Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Oestrogen Treatment on Skeletal Response to Exercise in the Hips and Spine in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It is recognized that low oestrogen status impairs the skeletal response to mechanical loading in elderly women; therefore, oestrogen administration is expected to increase the osteogenic response to mechanical strain.

Objectives

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the combined effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and exercise on femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women, in comparison with the effects of exercise-only intervention.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus and ProQuest up to May 1, 2014, to ascertain the influence of oestrogen administration and exercise on BMD in postmenopausal women. The study quality and potential publication bias of the included trials were evaluated. The primary end point was the change in BMD from baseline to follow-up. The effect sizes were estimated in terms of the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of exercise categories.

Results

Six studies with a total of 764 postmenopausal women (aged between 51.8 ± 2.9 and 68.0 ± 3.0 years) met the inclusion criteria. The included studies had low and high levels of heterogeneity of hip outcomes (I 2 = 0.0 %) and spine outcomes (I 2 = 80.8 %), respectively. Fixed- and random-effects models were used for calculating the effect size estimates. The pooled effect sizes associated with the combined interventions of HRT and exercise were significant for femoral neck BMD (SMD 0.220, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.011–0.429, p = 0.039) and lumbar spine BMD (SMD 0.729, 95 % CI 0.186–1.273, p = 0.009) in comparison with the exercise-only intervention. The mixed loading exercise programmes were sensitive to HRT in preventing postmenopausal bone loss in the spine (SMD 1.073, 95 % CI 0.140–2.005, p = 0.024) in comparison with single-mode exercise.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that oestrogen treatment significantly increases the skeletal response to exercise training in both the hips and the spine in postmenopausal women, which implies that the combination of oestrogen administration and exercise may generate greater effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorrain J, Paiement G, Chevrier N, et al. Population demographics and socioeconomic impact of osteoporotic fractures in Canada. Menopause. 2003;10(3):228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Kohrt WM. Effects of ground and joint reaction force exercise on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:177.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. A meta-analysis of impact exercise on postmenopausal bone loss: the case for mixed loading exercise programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(12):898–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kemmler W, Bebenek M, von Stengel S, et al. Effect of block-periodized exercise training on bone and coronary heart disease risk factors in early post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(1):121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. Meta-analysis of walking for preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Bone. 2008;43(3):521–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmitt NM, Schmitt J, Doren M. The role of physical activity in the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women—an update. Maturitas. 2009;63(1):34–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kemmler W, Engelke K, Weineck J, et al. The Erlangen Fitness Osteoporosis Prevention Study: a controlled exercise trial in early postmenopausal women with low bone density—first-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(5):673–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. High-intensity resistance training and postmenopausal bone loss: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(8):1225–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Snow CM, Shaw JM, Winters KM, et al. Long-term exercise using weighted vests prevents hip bone loss in postmenopausal women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(9):M489–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhodes EC, Martin AD, Taunton JE, et al. Effects of one year of resistance training on the relation between muscular strength and bone density in elderly women. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34(1):18–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanyon LE. Using functional loading to influence bone mass and architecture: objectives, mechanisms, and relationship with estrogen of the mechanically adaptive process in bone. Bone. 1996;18(1 Suppl.):37S–43S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee K, Jessop H, Suswillo R, et al. Endocrinology: bone adaptation requires oestrogen receptor-alpha. Nature. 2003;424(6947):389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tobias JH. At the crossroads of skeletal responses to estrogen and exercise. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14(10):441–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ankrom MA, Patterson JA, d’Avis PY, et al. Age-related changes in human oestrogen receptor alpha function and levels in osteoblasts. Biochem J. 1998;333(Pt 3):787–94.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hahn S, Williamson PR, Hutton JL, et al. Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies. Stat Med. 2000;19(24):3325–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Damien E, Price JS, Lanyon LE. The estrogen receptor’s involvement in osteoblasts’ adaptive response to mechanical strain. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(8):1275–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu J, Wang X, Chiba H, et al. Combined intervention of soy isoflavone and moderate exercise prevents body fat elevation and bone loss in ovariectomized mice. Metabolism. 2004;53(7):942–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu J, Wang XX, Takasaki M, et al. Cooperative effects of exercise training and genistein administration on bone mass in ovariectomized mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(10):1829–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassey EJ, Rothwell MC, Littlewood JJ, et al. Pre- and postmenopausal women have different bone mineral density responses to the same high-impact exercise. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(12):1805–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Going S, Lohman T, Houtkooper L, et al. Effects of exercise on bone mineral density in calcium-replete postmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(8):637–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kohrt WM, Snead DB, Slatopolsky E, et al. Additive effects of weight-bearing exercise and estrogen on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10(9):1303–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kohrt WM, Ehsani AA, Birge SJ Jr. HRT preserves increases in bone mineral density and reductions in body fat after a supervised exercise program. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998;84(5):1506–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maddalozzo GF, Widrick JJ, Cardinal BJ, et al. The effects of hormone replacement therapy and resistance training on spine bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women. Bone. 2007;40(5):1244–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Milliken LA, Going SB, Houtkooper LB, et al. Effects of exercise training on bone remodeling, insulin-like growth factors, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;72(4):478–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9, W64.

  26. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane reviewers’ handbook 5.0.1 (updated September 2008). Chichester: Wiley; 2008.

  27. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(3):321–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1701–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Banks E, Canfell K. Invited commentary: hormone therapy risks and benefits—the Women’s Health Initiative findings and the postmenopausal estrogen timing hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(1):24–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurney EP, Nachtigall MJ, Nachtigall LE, et al. The Women’s Health Initiative trial and related studies: 10 years later. A clinician’s view. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;142:4–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang J, Gao R, Cao P, et al. Additive effects of antiresorptive agents and exercise on lumbar spine bone mineral density in adults with low bone mass: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(5):1585–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. El-Khoury F, Cassou B, Charles MA, et al. The effect of fall prevention exercise programmes on fall induced injuries in community dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f6234.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karinkanta S, Piirtola M, Sievanen H, et al. Physical therapy approaches to reduce fall and fracture risk among older adults. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6(7):396–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet. 1993;341(8837):72–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Borer KT. Physical activity in the prevention and amelioration of osteoporosis in women: interaction of mechanical, hormonal and dietary factors. Sports Med. 2005;35(9):779–830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rubin CT, McLeod KJ. Promotion of bony ingrowth by frequency-specific, low-amplitude mechanical strain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:165–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pildal J, Hrobjartsson A, Jorgensen KJ, et al. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(4):847–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):601–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ammann P, Rizzoli R. Bone strength and its determinants. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(Suppl. 3):S13–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This analysis was based upon work funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. LY14H070001. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, 688 Yingbin Road, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, 321004, China

    Renqing Zhao, Zhengang Xu & Meihua Zhao

Authors
  1. Renqing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhengang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meihua Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renqing Zhao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Xu, Z. & Zhao, M. Effects of Oestrogen Treatment on Skeletal Response to Exercise in the Hips and Spine in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 45, 1163–1173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0338-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0338-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation