Skip to main content
Log in

Humility and Charismatic Leadership: A Boost or Bust for Leadership Outcomes in the Russian Context

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study unpacks how leader humility and charisma are related to leader effectiveness and satisfaction with the leader and examines how the need for leadership may moderate these relationships. We used data from 252 respondents from Russian companies in a 2 (high vs. low leader charisma) × 2 (high vs. low leader humility) vignette design in which levels of charisma and humility were manipulated. While leader humility was found to have a positive effect on satisfaction with a leader, no significant link between leader humility and leader effectiveness was observed in this study. Leader charisma was positively related to leader effectiveness and satisfaction with the leader. The interaction between leader charisma and leader humility in relation to leadership outcomes was found to be positive and significant. The need for leadership did not affect the relations between leader charisma and leader humility on the one hand and outcome variables on the other hand. However, the need for leadership did show strong positive relations with both leader effectiveness and satisfaction with the leader. The study's findings suggest that leader humility increases prosocial orientation and cooperation between the leaders and followers leading to higher satisfaction with the leaders. Leader charisma may motivate the subordinate more, resulting in greater (perceived) effectiveness of the leader and increasing satisfaction with the leader. Leader charisma and humility can interact, reinforcing higher leadership outcomes. Though results are based on a single cultural context, investigating the interaction between leader charisma and leader humility with leadership outcomes offers implications for theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar, S. (2018). Humility. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-017-9120-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Zada, M., Begum, A., Han, H., Ariza-Montes, A., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2021). Can leaders’ humility enhance project management effectiveness? Interactive effect of top management support. Sustainability, 13(17), 9526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, M. C., Yoshikuni, A. C., Dwivedi, R., & Larieira, C. L. C. (2022). Do leadership styles influence employee information systems security intention? A study of the banking industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(4), 535–550.

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization". The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Marcus, B., & De Vries, R. E. (2007). German lexical personality factors: Relations with the HEXACO model. European Journal of Personality, 21(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awang, Z., Wan Afthanorhan, W. M. A., & Asri, M. A. M. (2015). Parametric and non-parametric approach in structural equation modeling (SEM): The application of bootstrapping. Modern Applied Science. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n9p58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker-Pieper, A., & de Vries, R. E. (2013). The incremental validity of communication styles over personality traits for leader outcomes. Human Performance, 26(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassin, M. (1991). Russia between Europe and Asia: The ideological construction of geographical space. Slavic Review, 50(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2500595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birasnav, M., Mittal, R., & Dalpati, A. (2019). Integrating theories of strategic leadership, social exchange, and structural capital in the context of Buyer-Supplier relationship: An empirical study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birasnav, M., Mittal, R., & Loughlin, S. (2015). Linking leadership behaviors and information exchange to improve supply chain performance: A conceptual model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16, 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation models: Present and future.

  • Breevaart, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2017). Supervisor’s HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work groups. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 954–962. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., Ichiho, R., & Anderson, V. (2017). Understanding level 5 leaders: The ethical perspectives of leadership humility". The Journal of Management Development, 36(5), 724–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. A., Johnson, N. E., Jordan, S. L. K. D., & Short, J. C. (2023). A meta-analysis of humble leadership: Reviewing individual, team, and organizational outcomes of leader humility. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(1), 101660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Feng, J., Liu, X., & Yao, J. (2021). Leader humility, team job crafting and team creativity: The moderating role of leader–leader exchange. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-Y.C., & Owens, B. P. (2013). Exploring the relationship between humility and perceived charisma: Role of gender. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 15821. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.15821abstract

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2001). Level 5 leadership. The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuenca, R., Tomei, P. A., & Mello, S. F. (2022). Humility in organizations: A bibliometric study. Cadernos EBAPE BR, 20(5), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120210130x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darren, K. B., Lowe, K. B., Bahmannia, S., Cui, L., & Chen, Z. X. (2022). A wolf in sheep’s clothing: Exploring the relationship between leader humility and unethical behavior. Journal of Management, 48(7), 2009–2030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, B. C., Hasan, F., Sutradhar, S. R., & Shafique, S. (2023). Ukraine–Russia Conflict and Stock Markets Reactions in Europe. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(3), 395–407.

  • De la Gala-Velásquez, B., Hurtado-Palomino, A., & Arredondo-Salas, A. Y. (2023). Organisational Flexibility and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Support. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 219–234.

  • De Vries, R. E. (2000). When leaders have character: Need for leadership, performance, and the attribution of leadership. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(4), 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. E., Bakker-Pieper, A., & Oostenveld, W. (2010). Leadership= communication? The relations of leaders’ communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. E., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. C. B. (1998). Need for supervision: Its impact on leadership effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(4), 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. E., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. C. B. (2002). Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership and individual outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00097-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, T., Kiker, D. S., & Cross, T. C. (2009). A meta-analysis to review organizational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De l Administration, 17(4), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00234.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Errico, F. (2019). “Too humble and sad”: The effect of humility and emotional display when a politician talks about a moral issue. Social Sciences Information. Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 58(4), 660–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018419893564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, B. K., Stasi, A., Döpping, J. O., Gazi, M. A. I., Shaturaev, J., & Sarkar, S. M. (2022). Mediating role of strategic flexibility between leadership styles on strategic execution: A study on Bangladeshi private enterprises. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(3), 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, S., Singh, S., Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2021). Antecedents of strategic thinking and its impact on competitive advantage. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(4), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-08-2020-0262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumdum, U., Lowe, K., & Avolio, B. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In B. Avolio & F. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead (pp. 35–66). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eragula, R. (2015). Humility in Leadership. Advances in Economics and Business Management, 2(8), 786–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkutlu, H. (2008). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational and leadership effectiveness: The Turkish case. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810883616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. B., Patterson, C. E. P., Hester, K., & Stringer, D. Y. (1996). A quantitative review of research on charismatic leadership. Psychological Reports, 78(1), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.78.1.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Negrov, A. (2021). Perspectives on leadership development in post-Soviet Eurasia. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 21(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958211051551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. (2021). What is divine energy? Power of managing science of everything. Independently Published. Amazon.

  • Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718.

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Erdogan, B., Jiang, K., Bauer, T. N., & Liu, S. (2018). Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, C., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2020). Leadership humility and managing a multicultural workforce. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/sajbs-08-2019-0147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilyin, I., & Leonova, O. (2020). Russian Civilization and Global Culture: Alternative or Coexistence? In Challenges of Globalization and Prospects for an Inter-civilizational World Order (pp. 983–996). Springer International Publishing.

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatepe, O. M., Ozturk, A., & Kim, T. T. (2019). Servant leadership, organisational trust, and bank employee outcomes. The Service Industries Journal, 39(2), 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, T. K., Matthews, S. H., Matthews, M. J., & Henry, S. E. (2022). Humble leadership: A review and synthesis of leader expressed humility. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiker, D. S., Callahan, J. S., & Kiker, M. B. (2019). Exploring the boundaries of servant leadership: A meta-analysis of the main and moderating effects of servant leadership on behavioral and affective outcomes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 31(2), 172–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochanski, J. (1997). Competency-Based Management. Training & Development, 51(10), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korosteleva, E., & Paikin, Z. (2021). Russia between East and West, and the future of Eurasian order. International Politics, 58(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00261-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rowatt, W. C. (2021). Humility in novice leaders: links to servant leadership and followers’ satisfaction with leadership. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1952647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Xue, J., & Liu, J. (2021). Linking leader humility to employee creative performance: Work engagement as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality, 49(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior. and Human Performance, 34, 343–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1993). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90027-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., & Peng, J. (2022). Humble leadership and its outcomes: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 980322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. J., Puffer, S. M., & Darda, S. V. (2010). Convergence in Entrepreneurial Leadership Style: Evidence from Russia. California Management Review, 52(4), 4872. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2010.52.4.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad, M., Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Mohammad, M. (2019). Comparison between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Testing and confirming the Maqasid Syariah Quality of Life Measurement Model. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 53, 608–614. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.53.608.614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Casado, H., Leo, F. M., López-Gajardo, M. A., García-Calvo, T., Cuevas, R., & Sánchez-Oliva, D. (2021). Adaptation and validation of the MLQ-5X Leadership Scale to the Spanish educational context. An Psicol, 37(2), 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. A., Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations: Studies towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 58(10), 1323–1350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705059929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R., & Marrone, J. A. (2018). Humility: Our current understanding of the construct and its role in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Slay, H. S. (2010). A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809350892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nübold, A., Muck, P. M., & Maier, G. W. (2013). A new substitute for leadership? Followers’ state core self-evaluations. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Kinicki, A. J., Waldman, D. A., Xiao, Z., & Song, L. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 34–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213520131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou, A. Y., Waldman, D. A., & Peterson, S. J. (2018). Do humble CEOs matter? An examination of CEO humility and firm outcomes. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1147–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315604187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013a). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., Johnson, M., & Mitchell, T. (2013b). Humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24, 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parshikova, O. V., & Egorova, M. S. (2016). The Russian version of the HEXACO-100. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, H. M., & Srivastava, A. K. (2022). CEO Transformational Leadership, Supply Chain Agility and Firm Performance: A TISM Modeling among SMEs. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 1–15.

  • Reave, L. (2005). Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 655–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., Owens, B., Yam, K. C., Bluhm, D., Cunha, M. P. E., Silard, A., Gonçalves, L., Martins, M., Simpson, A. V., & Liu, W. (2019). Leader humility and team performance: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of team PsyCap and task allocation effectiveness. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1009–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316688941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohmann, A., & Rowold, J. (2009). Gender and leadership style: A field study in different organizational contexts in Germany. Equal Opportunities International. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150910996399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, E., Villar, P., & López-Romero, L. (2015). Assessing six factors in Spain: Validation of the HEXACO-100 in relation to the Five Factor Model and other conceptually relevant criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russia. (2017, August 22). Hofstede Insights. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/russia/

  • Sampson, H., & Johannessen, I. A. (2020). Turning on the tap: The benefits of using “real-life” vignettes in qualitative research interviews. Qualitative Research: QR, 20(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118816618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekshnia, S. V., McCarthy, D. J., & Puffer, S. M. (2017). Leadership development in Russia. In Human resource management in Russia (pp. 43–64). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351156240-3

  • Singh, S., Singh, G., & Dhir, S. (2022). Impact of digital marketing on the competitiveness of the restaurant industry. Journal of Foodservice Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2022.2077088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. N., Montagno, R. V., & Kuzmenko, T. N. (2004). Transformational and servant leadership: Content and contextual comparisons. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190401000406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics: Pearson new international edition (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielmann, I., Akrami, N., Babarović, T., Belloch, A., Bergh, R., Chirumbolo, A., Čolović, P., de Vries, R. E., Dostál, D., Egorova, M., Gnisci, A., Heydasch, T., Hilbig, B. E., Hsu, K.-Y., Izdebski, P., Leone, L., Marcus, B., Međedović, J., Nagy, J., et al. (2020). The HEXACO-100 across 16 languages: A large-scale test of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(5), 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1614011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Dunlop, P. D., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., & Gachunga, H. (2022). The moderating role of honesty-humility in the association of agreeableness with interpersonal competency: A study of managers in two countries. Psychologie Appliquee [applied Psychology], 71(1), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K., Zhou, L., Wang, Z., Lin, C., & Luo, Z. (2019). The dark side of expressed humility for non-humble leaders: A conservation of resources perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1858. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, C. P., & Hayes-Jones, L. C. (2019). The consequences of humility for leaders: A double-edged sword. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 152, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., & Wang, H. (2017). CEO humility, narcissism and firm innovation: A paradox perspective on CEO traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to following for their valuable comments on the first draft of this paper: Professor Giles Hirst, Professor, Research School of Management, College of Business & Economics, Australian National University, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Acton ACT Australia 2601 & Visiting Fellow, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge. Cambridge, UK. Email: giles.hirst@anu.edu.au. Professor Sagar Sharma, Professor Emeritus & Former Professor &Head, Department of Psychology, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, H.P. Email: sagar1939@gmail.com

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zafar Husain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A co-author, Zafar Husain is on Editorial Board of the Journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Factor Loadings for Model Variables

Factor

Indicator

Estimate

Std. Error

Perceived leader effectiveness

v_eff2

0.70

0.02

v_eff4

0.84

0.02

v_eff5

0.81

0.02

Need for leader

v_nfs2

0.70

0.03

v_nfs4

0.76

0.03

Satisfaction with leader

v_sat1

0.84

0.02

v_sat2

0.82

0.02

v_sat3

0.86

0.02

v_sat4

0.91

0.02

Leader humility

c_hum04

0.86

0.03

c_hum06

0.88

0.04

Leader charisma

c_cha02

0.83

0.03

c_cha06

0.85

0.03

Appendix B: Model Fit Chi-Square Test

Model

χ2

df

p-value

Baseline model

11,534.92

78

 

Factor model

96.694

55

 < 0.001

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pathak, R.D., Sergei, T., de Vries, R.E. et al. Humility and Charismatic Leadership: A Boost or Bust for Leadership Outcomes in the Russian Context. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 25, 101–116 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00364-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00364-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation