Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions Between CYP3A5*3 and POR*28 Polymorphisms and Lipid Lowering Response with Atorvastatin

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

The polymorphic enzyme P450 oxidoreductase (POR) transfers electrons from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) to cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzyme s, which metabolize atorvastatin. This suggests that variations in the CYP3A5 and POR genes may influence the response to statins. We aimed to investigate the association and interactions between CYP3A5*3 and POR*28 polymorphisms and the lipid-lowering effects of atorvastatin in a Chinese population.

Methods

Genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and by PCR with direct sequencing analysis for 179 hyperlipidaemic patients treated with atorvastatin 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks. Serum levels of triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were determined before and after treatment.

Results

For the 179 patients (including 100 males), the variant allele frequencies of CYP3A5*3 and POR*28 were 73.75 and 41.62 %, respectively. Among all patients, no significant association was found between CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms and TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C levels before and after treatment with 20 mg of atorvastatin daily for 4 weeks. Homozygotes for the POR*28 T allele showed a significantly lower mean concentration of LDL-C than homozygotes for the POR*28 C allele (POR*28 TT vs POR*28 CC: 2.46 ± 0.37 vs 2.69 ± 0.49 mmol/L, P = 0.019) after treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg daily for 4 weeks. After adjustment for age, sex and body mass index, CYP3A5 non-expressors who were POR*28 wild-type homozygotes showed significantly higher mean TC and LDL-C levels than those who were POR*28 variant homozygotes, both at baseline (*3/CC vs *3/TT; TC: 7.30 ± 0.73 vs 6.94 ± 0.36 mmol/L, P = 0.026; LDL-C: 3.88 ± 0.70 vs 3.47 ± 0.46 mmol/L, P = 0.009) and after atorvastatin treatment (*3/CC vs *3/TT; TC: 6.03 ± 0.64 vs 5.69 ± 0.34 mmol/L, P = 0.017; LDL-C: 2.80 ± 0.62 vs 2.43 ± 0.40 mmol/L, P = 0.008). CYP3A5 non-expressors who were POR*28 wild-type homozygotes showed significantly higher TC and LDL-C levels at baseline (*3/CC vs *1/CC; TC: 7.30 ± 0.73 vs 6.95 ± 0.41 mmol/L, P = 0.010; LDL-C: 3.88 ± 0.70 vs 3.55 ± 0.39 mmol/L, P = 0.010) and showed higher TC levels after atorvastatin treatment (*3/CC vs *1/CC; 6.03 ± 0.64 vs 5.73 ± 0.27 mmol/L, P = 0.012), in comparison with patients expressing CYP3A5 who were POR*28 wild-type homozygotes. CYP3A5 non-expressors who were POR*28 heterozygotes showed significantly lower percentage changes in TC from baseline than those expressing CYP3A5 who were POR*28 heterozygotes (*3/CT vs *1/CT; 16.77 ± 3.13 vs 18.40 ± 4.16 mmol/L, P = 0.031).

Conclusion

POR*28 is associated with a poorer response to atorvastatin, but there is no association of the latter with CYP3A5*3. POR*28 single nucleotide polymorphisms are associated with greater increases in the effect on plasma lipids in non-expressors of CYP3A5. Besides CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphism, POR*28 genetic polymorphism might also be responsible for the marked interindividual variability in the lipid-lowering response to atorvastatin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Naci H, Brugts JJ, Fleurence R, et al. Comparative benefits of statins in the primary and secondary prevention of major coronary events and all-cause mortality: a network meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(4):641–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim SH, Kim MK, Seo HS, et al. Efficacy and safety of morning versus evening dose of controlled-release simvastatin tablets in patients with hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III trial. Clin Ther. 2013;35(9):1350–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sirtori CR, Mombelli G, Triolo M, et al. Clinical response to statins: mechanism(s) of variable activity and adverse effects. Ann Med. 2012;44(5):419–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Postmus I, Trompet S, Deshmukh HA, et al. Pharmacogenetic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of LDL cholesterol response to statins. Nat Commun. 2014;28:5068.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Pan LQ, Naranmandura H, et al. Influence of various polymorphic variants of cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (POR) on drug metabolic activity of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38495.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ragia G, KolovouV Tavridou A, et al. Lack of association of the p450 oxidoreductase *28 single nucleotide polymorphism with the lipid-lowering effect of statins in hypercholesterolemic patients. Mol Diagn Ther. 2014;18(3):323–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oneda B, Crettol S, Jaquenoud Sirot E, et al. The P450 oxidoreductase genotype is associated with CYP3A activity in vivo as measured by the midazolam phenotyping test. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009;19(11):877–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Jonge H, Metalidis C, Naesens M, et al. The P450 oxidoreductase *28 SNP is associated with low initial tacrolimus exposure and increased dose requirements in CYP3A5-expressing renal recipients. Pharmacogenomics. 2011;12(9):1281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kivistö KT, Niemi M, Schaeffeler E. Lipid-lowering response to statins is affected by CYP3A5 polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics. 2004;14(8):523–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989. p. 16–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Schaik RH, van der Heiden IP, van den Anker JN, et al. CYP3A5 variant allele frequencies in Dutch Caucasians. Clin Chem. 2002;48(10):1668–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuen S, Fukuda T, Maune H, et al. Novel detection assay by PCR–RFLR and frequency of CYP3A5 SNPs, CYP3A5*3 and *6, in a Japanese population. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12(4):331–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuehl P, Zhang J, Lin Y, et al. Sequence diversity in CYP3A promoters and characterization of the genetic basis of polymorphic CYP3A5 expression. Nat Genet. 2001;27(4):383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang N, Agrawal V, Giacomini KM, et al. Genetics of P450 oxi-doreductase: sequence variation in 842 individuals of four ethnicities and activities of 15 missense mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(5):1733–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park JE, Kim KB, Bae SK, et al. Contribution of cytochrome P450 3A4 and 3A5 to the metabolism of atorvastatin. Xenobiotica. 2008;38(9):1240–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hubbard PA, Shen AL, Paschke R, et al. NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase: structural basis for hydride and electron transfer. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(31):29163–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang G, Fu Z, Chen X, et al. Effects of the CYP oxidoreductase Ala503Val polymorphism on CYP3A activity in vivo: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in healthy Chinese men. Clin Ther. 2011;33(12):2060–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elens L, Nieuweboer AJ, Clarke SJ, et al. Impact of POR*28 on the clinical pharmacokinetics of CYP3A phenotyping probes midazolam and erythromycin. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2013;23(3):148–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our study complied with ethical standards. All procedures in this study were performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its amendments. All patients gave their written informed consent to participate in the study, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University. This work was supported by a grant from the Engineering Project for Innovative Scholars of Henan Province (No. 074100510020). The work was completed at the Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhengzhou University. Kan-kan Wei and Li-rong Zhang report no conflict of interest in connection with this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kan-kan Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, Kk., Zhang, Lr. Interactions Between CYP3A5*3 and POR*28 Polymorphisms and Lipid Lowering Response with Atorvastatin. Clin Drug Investig 35, 583–591 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-015-0317-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-015-0317-3

Keywords

Navigation