Skip to main content
Log in

Aspirin with Low-Dose Ticagrelor or with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban for Secondary Prevention: A Cost per Outcome Analysis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Secondary prevention of cardiovascular events among patients with diagnosed cardiovascular disease and high ischemic risk poses a significant challenge in clinical practice. The combinations of aspirin with low-dose (LD) ticagrelor or LD rivaroxaban have shown superiority in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with aspirin treatment alone. The comparative value for money of these two regimens remains unexplored.

Methods

We analyzed each regimen's annual cost needed to treat (CNT) by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (aNNT) by the annual cost of each drug. The aNNTs were based on outcome data from PEGASUS TIMI-54 and COMPASS trials. Scenario analyses were performed to overcome variances in terms of population risk. Costs were calculated as 75% of US National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC), extracted in January 2022. The primary outcome was defined as CNT to prevent one MACE across the two regimens. Secondary value analysis was performed for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular death as separate outcomes.

Results

The aNNTs to prevent MACE with LD ticagrelor and with LD rivaroxaban were 229 [95% confidence interval (CI) 141–734] and 147 (95% CI 104–252), respectively. At an annual cost of US$3726 versus US$4533, the corresponding CNTs were US$853,254 (95% CI 525,366–2,734,884) with LD ticagrelor and US$666,351 (95% CI 471,432–1,142,316) with LD rivaroxaban.

Conclusion

Combining aspirin with LD rivaroxaban provides better value for money than with LD ticagrelor for secondary prevention of MACE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhatt DL, Eagle KA, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Goto S, Mahoney EM, et al. Comparative determinants of 4-year cardiovascular event rates in stable outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis. JAMA J Am Med Assoc [Internet]. American Medical Association 2010;304:1350–7. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/186626. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  2. Capodanno D, Alberts M, Angiolillo DJ. Antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in cerebrovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol [Internet]. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:609–22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27489191/. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  3. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: commentary. Rev Port Cardiol [Internet]. Massachusetts Medical Society 2007;26:1297–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0706482. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  4. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med [Internet]. Massachusetts Medical Society 2009;361:1045–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0904327. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  5. Investigators TC in UA to PRET. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without st-segment elevation. N Engl J Med [Internet]. Massachusetts Medical Society 2001;345:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa010746. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  6. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, Steg PG, Storey RF, Jensen EC, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med [Internet]. Massachusetts Medical Society 2015;372:1791–800. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1500857. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  7. Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bosch J, Dagenais GR, Hart RG, Shestakovska O, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. Massachusetts Medical Society 2017;377:1319–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1709118. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  8. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J [Internet]. Oxford Academic 2018;39:213–54. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/39/3/213/4095043. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  9. Zomer E, Si S, Hird TR, Liew D, Owen AJ, Tonkin A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin versus aspirin alone in people with peripheral or carotid artery disease: An Australian healthcare perspective. Eur J Prev Cardiol [Internet]. 2019;26:858–68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30526023/. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  10. Magnuson EA, Li H, Wang K, Vilain K, Shafiq A, Bonaca MP, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Long-Term Ticagrelor in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction: Results From the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:527–38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28750695/. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  11. Brunetti ND, De Gennaro L, Correale M, Ieva R, Santoro F. COMPASS vs PEGASUS approach in a comparative budget impact analysis. Eur J Intern Med [Internet]. Elsevier 2021;83:102–4. http://www.ejinme.com/article/S0953620520303794/fulltext. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  12. Levy J, Rosenberg M, Vanness D. A transparent and consistent approach to assess US outpatient drug costs for use in cost-effectiveness analyses. Value Heal [Internet]. Value Health 2018;21:677–84. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29909872/. Accessed 8 Nov 2021.

  13. Drug Tariff|NHSBSA [Internet]. 2022. https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/pharmacies-gp-practices-and-appliance-contractors/drug-tariff. Accessed 28 Jun 2022.

  14. Kedhi E, Delewi R, Fabris E, De Luca G, Hermanides RS, van den Ent M, et al. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction: insights from a pooled database of the SMART-DATE and DAPT-STEMI trials. Atherosclerosis [Internet]. Elsevier 2020;315:55–61. http://www.atherosclerosis-journal.com/article/S0021915020314970/fulltext. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  15. Van Der Sangen NMR, Rozemeijer R, Chan Pin Yin DRPP, Valgimigli M, Windecker S, James SK, et al. Patient-tailored antithrombotic therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J [Internet]. Oxford Academic 2021;42:1038–46. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/10/1038/6122862. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  16. Magnani G, Ardissino D, Im KA, Budaj A, Storey RF, Steg PG, et al. Predictors, type, and impact of bleeding on the net clinical benefit of long-term ticagrelor in stable patients with prior myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc [Internet]. American Heart Association Inc. 2021;10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017008. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

  17. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ [Internet]. British Medical Journal Publishing Group 2010;340:698–702. https://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c332. Accessed 8 Nov 2021.

  18. Chew DP, Huynh LT, Liew D, Astley C, Soman A, Brieger D. Potential survival gains in the treatment of myocardial infarction. Heart [Internet]. Heart 2009;95:1844–50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19666459/. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gal Tsaban.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work has not been funded by external grants.

Competing interests

Gal Tsaban, Hilmi Alnsasra, Aref El Nasasra, Amjad Abu-Salman, Ala Abu-Dogosh, Itay Weissberg, Yael Ben-Baruch Golan, Orit Barrett, Roi Westreich, Enis Aboalhasan, Joseph Azuri, Ariel Hammerman, and Ronen Arbel declare no competing interest related to this work or any relevant conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

GT, HA, and RA conceived the study and analysis. Material preparation and data collection were performed by GT HA, AEN, AAS, and EA. Statistical analysis was performed by EA and was reviewed by AH and JA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GT, HA, and RA. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable

Consent to participate and/or publish

Not applicable.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsaban, G., Alnsasra, H., El Nasasra, A. et al. Aspirin with Low-Dose Ticagrelor or with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban for Secondary Prevention: A Cost per Outcome Analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 22, 677–683 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-022-00543-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-022-00543-8

Navigation