Skip to main content
Log in

MicroRNA-21 Expression in Primary Breast Cancer Tissue Among Egyptian Female Patients and its Correlation with Chromosome 17 Aneusomy

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer amongst Egyptian women and worldwide. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21), on chromosome 17q21.3, is one of the most up-regulated microRNAs in cancer that silences multiple target genes involved in cancer-signaling pathways. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between numerical aberrations of chromosome 17 and the miR-21 expression profile in BC tissues in female Egyptian patients.

Methods

The study included 37 female patients with sporadic primary breast carcinoma, their age ranged from 31 to 65 years. Fresh breast tissue specimens were evaluated for miR-21 expression levels using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction technology and cytogenetic fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis for chromosome 17 aneusomy.

Results

miR-21 was up-regulated 12.9-fold in BC tissues compared with normal adjacent tissue. Over-expression was significantly associated with several clinico-pathologic characteristics; as higher tumor grade, more tumor size, advanced stage, and poor prognostic index. In addition, chromosome 17 monosomy and trisomy were observed in 21.6 and 5.4 % of BC patients, respectively. However, the large majority (73 %) of patients had heterogeneous cell populations. Chromosome 17 copy number heterogeneity in cell populations were significantly associated with advanced clinical stage and higher miR-21 expression profile in BC tissues.

Conclusion

Chromosome 17 aneusomy and miR-21 expression are positively correlated and can potentially serve as prognostic markers in BC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kachoui MA, Keyhani E, Karbasian H, Karimlou M, Kadivar M, Behjati F. Role of chromosome 17 aneusomy as a prognostic parameter in some Iranian women with sporadic breast cancer using interphase FISH technique. Iran J Pathol. 2010;5(2):65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang X, Qi Y, Ling G, Xing-Hua L, Xiao-Hui Z, Li-Bing S, Huan-Xin L. Flotillin-2 is associated with breast cancer progression and poor survival outcomes. J Transl Med. 2013;11:190–200.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hafez MM, Hassan ZK, Zekri AN, Gaber AA, Al Rejaie SS, Sayed-Ahmed MM, Al Shabanah O. MicroRNAs and metastasis-related gene expression in Egyptian breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:591–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hussein O, Mosbah M, Farok O, Farag K, El-Sayed A, Arafa M, Abdallah A. Hormone receptors and age distribution in breast cancer patients at a university hospital in Northern Egypt. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2013;7:51–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vasconcelos DS, da Silva FPE, Quintana LG, Anselmo NP, Othman MAK, Liehr T, de Oliveira EHC. Numerical aberrations of chromosome 17 and TP53 in brain metastases derived from breast cancer. Genet Mol Res. 2013. doi:10.4238/2013.January.4.15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruan K, Fang X, Ouyang G. MicroRNAs: novel regulators in the hallmarks of human cancer. Cancer Lett. 2009;285:116–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Qian B, Katsaros D, Lu L, Preti M, Durando A, Arisio R, Mu L, Yu H. High miR-21 expression in breast cancer associated with poor disease-free survival in early stage disease and high TGF-β1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:131–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinholz MM, Bruzek AK, Visscher DW, Lingle WL, Schroeder MJ, Perez EA, Jenkins RB. Breast cancer and aneusomy 17: implications for carcinogenesis and therapeutic response. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(3):267–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Selcuklu S, Yakicier M, Erson A. An investigation of microRNAs mapping to breast cancer related genomic gain and loss regions. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2009;189(1):15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. John S, Consuelo A, Clara M, Neal O, Irma R, Jose R, Andrew G, Barbara A, Karen L, Reza P. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom–Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:1067–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singletary S, James L. Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:37–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okugawa H, Yamamoto D, Uemura Y, Sakaida N, Yamada M, Tanaka K, Kamiyama Y. Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the value of the Nottingham prognostic index for patients treated in a single institution. Surg Today. 2005;35:907–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heneghan H, Miller N, Lowery A, Karl J, Newell J, Michael J. Circulatory microRNAs as novel minimally invasive biomarkers for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):499–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li-Xu Y, Xiu-Fang H, Qiong S, Deng L, Wu Q, Zeng Y, Shao J. MicroRNA miR-21 overexpression in human breast cancer is associated with advanced clinical stage, lymph node metastasis and patient poor prognosis. RNA. 2008;14(11):2348–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Espinosa AB, Tabernero MD, Maillo A, Sayagues JM. The cytogenetic relationship between primary and recurrent meningiomas points to the need for new treatment strategies in cases at high risk of relapse. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:772–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmittgen D, Eun J, Jinmai J, Anasuya S, Liuqing Y, Terry S, Caifu C. Real-time PCR quantification of precursor and mature microRNA. Methods. 2008;44(1):31–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sikand K, Singh J, Ebron JS, Shukla GC. Housekeeping gene selection advisory: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-actin are targets of miR-644a. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47510.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Jin H, Liu H, Lv S, Wang B, Wang R, Liu H, Ding M, Yang Y, Li L, Zhang J, Fu S, Xie D, Wu M, Zhou W, Qian Q. MiRNA-99a directly regulates AGO2 through translational repression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogenesis. 2014;3(97):1038–41.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Iorio M, Ferracin M, Liu C, Veronese A, Spizzo R, Sabbioni S. MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7063–70.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leidner RS, Li L, Thompson CL. Dampening enthusiasm for circulating microRNA in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57841.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Duygu S, Mark T, Charles S. Mir-21 as a key regulator of oncogenic processes. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:918–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmitt FC, Soares R, Leitao D. Detection of numerical chromosome 17 abnormalities in fine-needle aspirates of breast cancer using a novel in situ hybridization signal amplification method. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;19(2):141–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Botti C, Pescatore B, Mottolese M, Sciarretta F, Greco C, Di Filippo F, Gandolfo GM, Cavaliere F, Bovani R, Varanese A, Cianciulli AM. Incidence of chromosomes 1 and 17 aneusomy in breast cancer and adjacent tissue: an interphase cytogenetic study. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(5):530–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang S, Hossein Saboorian M, Frenkel EP, Haley BB, Siddiqui MT, Gokaslan S, Hynan L, Ashfaq R. Aneusomy 17 in breast cancer: its role in HER-2/neu protein expression and implication for clinical assessment of HER-2/neu status. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(2):137–145.

  25. Watters AD, Going JJ, Cooke TG, Bartlett JM. Chromosome 17 aneusomy is associated with poor prognostic factors in invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;77:109–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pritchard KI, Munro A, O’Malley FP. Chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) duplication as a predictor of anthracycline response: evidence from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) MA.5 Trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:541–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang H, Bai X, Meng F, Zhang C, Zhang GX. Evaluation of chromosome 17 polysomy in breast cancer by FISH analysis of whole nuclei, and its clinicopathological significance. Oncol Lett. 2014;7(6):1954–8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noura Ramadan Abdel-hamid.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and informed consent

The Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University approved the study (ID No. SRC/ 9/7/2012) and all patients gave written informed consent.

Conflict of interest

All authors (NRA, EAM, AHA, and FMB) declare that there was no conflict of interest. All authors (NRA, EAM, AHA, and FMB) declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be considered as a potential conflict of interest. Furthermore, no authors have any non-financial competing interests.

Funding

All authors (NRA, EAM, AHA, and FMB) declare that no external funding source was received for this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-hamid, N.R., Mohammed, E.A., Abbas, A.H. et al. MicroRNA-21 Expression in Primary Breast Cancer Tissue Among Egyptian Female Patients and its Correlation with Chromosome 17 Aneusomy. Mol Diagn Ther 19, 365–373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-015-0161-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-015-0161-4

Keywords

Navigation