Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improvisation in Higher Education Management: Coping with Complexity and Organizational Dynamics

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze how improvisation activities take place within the management of a higher education organization, by examining practices and related constructs, such as innovation, intuition, bricolage and learning. This is a case study on a large private university, located in São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation and document analysis. The results showed that improvisation in academic management is characterized by constant pressures that challenge their managers toward adaptations, reorganization in crisis situations, the sense of urgency and coping with the unexpected. Minimal structures, flexibility and competence have proved to be essential elements for improvisation. Decisions and actions, practiced by academic managers, were characterized by spontaneity, creativity and managerial flexibility. Dynamic and complex environments make improvisational practices that emerge in the day-to-day of academic management. The existence of a culture favorable to experimentation, to the autonomy of managers, contributes to reviewing processes and disseminating practices of improvisation. The incorporation of bricolage as a way to better use limited resources proved to be promising for managerial effectiveness. Originality is demonstrated in the relationship between the practices of improvisation and academic management, seen as a unique context in a flexible and complex system. This paper highlights suggestions for managerial practice related to improvisation practices as one of the ways to cope with organizational dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, P., Maguire, S., & Mckelvey, B. (2011). Handbook of complexity and managment. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backer, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V. (1983). Strategic planning in higher education: Does the emperor have any clothes? The dynamics of organizational change in education. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de conteúdo (Vol. 70). Lisboa: Edições.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. (2016). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Ed. Especial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista, M. G. C. (2008). Sob a Superfície: o papel da improvisação no contexto organizacional. Programa de Doutoramento do Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa.

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2010). Investigação qualitativa em educação. Porto: Porto Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2002). Autonomy and self-management: Concepts and evidence. In T. Bush & L. Bell (Eds.), The principles and practice of educational management. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2008). Reconceptualising the self-managing school. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary, B. V. (2001). Flexibility and related issues in evaluation and selection of technological systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2(2), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (2002). Why we cannot know complex things completely. Emergence, 4(1), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R. (1990). Frameworks of power. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity. The American College President. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., & Hurst, D. (2003). Strategic renewal as improvisation: Reconciling the tension between exploration and exploitation. Working paper. University of Western Ontario, Richard Ivey Business School.

  • Crossan, M., & Sorrenti, M. (2005). Making sense of improvisation. In H. N. Kamoche, M. P. Cunha, & J. V. Cunha (Eds.), Organization improvisation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M. P. (2002). All That Jazz: Três Aplicações do Conceito de Improvisação Organizacional. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 42(3), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M. P. (2005). Bricolage in organizations. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, Hoboken, 1(3), 299–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, J. V., Cunha, M. P., & Kamoche, K. (2003). Organizational improvisation: A contextual approach. International Review of Sociology, 13(3), 567–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehlin, E. (2008). The flesh and blood of improvisation. A Study of everyday organization. Trondheim: NTNU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepali, Jain, S. K., & Chaudhary, H. (2017). Quest for effective mentors: a way of mentoring potential entrepreneurs successfully. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(2), 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice. California Management Review, 39(2), 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P. E. (2007). Quatro faces das organizações educacionais. Revista Brasileira de Política e Administração da Educação, 23(3), 449–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flach, L., & Antonello, C. S. (2011). Improvisação e aprendizagem nas organizações: reflexões a partir da metáfora da improvisação no teatro e na música. BASE - Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da UNISINOS, 8(2), 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giustiniano, L., Cunha, M. P., & Clegg, S. (2016). The dark side of organizational improvisation: Lessons from the sinking of Costa Concordia. Business Horizons, 59(2), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorod, A., Gandhi, J., Sauser, B., & Boardman, J. (2017). Flexibility of system of systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 9(4), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadida, A. L., Tavainen, W., & Rose, J. (2015). Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 437–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Fenton, E. (2006). Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts. Long Range Planning, 39(6), 631–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena, L. K., & Memon, N. Z. (2018). Does workplace flexibility usher innovation? A moderated mediation model on the enablers of innovative workplace behavior. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamoche, K., & Cunha, M. P. (2001). Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organization Studies, 22(5), 733–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (1983). Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (1998). Fontes do poder: o modo como as pessoas tomam decisões. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, L. (2010). A critical review of improvisation in organizations: Open issues and future research directions. In Summer conference 2010 on “opening up innovation: strategy, organization and technology”. Imperial College London Business School.

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (2005). O pensamento selvagem. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissack, M. R. (2002). The interaction of complexity and management. Wetport, CT: Greenwood Pubishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1999). The pursuit of organization intelligence. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2010). Rediscovering institutions—The organizations of politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2010). Higher education in the global knowledge economy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6962–6980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, R. (2007). Management strategies for complex adaptive systems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(2), 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, V., & Lopes, M. C. B. (2015). Administering the immeasurable: A critique of academic organizations. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, Rio de Janeiro, 13(1), 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (2010). Managing: desvendando o dia a dia da gestão. Tradução de Francisco Araújo da Costa. Revisão Técnica: Roberto Fachin. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2011). A complexity theory approach to sustainability: A longitudinal study in two London NHS hospitals. The Learning Organization, 18(1), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, Briarcliff Manor, 23(4), 698–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D., & Dooley, L. (2009). Applying the innovation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, L. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascuci, L., Meyer, V., Jr., Magioni, B., & Sena, R. (2016). Managerialism na gestão universitária: implicações do planejamento estratégico segundo a percepção de gestores de uma universidade pública. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina - GUAL, Florianópolis, 9(1), 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piansoongnern, O. (2016). Chinese Leadership and Its Impacts on Innovative Work Behavior of the Thai Employees. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. A. (2011). Complexity and management: a pluralistic view. In P. Allen, S. Maguire, & B. McKelvey (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of complexity and management (pp. 366–382). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I. F., & Johnston, W. J. (2004). Managing in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (2003). Difusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational, learning. Organization Science, Pittsburg, 2(1), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (2011). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking?. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2001). Enterprise flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2(4), 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science Catonsville, 9(5), 543–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (2002). A estética da imperfeição em orquestras e organizações. RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, 42(3), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wescott, J. W. (2000). Perspectives from a new department chair. The Journal of Technology stud Universities, 26(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (1998). Edgeware: Insights from complexity science of health care leaders. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by CAPES (Grant No. 88881.188947/2018-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Rua Imaculada Conceição 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR, 80215-901, Brazil

    Vera Lucia Telles Scaglione & Victor Meyer Jr.

  2. Business School, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Rua José de Oliveira Franco, 100 Sobrado 03, Bairro Alto, Curitiba, PR, 82840-000, Brazil

    Diórgenes Falcão Mamédio

Authors
  1. Vera Lucia Telles Scaglione
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victor Meyer Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diórgenes Falcão Mamédio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diórgenes Falcão Mamédio.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scaglione, V.L.T., Meyer, V. & Mamédio, D.F. Improvisation in Higher Education Management: Coping with Complexity and Organizational Dynamics. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 20, 291–302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00215-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00215-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation