Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of arc, weld pool and weld properties with a desktop computer model of metal–inert-gas welding

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-dimensional computational model of metal–inert-gas welding, which includes the arc, wire and workpiece self-consistently, is presented. It takes into account the phenomena including (1) the motion of the arc relative to the workpiece; (2) the energy, momentum and mass transported by droplets; (3) flow in the weld pool and deformation of its surface; (4) effects of metal vapour and (5) mixing of the wire and workpiece alloys. A graphical user interface has been added. The model predicts the depth and shape of the weld and heat-affected zone and arc and weld pool properties. Thermal histories of the workpiece, required to calculate residual stress and microstructure, are also predicted. Results for welding of aluminium alloy sheets in lap fillet geometry are presented. It is found that the arc temperature is relatively low, due to the high concentration of aluminium vapour, which radiates strongly. The droplets are predicted to mix fairly thoroughly in the weld pool, with the flow in the weld pool driven downwards by the droplet momentum. The orientation of the wire electrode strongly influences the shape and depth of the weld, with a decreased work angle (i.e. further from vertical) leading to a decreased reinforcement height and deeper penetration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murphy AB, Tanaka M, Yamamoto K, Tashiro S, Lowke JJ, Ostrikov K (2010) Modelling of arc welding: the importance of including the arc plasma in the computational domain. Vacuum 85(5):579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanaka M, Lowke JJ (2007) Predictions of weld pool profiles using plasma physics. J Phys D Appl Phys 40(1):R1–R23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy AB (2010) The effects of metal vapour in arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 43(43):434001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar A, DebRoy T (2007) Heat transfer and fluid flow during gas-metal-arc fillet welding for various joint configurations and welding positions. Metall Mater Trans A: Phys Metall Mater Sci 38(3):506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho MH, Farson DF (2007) Understanding bead hump formation in gas metal arc welding using a numerical simulation. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 38(2):305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schnick M, Fuessel U, Hertel M, Haessler M, Spille-Kohoff A, Murphy AB (2010) Modelling of gas-metal arc welding taking into account metal vapour. J Phys D Appl Phys 43(43):434008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez JJ, Lago F, Freton P, Masquere M, Franceries X (2005) Numerical modelling of an electric arc and its interaction with the anode: part II. The three-dimensional model—influence of external forces on the arc column. J Phys D Appl Phys 38(2):306–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu J, Tsai HL (2007) Heat and mass transfer in gas metal arc welding. Part I: the arc. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50(5–6):833–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy AB (2011) A self-consistent three-dimensional model of the arc, electrode and weld pool in gas–metal arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(19):194009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy AB (2013) Influence of droplets in gas–metal arc welding—a new modelling approach, and application to welding of aluminium. Sci Technol Weld Join 18(1):32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murphy AB (2013) Influence of metal vapour on arc temperatures in gas–metal arc welding: convection versus radiation. J Phys D Appl Phys 46(22):224004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Patankar SV (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Doormaal JP, Raithby GD (1984) Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer Heat Transfer 7(2):147–163

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mundra K, DebRoy T, Kelkar KM (1996) Numerical prediction of fluid flow and heat transfer in welding with a moving heat source. Numer Heat Transfer A 29(2):115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Voller VR, Brent AD, Prakash C (1989) The modelling of heat, mass and solute transport in solidification systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 32(9):1719–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim J-W, Na S-J (1995) A study on the effect of contact tube-to-workpiece distance on weld pool shape in gas metal arc welding. Weld J 74(5):141s–152s

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu CS, Chen J, Zhang YM (2007) Numerical analysis of both front- and back-side deformation of fully-penetrated GTAW weld pool surfaces. Comput Mater Sci 39(3):635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crowe CT, Sharma MP, Stock DE (1977) The particle-source-in cell (PSI-CELL) model for gas-droplet flows. J Fluid Eng 99(2):325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy AB (1993) Diffusion in equilibrium mixtures of ionized gases. Phys Rev E 48(5):3594–3603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barrett J, Clement C (1992) Kinetic evaporation and condensation rates and their coefficients. J Colloid Interface Sci 150(2):352–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MatWeb (2012) Aluminum 4043-H18. http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=2541bb0127b34c7294612c77393ead8c. Accessed 13 June 2012

  22. Punkari A, Weckman DC, Kerr HW (2003) Effects of magnesium content on dual beam Nd:YAG laser welding of Al-Mg alloys. Sci Technol Weld Join 8(4):269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang Y, Dua Y, Zhang L, Yuan X, Kaptay G (2012) Thermodynamic description of the Al–Mg–Si system using a new formulation for the temperature dependence of the excess Gibbs energy. Thermochim Acta 527(1):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jácomea PAD, Landima MC, Garciab A, Furtadoa AF, Ferreira IL (2011) The application of computational thermodynamics and a numerical model for the determination of surface tension and Gibbs–Thomson coefficient of aluminum based alloys. Thermochim Acta 523(1–2):142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. PAD J, Landima MC, Garciab A, Furtadoa AF, Ferreira IL (2011) Corrigendum to “the application of computational thermodynamics and a numerical model for the determination of surface tension and Gibbs–Thomson coefficient of aluminum based alloys” [Thermochim. Acta 523 (2011) 142–149]. Thermochim Acta 526(1–2):262–263

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang QG, Davidson CJ (2001) Solidification and precipitation behaviour of Al-Si-Mg casting alloys. J Mater Sci 36(3):739–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goicoechea J, Garcia-Cordovilla C, Louis E, Pamies A (1992) Surface tension of binary and ternary aluminium alloys of the systems Al-Si-Mg and AI-Zn-Mg. J Mater Sci 27(19):5247–5252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sklyarchuk V, Plevachuk Y, Yakymovych A, Eckert S, Gerbeth G, Eigenfeld K (2009) Structure sensitive properties of liquid Al-Si alloys. Int J Thermophys 30(4):1400–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Assael MJ, Kakosimos K, Banish RM, Brillo J, Egry I, Brooks R, Quested PN, Mills KC, Nagashima A, Sato Y, Wakeham WA (2006) Reference data for the density and viscosity of liquid aluminium and liquid iron. J Phys Chem Ref Data 35(1):285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brandt R, Neuer G (2007) Electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of pure aluminum and aluminum alloys up to and above the melting temperature. Int J Thermophys 28(5):1429–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ólafsson P, Sandström R, Karlsson Å (1997) Comparison of experimental, calculated and observed values for electrical and thermal conductivity of aluminium alloys. J Mater Sci 32(16):4383–4390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gaber A, Afify N, Abdel-Latief AY, Mostafa MS (1993) Electrical and microhardness studies on Al-Mg alloys. Sol St Comm 86(19):679–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aqra F, Ayyad A (2011) Surface energies of metals in both liquid and solid states. Appl Surf Sci 257(15):6372–6379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kargl F, Weis H, Unruh T, Meyer A (2012) Self diffusion in liquid aluminium. In: 5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering, Prague, Czech Republic, 2011. Journal of Physics Conference Series. IOP Publishing, p 012077. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/340/1/012077

  35. Murphy AB, Arundell CJ (1994) Transport coefficients of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, argon-nitrogen and argon-oxygen plasmas. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 14:451–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cram LE (1985) Statistical evaluation of radiative power losses from thermal plasmas due to spectral lines. J Phys D Appl Phys 18(3):401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Essoltani A, Proulx P, Boulos MI, Gleizes A (1994) Volumetric emission of argon plasmas in the presence of vapors of Fe, Si and Al. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 14(4):437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gleizes A, Cressault Y, Teulet P (2010) Mixing rules for thermal plasma properties in mixtures of argon, air and metallic vapours. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 19(5):055013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Murphy AB, Nguyen V, Feng Y, Thomas DG, Gunasegaram D (2017) A desktop computer model of the arc, weld pool and workpiece in metal inert gas welding. Appl Math Model. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.033

    Google Scholar 

  40. McIntosh C, Mendez PF (2017) Experimental measurements of fall voltages in gas metal arc welding. Weld J 96 (in press)

  41. Murphy AB (2015) A perspective on arc welding research: the importance of the arc, unresolved questions and future directions. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 35(3):471–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Carlson KD, Lin Z, Beckermann C (2007) Modeling the effect of finite-rate hydrogen diffusion on porosity formation in aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 38(8):541–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tashiro S, Zeniya T, Yamamoto K, Tanaka M, Nakata K, Murphy AB, Yamamoto E, Yamazaki K, Suzuki K (2010) Numerical analysis of fume formation mechanism in arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 43(43):043012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tashiro S, Murphy AB, Matsui S, Tanaka M (2013) Numerical analysis of the influence of particle charging on the fume formation process in arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 46(22):224007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support provided for the work reported here by General Motors, General Motors Holden, and the Commonwealth of Australia, through the AutoCRC, is gratefully acknowledged, as are useful discussions with Drs John Lowke and Eugene Tam of CSIRO, and Dr. Hui-Ping Wang of General Motors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony B. Murphy.

Additional information

Recommended for publication by Study Group 212 - The Physics of Welding

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, A.B., Thomas, D.G. Prediction of arc, weld pool and weld properties with a desktop computer model of metal–inert-gas welding. Weld World 61, 623–633 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-017-0444-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-017-0444-y

Keywords (IIW Thesaurus)

Navigation