Skip to main content
Log in

Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Rural and Urban Trends in Medicare Beneficiaries

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Data are needed on the use of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in rural versus urban areas, including the initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Objective

We used Medicare data to examine rural/urban differences in anticoagulation use in patients with AF.

Methods

We identified incident AF in a 20% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (aged ≥ 65 years) from 2011 to 2016 and collected ZIP code and covariates at the time of AF. We identified the first anticoagulant prescription filled, if any, following AF diagnosis. We categorized beneficiaries into four rural/urban areas using rural–urban commuting area codes and used Poisson regression models to compare anticoagulant use.

Results

We included 447,252 patients with AF (mean age 79 ± 8 years), of which 82% were urban, 9% large rural, 5% small rural, and 4% isolated. The percentage who initiated an anticoagulant rose from 34% in 2011 to 53% in 2016, paralleling the uptake of DOACs. In a multivariable-adjusted analysis, those in rural areas (vs. urban) were more likely to initiate an anticoagulant. However, rural beneficiaries (vs. urban) were less likely to initiate a DOAC; those in isolated areas were 17% less likely (95% confidence interval [CI] 13–20), those in small rural areas were 12% less likely (95% CI 9–15), and those in large rural areas were 10% less likely (95% CI 8–12).

Conclusion

Among Medicare beneficiaries with AF, anticoagulation use was low but increased over time with the introduction of DOACs. Rural beneficiaries were less likely to receive a DOAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katsnelson M, Koch S, Rundek T. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Atrial Fibrillation. 2010;3(3):279. https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):e199-267. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(1):104–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes GD, Lucas E, Alexander GC, Goldberger ZD. National trends in ambulatory oral anticoagulant use. Am J Med. 2015;128(12):1300–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Desai NR, Krumme AA, Schneeweiss S, Shrank WH, Brill G, Pezalla EJ, et al. Patterns of initiation of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation- quality and cost implications. Am J Med. 2014;127(11):1075-82 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moy GM, Bastian B, et al. Leading causes of death in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan areas—United States, 1999-2014. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(SS-1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6601a1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Connor A, Wellenius G. Rural-urban disparities in the prevalence of diabetes and coronary heart disease. Public Health. 2012;126(10):813–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.05.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howard G, Kleindorfer DO, Cushman M, Long DL, Jasne A, Judd SE, et al. Contributors to the excess stroke mortality in rural areas in the United States. Stroke J Cerebr Circ. 2017;48(7):1773–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mainous AG 3rd, King DE, Garr DR, Pearson WS. Race, rural residence, and control of diabetes and hypertension. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):563–8. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Alonso A, MacLehose RF, Chen LY, Bengtson LG, Chamberlain AM, Norby FL, et al. Prospective study of oral anticoagulants and risk of liver injury in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Piccini JP, Hammill BG, Sinner MF, Jensen PN, Hernandez AF, Heckbert SR, et al. Incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation and associated mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1993–2007. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.962688.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen PN, Johnson K, Floyd J, Heckbert SR, Carnahan R, Dublin S. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying atrial fibrillation using administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(Suppl 1):141–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.2317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes (RUCAs): rural health research center. http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/index.php Accessed 20 Apr 2019.

  14. USDA: Rural-urban communting area codes. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes.aspx Accessed 27 Feb 2020.

  15. Garg RK, Glazer NL, Wiggins KL, Newton KM, Thacker EL, Smith NL, et al. Ascertainment of warfarin and aspirin use by medical record review compared with automated pharmacy data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(3):313–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.2041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham A, Stein CM, Chung CP, Daugherty JR, Smalley WE, Ray WA. An automated database case definition for serious bleeding related to oral anticoagulant use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(6):560–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.2109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Norby FL, Bengtson LGS, Lutsey PL, Chen LY, MacLehose RF, Chamberlain AM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0672-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263–72. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-1584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010;138(5):1093–100. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-0134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bergstralh EKJ. GMATCH macro. 2003. http://www.mayo.edu/research/departments-divisions/department-health-sciences-research/division-biomedical-statistics-informatics/software/locally-written-sas-macros. Accessed.

  22. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gage BF, Boechler M, Doggette AL, Fortune G, Flaker GC, Rich MW, et al. Adverse outcomes and predictors of underuse of antithrombotic therapy in medicare beneficiaries with chronic atrial fibrillation. Stroke J Cerebr Circ. 2000;31(4):822–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hernandez I, Saba S, Zhang Y. Geographic variation in the use of oral anticoagulation therapy in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Stroke J Cerebr Circ. 2017;48(8):2289–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Waddy SP, Solomon AJ, Becerra AZ, Ward JB, Chan KE, Fwu CW, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in atrial fibrillation treatment and outcomes among dialysis patients in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(3):637–49. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2019050543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Essien UR, Magnani JW, Chen N, Gellad WF, Fine MJ, Hernandez I. Race/ethnicity and sex-related differences in direct oral anticoagulant initiation in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study of medicare data. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020;112(1):103–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2019.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hayden K, Schweinle W. Demographic considerations in anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. S D Med J S D State Med Assoc. 2015;68(3):116–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shields GE, Bates AE, Chapman AM. Implementing guidelines: the cost and clinical impact of anticoagulants in the UK atrial fibrillation population. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(5):543–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-015-0180-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vestergaard AS, Ehlers LH. A health economic evaluation of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: guideline adherence versus the observed treatment strategy prior to 2012 in Denmark. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(9):967–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0281-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Turakhia MP, Hoang DD, Xu X, Frayne S, Schmitt S, Yang F, et al. Differences and trends in stroke prevention anticoagulation in primary care vs cardiology specialty management of new atrial fibrillation: The Retrospective Evaluation and Assessment of Therapies in AF (TREAT-AF) study. Am Heart J. 2013;165(1):93-101 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Perino AC, Fan J, Schmitt SK, Askari M, Kaiser DW, Deshmukh A, et al. Treating specialty and outcomes in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: from the TREAT-AF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fosbol EL, Holmes DN, Piccini JP, Thomas L, Reiffel JA, Mills RM, et al. Provider specialty and atrial fibrillation treatment strategies in United States community practice: findings from the ORBIT-AF registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(4):e000110. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Neal WT, Sandesara PB, Claxton JS, MacLehose RF, Chen LY, Bengtson LGS, et al. Provider specialty, anticoagulation prescription patterns, and stroke risk in atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007943.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This manuscript is part of Dr. Faye Norby’s PhD dissertation (manuscript 3). A non-peer-reviewed, full-text version of the dissertation is available online at Proquest, LLC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faye L. Norby.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Alvaro Alonso has received funding from American Heart Association grant 16EIA26410001 and NHLBI grant K24HL148521.

Conflict of interest

Faye L. Norby, Pamela L. Lutsey, Nathan D. Shippee, Lin Y. Chen, Carrie Henning-Smith, Alvaro Alonso, Rob F. Walker, and Aaron R. Folsom have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board as exempt because deidentified data were used.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

The authors are unable to share the data since they were obtained under a data use agreement that does not allow data sharing.

Code availability

Available upon request.

Author contributions

FN, PL, NS, LC, and AF designed the study; FN and RW undertook the statistical analysis; FN wrote the manuscript; and PL, NS, LC, CHS, AA, RW, and AF undertook critical revision of the manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Norby, F.L., Lutsey, P.L., Shippee, N.D. et al. Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Rural and Urban Trends in Medicare Beneficiaries. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 22, 207–217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-021-00502-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-021-00502-9

Navigation