Skip to main content
Log in

Real diesel engine exhaust emission control: indirect non-thermal plasma and comparison to direct plasma for NOX, THC, CO, and CO2

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, diesel engine exhaust emission control by non-thermal plasma (NTP) technology has been shown to be promising. However, carbon and soot deposition on the inner surface of the NTP reactor for direct plasma processing decreased the efficiency of the plasma process throughout the experiments. In the present work, the feasibility of indirect plasma processing was investigated as an innovative and novel method compared to direct plasma processing. Air was directed through an NTP at an applied voltage of VP-P = 7 kV and a flow rate of 1–4 L/min, and then, it was combined with engine exhaust gas at a flow rate of 5 L/min. In this case, the maximum conversion of NOX was 64.9% at 4 L/min. However, for direct plasma processing at 5 L/min, NO conversion was 58%, which proves that the indirect NTP process can decrease NOX concentration effectively. The maximum conversion for unburned hydrocarbon (UHC), carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) was obtained as 2%, 4% and 0.7% at 4, 2 and 3 L/min in indirect plasma processing; While their remove rate for direct plasma processing was 16.3%, −0.5% and 13.2%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Air quality guidelines for Europe. 2nd ed. WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 91, 2000.

  2. Miri M, Derakhshan Z, Allahabadi A, Ahmadi E, Conti GO, Ferrante M, Aval HE. Mortality and morbidity due to exposure to outdoor air pollution in Mashhad metropolis, Iran. AirQ Model Approach Environ Res. 2016;151:451–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmadi E, Kakavandi B, Azari A, Izanloo H, Gharibi H, Mahvi AH, Javid A, Hashemi SY. The performance of mesoporous magnetite zeolite nanocomposite in removing dimethyl phthalate from aquatic environments. Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57:27768–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmadi E, Yousefzadeh S, Mokammel A, Miri M, Ansari M, Arfaeinia H, Badi MY, Ghaffari HR, Rezaei S, Mahvi AH. Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2020;121:109674.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dehghani MH, Salari M, Naddafi K, Nazmara S, Ahmadi E, Kumar P. Evaluation of formaldehyde concentration in the ambient air of a most populated Iranian city. Tehran Air Qual Atmos Health. 2017;10:763–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yousefzadeh S, Ahmadi E, Gholami M, Ghaffari HR, Azari A, Ansari M, Miri M, Sharafi K, Rezaei S. A comparative study of anaerobic fixed film baffled reactor and up-flow anaerobic fixed film fixed bed reactor for biological removal of diethyl phthalate from wastewater: a performance, kinetic, biogas, and metabolic pathway study. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gholizadeh A, Taghavi M, Moslem A, Neshat AA, Najafi ML, Alahabadi A, Ahmadi E, Asour AA, Rezaei H, Gholami S. Ecological and health risk assessment of exposure to atmospheric heavy metals. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;184:109622.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghaffari HR, Aval HE, Alahabadi A, Mokammel A, Khamirchi R, Yousefzadeh S, Ahmadi E, Rahmani-Sani A, Estaji M, Ghanbarnejad A. Asthma disease as cause of admission to hospitals due to exposure to ambient oxidants in Mashhad. Iran Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:27402–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prüss-Ustün A, Wolf J, Corvalán C, Bos R and Neira M. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. World Health Organization; (2016).

  10. Babaie M, Davari P, Talebizadeh P, Zare F, Rahimzadeh H, Ristovski Z, Brown R. Performance evaluation of non-thermal plasma on particulate matter, ozone and CO2 correlation for diesel exhaust emission reduction. Chem Eng J. 2015;276:240–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Talebizadeh P, Babaie M, Brown R, Rahimzadeh H, Ristovski Z, Arai M. The role of non-thermal plasma technique in NOX treatment: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;40:886–901.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang X, Lu H, Lin L, Yao S. Experimental investigation of plasma oxidization of diesel particulate matter. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2013;33:281–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Madhukar A, Rajanikanth B. Augmenting NOX reduction in diesel exhaust by combined plasma/ozone injection technique, a laboratory investigation. The Institution of Engineering and Technology; 2017.

  14. Brüggemann TC, Keil FJ. Theoretical investigation of the mechanism of the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia on H-form zeoles. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:17378–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao G-B, Garikipati SVBJ, Hu X, Argyle MD, Radosz M. Effect of oxygen on nonthermal plasma reactions of nitrogen oxides in nitrogen. Am Inst Chem Eng. 2005;51(6):1800.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Skalska K, Miller JS, Ledakowicz S. Trends in NOX abatement: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:3976–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mok YS, Lee H-J. Removal of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides by using ozone injection and absorption–reduction technique. Fuel Process Technol. 2006;87:591–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Durme J, Dewulf J, Leys C, Van Langenhove H. Combining non-thermal plasma with heterogeneous catalysis in waste gas treatment: a review. Appl Catal B Environ. 2008;78:324–33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mok YS, Koh DJ, Kim KT, Nam I-S. Nonthermal plasma-enhanced catalytic removal of nitrogen oxides over V2O5/TiO2 and Cr2O3/TiO2. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42:2960–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jõgi I, Erme K, Levoll E, Raud J, Stamate E. Plasma and catalyst for the oxidation of NOX. Plasma Sources Sci Technol. 2018;27:035001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hosseini Rad R, Khani M, Mehdi Kia H, Shafiei M, Shokri B. Decomposition of high concentration benzene (produced in paper and painting industries) and its byproducts, methane and carbon dioxide, using plate gliding arc. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2019;17:549–60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rajanikanth B, Rout S. Studies on nitric oxide removal in simulated gas compositions under plasma-dielectric/catalytic discharges. Fuel Process Technol. 2001;74:177–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hołub M, Kalisiak S, Borkowski T, Myśków J, Brandenburg R. The influence of direct non-thermal plasma treatment on particulate matter (PM) and NOX in the exhaust of marine diesel engines. Pol J Environ Stud. 2010;19:1199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yao S, Shen X, Zhang X, Han J, Wu Z, Tang X, Lu H, Jiang B. Sustainable removal of particulate matter from diesel engine exhaust at low temperature using a plasma-catalytic method. Chem Eng J. 2017;327:343–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi Y, Cai Y, Li X, Xu H, Li W, Pu X. Low temperature diesel particulate filter regeneration by atmospheric air non-thermal plasma injection system. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2016;36:783–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yousefzadeh S, Matin AR, Ahmadi E, Sabeti Z, Alimohammadi M, Aslani H, Nabizadeh R. Response surface methodology as a tool for modeling and optimization of bacillus subtilis spores inactivation by UV/ nano-Fe0 process for safe water production. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;114:334–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Linbo G, Yixi C, Yunxi S, Jing W, Xiaoyu P, Jing T, Runlin F. Effect of indirect non-thermal plasma on particle size distribution and composition of diesel engine particles. Plasma Sci Technol. 2017;19:115503.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matin AR, Yousefzadeh S, Ahmadi E, Mahvi A, Alimohammadi M, Aslani H, Nabizadeh R. A comparative study of the disinfection efficacy of H2O2/ferrate and UV/H2O2/ferrate processes on inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores by response surface methodology for modeling and optimization. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;116:129–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gao J, Ma C, Xia F, Xing S, Sun L, Huang L. Raman characteristics of PM emitted by a diesel engine equipped with a NTP reactor. Fuel. 2016;185:289–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Badi M, Azari A, Esrafili A, Ahmadi E, Gholami M. Performance evaluation of magnetized multiwall carbon nanotubes by iron oxide nanoparticles in removing fluoride from aqueous solution. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2015;25:128–42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hammer T, Kappes T, Baldauf M. Plasma catalytic hybrid processes: gas discharge initiation and plasma activation of catalytic processes. Catal Today. 2004;89:5–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hueso J, Cotrino J, Caballero A, Espinós J, González-Elipe A. Plasma catalysis with perovskite-type catalysts for the removal of NO and CH4 from combustion exhausts. J Catal. 2007;247:288–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Penetrante B, Brusasco R, Merritt B, Pitz W, Vogtlin G. Plasma-assisted catalytic reduction of NOx. Warrendale: Sae International; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jogi I, Stamate E, Irimiea C, Schmidt M, Brandenburg R, Hołub M, Bonisławski M, Jakubowski T, Kääriäinen M-L, Cameron DC. Comparison of direct and indirect plasma oxidation of NO combined with oxidation by catalyst. Fuel. 2015;144:137–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Holub M. On the measurement of plasma power in atmospheric pressure DBD plasma reactors. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech. 2012;33:307–322.

  36. Wang T, Sun B-M, Xiao H-P. Characteristics and analysis of the mechanism of NO removal in dielectric barrier discharge plasma by hydrocarbons at varying temperatures. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2013;33:307–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pârvulescu VI, Magureanu M, Lukes P. Plasma chemistry and catalysis in gases and liquids. Wiley; 2012.

  38. National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Chemical Kinetics Database. http://kinetics.nist.gov/kinetics/index.jsp

  39. Obradović BM, Sretenović GB, Kuraica MM. A dual-use of DBD plasma for simultaneous NOX and SO2 removal from coal-combustion flue gas. J Hazard Mater. 2011;185:1280–6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Arai M, Saito M, Yoshinaga S. Effect of oxygen on NOX removal in corona discharge field: NOX behavior without a reducing agent. Combust Sci Technol. 2004;176:1653–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Penetrante BM, Schultheis SE. Non-thermal plasma techniques for pollution control: part b: electron beam and electrical discharge processing. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.

  42. Atkinson R, Baulch D, Cox R, Hampson R Jr, Kerr J, Troe J. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: supplement IV. IUPAC subcommittee on gas kinetic data evaluation for atmospheric chemistry. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1992;21:1125–568.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McLarnon CR, Penetrante BM. Effect of gas composition on the NOx conversion chemistry in a plasma. San Francisco: Society of Automotive Engineers Fall Fuels and Lubricants Meeting; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jõgi I, Erme K, Raud J, Laan M. Oxidation of NO by ozone in the presence of TiO2 catalyst. Fuel. 2016;173:45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hammer T. Non-thermal plasma application to the abatement of noxious emissions in automotive exhaust gases. Plasma Sources Sci Technol. 2002;11:A196–201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mok YS, Lee H-J, Dors M, Mizeraczyk J. Improvement in selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides by using dielectric barrier discharge. Chem Eng J. 2005;110:79–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Babaie M. Reduction of diesel engine exhaust emissions using non-thermal plasma technology. PhD Thesis. Queensland University of Technology; 2015.

  48. Thomas SE, Martin AR, Raybone D, Shawcross J.T, Ng KL, Beech P, Whitehead JC. Non thermal plasma aftertreatment of particulates-theoretical limits and impact on reactor design. SAE Technical Paper; 2000.

  49. Tang X, Lu H, Lin L, Yao S. Experimental investigation of plasma oxidization of diesel particulate matter. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2013;33:281–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Okubo M, Yamada H, Yoshida K and Kuroki T. Simultaneous reduction of diesel particulate and NOX using a catalysis-combined nonthermal plasma reactor. Ieee Transactions on Industry Applications. 2017;53(6):5875–5882.

  51. Grundmann J, Muller S, and Zahn R-J. Treatment of soot by dielectric barrier discharges and ozone. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2005;25(5):5875–5882.

  52. Jo J-O, Trinh HQ, Kim SH, Mok YS. Simultaneous removal of hydrocarbon and CO using a nonthermal plasma-catalytic hybrid reactor system. Chem Eng J. 2016;299:93–103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Khani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khani, M.R., Barzideh Pour, E., Rashnoo, S. et al. Real diesel engine exhaust emission control: indirect non-thermal plasma and comparison to direct plasma for NOX, THC, CO, and CO2. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 18, 743–754 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00500-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00500-0

Keywords

Navigation