Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship of Manufacturing Flexibility with Organizational Strategy

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manufacturing flexibility is an essential organizational capability for supporting strategic intent of organizations that seek to outperform competitors in an environment of uncertainty. The specific nature of flexibility characteristics exhibited by different manufacturing organizations depends on their pursued organizational strategic goals. Organizations pursuing a mass production (or, defender strategy) will have a completely different perspective on manufacturing flexibility requirements for their products compared to those seeking differentiation (or, prospector strategy). There are no prominent studies to address the critical relationship between a specific strategy and the type of manufacturing flexibility resource; it should emphasize to remain stable, competitive and performance oriented. The objective of the current study is to draw and investigate the relationship between pursued organizational strategy and manufacturing flexibility. The theoretical framework considers manufacturing flexibility as a multi-dimensional construct with twenty dimensions (MF1–MF20), representing the various activities involved in a production system from procurement of raw materials from suppliers to different production processes in the core company to the distribution of finished products to market. All these twenty dimensions are studied with reference to the two strategy types, to establish the research framework in the form of the hypotheses (H1.a–H20.a and H1.b–H20.b). The findings of the empirical investigation on the data collected from 212 manufacturing firms operating in diverse sectors confirm adequate support for the developed research framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M., & Murshid, M. (2016). Performance evaluation of flexible manufacturing system under different material handling strategies. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(3), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, M., & Sapir, D. E. (2003). Flexibility in logistic system modeling and performance evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrbohm, P. (1985). Flexibilitaet in der industriellen Produktion. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjaafar, S., & Ramakrishnan, R. (1996). Modelling, measurement and evaluation of sequencing flexibility in manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 34(5), 1195–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. L., & Hill, T. (1992). Linking systems to strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 12(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, M., Gibson, D. E., Doty, D. H., et al. (2005). The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and human resource practices on firm performance. Journal of Management, 31(4), 622–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J., Dubois, D., Rathmill, K., Sethi, S., Stecke, K. E., et al. (1984). Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. The FMS Magazine, 2(2), 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. G., Morgan, L., Vollmann, T. E., et al. (1993). Cellular manufacturing: Its impact on the total factory. International Journal of Production Research, 31(9), 2059–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. F. (1986). Designing flexibility into automated manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of the second ORSA/TIMS conference on FMS, pp. 107–118.

  • Chang, A.-U. (2012). Prioritising the types of manufacturing flexibility in an uncertain environment. International Journal of Production Research, 50(8), 2133–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S., Yang, C., Cheng, H., Sheu, C., et al. (2003). Manufacturing flexibility and business strategy: An empirical study of small and medium sized firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 83(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., Boer, H., Taran, Y., et al. (2018). Supply chain integration, risk management and manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(3), 690–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, P. Y., Chang, K. H., Huang, H. F., et al. (2012). How to increase supplier flexibility through social mechanisms and influence strategies. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, D. E., & Williams, F. P. (2000). Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions. Jounal of Operations Management, 18(5), 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. (1992). Measuring manufacturing flexibility: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Operational Research, 60(2), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, L., & Ericksen, J. (2005). In pursuit of marketplace agility: Applying precepts of self-organizing systems to optimize human resource scalability. Human Resource Management, 44, 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elstner, S., & Krause, D. (2014). Methodical approach for consideration of ramp-up risks in the product development of complex products. Procedia CIRP, 20, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, B. B. (1987). Repetitive lots: The use of a sequence-dependent set-up time scheduling procedure in group technology and traditional shops. Journal of Operations Management, 7(1–2), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza, O., & Smunt, T. L. (1991). Countering the negative impact of intercell flow in cellular manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 10(1), 92–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin, D. (1993). Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Science, 39(4), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2013). Product and process modularity: Improving flexibility and reducing supplier failure risk. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5757–5770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984a). Build, hold, harvest: Converting strategic intentions into reality. Journal of Business Strategy, 4(3), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984b). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Y. P., & Somers, T. M. (1996). Business strategy, manufacturing flexibility, and organizational performance relationships: A path analysis approach. Production and Operations Management, 5(3), 204–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., et al. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., MacMillan, I. C., Day, D. L., et al. (1982). Strategic attributes and performance in the BCG matrix—A PIMS-based analysis of industrial product businesses. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 510–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. B., Krause, D. R., Scannell, T. V., Monczka, R. M., et al. (2000). Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development. Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, V. (2001). The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, V., & Remko, I. (1997). Postponed manufacturing: A case study in the food supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 2, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, V., & Remko, I. (1998). Logistics and virtual integration: Postponement, outsourcing and the flow of information. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28, 508–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, V., & Remko, I. (2000). Role of third party logistic services in customisation through postponement. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11, 374–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2001). Factory physics (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua, S., Chatterjee, S. R., Yu, K. K., et al. (2009). Access flexibility, trust and performance in achieving competitiveness: An empirical study of Chinese suppliers and distributors. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 2(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Das, A., Choi, T.-M., et al. (2018). New flexibility drivers for manufacturing, supply chain and service operations. International Journal for Production Research, 56(10), 3359–3368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A., Jain, P. K., Chan, F. T. S., Singh, S., et al. (2013). A review on manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5946–5970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., Hopkins, M. M., Wittmer, J. L. S., et al. (2010). Linking human capital to competitive advantages: Flexibility in a manufacturing firm’s supply chain. Human Resource Management, 49(5), 939–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. J. (2003). A framework for reducing manufacturing throughput time. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 22(4), 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kara, S., & Kayis, B. (2004). Manufacturing flexibility and variability: An overview. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(6), 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karuppan, C. M. (2004). Strategies to foster labor flexibility. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(6), 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, R., & Partovi, F. Y. (1999). Work force management practices for manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 18(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katic, M., & Agarwal, R. (2018). The Flexibility paradox: Achieving ambidexterity in high-variety, low-volume manufacturing. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(Suppl. 1), S69–S86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, S. P., Kumar, J., Kumar, R., et al. (2017). The relationship between flexibility of manufacturing system components, competitiveness of SMEs and business performance: A study of manufacturing SMEs in Northern India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemian, I., & Aref, S. (2016). Multi-echelon supply chain flexibility enhancement through detecting bottlenecks. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(4), 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmoe, S., Pernot, P. A., Tchernev, N., et al. (2014). Model for flexibility evaluation in a manufacturing network strategic planning. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4396–4411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Suresh, N. C., & Hillmer, C. (2013). An impact of manufacturing flexibility and technological dimensions of manufacturing strategy on improving supply chain responsiveness: Business environment perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5597–5611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok, T. G. (2018). Modelling short-term manufacturing flexibility by human intervention and its impact on performance. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koste, L. L., & Malhotra, M. K. (1999). A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 18(1), 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koste, L. L., Malhotra, M. K., Sharma, S., et al. (2004). Measuring dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, S. S., & Francas, D. (2018). Capacity investment and the value of operational flexibility in manufacturing systems with product blending. International Journal of Production Research, 56(10), 3563–3589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Fantazy, K. A., Kumar, U., et al. (2006). Implementation and management framework for supply chain flexibility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(3), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, S., & Everitt, B. S. (2004). A handbook of statistical analysis using SPSS. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. S. M. (1999). Critical factors for achieving manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 328–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Ding, Y., Asian, S., & Paul, S. K. (2018). From supply chain integration to operational performance: The moderating effect of market uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(Suppl. 1), S3–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucake, J. F. (1996). Student’s t-tests and the Glasgow Coma Scale. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 28, 408–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lummus, R. R., Duclos, L. K., Vokurka, R. J., et al. (2003). Supply chain flexibility: Building a new model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 4(4), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, L., & Machado, J. (2015). Employees’ skills, manufacturing flexibility and performance: A structural equation modelling applied to the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research, 54(13), 4087–4101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., Coleman, H. J., et al. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1986). Porter’s (1980) generic strategies and performance: An empirical examination with American data. Part I: Testing porter. Journal of Management Studies, 7, 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., & Roth, A. V. (1994). A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Science, 40(3), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, D., Sharma, R. R. K., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., et al. (2017). Role of decoupling point in examining manufacturing flexibility: An empirical study for different business strategies. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1359527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., & Das, A. (2000). An empirical examination of sourcing’s role in developing manufacturing flexibilities. International Journal of Production Research, 38(4), 875–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. L. (1978). Psychometric theory (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojha, D., White, R. E., Rogers, P. P., Kuo, C. C., et al. (2015). Information processing-related infrastructural antecedents of manufacturing flexibility—A real options perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 53(17), 5174–5192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olhager, J. (2003). Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(3), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olhager, J. (2010). The role of the customer order decoupling point in production and supply chain management. Computers in Industry, 61(9), 863–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. P., & Wirth, A. (1999). Manufacturing flexibility: Measures and relationships. European Journal of Operational Research, 118(3), 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, M. P., Bedia, A. N. S., Fernandez, M. C. L., et al. (2016). A review of manufacturing flexibility: Systematising the concept. International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3133–3148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Turner, C., et al. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujawan, I. N. (2004). Assessing supply chain flexibility: A conceptual framework and case study. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 1(1), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. P., Ojha, D., White, R. E., et al. (2011). Conceptualizing complementarities in manufacturing flexibility: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Production Research, 49(12), 3767–3793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A. M., & Perez, M. P. (2005). Supply chain flexibility and firm performance: A conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(7), 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, A., & Sethi, S. (1990). Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 2, 289–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. R. K., & Abidi, S. (2006). Different culture of prospectors and defenders. In International conference on operations & quantitative methods-VII, pp. 777–782.

  • Sharman, G. (1984). The rediscovery of logistics. Harvard Business Review, 62(5), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, A. C., Deshmukh, S. G., Kanda, A., et al. (2010). Flexibility and sustainability of supply chains: Are they together? Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(1–2), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibin, K. T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M., & Wamba, S. F. (2016). Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: a total interpretive structural modeling approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(2), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. K., & Acharya, P. (2013). Supply chain flexibility: A frame work of research dimensions. Global Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 14(3), 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. L. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting Organizations and Soceity, 22(2), 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: Definition and review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 685–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, F. F., Cusumano, M. A., Fine, C. F., et al. (1996). An empirical study of manufacturing flexibility in printed circuit board assembly. Operations Research, 44(1), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2018). Interpretive multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives on direct value chain. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(9), 3720–3742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., Murthy, N. N., et al. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsourveloudis, N. C., & Phillis, Y. A. (1998). Manufacturing flexibility measurement: A fuzzy logic framework. IEEE Transactions Robotics and Automation, 14, 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S., Calantone, R., Cornelia, D., et al. (1999). Supply chain flexibility: An empirical study. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanadham, N., & Narahari, Y. (1992). Performance modeling of automated manufacturing systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann, T., Berry, W., Whybark, D. C., Jacobs, R., et al. (2005). Manufacturing planning and control for supply chain management (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, N. A., Hahn, C. K., Sohn, B. K., et al. (1993). Manufacturing flexibility: Concept and measurement. Operations Management Review, 9(4), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M., & Snell, S. A. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 756–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., Burns, N. D., Backhouse, C. J., et al. (2005). An empirical investigation into the barriers to postponement. International Journal of Production Research, 43(5), 991–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazici, H. J. (2005). Influence of flexibilities on manufacturing cells for faster delivery using simulation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(8), 825–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., Lim, J. S., et al. (2003). Manufacturing flexibility: Defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208016, India

    Somen Dey & R. R. K. Sharma

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208016, India

    Balbir Kumar Pandey

Authors
  1. Somen Dey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. R. K. Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Balbir Kumar Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Somen Dey or R. R. K. Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dey, S., Sharma, R.R.K. & Pandey, B.K. Relationship of Manufacturing Flexibility with Organizational Strategy. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 20, 237–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00212-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00212-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation