Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency and mechanism of formaldehyde removal from air by two wild plants; Plantago asiatica L. and Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indoor potted plants played an important role in the removal of air-borne VOCs. According to the difference between plant fresh extracts and boiled extracts on breakdown ability to the added formaldehyde, a simple quantitative evaluation method was used to identify the mechanisms of formaldehyde removal from the air by wild Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz. and Plantago asiatica L.. After shoots exposure to formaldehyde (1.28 mg/m3 in the air) for 24 h, the formaldehyde removal rates of P. asiatica and T. mongolicum were 73.18 and 121.20 mg/h/kg FW (fresh weight), respectively. Formaldehyde can be transported from the air to the rhizosphere solution by plants, and the maximum rates of transmission by T. mongolicum and P. asiatica were 23.73 and 83.08 mg/h/kg FW, respectively. Although plant metabolism was responsible for formaldehyde loss in the air-plant-solution system, and the metabolic activity depended on the enzymatic and redox reactions in the plants, P. asiatica and T. mongolicum are still good candidate species for developing phyto-microbial technologies. The redox reaction was the main mechanism used by P. asiatica shoots to dissipate formaldehyde, while the enzymatic reaction was the main mechanism used by T. mongolicum. The higher oxidative potential and lower defensive enzyme activity in P. asiatica shoots led to its higher formaldehyde removal rate compared to T. mongolicum. Meanwhile, the stronger redox reaction ability in the T. mongolicum roots was partly responsible for its lower formaldehyde transmission rate. The results show two plants have strong tolerance to formaldehyde in the air and good formaldehyde removal ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldasano JM, Gonçalves M, Soret A, Jiménez-Guerrero P. Air pollution impacts of speed limitation measures in large cities: the need for improving traffic data in a metropolitan area. Atmos Environ. 2010;44(25):2997–06.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hofman J, Bartholomeus H, Calders K, Wittenberghe SV, Wuyts K, Samson R. On the relation between tree crown morphology and particulate matter deposition on urban tree leaves: a ground-based lidar approach. Atmos Environ. 2014;99:130–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baciak M, Warmiński K, Bęś A. The effect of selected gaseous air pollutants on woody plants. For Res Pap. 2015;76(4):401–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chauhan AJ, Johnston SL. Air pollution and infection in respiratory illness. Br Med Bull. 2003;68(1):95–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen AJ, Ross Anderson H, Ostro B, Pandey KD, Krzyzanowski M, Künzli N, et al. The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2005;68(13–14):1301–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang Y, H SS, Lu Y, Niu R, Xu L, Cao J, et al. Removal of indoor volatile organic compounds via photocatalytic oxidation: a short review and prospect. Molecules. 2016;21(1):56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raaschounielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Jensen SS, Ketzel M, Sørensen M, Hansen J, et al. Traffic air pollution and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes: a danish cohort study. Environ Health. 2012;11(1):60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (WHO). 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution. 2014. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/. Accessed 28 Apr 2014.

  9. Kim KJ, Ahn HG. The effect of pore structure of zeolite on the adsorption of VOCs and their desorption properties by microwave heating. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012;152:78–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren HJ, Koshy P, Chen WF, Qi S, Sorrell CC. Photocatalytic materials and technologies for air purification. J Hazard Mater. 2017;325:340–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Pennisi SV, Kays SJ, Habteselassie MY. Isolation and identification of toluene-metabolizing bacteria from rhizospheres of two indoor plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013;224:1648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasunuma H, Ishimaru Y, Yoda Y, Shima M. Decline of ambient air pollution levels due to measures to control automobile emissions and effects on the prevalence of respiratory and allergic disorders among children in Japan. Environ Res. 2014;131:111–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sriprapat W, Boraphech P, Thiravetyan P. Factors affecting xylene-contaminated air removal by the ornamental plant Zamioculcas zamiifolia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21(4):2603–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosaddegh MH, Jafarian A, Ghasemi A, Mosaddegh A. Phytoremediation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene contaminated air by D. deremensis and O. microdasys plants. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014;12:39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmitz H, Hilgers U, Weidner M. Assimilation and metabolism of formaldehyde by leaves appear unlikely to be of value for indoor air purification. New Phytol. 2000;147(2):307–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fismes J, Perrin-Ganier C, Empereur-Bissonnet P, Morel JL. Soil-to-root transfer and translocation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by vegetables grown on industrial contaminated soils. J Environ Qual. 2002;31(5):1649–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sriprapat W, Thiravetyan P. Efficacy of ornamental plants for benzene removal from contaminated air and water: effect of plant associated bacteria. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2016;113:262–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolverton BC, Wolverton JD. Plants and soil microorganism: removal of formaldehyde, xylene, and ammonia from the indoor environment. J Miss Acad Sci. 1993;38:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barrutia O, Epelde L, Garcia-Plazaola JI, Garbisu C, Becerril JM. Phytoextraction potential of two Rumex acetosa L. accessions collected from metalliferous and non-metalliferous sites: effect of fertilization. Chemosphere. 2009;74:259–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Susarla S, Medina VF, Mccutcheon SC. Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol Eng. 2002;18(5):647–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dela Cruz M, Müller R, Svensmark B, Pedersen JS, Christensen JH. Assessment of volatile organic compound removal by indoor plants–a novel experimental setup. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21(13):7838–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Treesubsuntorn C, Thiravetyan P. Removal of benzene from indoor air by dracaena sanderiana: effect of wax and stomata. Atmos Environ. 2012;57:317–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Clausen G, Beko G, Corsi RL, Gunnarsen L, Nazaroff WW, Olesen BW, et al. Reflections on the state of research: indoor environmental quality. Indoor Air. 2011;21(3):219–30.

  24. Xiong JY, Zhang PP, Huang SD,Zhang YP. Comprehensive influence of environmental factors on the emission rate of formaldehyde and VOCs in building materials: correlation development and exposure assessment. Environ Res. 2016;151:734–41.

  25. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

  26. Xu ZJ, Wang L, Hou HP. Formaldehyde removal by potted plant-soil systems. J Hazard Mater. 2011;192(1):314–8.

  27. Nian HJ, Meng QC, Zhang W, Chen LM. Overexpression of the formaldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Brevibacillus brevisto enhance formaldehyde tolerance and detoxification of tobacco. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;169(1):170–80.

  28. Su YH, Liang YC. Foliar uptake and translocation of formaldehyde with bracket plants (Chlorophytum comosum). J Hazard Mater. 2015;291:120–8.

  29. Qi JS, Wang JL, Gong ZZ, Zhou JM. Apoplastic ROS signaling in plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017;38:92–100.

  30. LingHu YW, Li B, Li SF, Zhang Y, Liu LC. Monitoring,purification and response of three indoor ornamental plants on formaldehyde pollution. Acta Botan Boreali-Occiden Sin. 2011;31(4):776–82 (in Chinese).

  31. Xie SY, Yang XY, Ding ZG, Li MG, Zhao JY. Chemical constitutents and pharmacological effects of Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz. Nat Prod Res Dev. 2012;12:14151 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yao XH. Medicinal efficacy of plantain and measuring method of valid composition. J Anhui Agric Sci. 2007;4:1053–4 (in Chinese).

  33. Chatterjee K, Dollimore D, Alexander K. A new application for the Antoine equation in formulation development. Int J Pharm. 2001;213:31–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang S, Lu S, Xu X, Korpelainen H, Li CY. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and isozyme profiles in leaves of male and female populus cathayana infected with Melampsora larici-populina. Tree Physiol. 2010;30(1):116–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Guieysse B, Hort C, Platel V, Munoz R, Ondarts M, Revah S. Biological treatment of indoor air for VOC removal: potential and challenges. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26(5):398–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang JZ, Li XY, Li Z, Wang LH, Zhou Q, Huang XH. Analysis of effects of a new environmental pollutant, bisphenola, on antioxidant systems in soybean roots at different growth stages. Sci Rep. 2016;6:2378.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Morison JIL, Lawson T. Does lateral gas diffusion in leaves matter? Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30(9):1072–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21667028, 41361072, U1403381).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, People’s Republic of China

    Suya Zhao, Yuhong Su & Hanxiao Liang

Authors
  1. Suya Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuhong Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanxiao Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhong Su.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, S., Su, Y. & Liang, H. Efficiency and mechanism of formaldehyde removal from air by two wild plants; Plantago asiatica L. and Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 17, 141–150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-018-00335-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-018-00335-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation