Skip to main content
Log in

Biosimilars: A Value Proposition

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biosimilars are biological agents that effectively replicate original reference products. The main driver of their development is the promise of bringing competition into the marketplace, and consequently contributing to the sustainability of healthcare systems. By reducing financial barriers to biological therapies, biosimilars play a part in budgetary redistribution and, hence, in increasing patients’ access to treatment. They also foster innovation and deliver other non-price-driven advantages. However, the market is such that harmonization of pricing of reference biologics and biosimilars may dissuade physicians from prescribing biosimilars and often creates an unfavorable market environment for the launch of biosimilars. Such dynamics result in a high cost by denying patients the full benefits and added value inherent in biosimilar agents. A more equitable offering of established original biologics and biosimilars is needed to ensure the viability of current healthcare services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Mora F. Biosimilar: what it is not. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80:949–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. EMA (European Medicines Agency). Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. In: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), CHMP/437/04 Rev 1. 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2014/10/WC500176768.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  3. FDA (US Food and Drug Administration). Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. Guidance for industry. 2015. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  4. WHO (World Health Organization). Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs). 2009. http://www.who.int/biologicals/areas/biological_therapeutics/BIOTHERAPEUTICS_FOR_WEB_22APRIL2010.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  5. IMS. Delivering on the Potential of Biosimilar Medicines. 2016. https://www.medicinesforeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/IMS-Institute-Biosimilar-Report-March-2016-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  6. Ramírez E, Morell A. Biosimilares: impacto económico de su utilización en el tratamiento de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Prescripción de fármacos. Vol. 23 (5), Septiembre-Octubre 2017. http://www.madrid.org/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheadername1=Content-disposition&blobheadername2=cadena&blobheadervalue1=filename%3DVol+23-5_Sep-Oct-2017.pdf&blobheadervalue2=language%3Des%26site%3DHospitalLaPrincesa&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1352942509134&ssbinary=true. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  7. Putrik P, et al. Inequities in access to biologic and synthetic DMARDs across 46 European countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:198–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. IQVIA. The Impact of Biosimilar Competition in Europe. 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/31642. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  9. Péntek M, et al. Access to biologicals in Crohn’s disease in ten European Countries. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(34):6294–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Simon-Kucher & Partners. Payers’ price & market access policies supporting a sustainable biosimilar medicines market. Final Report. 2016. https://www.medicinesforeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Simon-Kucher-2016-Policy-requirements-for-a-sustainable-biosimilar-market-FINAL-report_for-publication2.pdf. Accessed 14 may 2019.

  11. GfK Market access. Factors supporting a sustainable European Biosimilar Medicines Market. 2014. https://www.medicinesforeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/GfK_Final_Report-_Factors_Supporting_a_Sustainable_European_Biosimilar_Medicines_Market.pdf

  12. Lamanna WC, et al. The structure-function relationship of disulfide bonds in etanercept. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. EMA (European Medicines Agency). Medicine Shortages. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/post-authorisation/medicine-shortages. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  14. EMA (European Medicines Agency). Shortages Catalogue. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/post-authorisation/medicine-shortages/shortages-catalogue. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  15. Rompas S, et al. Demonstrating value for biosimilars: a conceptual framework. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015;8(3):129–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pimentel FF, Morgan G, Tiezzi DG, de Andrade JM. Development of New formulations of biologics: expectations, immunogenicity, and safety for subcutaneous. Trastuzumab Pharmaceut Med. 2018;32(5):319–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-018-0247-5 (PMCID: PMC6182492 PMID: 30363808).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Policy roundtables: Generic pharmaceuticals. DAF/COMP(2009)39. 2009. https://www.oecd.org/competition/sectors/46138891.pdf

  18. Federal Trade Commission. To promote innovation: the proper balance of competition and patent law and policy. 2003. https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/promote-innovation-proper-balance-competition-and-patent-law-and-policy/innovationrpt.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  19. Foxon G, Mitchell P, Turner N, McConnell A, Kendrew H, Jenkins J. Bemfola fixed dose pens potentially reduce drug wastage and associated costs of infertility treatment. Hum Fertil. 2018;21(4):275–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. de Mora F, Fauser BCJM. Biosimilars to recombinant human FSH medicines: comparable efficacy and safety to the original biologic. Reprod Biomed On line. 2017;35(1):81–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Westhovens R, Yoo DH, Jaworski J, Matyska-Piekarska E, Smiyan S, Ivanova D, Zielinska A, Raussi EK, Batalov A, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Suh JH. Novel formulation of CT-p13 for subcutaneous administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: initial results from a phase I/III randomized controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl. 2):A315.

    Google Scholar 

  22. IQVIA Institute. Advancing Biosimilar Sustainability in Europe. A Multi-Stakeholder Assessment. 2018. https://www.iqvia.com/institute/reports/advancing-biosimilar-sustainability-in-europe. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  23. European Commission. Competition Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Sector (2009–2017) European competition authorities working together for affordable and innovative medicines. 2019. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0718081enn.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  24. OECD/EU. Health at a Glance: Europe 2018: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Legifrance. Arrêté du 3 août 2018 relatif à l’expérimentation pour l’incitation à la prescription hospitalière de médicaments biologiques similaires délivrés en ville. In: JORF n°0188 du 17 août 2018, texte n° 9. 2018. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/arrete/2018/8/3/SSAS1821431A/jo/texte. Accessed 14 May 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando de Mora.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for the drafting of this review.

Conflict of interest

Within the past 5 years, Dr de Mora has served as speaker/consultant for assorted pharmaceutical companies (including Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Finox, Gebro, Hikma, Hospira, KernPharma, Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Stada, and Theramex) producing biosimilars or original biologics and for biosimilar company associations. He also collaborates with healthcare administrations and other non-governmental organizations from European and non-European jurisdictions on biosimilar science, regulation, clinical use, and market trends.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Mora, F. Biosimilars: A Value Proposition. BioDrugs 33, 353–356 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-019-00360-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-019-00360-7

Navigation