Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovative Solar Sail Earth-Trailing Trajectories Enabling Sustainable Heliophysics Missions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presented trajectory design study demonstrates that near-future solar sails can reach and maintain innovative science orbits about non-traditional Earth-trailing equilibrium points. The proposed configurations can enable long duration stereoscopic solar imaging while potentially alleviating telemetry requirements constraining current solar sail studies. Initial guesses for controlled periodic orbits about equilibrium points that trail the Sun-Earth line by 1.5∘-15∘ are constructed from a linearized solar sail circular restricted three body problem equations of motion. Orbits are then converged in the full nonlinear model using a high order direct collocation method. Transfers to Earth-trailing orbits are then constructed under the assumption that the solar sail is a secondary payload on a larger spacecraft en-route to the Sun-Earth L1 Lagrange point. Naturally occurring gravitational manifolds flowing towards the Lagrange point, as well as navigation data from previous Lagrange point missions, are used to generate a set of baseline trajectories for the primary spacecraft. End-to-end trajectory design and optimization is then carried out to construct time optimal solar sail transfers to each target science orbit from initial conditions constrained to lie on the carrier spacecraft’s Lagrange point trajectory. Additionally, trade studies are performed to assess how sail performance and Earth-trailing orbit selection affect transfer time of flight and instrument pointing accuracy. Results indicate that, based on current technological developments, near future solar sails are capable of station keeping about periodic Earth-trailing orbits while maintaining near-constant solar observation. Moreover, time of flights on the order of 1 year are observed for most combinations of sail performance and feasible initial conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaiser, M. L., Kucera, T., Davila, J., Cyr, O. S., Guhathakurta, M., Christian, E.: The STEREO mission: An introduction. Space Sci. Rev. 136(1-4), 5–16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pezent, J., Sood, R., Heaton, A.: High-fidelity contingency trajectory design and analysis for NASA’s Near-Earth Asteroid (NEA) scout solar sail mission. Acta Astronautica (2019)

  3. Howell, K. C.: Three-dimensional, periodic, ‘halo’orbits. Celestial mechanics 32(1), 53–71 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Sood, R., Howell, K.: Solar sail transfers and trajectory design to Sun-Earth L4, L5: Solar observations and potential Earth trojan exploration. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-018-00141-4 (2019)

  5. Sood, R.: Significance of specific force models in two applications: Solar sails to Sun-Earth L 4/L 5 and grail data analysis suggesting lava tubes and buried craters on the moon. PhD thesis, Purdue University (2016)

  6. Ozimek, M. T., Grebow, D. J., Howell, K. C.: A collocation approach for computing solar sail lunar pole-sitter orbits. Open Aerospace Engineering Journal 3, 65–75 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grebow, D. J., Ozimek, M. T., Howell, K. C.: Design of optimal low-thrust lunar pole-sitter missions. J. Astronaut. Sci. 58(1), 55–79 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Szebehely, V.: Theory of orbit: The restricted problem of three Bodies. Elsevier (2012)

  9. Howell, K., Pernicka, H.: Numerical determination of Lissajous trajectories in the restricted three-body problem. Celest. Mech. 41(1-4), 107–124 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Howell, K.: Families of orbits in the vicinity of the collinear libration points. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, pp. 4465 (1998)

  11. Howell, K. C., Kakoi, M.: Transfers between the Earth–Moon and Sun–Earth systems using manifolds and transit orbits. Acta Astronaut. 59(1-5), 367–380 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrés, A., Heiligers, J., Miguel, N.: Road map to L4/L5 with a solar sail. 2018 Space flight mechanics meeting, p. 0211 (2018)

  13. Heiligers, J., Diedrich, B., Derbes, W., McInnes, C.: Sunjammer: preliminary end-to-end mission design. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, p. 4127 (2014)

  14. Heiligers, J., McInnes, C.: Agile solar sailing in three-body problem: motion between artificial equilibrium points. 64th International Astronautical Congress 2013, pp. IAC–13 (2013)

  15. McInnes, C. R., McDonald, A. J., Simmons, J. F., MacDonald, E. W.: Solar sail parking in restricted three-body systems. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 17(2), 399–406 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guzzetti, D., Sood, R., Chappaz, L., Baoyin, H.: Stationkeeping analysis for solar sailing the L4 region of binary asteroid systems. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, p. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003994 (2019)

  17. Johnson, L., McNutt, L., Castillo-Rogez, J.: Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) scout mission (2017)

  18. Johnson, L.: Solar sail propulsion status (2019)

  19. Topputo, F., Zhang, C.: Survey of direct transcription for low-thrust space trajectory optimization with applications. Abstract and Applied Analysis, Vol. 2014, Hindawi Publishing Corporation (2014)

  20. Betts, J. T.: Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 21(2), 193–207 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Herman, A. L., Conway, B. A.: Direct optimization using collocation based on high-order Gauss-Lobatto quadrature rules. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics 19(3), 592–599 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grebow, D. J.: Trajectory design in the Earth-Moon system and lunar South Pole coverage. PhD thesis, Purdue University (2010)

  23. Gill, P. E., Murray, W., Saunders, M. A.: SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM review 47(1), 99–131 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wächter, A., Biegler, L. T.: On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming 106(1), 25–57 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Barclay, A., Gill, P. E., Rosen, J. B.: SQP methods and their application to numerical optimal control. Report NA, p. 97–3 (1997)

  26. Farrés, A., Jorba, À.: Station keeping strategies for a solar sail in the solar system. Recent advances in celestial and space mechanics, pp. 83–115. Springer (2016)

  27. Heaton, A., Ahmad, N., Miller, K.: Near Earth asteroid scout solar sail thrust and torque model (2017)

  28. Heaton, A., Diedrich, B. L., Orphee, J., Stiltner, B., Becker, C.: Momentum management for the NASA near Earth asteroid scout solar sail mission (2017)

  29. Orphee, J., Diedrich, B., Stiltner, B., Becker, C., Heaton, A.: Solar Sail attitude control system for the NASA near Earth asteroid scout mission (2017)

  30. Ozimek, M. T.: Low-thrust trajectory design and optimization of lunar south pole coverage missions. PhD thesis, Purdue University (2010)

  31. Roberts, C., Case, S., Reagoso, J., Webster, C: Early mission maneuver operations for the deep space climate observatory Sun-Earth L1 libration point mission (2015)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Astrodynamics and Space Research Laboratory, The University of Alabama, 245 7th Ave, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35401, USA

    James B. Pezent & Rohan Sood

  2. EV/42, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, 35812, USA

    Andrew Heaton

Authors
  1. James B. Pezent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rohan Sood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Heaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James B. Pezent.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A previous version of this paper was presented at the 2019 AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting (AAS 19-541).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pezent, J.B., Sood, R. & Heaton, A. Innovative Solar Sail Earth-Trailing Trajectories Enabling Sustainable Heliophysics Missions. J Astronaut Sci 67, 1249–1270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-020-00214-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-020-00214-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation