Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pediatric Dysphagia: Evaluation and Management for Otolaryngologists

  • Published:
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The goal of this review is to understand normal swallow physiology in children and how that physiology can be disrupted, to give recommendations for evaluating dysphagia in children, and to summarize important etiologies of dysphagia that can be managed by otolaryngologists.

Recent Findings

Although prematurity and genetic syndromes predispose children to dysphagia, about ¼ of children referred to otolaryngologists for dysphagia are developmentally normal. Recent research has established that for children, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallow is less sensitive for aspiration compared to video fluoroscopic swallow study.

Summary

Pediatric dysphagia has become both more common and more commonly recognized as rates of survival of preterm and syndromic children have increased. More high-quality research is needed to confidently understand the role of ankyloglossia and frenotomy in dysphagia. Multidisciplinary clinics have shown good outcomes for pediatric patients with dysphagia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Bhattacharyya N. The prevalence of pediatric voice and swallowing problems in the United States. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:746–50. This study shows that the prevalence of dysphagia in pediatric patients is 0.9% ± 0.1%, with a slight male predominance.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. • Marvin K, Coulter M, Johnson C, Friesen T, Morris K, Brigger MT. Dysphagia outcomes following surgical management of unilateral vocal fold immobility in children: a systematic review. Oto HNS. 2022. A meta analysis shows successful improvement in dysphagia outcomes after surgical intervention for 79% of children with until vocal fold immobility.

  3. Grantham-McGregor SM, Ani CC. Undernutrition and mental development. Nutrition and Brain. 2001;5:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lau C. Development of Suck and Swallow Mechanisms in Infants. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66:7–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jadcherla SR. Advances with neonatal aerodigestive science in the pursuit of safe swallowing in infants: invited review. Dysphagia. 2017;32:15–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kakodkar K, Schroeder JW Jr. Pediatric dysphagia. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(4):969–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jadcherla S. Dysphagia in the high-risk infant: potential factors and mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(2):622S-628S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeballos-Sarrato S, Villar-Castro S, Zeballos-Sarrato G, Ramos-Navarro C, Gonzalez-Pacheco N, Sanchez LM. Survival estimations at the limit of viability. J Mat-Fet Neonatal Med. 2016;29(22):3660–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA, Shankaran S, et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1039–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Varga P, Berecz B, Gasparics A, Dombi Z, Varga Z, Jeager J, et al. Morbidity and mortality trends in very–very low birth weight premature infants in light of recent changes in obstetric care. Eur J Obs Gyn Rep Bio. 2017;211:134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Horton J, Atwood C, Gnagi S, Teufel R, Clemmens C. Temporal Trends of Pediatric Dysphagia in Hospitalized Patients. Dysphagia. 2018;33:655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rommel N, van Wijk M, Boets B, Hebbard G, Haslam R, Davidson G, et al. Development of pharyngo-esophageal physiology during swallowing in the preterm infant. Neurogastro Motil. 2011;23(10):401–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Umay E, Eyigor S, Giray E, Karadag SE, Karadag B, Durmus KN. Pediatric dysphagia overview: best practice recommendation study by multidisciplinary experts. World J Pediatr. 2022;18:715–24. This paper provides best practice recommendations for recognizing signs of dysphagia in pediatric patients and notes that about one-fourth of pediatric dysphagia patients are children with normal development.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Byant-Waugh R, Markham L, Kreipe RE, Walsh BT. Feeding and eating disorders in childhood. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43:98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moroco AE, Aaronson NL. Pediatric dysphagia. Ped Clin North America. 2022;69(2):349–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. • Adil E, Al Shemari H, Kacprowicz A. Evaluation and management of chronic aspiration in children with normal upper airway anatomy. JAMA Oto-HNS. 2015;141(11):1006–11. This study characterizes pediatric patients with chronic aspiration and normal upper airway anatomy, finding that 36 of 46 patients had resolution with therapy and 3 out of 46 patients required tracheostomy for refractory aspiration.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pavithran J, Puthiyottil IV, Narayan M. Vidhyadharan S, Menon JR, Iyer S. Observations from a pediatric dysphagia clinic: Characteristics of children at risk of aspiration pneumonia. Laryngoscope. 2019:129: 2614–2618.

  18. Svystun O, Johannsen W, Persad R, Turner J, Majaesic C, El-Hakim H. Dysphagia in healthy children: Characteristics and management of a consecutive cohort at a tertiary centre. Int J Ped Oto. 2017;99:54–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arvedson J, Rogers B, Buck G, Smart P, Msall M. Silent aspiration prominent in children with dysphagia. Int J Ped Oto. 1994;28:173–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamity R, Ferrara L, Dumpa V, Reynolds J, Islam S, Hanna N. Simultaneous Videofluoroscopy and Endoscopy for Dysphagia Evaluation in Preterm Infants-A Pilot Study. Front Pediatr. 2020;15(88):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Suterwala MS, Reynolds J, Carroll S, Sturdivant C, Armstrong ES. Using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect laryngeal penetration and aspiration in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2017;37:404–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pavithran J, Puthiyottil IV, Kumar M, Nikitha AV, Vidyadharan S, Bhaskaran R, et al. Exploring the utility of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in young children- a comparison with videofluoroscopy. Int J Ped Oto. 2020;138:110339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. • Lawlor CM, Choi S. Diagnosis and management of pediatric dysphagia: a review. JAMA Oto-HNS. 2020;146(2):183–91. This review article summarizes etiologies of pediatric dysphagia and management according to etiology.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shih MC, Rappazzo C, Hudson C, Ongkasuwan J. Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies and Diagnostic Outcomes in Otherwise Healthy Infants With Dysphagia. Ann Oto. 2022;131(8):892–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simione M, Dartley AN, Cooper-Vince C, Martin V, Hartnick C, Taveras EM, et al. Family-centered outcomes that matter most to parents: a pediatric feeding disorders qualitative study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;71(2):270–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Yan K, Gao Y, Wang H, Chen G, Wu B, et al. Feeding difficulty is the dominant feature in 12 Chinese newborns with CHD7 pathogenic variants. BMC Med Genet. 2019;20(1):93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Silva DP, Ribeiro D, Vilarinho S, Dias L. Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis: a rare cause of upper airway obstruction in newborn. BMJ Case Reports CP. 2018;11:e227647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kilcoyne S, Potter K, Gordon Z, Overton S, Brockbank S, Jayamohan J. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):134–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alhuwalia IB, Morrow B, Hsia J. Why do women stop breastfeeding? Findings from the pregnancy risk assessment and monitoring system. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1408–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng J, Raynor E. Ankyloglossia and dysphagia. In: Ongkasuwen J, Chiou E, editors. Pediatric Dysphagia; 2018.

  31. Ghaheri BA, Cole M, Fausel SC, Chuop M, Mace JC. Breastfeeding improvement following tongue-tie and lip-tie release: a prospective cohort study. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:1217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Siegel SA. Aerophagia induced reflux in breastfeeding infants with ankyloglossia and shortened maxillary labial frenula (tongue and lip tie). Int J Clin Pediatr. 2016;5:6–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Benoiton L, Morgan M, Baguley K. Management of posterior ankyloglossia and upper lip ties in a tertiary otolaryngology outpatient clinic. Int J Ped Oto. 2016;88:13–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brooks L, Landry A, Deshpande A, Marchica C, Cooley A, Raol N. Posterior tongue tie, base of tongue movement, and pharyngeal dysphagia: what is the connection? Dysphagia. 2020;35(1):129–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shah S, Allen P, Walker R, Rosen-Carole C, McKenna Benoit MK. Upper lip tie: anatomy, effect on breastfeeding, and correlation with ankyloglossia. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:E1701–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haischer-Rollo GD, Lu K, Drumm C, Fagiana A, Bowe SN, Aden J, Demarcantonio M. Superior labial frenulum attachment site and correlation with breastfeeding outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2022;132:2498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. • Ghaheri BA, Lincoln D, Mai TNT, Mace JC. Objective improvement after frenotomy for posterior tongue tie: a prospective randomized trial. Oto-HNS. 2022;166(5):976–84. This randomized controlled trial found improvement to breastfeeding self-efficacy, infant reflux symptoms, and nipple pain for infants and mothers in a frenotomy interventional group.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Clayburgh D, Milczuk H, Gorsek S, Sinden N, Bowman K, MacArthur C. Efficacy of tonsillectomy for pediatric patients with dysphagia and tonsillar hypertrophy. Arch Oto HNS. 2011;137(12):1197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell RB, Archer SM, Ishman SL, Rosenfeld RM, Coles S, Finestone SA, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Tonsillectomy in Children (Update)-Executive Summary. Oto-HNS. 2019;160:187–205.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Landry AM, Thompson DM. Laryngomalacia: disease presentation, spectrum, and management. Int J Pediatr 2012:753526.

  41. Richter GT, Wootten CT, Rutter MJ, Thompson DM. Impact of supraglottoplasty on aspiration in severe laryngomalacia. Ann Oto, Rhino, Laryngo. 2009;118(4):259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. • Nguyen M, Brooks L, Wetzel M, Raol N. Swallowing outcomes following supraglottoplasty: a retrospective review. Laryngoscope. 2021:2817–2822. Instrumental swallow evaluations in this study showed that dysphagia resolved for most patients after supraglottoplasty, and most of those with persistent dysphagia had syndromes or neurodevelopmental delay.

  43. Cohen O, Picard E, Joseph L, Schwartz Y, Sichel JY, Attal P. Supraglottoplasty for severe laryngomalacia. Can we predict success? Int J Ped Oto 2020:138:110–333.

  44. Benjamin B, Inglis A. Minor congenital laryngeal clefts: diagnosis and classification. Ann Oto Rhino Laryngo. 1989;98(6):417–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Martha VV, Vontela S, Calder AN, Martha RR, Sataloff RT. Laryngeal cleft: a literature review. Am J Oto. 2021;42(6):103072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ojha S, Ashland JE, Hersh C, Ramakrishna J, Maurer R, Hartnick CJ. Type 1 Laryngeal Cleft: A Multidimensional Management Algorithm. JAMA Oto-HNS. 2014;140:34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  47. • Timashpolsky A, Schild SD, Ballard DP, Leventer SP, Rosenfeld RM, Plum AW. Management of Type 1 Laryngeal Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Oto-HNS. 2021;164(3):489–500. This paper reviews techniques of laryngeal cleft repair and shows that endoscopic repair had the greatest success in treating symptoms of type 1 laryngeal cleft in patients who fail nonsurgical treatment.

    Google Scholar 

  48. •• Yeung JC, Balakrishnan K, Cheng ATL, Daniel SJ, Garabedian EN, Hart CK, et al. International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group: Consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of type I laryngeal clefts. Int J Ped Oto. 2017;101:51–6. This paper outlines consensus guidelines for type 1 laryngeal clefts including management of patients with high aspiration risk and recommendations for multidisciplinary care, and emphasizes that management of type 1 clefts should be based on the presence of functional issues related to the cleft.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kiessling P, Smith A, Puccinella C, Balakrishnan K. Postoperative dysphagia immediately following pediatric endoscopic laryngeal cleft repair. Int J Ped Oto. 2021;142:110625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Orzell S, Joseph R, Ongkasuwan J, Bedwell J, Shin J, Raol N. Outcomes of vocal fold motion impairment and dysphagia after pediatric cardiothoracic surgery: a systematic review. Oto-HNS. 2019;161:754–63.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Narawane A, Rappazzo C, Hawney J, Clason H, Roddy DJ, Ongkasuwan J. Vocal fold movement and silent aspiration after congenital heart surgery. Laryngoscope. 2022;132(3):701–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. • Meister K, Johnson A, Sidell DR. Injection laryngoplasty for children with unilateral vocal fold paralysis: procedural limitations and swallow outcomes. Oto-HNS. 2019;160(3):540–5. This retrospective study at a large academic center showed that injection laryngoplasty had a low rate of complications and that most patients were able to advance their diet after injection.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shaw-Smith C. Oesophageal atresia, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, and the VACTERL association: review of genetics and epidemiology. J Med Genet. 2006;43:545–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Al-Salem AH, Mohaidly MA, Al-Buainain HMH, Al-Jadaan S, Raboei E. Congenital H-type tracheoesophageal fistula: a national multicenter study. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32:487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dylkowski D, Dave S, McClure JA, Welk B, Winick-Ng J, Jones S. Repair of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula repair in Ontario over the last 20 years: volume and outcomes. J Pedi Surg. 2018;53:925–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kennedy AA, Hart CK, de Alarcon A, Putnam PE, von Allmen D, Lehenbauer D, et al. Slide tracheoplasty for repair of complex tracheoesophageal fistulas. Laryngoscope. 2022;132:1542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Byerly KA, Pauli RM. Cranial nerve abnormalities in CHARGE association. Am J Med. 1993;45:751–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. • Boesch RP, Balakrishnan K, Acra S, Benscoter DT, Cofer SA, Collaco JM, et al. Structure and functions of pediatric aerodigestive programs: a consensus statement. Pediatrics 2018:141. This consensus statement shows that specialists see combined endoscopy as essential for treating aerodigestive patients.

  59. Piccione J, Boesch RP. The multidisciplinary approach to pediatric aerodigestive disorders. Curr Probl Ped Adolesc Health Care. 2018;48:66–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Collaco JM, Aherrera AD, Au Yeung KJ, Lefton-Greif MA, Hoch J, Skinner ML. Interdisciplinary pediatric aerodigestive pediatric aerodigestive care and reduction in health care costs and burden. JAMA Oto-HN. 2015;141:101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ruiz AG, Bhatt JM, DeBoer EM, Friedlander J, Janosy N, Peterson MB, et al. Demonstrating the benefits of a multidisciplinary aerodigestive program. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:521–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. •• Boesch RP, Balakrishnan K, Grothe RM, Driscoll SW, Knoebel EE, Visscher SL, et al. Interdisciplinary aerodigestive care model improves risk, cost, and efficiency. Int J Ped Oto. 2018;113:119–23. This study shows that multidisciplinary evaluation of pediatric aerodigestive patients and triple endoscopy reduces costs and time under general anesthesia and improves family satisfaction with care.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rotsides JM, Krakovsky GM, Pillai DK, Seghal S, Collins ME, Noelke CE, et al. Is a multidisciplinary aerodigestive clinic more effective at treating recalcitrant aerodigestive complaints than a single specialist? Ann Oto Rhino Laryngo. 2017;126:537–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kim S, Park M, Kim E, Kim GE, Jun JH, Kim SY, et al. Development of a multidisciplinary aerodigestive program: an institutional experience. Children. 2021;8:535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Gendler J, Sequier-Lipszyc E, Silbermintz A, Hain M, Stern Y, Kravarusic D, et al. Aerodigestive clinics as emerging pediatric care model: the first 100 patients in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2021;23:569–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doug Sidell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coughran, A., Sidell, D. Pediatric Dysphagia: Evaluation and Management for Otolaryngologists. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 11, 365–373 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-023-00465-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-023-00465-2

Keywords

Navigation