.D.B., Coelho, A.A.R. Hybridization of IMC and PID control structures based on filtered GPC using genetic algorithm. Comp. Appl. Math. 37, 2152–2165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0444-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0444-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation