Skip to main content
Log in

Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and the Risk of Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disease Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors may be associated with an increased risk of gallbladder and bile duct disease among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We conducted a population-based cohort study using an active comparator, new-user design. We used data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink to identify patients newly treated with either a DPP-4 inhibitor or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor between January 2013 and December 2020. We fitted Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine stratification weighting to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident gallbladder and bile duct disease associated with DPP-4 inhibitors compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors.

Results

DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a 46% increased risk of gallbladder and bile duct disease (4.3 vs. 3.0 events per 1000 person-years, HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17–1.83). At 6 months and 1 year, 745 and 948 patients, respectively, would need to be treated with DPP-4 inhibitors for one patient to experience a gallbladder or bile duct disease.

Conclusions

In this population-based cohort study, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors, when compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors, was associated with a moderately increased risk of gallbladder and bile duct disease among patients with type 2 diabetes. This outcome was still quite rare with a high number needed to harm at 6 months and 1 year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guideline: type 2 diabetes in adults: management. London: National Institute for Health And Care Excellence (Nice). Copyright National Institute For Health And Care Excellence; 2015.

  2. American Diabetes Association. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Supplement 1):S98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moran G, Bakhai C, Song S, Agwu J. Type 2 diabetes: summary of updated nice guidance. BMJ Br Med J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonora B, Avogaro A, Fadini G. Extraglycemic effects of Sglt2 inhibitors: a review of the evidence. Diabet Metab Syndr Obes. 2020;13:161–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Filippatos T, Panagiotopoulou T, Elisaf M. Adverse effects of Glp-1 receptor agonists. Rev Diabet Stud. 2014;11(3–4):202–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin Y, Wang T-H, Tsai M-L, Wu V-C, Tseng C-J, Lin M-S, et al. The cardiovascular and renal effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01793-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao X, Wang M, Wen Z, Lu Z, Cui L, Fu C, et al. Glp-1 receptor agonists: beyond their pancreatic effects. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.721135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Faillie J, Yu O, Yin H, Hillaire-Buys D, Barkun A, Azoulay L. Association of bile duct and gallbladder diseases with the use of incretin-based drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1474–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. He L, Wang J, Ping F, Yang N, Huang J, Li Y, et al. Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use with risk of gallbladder and biliary diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(5):513–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nauck M, Muus Ghorbani M, Kreiner E, Saevereid H, Buse J. Effects of liraglutide compared with placebo on events of acute gallbladder or biliary disease in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events in the leader randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(10):1912–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Keller J, Trautmann M, Haber H, Tham L, Hunt T, Mace K, et al. Effect of exenatide on cholecystokinin-induced gallbladder emptying in fasting healthy subjects. Regul Pept. 2012;179(1–3):77–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. He L, Wang J, Li Z, Li Y, Zhang H. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary diseases: data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system. Diabetes Care. 2022;46(2):E72–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moses R, Round E, Shentu Y, Golm G, Oneill EA, Gantz I, et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin added to the combination of sulfonylurea and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemic control. J Diabetes. 2016;8(5):701–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenstock J, Kahn S, Johansen O, Zinman B, Espeland M, Woerle H, et al. Effect of linagliptin vs glimepiride on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Carolina randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(12):1155–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen O, Cooper M, Kahn S, Marx N, et al. Effect of linagliptin vs placebo on major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular and renal risk: the Carmelina randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(1):69–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scirica B, Bhatt D, Braunwald E, Steg P, Davidson J, Hirshberg B, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1317–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. He L, Wang J, Ping F, Yang N, Huang J, Li W, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary disease in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2022;377:E068882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Herrett E, Gallagher A, Bhaskaran K, Forbes H, Mathur R, Van Staa T, et al. Data resource profile: clinical practice research datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(3):827–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolf A, Dedman D, Campbell J, Booth H, Lunn D, Chapman J, et al. Data resource profile: clinical practice research datalink (CPRD) aurum. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(6):1740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrett E, Thomas S, Schoonen W, Smeeth L, Hall A. Validation and validity of diagnoses in the general practice research database: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(1):4–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nf K, Se H, Pw R. Validity of diagnostic coding within the general practice research database: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(572):E128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jick H, Jick S, Derby L. Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom. Br Med J. 1991;302(6779):766–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Herbert A, Wijlaars L, Zylbersztejn A, Cromwell D, Hardelid P. Data resource profile: hospital episode statistics admitted patient care (HES APC). Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(4):1093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. National Health Service. Hospital episode statistics (HES). Available from https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-tools-and-services/data-services/hospital-episode-statistics.

  25. Office for National Statistics. Deaths. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths.

  26. Wexler D. Management of persistent hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. In: Nathan D, Mulder J, editors. Up to date. Waltham, MA: Up to date; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilkinson S, Douglas I, Stirnadel-Farrant H, Fogarty D, Pokrajac A, Smeeth L, et al. Changing use of antidiabetic drugs in the UK: trends in prescribing 2000–2017. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):E022768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Desai RJ, Franklin JM. Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners. BMJ. 2019;367:L5657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. White I, Royston P. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Stat Med. 2009;28(15):1982–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pizzimenti V, Giandalia A, Cucinotta D, Russo G, Smits M, Cutroneo P, et al. Incretin-based therapy and acute cholecystitis: a review of case reports and eudravigilance spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting database. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(2):116–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Woronow D, Chamberlain C, Niak A, Avigan M, Houstoun M, Kortepeter C. Acute cholecystitis associated with the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists reported to the US Food And Drug Administration. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(10):1104–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Erlinger S. Gallstones in obesity and weight loss. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12(12):1347–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, Greenway F, Halpern A, Krempf M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gallwitz B. Clinical use of Dpp-4 inhibitors. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marzioni M, Alpini G, Saccomanno S, Candelaresi C, Venter J, Rychlicki C, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and its receptor agonist exendin-4 modulate cholangiocyte adaptive response to cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(1):244–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen B, Zhao W, Dong J, Sima H. Expression of Glp-1r protein and its clinical role in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tissues. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(7):4313–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marzioni M, Alpini G, Saccomanno S, Candelaresi C, Venter J, Rychlicki C, et al. Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist protects cholangiocytes from apoptosis. Gut. 2009;58(7):990–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nexøe-Larsen C, Sørensen P, Hausner H, Agersnap M, Baekdal M, Brønden A, et al. Effects of liraglutide on gallbladder emptying: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with overweight or obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(11):2557–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gether I, Nexøe-Larsen C, Knop F. New avenues in the regulation of gallbladder motility-implications for the use of glucagon-like peptide-derived drugs. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(7):2463–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rehfeld J, Knop F, Asmar A, Madsbad S, Holst J, Asmar M. Cholecystokinin secretion is suppressed by glucagon-like peptide-1: clue to the mechanism of the adverse gallbladder events of Glp-1-derived drugs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(12):1429–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shaddinger B, Young M, Billiard J, Collins D, Hussaini A, Nino A. Effect of albiglutide on cholecystokinin-induced gallbladder emptying in healthy individuals: a randomized crossover study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57(10):1322–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gebhard R, Prigge W, Ansel H, Schlasner L, Ketover S, Sande D, et al. The role of gallbladder emptying in gallstone formation during diet-induced rapid weight loss. Hepatology. 1996;24(3):544–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pauletzki J, Althaus R, Holl J, Sackmann M, Paumgartner G. Gallbladder emptying and gallstone formation: a prospective study on gallstone recurrence. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(3):765–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. LaMorte WW. Biliary motility and abnormalities associated with cholesterol cholelithiasis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 1993;9(5):810–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Smits M, Tonneijck L, Muskiet M, Hoekstra T, Kramer M, Diamant M, et al. Biliary effects of liraglutide and sitagliptin, a 12-week randomized placebo-controlled trial in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(12):1217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Han T, Zhang S, Tang W, Jiang Z. Bile acids in serum and bile of patients with cholesterol gallstone. World J Gastroenterol. 1998;4(1):82–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lund J, Richardson D, Stürmer T. The active comparator, new user study design in pharmacoepidemiology: historical foundations and contemporary application. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015;2(4):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yoshida K, Solomon D, Kim S. Active-comparator design and new-user design in observational studies. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(7):437–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hawthorne G, Hrisos S, Stamp E, Elovainio M, Francis J, Grimshaw J, et al. Diabetes care provision in UK primary care practices. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):E41562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Williams D, Baxter H, Airey C, Ali S, Turner B. Diabetes UK funded surveys of the structural provision of primary care diabetes services in the UK. Diabet Med. 2002;19(Suppl 4):21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sharma M, Nazareth I, Petersen I. Trends in incidence, prevalence and prescribing in type 2 diabetes mellitus between 2000 and 2013 in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):E010210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Aune D, Vatten L. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of gallbladder disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Diabetes Complications. 2016;30(2):368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chapman BA, Wilson IR, Frampton C, Chisholm R, Stewart N, Eagar G, et al. Prevalence of gallbladder disease in diabetes mellitus. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41(11):2222–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Haffner S, Diehl A, Valdez R, Mitchell B, Hazuda H, Morales P, et al. Clinical gallbladder disease in NIDDM subjects. Relationship to duration of diabetes and severity of glycemia. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(9):1276–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yuan S, Gill D, Giovannucci E, Larsson S. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, lifestyle factors, and risk of gallstone disease: a Mendelian randomization investigation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(3):E529–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bailey C, Day C, Bellary S. Renal protection with Sglt2 inhibitors: effects in acute and chronic kidney disease. Curr Diab Rep. 2022;22(1):39–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Karangelis D, Mazer C, Stakos D, Tzifa A, Loggos S, Verma S, et al. Cardio-protective effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: focus on heart failure. Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(8):1051–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yanai H, Hakoshima M, Adachi H, Katsuyama H. Multi-organ protective effects of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Pradhan R, Lu S, Yin H, Yu OHY, Ernst P, Suissa S, et al. Novel antihyperglycaemic drugs and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations among patients with type 2 diabetes: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2022;379:E071380.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Azoulay.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was funded by a Foundation Scheme grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-143328). SBS is the recipient of a doctoral training award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. LA is the recipient of a Distinguished Research Scholar Award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé and received a William Dawson Scholar award from McGill University. The study funder was not involved in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and writing the report; and did not impose any restrictions regarding the publication of the report.

Conflict of Interests

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. LA has received speaking and consulting fees from Pfizer and Roche for work unrelated to this project. OY was involved in an advisory board meeting for Novo Nordisk for work unrelated to this study. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. LA is an Editorial Board member of Drug Safety. LA was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions.

Ethics Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Research Data Governance of the CPRD (protocol 23_002543) and by the Research Ethics Board of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

Data Availability

No data are available. This study is based on data from the CPRD obtained under license from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The data are provided by patients and collected by the UK National Health Service as part of their care and support. The interpretation and conclusions contained in this study are those of the authors alone. Because electronic health records are classified as “sensitive data” by the UK Data Protection Act, information governance restrictions (to protect patient confidentiality) prevent data sharing via public deposition. Data are available with approval through the individual constituent entities controlling access to the data. Specifically, the primary care data can be requested via application to the CPRD (https://www.cprd.com).

Code Availability

Codes may be made privately available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

SBS wrote the manuscript, and all authors edited, critically reviewed, and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors conceived and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, approved the final version of the manuscript, and are accountable for its accuracy. SBS, HY, and LA performed the statistical analyses. LA acquired the data and supervised the study.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 459 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shapiro, S.B., Yin, H., Yu, O.H.Y. et al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and the Risk of Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disease Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Drug Saf (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01434-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01434-4

Navigation