Skip to main content
Log in

Biosimilar DMARDs: What Does the Future Hold?

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological medicinal products, albeit fundamental in unresponsive inflammatory rheumatic diseases, represent a significant economic burden to healthcare systems worldwide. A new landmark in the treatment of these conditions was achieved with the European Medicines Agency’s endorsement of CT-P13, the first biosimilar of a monoclonal antibody, infliximab. The main driving force behind biosimilar development is to improve accessibility at lower costs, provided the quality, efficacy and safety of the biosimilar is similar to that of the reference drug. Many other biosimilar candidates are currently under development and will probably be approved in the near future, posing complex prescribing decisions for rheumatologists. In this article, biosimilar disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are put into perspective: what they are, the stepwise manufacturing process and the available mechanisms that regulate the thorough comparability exercise. Non-clinical and clinical data leading to CT-P13 approval are briefly reviewed, and current clinical data on upcoming biosimilars are also addressed. Other matters covered include extrapolation of clinical indications, interchangeability and automatic substitution. As cumulative evidence on the use of biosimilars grows, controversies abate and patients and physicians become reassured. However, adequate answers to the uncertainties still surrounding biosimilar agents are necessary to ensure the trust of rheumatologists and, on a larger scale, to guarantee their widespread use and success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IMS Institute for Health Informatics. Specialty medicines and generics outpace growth of traditional, small molecules and brands. In: Medicine Use and Shifting Costs of Healthcare. 2014. http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/imshealth/Global/Content/Corporate/IMS%20Health%20Institute/Reports/US_Use_of_Meds_2013/2013_Medicine_Spending.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015.

  2. IMS Institute for Health Informatics. Assessing biosimilar uptake and competition in European markets. 2014. http://www.imshealth.com/imshealth/Global/Content/Corporate/IMS%20Health%20Institute/Insights/Assessing_biosimilar_uptake_and_competition_in_European_markets.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015.

  3. IMS Institute for Health Informatics. Specialty medicines now account for one-third of spending driven by a wave of recent innovations. In: Medicines Use and Spending Shifts. 2014. http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/imshealth/Global/Content/Corporate/IMS%20Health%20Institute/Reports/Use%20of%20Meds%20-%202015/Spending-on-Specialty-Medicines.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015.

  4. HEXAL AG. Summary of product characteristics Epoetin alfa HEXAL http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000726/WC500028282.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015.

  5. European Medicines Agency. Bemfola Assessment Report. 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/002615/WC500166820.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015.

  6. Klotz U, Teml A, Schwab M. Clinical pharmacokinetics and use of infliximab. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46:645–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dörner T, Strand V, Castañeda-Hernández G, et al. The role of biosimilars in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:322–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/01/WC500180219.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  9. European Medicines Agency. Note for guidance on biotechnological/biological products subject to changes in their manufacturing process. In: ICH Topic Q 5 E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products. 2005. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002805.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  10. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. 2005. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003517.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  11. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues. 2006. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003953.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  12. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. 2006. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003920.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  13. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing monoclonal antibodies—non-clinical and clinical issues. 2012. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/06/WC500128686.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  14. World Health Organisation. Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products. 2009. http://www.who.int/biologicals/areas/biological_therapeutics/BIOTHERAPEUTICS_FOR_WEB_22APRIL2010.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product—guidance for industry. 2015. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  16. Zalai D, Dietzsch C, Herwig C. Risk-based process development of biosimilars as part of the Quality by Design Paradigm. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2013;67:569–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues (revision 1). 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2014/06/WC500167838.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  18. Bui L, Hurst S, Finch G, et al. Key considerations in the preclinical development of biosimilars. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(Suppl 1):3–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Araújo F, Cordeiro I, Teixeira F, Gonçalves J, Fonseca JE. Pharmacology of biosimilar candidate drugs in Rheumatology: a literature review. Acta Reumatol Port. 2014;39:19–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin. 2005. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003636.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  21. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry non-inferiority clinical trials. 2010. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/…/Guidances/UCM202140.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  22. World Health Organisation. Biological qualifier—an INN proposal. 2015. http://www.who.int/medicines/services/inn/bq_innproposal201506.pdf.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2016.

  23. US Food and Drug Administration. Nonproprietary naming of biological products—guidance for industry. 2015. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM459987.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2016.

  24. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices. 2012. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/02/WC500123202.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2016.

  25. European Medicines Agency. Remsima assessment report. 2013. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/002576/WC500151486.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  26. US Food and Drug Administration. BLA 125544 CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to Remicade® (infliximab). 2016. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/ArthritisAdvisoryCommittee/UCM484859.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2016.

  27. Braun J, Kudrin A. Progress in biosimilar monoclonal antibody development: the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Immunotherapy. 2015;7:73–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jung SK, Lee KH, Jeon JW, et al. Physicochemical characterization of Remsima. MAbs. 2014;6:1163–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Park W, Hrycaj P, Jeka S, et al. A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, prospective study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: the PLANETAS study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1605–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda P, et al. A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1613–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoo DH, Racewicz A, Brzezick J, et al. A phase 3 randomised controlled trial to compare CT-P13 with infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: 54 week results from the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(S3):73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Park W, Yoo DH, Jaworski J, et al. Comparable long-term efficacy, as assessed by patient-reported outcomes, safety and pharmacokinetics, of CT-P13 and reference infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 54-week results from the randomized, parallel-group PLANETAS study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:25. doi:10.1186/s13075-016-0930-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoo DH, Park W, Miranda P, et al. Inhibition of radiographic progression and its association with clinical parameters in RA patients treated with CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(S2):234–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Emery P, Vencovský J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207588.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczyñski P, et al. A phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study comparing SB4, an etanercept biosimilar, with etanercept reference product (Enbrel®) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy (52-week results). 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, Abstract 2055.

  36. Samsung Bioepis Enters the European Biopharmaceutical Market with Benepali ®, the First Fusion Protein Biosimilar Approved by the European Commission. 2016. http://www.samsungbioepis.com/newsroom2/newsroom_12.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2016.

  37. Jani RH, Gupta R, Bhatia G, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, active controlled study to compare efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (Exemptia; ZRC-3197) and adalimumab (Humira) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015; doi:10.1111/1756-185X.12711.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Castañeda-Hérnandez G, Szekanecz Z, Mysler E, et al. Biopharmaceuticals for rheumatic diseases in Latin Europe, Russia and India: innovators, biosimilars and intended copies. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:471–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Barile-Fabris L, Irazoque-Palazuelos F, Vásquez R, et al. Incidence of Adverse events in patients treated with intended copies of biologic therapeutic agents in Colombia and Mexico. 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, Abstract 1506.

  40. World Health Organisation. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: sixty-fifth report. 2015. http://www.who.int/biologicals/expert_committee/WHO_TRS_993_web_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2016.

  41. Weise M, Kurki P, Wolff-Holz E, Bielsky MC, Schneider C. Biosimilars: the science of extrapolation. Blood. 2014;124:3191–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Feagan BG, Choquette D, Ghosh S, et al. The challenge of indication extrapolation for infliximab biosimilars. Biologicals. 2014;42:177–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee H. Is extrapolation of the safety and efficacy data in one indication to another appropriate for biosimilars? AAPS J. 2014;16:22–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Health Canada. Summary basis of decision for Remsima. 2015. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/sbd-smd/drug-med/sbd_smd_2014_remsima_160195-eng.php. Accessed 13 Sept 2015.

  45. US Food and Drug Administration. Information for Consumers (Biosimilars). 2015. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/ucm241718.htm. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.

  46. The United States Senate. Title VII—improving access to innovative medical therapies. subtitle a—biologics price competition and innovation. 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm216146.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2015.

  47. European Commission. What you need to know about Biosimilar Medicinal Products—Consensus Information Paper 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/8242/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native. Accessed 13 Sept 2015.

  48. Dorner T, Kay J. Biosimilars in rheumatology: current perspectives and lessons learnt. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tsiftsoglou AS, Trouvin JH, Calvo G, Ruiz S. Demonstration of biosimilarity, extrapolation of indications and other challenges related to biosimilars in Europe. BioDrugs. 2014;28:479–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Diakonhjemmet Hospital. The NOR-SWITCH study. 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02148640. Accessed 13 Sept 2015.

  51. Sandoz. GP2013 treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis, previously treated with Rituxan® or MabThera® (ASSIST-RT). 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02514772. Accessed 13 Sept 2015.

  52. Sandoz. Study to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and to compare safety of biosimilar Etanercept (GP2015) and Enbrel (EGALITY). 2015. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01891864. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  53. The American College of Rheumatology. Position statement on biosimilars. 2015. http://www.rheumatology.org/Portals/0/Files/Biosimilars.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2015.

  54. Fonseca JE, Gonçalves J, Araújo F, et al. The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilars. Acta Reumatol Port. 2014;39:60–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Azevedo VF, Meirelles ES, Kochen JAL, et al. Recommendations on the use of biosimilars by the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology, Brazilian Society of Dermatology, Brazilian Federation of Gastroenterology and Brazilian Study Group on Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Focus on clinical evaluation of monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14:769–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Atzeni F, Sebastiani M, Ricci C, et al. Position paper of Italian rheumatologists on the use of biosimilar drugs. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33:1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hernández MAA, Andreu JL, Ruiz MAC, et al. Position paper from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on biosimilar drugs. Reumatol Clin. 2015;11:269–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ruff L, Rezk MF, Uhlig T, Gommers JW. Budget impact analysis of an etanercept biosimilar for the treatment of all licensed etanercept indications for adults in Europe. Value Health. 2015;18:A639. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2278.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ruff L, Rezk MF, Uhlig T, Gommers JW. Budget impact analysis of an etanercept biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Europe. Value Health. 2015;18:A639. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2276.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jha A, Upton A, Dunlop WC, Akehurst R. The budget impact of biosimilar infliximab (Remsima®) for the treatment of autoimmune diseases in five European countries. Adv Ther. 2015;32:742–56. doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0233-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Brodszky V, Baji P, Balogh O, Pe´ntek M. Budget impact analysis of biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in six Central and Eastern European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(Suppl 1):S65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kim J, Hong J, Kudrin A. 5 year budget impact analysis of biosimilar infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in UK, Italy, France and Germany. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(Suppl):S512.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Whitehouse J, Walsh K, Papandrikopoulou A, Hoad R. The cost saving potential of utilizing biosimilar medicines in biologic naive severe rheumatoid arthritis patients. Value Health. 2013;16:A573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. McCarthy G, Bitoun EC, Guy H. Introduction of an infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13): a five-year budget impact analysis for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Ireland. Value Health. 2013;16:A558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kleinrock M. Challenges surrounding the new biosimilars landscape. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015;8:138–9.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:492–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Eurico Fonseca.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

Filipe Araújo has no conflicts of interest. João Gonçalves has participated in investigator studies sponsored by investigational grants from MSD, UCB and Hospira. He has acted as a consultant or speaker at scientific meetings sponsored by MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Sandoz, Hospira, Celltrion, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Roche and Merck. João Eurico Fonseca has received unrestricted research grants from or acted as a speaker for Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celtrion, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Mundipharma, MSD, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Servier and UCB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araújo, F., Gonçalves, J. & Fonseca, J.E. Biosimilar DMARDs: What Does the Future Hold?. Drugs 76, 629–637 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-016-0556-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-016-0556-5

Keywords

Navigation