Skip to main content
Log in

Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes

  • Adis Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dulaglutide (Trulicity™) is a once-weekly subcutaneously administered glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist produced by recombinant DNA technology and approved in numerous countries as an adjunct to diet and exercise for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In randomized controlled trials in patients with T2DM, dulaglutide monotherapy was noninferior to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide monotherapy and significantly more effective than oral metformin monotherapy in improving glycemic control at 26 weeks. When used in combination with other agents (including metformin, metformin and a sulfonylurea, metformin and oral pioglitazone, and prandial insulin ± metformin), dulaglutide was noninferior to once-daily liraglutide and significantly more effective than once-daily oral sitagliptin, twice-daily subcutaneous exenatide, and once-daily subcutaneous insulin glargine in terms of improvements in glycated hemoglobin from baseline at 26 or 52 weeks, in trials of 26–104 weeks’ duration. Moreover, dulaglutide 1.5 mg once weekly, but not 0.75 mg once weekly, was associated with consistent reductions form baseline in bodyweight. Improvements in glycemic control and bodyweight were maintained during long-term treatment (up to 2 years). Dulaglutide was generally well tolerated, with a low inherent risk of hypoglycemia. The most frequently reported adverse events in clinical trials were gastrointestinal-related (e.g., nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea). Thus, dulaglutide is a useful option for the treatment of adult patients with T2DM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas: sixth edition 2014 update. 2014. http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  2. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. AACE/ACE comprehensive diabetes management algorithm 2015. Endocr Pract. 2015. doi:10.4158/EP15693.CS.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368(9548):1696–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown DX, Evans M. Choosing between GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: a pharmacological perspective. J Nutr Metab. 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/381713.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. European Medicines Agency. Trulicity™: summary of product characteristics. 2015. http://www.ema.europa.eu/. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  7. Eli Lilly. Trulicity™ (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous use: US prescribing information. 2014. http://pi.lilly.com/us/trulicity-uspi.pdf. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  8. Eli Lilly Japan Co Ltd. “Torurishiti® subcutaneous injection 0.75 mg Ateosu®” GLP-1 receptor agonist of weekly administration, get the manufacturing and marketing approval in Japan [media release]. 3 July 2015. https://www.lilly.co.jp/.

  9. Glaesner W, Vick AM, Millican R, et al. Engineering and characterization of the long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue LY2189265, an Fc fusion protein. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2010;26(4):287–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. European Medicines Agency. EPAR: public assessment report for Trulicity. 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  11. Gerich JE. Is reduced first-phase insulin release the earliest detectable abnormality in individuals destined to develop type 2 diabetes? Diabetes. 2002;51(Suppl 1):S117–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loghin C, de la Peña A, Cui X. Gastric emptying effects of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [abstract]. In: 23rd Annual Scientific & Clinical Congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2014.

  13. Umpierrez GE, Blevins T, Rosenstock J, et al. The effects of LY2189265, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes: the EGO study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(5):418–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrington P, Chien JY, Showalter HDH, et al. A 5-week study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LY2189265, a novel, long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(5):426–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grunberger G, Chang A, Garcia Soria G, et al. Monotherapy with the once-weekly GLP-1 analogue dulaglutide for 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: dose-dependent effects on glycaemic control in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(10):1260–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Terauchi Y, Satoi Y, Takeuchi M, et al. Monotherapy with the once weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide for 12 weeks in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: dose-dependent effects on glycaemic control in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Endocr J. 2014;61(10):949–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Skrivanek Z, Gaydos BL, Chien JY, et al. Dose-finding results in an adaptive, seamless, randomized trial of once-weekly dulaglutide combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes patients (AWARD-5). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(8):748–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Umpierrez G, Povedano ST, Manghi FP. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2168–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nauck M, Weinstock RS, Umpierrez GE, et al. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dungan K, Povedano ST, Forst T. Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1349–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wysham C, Blevins T, Arakaki R, et al. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added on to pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2159–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Giorgino F, Benroubi M, Sun JH. Efficacy and safety of once weekly dulaglutide vs insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin and glimepiride (AWARD-2). Diabetes Care. 2015. doi:10.2337/dc14-1625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blonde L, Jendle J, Gross J. Once-weekly dulaglutide versus bedtime insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet. 2015;385:2057–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Araki E, Inagaki N, Tanizawa Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide in combination with sulphonylurea and/or biguanide compared with once-daily insulin glargine in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015. doi:10.1111/dom.12540.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miyagawa J, Odawara M, Takamura T, et al. Once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide is non-inferior to once-daily liraglutide and superior to placebo in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomized phase III study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015. doi:10.1111/dom.12534.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstock RS, Guerci B, Umpierrez G, et al. Safety and efficacy of once weekly dulaglutide vs sitagliptin after two years in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-5): a randomised, phase 3 study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015. doi:10.1111/dom.12479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferdinand KC, White WB, Calhoun DA, et al. Effects of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide on ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hypertension. 2014;64(4):731–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De La Peña A, Loghin C, Cui X, et al. Pharmacokinetics of once weekly dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [abstract no. 981-P]. Diabetes. 2014;63(Suppl 1):A251–2.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Loghin C, de la Pena A, Cui X, et al. Pharmacokinetics of once weekly dulaglutide in special populations [abstract no. 880]. In: 50th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. 2014.

  30. Reaney M, Mitchell BD, Wang P, et al. Patient-reported outcomes with dulaglutide vs. metformin (AWARD-3) [abstract no. 1027-P]. In: 73rd Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association. 2013.

  31. Reaney M, Yu M, Adetunji O, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) from a 104 week, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled study comparing once weekly dulaglutide to sitagliptin and placebo in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes; the Assessment of Weekly Administration of Dulaglutide in Diabetes (AWARD-5) trial [abstract no. P78]. Diabet Med. 2014;31(Suppl 1):50.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boye KS, Yu M, Van Brunt K. Patient-reported outcomes with once weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus once daily liraglutide 1.8 mg (AWARD-6) [abstract no. 907]. In: 50th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. 2014.

  33. Van Brunt K, Reaney M, Yu M, et al. Patient-reported outcomes with dulaglutide, exenatide, or placebo (AWARD-1) [abstract no. 985]. Diabetologia. 2013;56(Suppl 1):S394–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reaney M, Yu M, Van Brunt K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes with once weekly dulaglutide vs. insulin glargine (AWARD-2) [abstract no. 979-P]. Diabetes. 2014;63(Suppl 1):A251.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reaney M, Yu M, Van Brunt K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes with once-weekly dulaglutide vs. insulin glargine, both in combination with premeal insulin lispro, in type 2 diabetes mellitus (AWARD-4) [abstract no. 2393-PO]. Diabetes. 2014;63(Suppl 1):A607.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Adetunji O, Jung HS, Jia N. Assessment by baseline HbA1c of key outcomes for once weekly dulaglutide vs daily insulin glargine, both with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Assessment of Weekly Administration of Dulaglutide in Diabetes 4 (AWARD-4) study [abstract no. P152]. Diabet Med. 2015;32(Suppl 1):77.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cummings M, Gentilella R, Nicolay C. Effect of baseline body mass index (BMI: <30 kg/m2, >30 to <35 kg/m2 and >35 kg/m2) on glycaemic response and weight change in patients with type 2 diabetes with baseline HbA1c >7.5 % after treatment with the once weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) dulaglutide and active comparators in five clinical studies (AWARD 1-5) [abstract no. P144]. Diabet Med. 2015;32(Suppl 1):74.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vora J, Pechtner V, Jia N. Efficacy and safety of once weekly dulaglutide and once daily insulin glargine at 52 weeks’ treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Assessment of Weekly Administration of Dulaglutide in Diabetes 2 (AWARD-2) study, stratified by duration of diabetes (<5 years, >5 to <10 years, >10 years) [abstract no. P151]. Diabet Med. 2015;32(Suppl 1):77.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bain SC, Skrivanek Z, Tahbaz A, et al. Efficacy of long-acting once weekly dulaglutide compared with short-acting twice daily (bid) exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a posthoc analysis to determine the influence of baseline HbA1c in the Assessment of Weekly Administration of LY2189265 in Diabetes-1 (AWARD-1) trial [abstract no. P79]. Diabet Med. 2014;31(Suppl 1):50.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Reaney M, Yu M, Lakshmanan M, et al. Treatment satisfaction in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with once-weekly dulaglutide: data from the AWARD-1 and AWARD-3 clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015. doi:10.1111/dom.12527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Milicevic Z, Anglin G, Harper K. Low incidence of anti-drug antibody in type 2 diabetes patients treated with once-weekly dulaglutide [abstract no. 1135-P]. In: 75th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association. 2015.

  42. Iyer SN, Tanenberg RJ, Mendez CE, et al. Pancreatitis associated with incretin-based therapies. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):e49.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ferdinand KC, Sager G, Atisso C. Once-weekly dulaglutide dose not increase the risk for CV events in type 2 diabetes: a prespecificed CV meta-analysis of prospectively adjudicated CV events [abstract no. 1125-P]. In: 75th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association. 2015.

  44. Tuttle KR, McKinney TD, Davidson JA. Effects of once-weekly dulaglutide on kidney function in clinical trials [abstract no. 1114-P]. In: 75th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association. 2015.

  45. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry diabetes mellitus—evaluating cardiovascular risk in new antidiabetic therapies to treat type 2 diabetes. 2008. http://www.fda.gov. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  46. US National Institutes of Health. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  47. European Medicines Agency (EMEA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. 2005. http://www.ema.europa.eu/. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  48. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry—patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009. http://www.fda.gov. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  49. Chiu WY, Shih SR, Tseng CH. A review on the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and thyroid cancer. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/924168.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Byrd RA, Sorden SD, Ryan T, et al. Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies of the long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in rodents. Endocrinology. 2015. doi:10.1210/en.2014-1722.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vahle JL, Byrd RA, Blackbourne JL, et al. Effects of dulaglutide on thyroid C-cells and serum calcitonin in male monkeys. Endocrinology. 2015. doi:10.1210/en.2014-1717.

    Google Scholar 

  52. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves Trulicity to treat type 2 diabetes [media release]. 21 Sept 2014. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm415180.htm.

  53. Asche C, LaFleur J, Conner C. A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes. Clin Ther. 2011;33(1):74–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ross SA. Breaking down patient and physician barriers to optimize glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Am J Med. 2013;126(9 Suppl 1):S38–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Eli Lilly. Instructions for use TRULICITY™. 2014. http://pi.lilly.com/us/trulicity-lowdose-ai-ifu.pdf. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  56. GlaxoSmithKline. Tanzeum (albiglutide): US prescribing information. 2014. http://www.fda.gov/. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

  57. Matfin G, Van Brunt K, Zimmermann AG, et al. Safe and effective use of the once weekly dulaglutide single-dose pen in injection-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015. doi:10.1177/1932296815583059.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

During the peer review process, the manufacturer of the dulaglutide was also offered an opportunity to review this article. Changes resulting from comments received were made on the basis of scientific and editorial merit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celeste B. Burness.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding.

Conflict of interest

Celeste Burness and Lesley Scott are salaried employees of Adis/Springer, are responsible for the article content and declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

Additional information

The manuscript was reviewed by: D. S. H. Bell, Southside Endocrinology, University of Alabama Medical School, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; S. R. Bloom, Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; G. Dimitriadis, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, “Attikon” University Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; J. G. Eriksson, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Finland and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; V. C. Woo, Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burness, C.B., Scott, L.J. Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. BioDrugs 29, 407–418 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-015-0143-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-015-0143-4

Keywords

Navigation