Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bringing Nature to Schools to Promote Children’s Physical Activity

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is essential for human health and wellbeing across all age, socioeconomic, and ethnic groups. Engagement with the natural world is a new defining criterion for enhancing the benefits of PA, particularly for children and young people. Interacting with nature benefits children’s social and emotional wellbeing, develops resilience, and reduces the risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus across all population groups. Governments around the world are now recognizing the importance of children spending more active time outdoors. However, children’s outdoor activities, free play, and nature-related exploration are often structured and supervised by adults due to safety concerns and risks. In this context, schools become more accessible and safe options for children to engage in PA outdoors with the presence of nature features. Research on school designs involving young children has revealed that children prefer nature-related features in school environments. Affordances in nature may increase children’s interest in physically active behaviors. Given that present school campuses are designed for operational efficiency and economic reasons, there is a need to re-design schools responding to the positive role of nature on human health. If schools were re-designed to incorporate diverse natural features, children’s PA and consequent health and wellbeing would likely improve markedly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lubans D, Plotnikoff R, Lubans N. A systematic review of the impact of physical activity programmes on social and emotional well-being in at-risk youth. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2012;17(1):2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Penedo FJ, Dahn JR. Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Curr Opt Psychiatry. 2005;18:189–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fjørtoft I, Kristoffersen B, Sageie J. Children in schoolyards: tracking movement patterns and physical activity in schoolyards using global positioning system and heart rate monitoring. Landsc Urban Plan. 2009;93:210–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu G, Wilson J, Qi R, et al. Green neighbourhoods, food retail and childhood overweight: differences by population density. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21(4):317–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, et al. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer S, Frantz C, Bruehlman-Senecal E, et al. Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environ Behav. 2009;41(5):607–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ottosson J, Grahn P. A comparison of leisure time spent in a garden with leisure time spent indoors: on measures of restoration in residents in geriatric care. Landsc Res. 2005;30(1):23–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maas J, Verheij RA, Spreeuwenberg P, et al. Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell R, Popham F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1655–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pretty J, Peacock J, Hine R, et al. Green exercise in the UK countryside: effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy. J Environ Plan Manage. 2007;50(2):211–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pryor A, Carpenter C, Townsend M. Outdoor education and bush adventure therapy: a socio-ecological approach to health and wellbeing. Aust J Outdoor Educ 2005;9(1):3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brymer E, Davids K, Mallabon L. Understanding the psychological health and well-being benefits of physical activity in nature: an ecological dynamics analysis. Ecopsychol. 2014;6(3):189–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan K, Qin W, Wang G, et al. Microstructure abnormalities in adolescents with Internet Addiction Disorder. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gregoire C. Green spaces in schools improve children’s memory and attention. In: The Huffington post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/19/green-spaces-schools_n_7594882.html. Accessed 19 Jun 2015.

  15. Grossman C. Federal program gives families ‘nature prescriptions’. In USA TODAY 2011; http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/environment/2011-02-28-nature28_ST_N.htm. Accessed 14 Mar 2015.

  16. Southern M. Obesity prevention in children: physical activity and nutrition. Nutrition. 2004;20(7–8):704–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Godbey G. Outdoor recreation, health, and wellness: understanding and enhancing the relationship, Discussion paper for the Outdoor Resources Review Group Resources for the Future Background Study, Washington 2009; http://www.rff.org.

  18. Maller C, Townsend M. Children’s mental health and wellbeing and hands-on contact with nature: perceptions of principals and teachers. Int J Learning. 2006;12(4):357–73.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Capaldi C, Dopko R, Zelenski J. The relationship between nature-connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2014;5(976):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roe J, Aspinall P. The emotional affordances of forest settings: an investigation in boys with extreme behavioural problems. Landsc Res. 2011;36(5):535–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Said I. Affordances of nearby forest and orchard on children’s performances. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012;38:195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stolar C. Go outside and play. Parks Recreat. 2009;44(3):36–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Storli R, Hagen TL. Affordances in outdoor environments and children’s physical active play in pre-school. Eur Early Child Educ Res J. 2010;18(4):445–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ungar M, Dumond C, Mcdonald W. Risk, resilience and outdoor programmes for at-risk children. J Soc Work. 2005;5:319–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wells NM. At home with nature: effects of “Greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environ Behav. 2000;32(6):775–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuo FE, Taylor FA. A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a national study. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(9):1580–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hofferth L, Sandberg F. How American children spend their time. J Marriage Fam. 2001;63(2):295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Korpela K, Kytta M, Hartig T. Restorative experiences, self-regulation, and children’s place preferences. J Environ Psychol. 2002;22:387–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Drenowatz C, Wartha O, Brandstetter S, et al. Effects of a teacher-centred, school-based intervention program on health behaviour and cardiovascular disease risk in elementary school children. ISRN Public Health; 2013.

  30. Gortmaker SL, Cheung LW, Peterson KE, et al. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinry intervention on diet and physical activity among urgan primary school children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:975–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Han K-T. Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the psychology, behavior, and health of students at a junior high school in Taiwan. Environ Behav. 2009;41(5):658–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Russell KC. Assessing treatment outcomes in outdoor behavioural healthcare using the Youth Outcome Questionnaire. Child Youth Care Forum. 2003;32(6):355–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor FA, Kuo F, Sullivan WC. Views of nature and self-discipline: evidence from inner city children. J Environ Psychol. 2002;22:49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams D, Dixon S. Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in schools: synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010. Rev Educ Res. 2013;83(2):211–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lloyd A, Gray T. Place-based outdoor learning and environmental sustainability within Australian Primary schools. J Sustain Educ. 2014;29(2):22–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Graham M. Understanding human agency in terms of place: a proposed Aboriginal research methodology. PAN Philos Act Nat. 2009;6:71–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Whap G. A Torres Strait Islander perspective on the concept of Indigenous Knowledge. Aust J Indig Educ. 2001;29(2):22–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gurholt K. Joy of nature, friluftsliv education and self: combining narrative and cultural–ecological approaches to environmental sustainability. JAEOL. 2014;14(3):233–46.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nisbett EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA. Happiness is in our nature: exploring nature-relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. J Happiness Stud. 2011;12:303–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weinstein N, Przybylski A, Ryan R. Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009;35(10):1315–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dowdell K, Gray T, Malone K. Nature and its influence on children’s outdoor play. Aust J Outdoor Educ. 2011;15(2):24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Barker JE, Semenov AD, Michaelson L, et al. Less-structured time in children’s daily lives predicts self-directed executive functioning. Front Psychol. 2014;5(593):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Brussoni M, Gibbons R, Gray C, et al. What is the relationship between risky outdoor play and health in children? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:6423–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bentsen P, Mygind E, Randrup T. Towards an understanding of Udeskole: education outside the classroom in a Danish context. In: Paper presented at the 4th International Mountain and Outdoor Sports Conference, November 20–23, 2008 Hrubá Skála (CZ) Czech Republic, http://www.imosc.org. Accessed 17 June 2015.

  45. Muñoz S-A. Children in the outdoors: a literature review. Published by the Sustainable Development Research Centre on behalf of the National Sustainable Development Centre with support from the Forestry Commission, Scotland; 2009.

  46. O’Brien L, Murray R. Forest School and its impacts on young children: case studies in Britain. Urban For Urban Green. 2007;6:249–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hope G, Austin R, Dismore H, et al. Wild woods or urban jungle: playing it safe or freedom to roam. Education. 2007;35(4):321–32.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Knight S. Forest School as a way of learning in the outdoors in the UK. Int J Cross-Disciplinary Subjects Educ. 2011;1(1):590–5.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gill T. No fear: growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zubrick SR, Wood L, Villanueva K, et al. Nothing but fear itself: parental fear as a determinant of child physical activity and independent mobility. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth); 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thomas G, Thompson J. A child’s place: why environment matters to children. London: Green Alliance\Demos; 2004.

  52. Halpin D. Utopian Spaces of ‘‘Robust Hope’’: the architecture and nature of progressive learning environments. Asia Pac J Teacher Educ. 2007;35(3):243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rudduck J, Flutter J. How to improve your school. London: Continuum; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cordovil R, Araujo D, Pepping GJ, et al. An ecological stance on risk and safe behaviours in children: the role of affordances and emergent behaviours. New Ideas Psychol. 2015;36:50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Christidou V, Tsevreni I, Epitropou M, et al. Exploring primary children’s views and experiences of the school ground: the case of a Greek school. Int J Environ Sci Educ. 2013;8(1):59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ghaziani R. School Design: researching children’s views. Childhoods Today. 2010;4(1):1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rigolon A. A space with meaning: children’s involvement in participatory design processes. Des Princ Pract. 2011;5(2):151–62.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Woolner P, Hall E, Wall K, et al. Getting together to improve the school environment: user consultation, participatory design and student voice. Improv Schools. 2007;10(3):223–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nair P. But are they learning? School buildings: the important unasked questions. http://www.designshare.com/Research/Nair/Are_They_Learning.htm. Accessed 14 May 2012.

  60. Cunningham AJ, Hill G. Co-designing with children to define child-friendly schools in Kenya. Stories of Innovation 2014. http://www.unicefstories.org/2014/05/28/co-designing-with-children-to-define-child-friendly-schools-in-kenya/. Accessed 12/2/2015.

  61. Mary Featherstone Design. The inside-out study 2006. http://www.featherston.com.au/inside-out.html. Accessed 20/8/2009.

  62. Sack-Min J. Teens help architects redesign schools. Am School Board J. 2008. http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/ehost/pdf?vid=5&hid=106&sid=6ffb5675-1536-4ede-983e-b3507273a6ad%40sessionmgr9. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.

  63. Fielding M. Transformative approaches to student voice. Br Educ Res J. 2004;30(2):295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ghaziani R. Children’s voices: raised issues for school design. CoDesign. 2008;4(4):225–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Cassebaum A. Revisiting Summerhill. Phi Delta Kappan. 2003;84(8):575–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Pridmore J. The poet’s school and the parrot’s cage: the educational spirituality of Rabindranath Tagore. Int J Child Spirituality. 2009;14(4):355–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Birkett D. The school I’d like: here is what you wanted. The Guardian, UK (3 May, 2011). http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/03/school-iwould-like. Accessed on 4/5/2011.

  68. Jenkins, M. School design: how important are buildings to learning? The Guardian, UK (22 March 2013). http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2013/mar/22/school-design-architecture-buildings-learning-live-chat. Accessed on 3/6/2015.

  69. Burke C, Grosvenor I. The school I’d like: children and young people’s reflections on an education for the 21st century. London: Routledge Falmer; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Doherty L. The school I’d like. News and features, Sydney Morning Herald, Australia; 2005.

  71. French J, Hill D. The kid-friendly school. Am School Board J. 2004;191(1):36–8.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Thomas H. Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis‘placement’ of learning. Br J Educ Technol. 2010;41(3):502–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wu CD, McNeely E, Cedeño-Laurent JG, et al. Linking student performance in Massachusetts elementary schools with the “Greenness” of school surroundings using remote sensing. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e108548. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Makela T, Kankaanranta M, Gallagher C. Involving students in the redesign of learning environments conducive to learning and wellbeing. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Architectural Research Symposium in Finland. 2014; p. 268–82.

  75. Barraza L. Children’s drawings about the environment. Environ Educ Res. 1999;5(1):49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Haney W, Russell M, Bebell D. Drawing on education: using drawings to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educ Rev. 2004;74(3):241–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Pluhar Z, Piko B, Uzzolib A, et al. Representations of the relationship among physical activity, health and perceived living environment in Hungarian urban children’s images. Landsc Urban Plan. 2010;95(4):151–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Pointon P. Students’ views of environments for learning from the primary to the secondary school. Int J Educ Res. 2000;33:375–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Prosser J, Loxley A. Enhancing the contribution of visual methods to inclusive education. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2007;7(1):55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bland D, Sharma-Brymer V. Imagination in school children’s choice of their learning environment: an Australian study. Int J Educ Res. 2013;56:75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Kellett M. Children as active researchers: a new research paradigm for the 21st century?. UK: ESRC; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  82. Woolner P. A school environment to help, not hinder: understanding the role of physical space in education. School design together. London: Routledge; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Pretty J, Angus C, Bain M, et al. Nature, childhood, health and life pathways. Occasional paper 2009; Interdisciplinary Centre for Environment and Society. UK: University of Essex; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kooiman BJ, Sheehan DP. Motivation to move with exergaming in online physical education. Int J Physical Educ Fitness Sports. 2014;3(2):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland, Australia

    Vinathe Sharma-Brymer

  2. School of Cultural and Professional Studies, Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia

    Derek Bland

Authors
  1. Vinathe Sharma-Brymer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Derek Bland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinathe Sharma-Brymer.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest

Vinathe Sharma-Brymer and Derek Bland declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma-Brymer, V., Bland, D. Bringing Nature to Schools to Promote Children’s Physical Activity. Sports Med 46, 955–962 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0487-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0487-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation