Abstract
In the welded joints, fatigue failures typically originate from defects or notch-like geometries under cyclic loading. This study investigates the impact of stress relief grooves (SRG) on the fatigue performance of butt-welded cast steel to ultra-high-strength steel components using experimental fatigue tests and finite element method. The experiments examined the fatigue properties of hybrid joints between G26CrMo4 cast steel (t = 20 mm) and S960 steel plate (t = 6 mm) with and without SRG. Gas metal arc welding process was used to weld the butt joints that had a permanent root backing machined on the cast steel part, causing a crack-like defect to the weld root. Additionally, the top surfaces of the welded parts were aligned, resulting in a significant axial misalignment in the butt joint. The SRG, positioned close to the weld root, was found to have a beneficial influence on the joint’s fatigue performance by a factor of 1.2 when using the nominal stress criterion. However, the fatigue capacity was still roughly 35% lower compared to the symmetrical equivalent due to the secondary bending stress, caused by axial misalignment. The finite element analyses indicated that the SRG reduces the amount of secondary stresses at the weld root leading to lower total structural stress. The study recommends using the FAT80 (m = 3) design curve in the structural stress method, for similar butt-welds having a crack-like defect, parallel to the loading direction, at the weld root. However, for welded joints with crack-like defects, it is advisable to use linear elastic fracture mechanics rather than relying solely on stress-based local approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The use of ultra-high-strength steels (UHSS) has increased in recent years, especially in weight-critical structures in the transportation, heavy machinery, lifting industry and civil engineering sectors [1]. In many applications, the development has been driven by needs for lighter and more energy-efficient structures, without compromising structures’ load-carrying capacity or safety [2, 3]. However, as UHSSs allow the use of thinner material thicknesses in structures, they also increase the overall stress level of structures. Higher stresses in structures cause increased demands in the quality requirements in design and manufacturing [4]. Fatigue design aspects are especially emphasised in order to effectively utilise the higher material strength of UHSSs in structures [5].
Cast steel parts are commonly used in various steel structures, including bearing housings, pin joints, lifting lugs, and nodes of the trusses. The main advantages of using cast steel parts are their flexible geometrical designs, cost-effectiveness in serial production and aesthetical appeal [6]. Casting-enabled designs can be used to position joints away from structurally critical areas, reduce stress concentrations with smooth shapes and manufacture topology-optimised shapes with minor additional costs [7]. Cast parts are typically joined to plate components or other structures by welding, and various details can be included in the cast design to reduce the need for machining and to facilitate the positioning of the parts.
In order to enhance the productivity of welded cast steel components, various bevels and permanent root backings are often used. Nonetheless, there is always a possibility that unwelded initial cracks or defects remain on top of permanent root backings at the weld root [8, 9]. Additionally, the fatigue strength of the weld is generally lower than that of the attached cast steel component [10]. Such initial defects are considered in the fatigue design guidelines according to the nominal stress method in the International Institute of Welding (IIW) recommendations [11] and Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures (EC3) [12]. Both guidelines recommend the fatigue strength class (FAT) of FAT71 for joints with non-destructive testing (NDT), while for joints without NDT, FAT36 is recommended.
This study investigates the fatigue strength of hybrid butt-welded (BW) joints between a cast steel part and a UHSS plate, which have a crack-like defect in the weld root, parallel to the applied load direction and caused by permanent root backing. The studied hybrid BW joint has a significant difference in material thicknesses, and the axial misalignment may cause a considerable amount of secondary bending stresses in the welded joint [13]. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the fatigue capacity of joints can be enhanced by reducing stress concentration in the weld root through the implementation of a stress relief groove (SRG) design. It is worth noting that SRGs are commonly utilised in machine elements, such as shafts, to redirect stress flows away from critical details [14]. The optimal location and geometry for the SRG were approximated numerically using the finite element method (FEM). Subsequently, the effects of the developed SRG on the fatigue strength of BWs were studied experimentally using welded coupon specimens. The results were analysed using both linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) and local approaches, including the effective notch stress method (ENS) and the theory of critical distances (TCD), with an idealised joint geometry of real specimens. Figure 1 provides a schematic overview of the studied BW joints, including the nominal stress method design FAT classes in the weld root, weld toe and machined SRG, according to IIW recommendations and EC3.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Materials
For the experimental study, two structural steel plates were selected: UHSS S960 MC (t = 6 mm) and S355 (t = 20 mm). These plates were welded to G26CrMo4 QT2 cast steel slabs. The materials were chosen based on an existing structure where a cast steel component is butt-welded to the S355 plate, with both welded materials having a 20 mm thickness. By replacing mild steel with higher strength grade steel (S960), a 70% weight reduction in the plate structure can be achieved, while still maintaining good weldability. Although thinner S960 has an ultimate load-carrying capacity approximately 40% lower than S355, it still reliably represents the fatigue strength of the joint detail under study. The specimens were produced using the gas metal arc welding (GMAW) process with filler materials that match the strength of the steel plates. A preliminary welding procedure specification, also known as pWPS, was created to ensure the quality of the welds. Tables 1 and 2 present the mechanical properties and chemical compositions of the steels and filler materials used, respectively.
2.2 Geometrical design of stress relief grooves and specimens
The SRG’s optimal location was numerically approximated using FEM. FEM models were created using quadratic plane-strain elements, and meshing at the notches was based on the mesh convergence study [16]. In these analyses, a U-notch type reference radius of rref = 0.05 mm [17] was applied to the initial crack caused by permanent root backing, and the weld root was modelled in a worst case when there is no weld penetration to the backing at all. The ENS approach with rref = 0.05 mm is recommended to be used on thin plates (t < 5 mm). However, in this case, the use of the smaller reference radius was deemed to be more appropriate than the reference radius of rref = 1 mm [17], which would have resulted in a significant material reduction at the weld root. The SRG was modelled as a simple cut with rounding of 1 mm, and a circular zone with a diameter of 6 mm was left untouched around the weld root. This area ensures sufficient conditions for welding with proper conduction away from the weld root, and root backing remains infusible after welding. A schematic overview of the FEM analysis with boundary conditions and loads is presented in Fig. 2.
Seven iterations were performed with varying distances (x-parameter in Fig. 2) and depth (y-parameter) of the centre (p-point) of the circular SRG arc in relation to the weld root. The analyses were conducted separately for membrane and bending loading. Stress concentration factors (SCFs) were collected separately for both axial and bending load cases at the weld root using the major principal stress criterion. SCFs were collected from the bottom of the applied groove with only membrane loading. The results of the rough analysis of the SRG location are presented in Fig. 3. Based on the obtained SCF results, the SRG variation ID no. 5 was chosen for the experimental testing, having a good compromise between SCFs in the root and the groove. The geometry was smoothened, and the groove radius was increased from 1 to 5 mm. This change did not significantly affect SCFs in the weld root (< 5% change), but it decreased SCF in the SRG and made parts easier to manufacture.
Four series of the coupon test specimen were used in the experimental research. The first series (35BW) served as a control group and did not have any axial misalignment. The remaining three series utilised S960 UHSS and had axial misalignment. The first of these (96BW-A) did not have the SRG, while the second (96BW-B) had the designed SRG. The third variation (96BW-C) had a deeper groove to highlight the effect of the groove by removing an additional 1 mm of material. The test matrix can be seen in Table 3, and schematics of the designed specimens are presented in Fig. 4. All specimens were tested in the as-welded condition (AW), except a few 96BW-C specimens that underwent high-frequency impact (HFMI) treatment from the bottom of the groove. In the first AW specimens of the series 96BW-C, the failure location shifted from the weld root to the bottom of the groove (Sect. 3). To maintain the weld root critical for the fatigue failure, HFMI treatment was employed to increase the fatigue strength of the machined surface of the groove, by inducing compressive residual stress and slightly improving the surface quality [17].
2.3 Manufacturing and measurements of the specimens
The plate parts were cut using nitrogen as cutting gas with a fiber laser parallel to the rolling direction. The cast steel parts with bevels, for weld configuration, were machined from cast steel slabs. Before welding, all steel parts underwent cleaning in a 10% citric acid bath. During the welding process, the cast steel and plate parts were clamped into the welding jig, and welding was performed with robotised GMAW in flat position (PA). Mixed shielding gas (8% CO2 + Ar) was used during welding. Figure 5a presents the welding setup, where the specimen is attached to the welding jig with four clamps. Details on the weld configuration and welding sequence are illustrated in Fig. 5b, c. After welding, the start and end points of the weld were cut, and the cut surfaces were machined and ground to flush. The used welding parameters corresponding to Fig. 5 are presented in Table 4.
The quality of the welds was verified through hardness measurements from macrographs and quasi-static tensile tests. The hardness measurements were performed with the Struers DuraScan 70 micro/macro hardness tester using the 5 kgf Vickers hardness (HV5) procedure. The measurement lines were taken roughly 1 mm below the surface at the weld face and the weld root. The results of the hardness measurements can be seen in Fig. 6. Both specimens show a significant increase in the hardness in the heat-affected-zone (HAZ) of the cast steel, which may be attributed to the higher carbon content of the studied cast steel, as seen in Table 2. The typical softening of the S960 microstructure was also detected in the HAZ, as previously reported in Refs. [19, 20].
Quasi-static tensile tests were performed on 35BW and 96BW-A specimens. The specimen shapes and dimensions of the tensile test specimens were identical to those presented in Fig. 4, except for a reduced width from 50 to 40 mm. The quasi-static tensile test were conducted using a Galdabini Quasar 600 material testing machine. The elongation in the vicinity of the weld area was measured using a digital image correlation (DIC) system [21]. The Aramis DIC setup used two 12-megapixel cameras, each with an 85 × 65 mm capturing area. The stress values were obtained using the rig’s force transducer data and measured cross-sectional values. Strain values were extracted using a 50-mm-long virtual extensometer in the DIC system measuring distance over the weld. The engineering stress–strain curves for both specimens are shown in Fig. 7, along with DIC images at the point reaching ultimate tensile loading. The 35BW specimen experienced final rupture outside of the DIC capturing area in the S355 base material, while the 96BW-A specimen failed at the softened HAZ on the S960 plate.
2.4 Fatigue testing
Fatigue tests were conducted mainly using a 750 kN servo-hydraulic fatigue test rig at around 1 Hz frequency. Because there was no axial misalignment in 35BW specimens, the fatigue tests at a frequency of 100 Hz frequency were conducted on Rumul Vibroforte 700 resonance test rig. Both fatigue testing rigs can be seen in Fig. 8. The experiments were performed with stress ratio of R = 0.1, and a few additional fatigue tests were carried out with an applied stress ratio of R = 0.5.
The specimens were fitted with a single strain gage (SG) according to the IIW recommendations [11], i.e. using the grid sizes of 3 mm and 0.6 mm for the t = 20 mm (S355) and t = 6 mm (S960) specimens, respectively. The SGs were installed at 0.4t distance from the weld toe to the steel plate. The nominal stress in each specimen was calculated using the test rig’s force data and the net cross-section of fatigue failure location, excluding the weld reinforcement. In addition to the test rig’s force data, SG measurements were used to determine structural stress at the steel plate. Structural stress in the bottom of the SRG was estimated analytically over the weld with the following equation:
where, σm/b are membrane and bending stress components that form the structural stress at the weld root, t1 is the thickness of the plate at the SG location and t2 is the material thickness at the SRGs location, excluding the additional thickness brought by the weld reinforcement (Fig. 9).
3 Fatigue test results
The fatigue test results were analysed using the standard statistical method [11], which utilises the least square linear regression to calculate the mean fatigue (Δσc,50%) at 2 × 106 cycles, with a fixed slope parameter m = 3. The specimens from the 96BW-C series, which had the fatigue failure occurring from the bottom of the SRG, were also analysed with the slope parameter of m = 5 that is recommended for machined surfaces. The characteristic fatigue strength (Δσc,97.7%) was determined from Δσc,50% using the standard deviation of the data set and survival probability of 97.7% [11]. Table 5 presents the mean fatigue strength of each test series, using both the nominal and structural stress systems. One 96BW-B specimen was excluded from the statistical analysis due to an overload (> 1.5Fmax) caused by an error in a hydraulic pressure source, during the experiment. The complete fatigue test data is presented in the Appendix: Table 7.
The fatigue test data points are presented in Fig. 10a according to the nominal stress criterion, along with the previously mentioned fatigue design curves (Fig. 1). In Fig. 10b, data points are shown in the structural stress system, with S–N curves fitted according to the fatigue failure location. A total number of 18 specimens failed from the weld root, and the sample size was sufficient to present the design S–N curve, Δσc,s,97.7% = 84 MPa, corresponding to Δσc,s,50% = 98 MPa (m = 3). The natural slope parameter correlated well with the recommended value slope parameter being m = 3.06. The HFMI treatment at the bottom of the groove increased the fatigue strength of 96BW-C specimens from Δσc,s,50% = 149 MPa to Δσc,s,50% = 192 MPa (m = 5).
The cross-sectional macrographs were created from the failed specimen in each test series, as presented in Fig. 11. It can be observed that in the 35BW, 96BW-A and 96BW-B test series, the crack initiated from the weld root, except for one specimen in the 96BW-B series, which failed from the bottom of the SRG. Upon further examination of this specimen, a competing fatigue crack from the weld root, measuring approximately 1 mm long, was discovered. The fatigue failure initiated from the bottom of the SRG in both machined and HFMI-treated conditions, in the 96BW-C series, where the SRG effect was emphasised with a deeper groove.
The SGs were used to monitor the crack growth behaviour during the fatigue test. It has been shown that SGs installed a few millimetres away from the weld toe can be used to measure a 0.5 to 1 mm long fatigue crack, indicating the transition from the crack initiation (CI) to the crack propagation (CP) phase [22]. In this study, a recommended 5% change in the measured strain values was used as a threshold from CI to CP. The normalised strain behaviour in all 96BW variations related to the total fatigue life is presented in Fig. 12 along with ratio of CI to total fatigue live. It can be observed that SRG has a clear effect on the CI trends. However, it is likely that the shift from CI to CP was not detected reliably in 96BW-C specimens and is not comparable to A and B variations. The reason being, SG was far from the fatigue failure location it responded with a delay to the crack growth. Similarly, AW and HFMI-treated specimens could not be distinguished, although the fatigue results indicate a significant difference.
4 Application of local approaches
The fatigue strength of joints 96BW-A and 96BW-B was evaluated using various local approaches, including TCD, ENS and LEFM analyses. In order to conduct a more detailed analysis, plane strain FE models were created based on 96BW-A and BW96-B specimens, in comparison to the rough SRG iteration models used in Sect. 2.2. The boundary conditions were adjusted to closely resemble those produced by the fatigue test rig. However, it should be noted that measuring the stiffness of the test rig would have to be a challenging task to measure and incorporate into the FEM analysis. To compensate for this unknown boundary condition, an additional external moment was included in the calculations based on the SG measurements. The FE models were created using an idealised version of the real geometry, which was based on 3D scanned specimens and macrographs. Schematic figure from the idealised FEM model creation can be seen in Fig. 13.
The study utilised the point method (PM) amongst various TCD criteria, as proposed by Baumgartner et al. [23], using a critical distance of a = 0.1 mm with the design S–N curve FAT160. A radius of 0.05 mm was used at the weld root when creating FE models for TCD. The same model was also used in the ENS method (rref = 0.05 mm) with a corresponding FAT630 design curve [24], and in LEFM (with an inserted initial crack). Furthermore, the ENS models with a fillet-type reference radius (rref = 1 mm) were created, which have a corresponding FAT225 curve [25]. The design S–N curves, according to both IIW and EC3 guidelines, include a characteristic survival probability of Ps = 97.7%. However, it has been suggested by Radaj et al. [26] that a statistical factor of jσ = 1.37 can be used to estimate the mean fatigue strength (Ps = 50%), which should correlate with experimental results. The stress distributions with TCD and ENS, with a smaller reference radius, can be seen in Fig. 14 along with location where structural stress was collected.
In order to conduct the LEFM FEM analysis, an initial crack with length of ai = 0.01 mm was introduced at the weld root in location, more specifically at the location where the maximum principal peak stress occurs. To model the crack, five additional elements were included along its length. The crack growth was executed with small increments to simulate the crack growth, and the J-integral approach was used to calculate stress intensity factors (SIF). The fatigue life estimation in the crack propagation phase was calculated with Paris’ power law using numerical integration with the following equation [27]:
where, Nf,LEFM is the estimated fatigue life, ai is the initial crack length, af is the final crack length, C is the crack propagation coefficient, ΔK(a) is the SIF range as a function of the crack length and mp is exponent of Paris power law. The nominal fatigue strength based on the S–N curve can be calculated from the LEFM analysis results using the following equation:
where m is the slope parameter of the S–N curve, and ΔσLEFM is the stress range corresponding with Nf,LEFM. For crack propagation, coefficient values are proposed: Cmean = 1.5∙10−13 mm/cycle [28] and Cchar = 5.21∙10−13 mm/cycle for weld root failure and exponent mp = 3 [11].
The structural stress values, obtained from the SG measurements and FEM models, showed differences, and this disparity can be attributed to the flexibility of the test rig, which was not taken into account in the FEM analysis. However, it was factored into analyses by calculating the difference in bending moment between structural stress and FEM analysis. This additional bending was incorporated, e.g. in the determination of the ENS stress range (ΔσENS) with the following equations:
where, Δσs,SG is the structural stress range determined by SG, Δσs,FEM is the structural stress range from FEM model at the SG location, Δσb is additional bending caused by boundary conditions and Kf,m/b are fatigue stress concentration factors for bending and membrane load, respectively. SCF values with used local approaches are presented in Table 6, from which can be observed that SRG should influence the stress concentration caused by the initial defect in the weld root and thus affect the fatigue life of the specimen.
The experimental fatigue test results were compared with the presented local approaches. Figure 15 shows that, whether or not the specimen had SRG, TCD and ENS methods yield non-conservative fatigue life estimates. Among the tested methods, LEFM provided the most accurate estimation of the experimental results.
5 Discussion
The study experimentally investigated the applications of the SRGs to enhance the fatigue capacity of the root critical butt-weld between the cast steel part and UHSS plate. The SRG was placed with an objective to reduce the stress concentration at the weld root by re-directing the stress flow away from the initial defect at the weld root, thereby improving the fatigue capacity of the weld. The results of fatigue tests showed that SRG improved the fatigue capacity by approximately 20% in axially misaligned BWs when examined using the nominal stress method. Additionally, with SRG specimens, the crack initiation phase accounted for a comparatively longer portion of the total lifetime (Fig. 12). Based on these findings, it is possible to conclude that SRG improves the BW’s fatigue strength, even though the fatigue resistance is still roughly 35% lower than it is for the control series.
The SRG was expected to have an influence on the SCFs, as indicated by preliminary FEM analyses (Fig. 3) and further studies in Sect. 4 (Table 6). This influence, approximately 10–15%, should have been reflected of the experimental results in the structural stress system. However, the control series (35BW) and the series with and without SRG (96BW-A/B) exhibited essentially the same mean fatigue strength (96–99 MPa) and showed a linear correlation in the structural stress system (Fig. 10b), which contradicts the numerical analyses. Due to this observation, additional experiments were conducted with a groove that was 1 mm deeper (96BW-C) to highlight the influence of the SRG. However, this modification resulted in a shift of the fatigue failure location from the weld root to the bottom of the SRG, which was not desired. To address this issue, HFMI treatment was applied to the bottom of the groove with the aim of ensuring that the weld root remained in the critical location for fatigue failure. The fatigue strength of the treated specimens improved, but the failure location remained at the bottom of the SRG.
The linear correlation in the structural stress system enabled the grouping and analysis of all 18 test specimens in which weld root fatigue failure occurred. The mean and characteristic fatigue strengths for these were 98 MPa and 84 MPa (m = 3), respectively (Fig. 10b), and the natural slope parameter of m = 3.06 indicated a good fit to the experimental data. Failures occurring at the bottom of the SRG followed closely slope parameter m = 5, with and without SRG. However, a small sample size of SRG failures must be noted. Based on the nominal stress method (Fig. 10a), it can be concluded that the FAT36 design curve is safe to use for all investigated BW geometries, and the FAT71 design curve is safe to use in the case of negligible secondary bending moment.
The calculation of the degree of bending (DOB), which indicates the ratio between the bending stress and total structural stress, was performed for each specimen. This was done by using the nominal stress (determined from the specimen cross-section and the force sensor data on the rig) and the strain gage data. The results showed that, instead of the SCF, the SRG had an influence on the DOB, which can be found in the Appendix: Table 7 along with other experimental data. This observation suggests that SRG reduced the amount of the secondary bending moment, which in turn lowers the overall structural stress at the weld root.
The fatigue strengths of joint geometries used in the 96BW-A and 96BW-B specimens, one with SRG and the other without, were estimated using stress-based local approaches TCDPM and two ENS variations, as well as LEFM. The estimations were compared with the experimental results which can be seen in Fig. 15. The stress-based approaches resulted in non-conservative estimations, as the experiments showed good agreement with the Ps = 97.7% design curves (FAT225, FAT630 and FAT160, depending on the approach). Ahola et al. [25] have also reported similar results regarding the ENS method for evaluating the weld root fatigue strength. LEFM performed well in the determination of the fatigue strength in specimens with or without SRG and estimated fatigue performance better than other approaches used. Similar results, regarding use of LEFM, were reported by Peng and Zhu [8] for a similar welded hybrid joint. Lipiäinen et al. [29] compared LEFM with local approaches and found that LEFM was conservative for specimens with an initial crack length of 0.3 mm at the bottom of the notched geometry, which was significantly shorter than in the present study.
6 Conclusions
This study experimentally and numerically investigated the fatigue capacity of axially misaligned butt-welds, with an initial defect in the weld root caused by permanent root backing. The experimental results were compared to the IIW recommendations and EC3 standard, and computational fatigue life estimations were obtained based on the local approaches. The following conclusions can be drawn based on the results of the experimental research, and evaluation of local approaches and LEFM:
-
Axial misalignment significantly reduces the fatigue capacity of the studied joints from the mean fatigue strength of 99 to 53 MPa in the nominal stress system. However, the stress relief groove increases the fatigue strength by a factor of 1.2 compared to the similar joint without the groove. Nevertheless, the fatigue capacity is still approximately 35% lower compared to the control S355 test specimens that did not have any axial misalignment.
-
In butt-welds where a weld root defect may arise, it is recommended to use the design curve FAT36 (m = 3) as suggested in both the IIW recommendations and EC3, which also aligns with the findings of the study. However, according to both design guidelines, FAT71 (m = 3) should not be used if the weld root is uninspected or has any defects. Nevertheless, it could be used conditionally in the absence of secondary stresses as found in this study.
-
The experimental study shows that the stress relief groove affects the amount of secondary bending moment in the joint, leading to a decrease in total structural stress in the weld root. The results of this study suggest that the structural stress method with FAT80 (m = 3) design curve could be recommended for butt-welded joints that have a weld root defect or crack caused by permanent root backing, parallel to the loading direction, regardless of whether the joint has axial misalignment or geometry modifications.
-
LEFM is found to be the most suitable method for evaluating the fatigue capacity of the welded joint under investigation with a crack-like defect in the weld root. In terms of fatigue life, the safety factors for specimens with and without stress relief groove are roughly 4.5 and 3, respectively. The fatigue strength assessment with other local approaches, TCDPM and two ENS variations, resulted in non-conservative estimations, and the experimental results closely followed Ps = 97.7% design curves, indicating that the safety factor in life was close to one.
-
The experimental results did not indicate the reduction of stress concentration factors due to the stress relief groove, despite the FEM analyses suggesting a reduction of approximately 10–15%. The study did not cover the reason for this phenomenon, and further research may be necessary.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper as appendix. Further generated data during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ban H, Shi G (2018) A review of research on high-strength steel structures. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 171:625–641. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00197
Mega T, Hasegawa K, Kawabe H (2004) Ultra high-strength steel sheets for bodies, reinforcement parts, and seat frame parts of automobile-ultra high-strength steel sheets leading to great improvement in crashworthiness. JFE Technical Report No 4 38–43. https://www.jfe-steel.co.jp/en/research/report/004/pdf/004-07.pdf
Mikkonen P, Björk T, Skriko T (2017) Ultralujien terästen ominaisuudet lopputuotteeseen osaavan suunnittelun ja valmistuksen avulla. Hitsaustekniikka No 1:26–30
Skriko T (2018) Dependence of manufacturing parameters on the performance quality of welded joints made of direct quenched ultra-high-strength steel. Dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology
Lipiäinen K, Ahola A, Virolainen E et al (2022) Fatigue strength of hot-dip galvanized S960 cut edges and longitudinal welds. J Constr Steel Res 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107083
Santos J, Gouveia RM, Silva FJG (2017) Designing a new sustainable approach to the change for lightweight materials in structural components used in truck industry. J Clean Prod 164:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.06.174
Haldimann-Sturm SC, Nussbaumer A (2008) Fatigue design of cast steel nodes in tubular bridge structures. Int J Fatigue 30:528–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.007
Peng Y, Zhu X (2024) Fatigue strength estimation of butt-welded joints between cast-steel and hot-rolled-steel plates. J Constr Steel Res 214:108493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108493
Wei Z, Pei X, Jin H (2021) Evaluation of welded cast steel joint fatigue data using structural stress methods. J Constr Steel Res 186:106895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106895
Ma A, Sharp JV (1997) Fatigue design of cast steel nodes in offshore structures based on research data. Proc Inst Civ Eng-Water Marit Energy 124:112–126. https://doi.org/10.1680/iwtme.1997.29774
Hobbacher AF (2016) Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components(2nd ed). Springer, Switzerland
SFS-EN 1993–1–9 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures. Part 1–9: Fatigue. Finnish Standards Association SFS
MacDonald KA (2011) Fracture and fatigue of welded joints and structures. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford
González-Mendoza JM, Alcántara-Montes S, Silva-Lomelí JDJ et al (2017) Size optimization of shoulder filleted shafts with relief grooves for improving their fatigue life. Ingeniería e Investigación 37:85–9. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v37n3.57957
Lipiäinen K, Afkhami S, Ahola A, Björk T (2022) Evaluation of geometrical notch and quality effects in the fatigue strength assessment of ultra-high-strength steel cut edges. Structures 37:881–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.069
Baumgartner J, Bruder T (2013) An efficient meshing approach for the calculation of notch stresses. World Weld 57:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-012-0005-3
Yildirim HC, Marquis GB (2012) Fatigue strength improvement factors for high strength steel welded joints treated by high frequency mechanical impact. Int J Fatigue 44:168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2012.05.002
SFS-EN 1011–2 (2001) Welding. Recommendations for welding of metallic materials. Part 2: Arc welding of ferritic steels. Finnish Standards Association SFS
Amraei M, Afkhami S, Javaheri V et al (2020) Mechanical properties and microstructural evaluation of the heat-affected zone in ultra-high strength steels. Thin-Walled Struct 157:107072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107072
Guo W, Li L, Dong S et al (2017) Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-narrow gap laser and gas-metal-arc welded S960 high strength steel. Opt Lasers Eng 91:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.11.011
Sutton M, Orteu J-J, Schreier H (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements Basic concepts, theory and applications. Springer, US, Boston
Al‐Karawi H, Bock und Polach RUF, Al‐Emrani M (2021) Crack detection via strain measurements in fatigue testing. Strain 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12384
Baumgartner J, Schmidt H, Ince E et al (2015) Fatigue assessment of welded joints using stress averaging and critical distance approaches. World Weld 59:731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-015-0248-x
Fricke W (2010) IIW-Doc. XIII-2240r2-08/XV-1289r2-08. Guideline for the fatigue assessment by notch stress analysis for welded structures
Ahola A, Skriko T, Lipiäinen K, Björk T (2021) On the weld root fatigue strength and improvement techniques for non-load-carrying transverse attachment joints with single-sided fillet welds and made of mild and ultra-high-strength steels. Eng Struct 249:113373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113373
Radaj D, Sonsino CM, Fricke W (2006) Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches, 2nd edn. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge
Jonsson B, Dobmann G, Hobbacher A.F,Kassner M, Marquis G (2016) IIW Guidelines on weld quality in relationship to fatigue strength. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland
King RN, Stacey A, Sharp J V (1996) A review of fatigue crack growth rates for offshore steels in air and seawater environments. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York
Lipiäinen K, Ahola A, Kaijalainen A, Björk T (2022) Fatigue performance of notched and hot-dip galvanized laser and mechanically cut S960 steel components considering local defects with the theory of critical distances. Int J Fatigue 164:107127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107127
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank SSAB Europe for providing plate materials.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by LUT University (previously Lappeenranta University of Technology (LUT)). The study has been carried out in the Fossil-Free Steel Applications (FOSSA-I and FOSSA-II) projects (Grant IDs 5498/31/2021 and 5462/31/2023) financially supported by Business Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Recommended for publication by Commission XIII - Fatigue of Welded Components and Structures
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Havia, J., Lipiäinen, K., Ahola, A. et al. Fatigue design of stress relief grooves to prevent weld root fatigue in butt-welded cast steel to ultra-high-strength steel joints. Weld World (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01797-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01797-3